Remember the Hamilton Project?
A couple of weeks ago Bill Moyers and Simon Johnston looked ahead to this week’s "relaunch":
Simon Johnson: "But Bill, it goes even further and deeper than that. Robert Rubin was Secretary of the Treasury in the 1990s. He oversaw the deregulation. He fought hard against Brooksley Born, the only regulator in living memory who tried to prevent derivatives from getting out of control. He then went to Citigroup. He presided over this nonsense and this mess. He’s now and he was he’s clearly éminence grise of this administration. Mr. Geithner and Mr. Summers are his protégés. But that’s, that’s not all. Next week, the Hamilton Project, a project of the Brookings Institution founded by Mr. Rubin, will have a big public event. Probably Mr. Rubin’s most prominent Washington appearance since the crisis broke. The headline act at this event will be Vice President Joe Biden. Now, maybe Mr. Biden will be taking on the view of finance that we all should fear greatly. But I’m not so optimistic."
But it turns out the Hamilton Project really hasn’t been doing much lately. Just ask the WaPo:
Ironically, once an administration more open to the group’s views arrived in January 2009, the Hamilton Project went dormant, as key staff members went to work in government.
Yep, huge irony here. Who could have anticipated?
Peter Orszag, the first director of the program, is now Obama’s budget director, Orszag’s successor at Hamilton, Jason Furman, is now a key White House aide, and Furman’s successor at Hamilton, Doug Elmendorf, is director of the Congressional Budget Office.
And little Timmy Geithner – protege of Richard Rubin, the Project’s co-founder – is Treasury Secretary. And the Project’s new director, Michael Greenstone? He’s the former chief economist for Obama’s White House Council of Economic Advisers.
Poor Hamilton Project. Left out in the cold all this time. How thoughtful of the WaPo to break out the Kleenex.
Never fear:
The project got a second wind this week, with a relaunch and a new director, and the reasonable expectation that this time around, the relationship to the White House will be much cozier. In fact, Hamilton could emerge as a key source of economic thinking for the Obama administration and the Democratic Congress.
Who knew the Hamilton Project suffers from separation anxiety? From the outside, looks like the only way the Project and Team Obama could be cozier is for the White House to wriggle up the Project’s backside. Further.
But in WaPo-land, when Biden showed up as the star pet at the Project’s relaunch, he was there to celebrate a two-fer. First – the Project’s long, painful exile from power is officially over. Second: Team Obama has a powerful new ally.
Vice President Biden spoke at the group’s relaunch Tuesday. Greenstone cited medical cost controls in the new health-care law and a budget that freezes discretionary spending as examples of the group’s ideas showing up in public policy.
If there’s a social program left standing in the moonscape Obama’s Hamilton Project masters inflicted on America, Greenstone and the Project are there to ensure Obama nukes it.
"It’s clear that we’re going to have to focus on providing proposals to help the recovery take hold," Greenstone said. "That said, one thing Hamilton has always been focused on is a sustainable deficit position. And if anything, the circumstances that have been thrust upon the world" — giant deficits from the recession — "make that ever more timely."
Shorter Greenspan: Now that Bob Rubin and the MOTU’s looted the Treasury – and Main Street – the next target is entitlements. We’re from the Hamilton Project, and we’re here to help. Ourselves.
If someone you care deeply about depends on Social Security – or will depend on Social Security – call them up today and tell them you love them. Because Team Obama has targeted Social Security…and your loved ones are just the MOTU’s version of collateral damage.
Deaths you can believe in, right?



59 Comments




These people are dangerous to children and other living things.
Time to Sweep the Vampire Squid Off Our Faces and Make Room for the Real Change
and Bill Moyers performing the PR. How fucking appropriate and fitting
Please explain your comment.
Moyers doing the public relations for the Hamilton Project, but making it appear that he’s involved in Journalism. Selling it to the USA.
(Moyers first conspired with LBJ on propagandizing us)
“Moyers doing the public relations for the Hamilton Project” ; please cite when and where you are perceiving Moyers doing this.
I didn’t know of the link between Orszag, through Hamilton, to Rubin, but it makes sense. I don’t think it can be emphasized enough just how extremist Obama really is. All this talk of centrism and being center-right really miss the point. He is a kleptocrat in an Administration of kleptocrats. Democrats and Republicans never have these debates when tax cