Last night Sen Diane Feinstein (D-Billionaires) announced her last minute secret deal to revoke Federal environmental law and a century of Western water law so that we taxpayers can subsidize a few hundred deadbeat welfare millionaires and one billionaire in California’s Central Valley.
In keeping with her visceral contempt for representative democracy and the citizens she purports to represent, Lord DiFi plans to push through her multi-billion dollar giveaway as a rider on the fast track Senate jobs bill.
Feinstein has long supported California agriculture but began to weigh in on the side of farmers in the water wars after requests from Stewart Resnick, the well-connected owner of Paramount Farms, which grows citrus and nuts on 118,000 acres in Kern County.
In September, Resnick wrote Feinstein complaining that "sloppy science" by federal wildlife agencies was causing farm water shortages. A week later, Feinstein forwarded the letter to Obama administration officials, who authorized a review by the National Academy of Sciences….
Feinstein made no mention Thursday of her demand for the National Academy of Sciences report, due next month, to verify the science behind fish-conservation demands.
Resnick’s business has given $29,000 to Feinstein’s campaigns and $246,000 more to Democratic political committees during years when she sought re-election, according to a report by California Watch, an investigative journalism nonprofit organization, that was published in The Chronicle in December.
DiFi’s billioniare donor Stewart Resnick will do very well from DiFi’s last-minute deal. You see, Resnick’s not merely a farmer: Resnick’s a water broker.
The Kern Water Bank, which was owned by the state Department of Water Resources from 1988 to 1995, is now in the hands of Kern County interests and is 48 percent owned by Westside Mutual Water Company, a private water company controlled by Beverly Hills billionaire Stewart Resnick.
And DiFi’s giveaway will give him and the few hundred deadbeat welfare farmers who own the Westlands Water District cheap public subsidized water. Water the billionaire and the deadbeat millionaires can turn around and sell to the public who once owned it, and still pay for the infrastucture that collects it. Water the billioniare and the deadbeat welfare millionaires can sell at market rates – which means they’ll make tens of billions. From the public who own the water DiFi wants to give away with her last minute rider on the jobs bill.
DiFi’s muliti-billion giveaway piggybacks on the Shock Doctrine campaign Fox , the Westland Water District‘s few hundred millionaire owners, and a few mega-wealthy Kern County water brokers are waging to take publicly subsidized Federal and State Water Project water away from the taxpayers who own it and turn over control of the resource to a relative handful of private players.
The private players have been beavering away to make certain they can sell off DiFi’s giveaway at market rates…to the same taxpayers who owned the water before DiFi gave it away. And the billions in profits the private beneficiaries of DiFi’s giveaway will make will come from – you guessed it – the public who now own the water DiFi wants to give away.
Of course, DiFi hasn’t been alone in laying the groundwork for private Water Lords to take control of the most essential public resource: water. A couple of months ago CA’s pliant, ambitious Assembly Speaker Karen Bass joined lawmakers on both sides of the aisle (Take a bow, Jared Huffman of Marin County! Stand up proud, Abel Maldonado!) and the usual cast of PEW-captured Big Green groups (hi NRDC and EDF – thanks for nothing!) to help Arnold make his own end run around democracy and place before CA’s voters a mega-billion bond measure that effectively gives over control of California’s vast Delta to a tiny unelected group, ostensibly guided by the Bay Delta Conservation Plan. Who pushed hardest for the scam? You guessed it: the same tiny handful of millionaire/billionaire welfare farmers DiFi’s deal will benefit.
Now Jared Huffman is shocked, shocked – and EDF are crying like babies. Why, EDF’s so mad they want to take their access and go home.
” … Ann Hayden, a senior water analyst at Environmental Defense Fund, said her group would quit the conservation planning process if the Feinstein amendment passes.
She called it an act of betrayal, since some water interests on the committee undoubtedly asked Feinstein for the amendment.
“It doesn’t help to know that folks we’re partnering with are playing it both ways,” Hayden said. “It will make the long-term planning almost meaningless if, in the short term, actions are taken that push some species to the point of extinction.” … “
Meanwhile, outside the PEW neutered groups and captive pols, ordinary folk saw Arnie’s grand plan clearly.
"However, the Schwarzenegger plan to build a 50 mile- long
canal will not generate any new water, abdicates any
meaningful oversight, cedes absolute authority to faceless
bureaucrats and will cost over $10 billion, even more once you
add mitigation and restoration costs. The language in this
legislation does nothing to change those facts," added Minton.Representatives from the Sierra Club California, Restore the
Delta, the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance, Friends
of the River and the Environmental Justice Coalition for Water
joined PCL in expressing concern over the fact that the
Legislature developed these bills (SB229 – Pavley; SB12 -
Simitian; AB39 – Huffman; and SB458 – Wolk) with no public
input and their worry that the bills will be rushed through in the
last three weeks of the legislative session."There is no question that the Delta is in crisis and we
must find a way to work together to save the Delta and
the San Francisco Bay," Minton noted. "But there has
to be a better way than jamming this down the public’s
throat and asking them to pay billions for a project
they haven’t had any say in at a time when the state
has been issuing IOU’s, cutting back on schools, and
shutting down parks."
Too bad Assembly Speaker Bass and Rep. Jared Huffman and EDF and NRDC and their pals ignored all the grass-roots enviros who spent months warning them Arnie’s push was merely a giant giveaway to BiggestAg and Hugest Contractors. Of course, for groups like EDF and NRDC who long ago drank the PEW kool-aid, the name of the game isn’t winning: it’s keeping that all important access.
Cause Power cares so much about their opinions, right? That’s why, when Power fucks them over, they’ll give up – you guessed it! – their precious access. Cause it was worth trading away the Delta for, right? Sure.
I’d call them suckers, but that would reflect poorly on fish.
The bond issue Speaker Karen Bass personally made it possible for Arnold to put before California voters gives voters the opportunity to vote for them to pay dozens of billions to subsidize the construction required for Westlands Water District and DiFi’s billionaire supporter to make maximun profits selling public water on the private market – to the taxpayers very own water districts.
Karen Bass ran for office touting her environmental justice credentials. As Speaker, she used her Power to ram through the Delta scam over the objections of the poor folks with the temerity to actually live in the Delta. (What do those cheeky proles think they’re doing living in the way of the billionaires’ new construction project, Arnie’s Ditch To Nowhere?)
Fortunately, despite decades of Grover Norquist’s jihad against public education, even CA’s low-info voters will likely see through the con job and vote down the bond issues. Unless, of course, they buy the Shock Doctrine propaganda FOX and DiFi and Arnie are selling. Yet buried in the (one hopes) doomed bond measure is a sneaky little bit of text effectively allowing the few hundered deadbeat owners of the Westlands Water District and DiFi’s mega-donor Resnick to resell the public water DiFi hopes to give them with her rider on the Jobs Bill.
Whatever happens to the execrable bond issue Speaker Karen Bass made possible – and lets hope it sinks – look for the water resale legislation to keep floating to the surface….like the 77,000 bloated, putrid salmon who clogged the lower Klamath in 2002 after Cheney ordered the National Marine Fisheries Service to join his Shock Doctrine war against the Federal Endangered Species Act.
Together with Arnie and his new BFF Abel Maldonado, Dems Jared Huffman, Fran Pavley, and Speaker Karen Bass were able to push through the water bond issue scam in no large part because the Fox propaganda network had spent months spewing Shock Doctrine. Fox hypes the 2009/2010 Big Fish Lie about California’s water: fish kill farms. This year’s Big Fish Lie echoes Cheney’s earlier secret effort to destroy Klamath River salmon protections just in time for Shrub to show up in the upper Klamath Basin and try to win Ag voters by punching the Endangered Species Act full of holes. Fox hyped that scam, too.
No surprise that in announcing her multi-billion dollar giveaway rider, DiFi parroted Fox’s Biggest Lies about California’s water.
Over the last few years, 400,000 acres of farmland have been fallowed, permanent crops uprooted, and tens of thousands of people are unemployed.
In the real world, turns out the 400,000 acres DiFi claims were fallowed by decreased Federal/State water supply – well – they don’t seem to exist.
In the real world the few hundred wealthy landowners who control the Westlands Water District in CA’s San Joaquin Valley have stiffed the US Treasury – that’s us, the taxpayers – for nearly half a billion dollars. You see, they just never got around to paying back their share of the Federal Water Project. The same Water Project they and Fox want us to believe has made the poor millionaires into neglected victims.
In the real world, the deadbeat owners of Westlands Water District – one-quarter the size of Connecticut – run vast welfare farms, collecting triple Federal subsidies: for the water wasting commodity crops they grow, for subsidized electricity to pump the below-market water, and for the subsidized water. And they get the subsidies even though they’ve blown off their debt to the Feds.
In the real world, the few hundred deadbeat welfare farmers who own the Westlands Water District propped up their astroturf group, the California Latino Water Coalition, to tell us all how we need to give away public wealth to help Westlands help the poor Latino farmworkers who get to suck down pesticides while they work for next to nothing on Westlands farmland.
As I wrote last May for FDL:
A pretty good joke, considering that the tiny ag communities where many of Westlands’ farm workers and their families have lived for decades are the Appalachia of the west. Unemployment rates over 30%, median income less than $8,000, massive pesticide exposure, and very high rates of cancer, infertility, and learning disorders associated with ag chemicals (from Westlands District farmers) were normal in these communities even before the last three years of drought. Because the few hundred wealthy families who own Westlands love their farmworkers so much.
In the real world, Associate Professor Jeffery Michael – director of the University of the Pacific’s Business Resource Center – sees though the lie. Westlands, along with nearly every other big farmers in the San Joaquin Valley, fuck over their farmworkers even when water’s abundant.
Water contractors point to 40 percent unemployment in Mendota as evidence of the water crisis. These unemployment estimates for towns aren’t a current survey, but are crude extrapolations from the 2000 Census, the last time any real data were compiled for these areas….
Delta water exports were above average in 2000, and local farm employment was at a nine-year peak. Despite this, the 2000 census found unemployment in Mendota exceeded 32 percent, highest of the state’s 494 towns.
Per-capita income was below $8,000, the lowest level in the state, nearly 20 percent lower than Mexico and many developing nations in Africa, Eastern Europe and South America. Not surprisingly, water contractors don’t issue news releases about unemployment when they have water.
In the real world, as Dr. Peter Gleick of the Pacific Institute wrote, California’s California’s robust agricultural sector added farm jobs even as Westside Water District farmers (whose water rights are junior to other water users) received less water.
. . . the drought has had very little overall impact on agricultural employment, compared to the much larger impacts of the recession. In fact, in the last three years, while State Water Project allocations have decreased statewide, California’s agricultural job sector has grown (see figure). Further, according to Professor Jeffrey Michael, director of the Business Forecasting Center at the University of the Pacific in Stockton, rising unemployment in the Central Valley is largely the result of the bad economy, not a lack of water.
In the real world, several years ago, so many Westlands Water District nut farmers planted new trees that in the subsequent years the farmers created a "nut glut". Then prices crashed, decreasing ag jobs. Because of this market failure, life is even harder for the people of Mendota than it was before.
What’s the biggest priority for FOX’s new pal, the Latino Water Coalition? Food, water, and air free of pesticides? Nope. The LWC’s biggest priority? Suspending the Endangered Species Act and getting more water for the Westlands Water District, the official victim for FOX’s May sweeps.
—
OK, that was last May. What are those "junior water rights" Dr. Gleick referred to? Well, in the real world, Western water rights are first come, first serve: and Westlands is at the end of the line. You see, the State Water Project supplies "back-up" water. The SWP was created with the explicit intent it would provide water when possible, but in dry years there would be no water for junior users. Like the Westlands Water District.
Which is why planting trees – the plants that require water every year, unlike annual food crops – was a boneheadedly stupid business decision for the deadbeat welfare farmers of the Westlands Water District.
The very same decision the deadbeat welfare farmers of the Westlands Water District, Fox, Sean Hannity, Abel Maldonado, Arnold, and the Teabaggers all want the rest of us to pay for. By giving away billions worth public water. You see, welfare’s OK for billionaire Resnick and the Westlands deadbeat welfare millionaires, but not for the farmworkers DiFi wants us all to believe she suddenly cares about so much.
Is DiFi’s multibillion scheme to give away thirty billion people’s water to a few hundred deadbeat welfare millionaires and one billionaire OK with Senate Majority Leader and President Obama?
Call them, and find out. But better call soon: the jobs bill – like DiFi’s obscenely wealthy pals – is on a fast track.
Or you can simply roll over, do nothing, and repeat the mantra: Forget it Jake. It’s the Delta.



30 Comments

I hope this guarantees a primary challenge for DiFi in 2012 should she decide to grace us with her presence for another term in the US Senate.
Rec’d.
Thanks, Teddy!
likewise — thanks kirk
Thank you, Suz!
Thanks, Doc.
DiFi has to go.
I’m guessing that since this is an election year Obama will back DiFi at tax payers expense but do the Dems really think they can win votes with this bribe?
Rec’d … Kirk !
Rec’d.
Reminds me of the West Bank.
Gee! It seems to me that the people of California and Her district have kept re-electing Her so that She has the power to make the deal.
So Who’s to blame? Her for making the deal, or the people for putting Her in the position to do so?
We complain about what these politicains do after we voted them into office, and gave them the power to do it.
This amendment by Senator Feinstein has long term unintended bad consequences besides the aspects already covered. I read couple of months back in National Geographic April 2009 Issue that Australia near New South Wales and Victoria regions did something similar by diverting water to newly created wineries instead of normal flow to the marshes. By doing this they have dried up the marshes and destroyed the marshes ecosystem existing for centuries of years. This created new micro-climate patterns which started causing very low precipitation, resulting in severe wild fires every year in the whole region and severe water shortages to everybody and paradoxically even to the wineries right up to this moment as I am writing this e-mail. This avoidable & unnecessary pain and suffering is what happens when a long term policy change is done without thinking through just like repealing wonderful Glass-Steagall Act which we all of us in the country are facing consequences of right now.
Excellent post!
Somebody’s ‘gonna get screwed over, science, conservation, good sense and equity be damned. And this won’t end well.
Amusingly, Turner Classics is running Chinatown right now.
Thanks for reading all this, folks.
And marc5, I was laughing out loud about Turner’s schedule. Thanks!
And the answer to the question in your entry title is: Probably.
Indeed.
Of course they will. This is just the sort of bullshit they love. It really really really is time to make it clear to the Dems that if they loose us, they loose power. Lots of damage will be incurred in the process but otherwise there is no hope, no change, no…
Thank you for writing about this. It is the Shock Doctrine. React hysterically and give industry whatever they want. The same game is being played with Big “renewabl”e energy right now, too.
Just like the public is being told by the Big Dems that if we don’t let tens of thousands of acres of Mojave desert and sagebrush public wild lands be destroyed for mega-renewable solar and wind farm sprawl – global warming can not be addressed. Behind the scenes of these Give us You r land and By the Way we need a lot of water to Big Energy projects are the same old Carlyle Group and other actors – and Big Dem investments in it all.
Instead of pursuing a sane rooftop solar, de-centralized renewable energy and conservation path – it is all about pillaging the public lands (on the cheap) and the public’s natural resources. Just like Oil and Gas has always been able to do. And Harry Reid is in the thick of it – many of these giveaways to big energy and powerful investors and the usual suspect developers – are in Nevada.
Many of the giant solar facilities use a lot of water, and increasingly water storage “batteries” are all the rage with mountain top removal wind farming. And then there are entities like SNWA (Southern Nevada Water Authority) and Harry Reid’s darling Pat Mulroy – that want to power their sucking dry of Great Basin aquifers with “renewable” mega-wind farms. How very green …
neuter the federal government-it is a toxic asset–a well spring of corruption–exactly why dr paul wants to bring it to within the confines of the constitution
Great post Kirk
“In the real world the few hundred wealthy landowners who control the Westlands Water District in CA’s San Joaquin Valley have stiffed the US Treasury – that’s us, the taxpayers – for nearly half a billion dollars. You see, they just never got around to paying back their share of the Federal Water Project. The same Water Project they and Fox want us to believe has made the poor millionaires into neglected victims.”
I have never been able to see what California voters have seen in Feinstein. Always seems to lean way over to the wrong. Voted for the 2002 war resolution, voted for Mukasey, votes for warmongering legislation having to do with Iran, interferes with holding the Bush administration accountable. Why there were never demands to investigate her conflict of interest and business interest having to do with her families war contracts is beyond belief.
She is a high roller and she is not rolling for the people
Don’t I wish we could get her out!
We couldn’t even get her censured!
When she voted for Mukasey we gathered the votes BUT the mucky-mucks in Sacramento turned thumbs down. DEMOCRACY MY EYE!
Does DiFi explain her economic reasoning on this on video? Because then we can make Snarky economic anti DiFi campaign commercials.
Lady Diane is one of the reasons that the Senate is dysfunctional.
White conservatives are heavily overrepresented, liberals are packed into huge states where you have to be worth $80 million (or however much DiFi is worth) to run for office. Add into that the disenfranchisement of African-Americans in DC (bigger than the state of Wyoming), we are so fucked.
Yup, that was at the e-board meeting in 2007 and it was because of the party’s parliamentary rules that the censure resolution couldn’t be voted on
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CmWlkLPaX7g
Our local group was one of the sponsors
PS this was also the meeting where Eden James was accosted because had a sign in support of the resolution ripped out of his hands and torn to shreds
Is the pope a former member of the Hitler Youth?
“When she voted for Mukasey we gathered the votes BUT the mucky-mucks in Sacramento turned thumbs down.” ; I remember that well and it is but one more example of the corruption that rules the two parties.
And DIFi voted for Roberts on the SCOTUS because he told her he would honor stare decsis; howz that working out Senator? Another example of your flawed decision/judgment making. Along with supporting the telecoms in their illegal wiretapping and your continuing support for an apartheid regime in Israel.
Her death will be one death that doesn’t diminish us all. And she is NOT a liberal,
She has her priorities.
A corporatist police state in America would serve her financial and tribal interests quite nicely.
Great post, why can’t the newspapers connect the dots so well?
They would prefer not to.
Sucks. I think too often we jest instead of making strong new demands and actual complaints. Thanks for bringing her closer to us with this article. One might figure this patron would also be into Reid and Obama? Or ois this the reason they killed the jobs bill. Maybe the news of her was effective. More discussion of her “reputation” and her votes couldn’t hurt! I don’t like her hawkish positions.. military and Israel. She is way too elitist (read undemocratic) and corporate for our populist taste.
“…to take publicly subsidized Federal and State Water Project water away from the taxpayers who own it and turn over control of the resource to a relative handful of private players.” THIS PLAN MUST BE STOPPED?!! THIS IS WHAT EARNS POLITICIANS LIKE FEINSTEIN A BAD NAME. IT SHOULD BE ILLEGAL IF IT ISN’T ALREADY.
All water is a PUBLIC RESOURCE for human need and not for damned profit! MAYBE ITS NOT TOO LATE FOR THE NRDC AND THE EDF TO CALL HER OUT.
Great post Dr. Murphy.
This needs to be front paged.
Criminal work by DiFi.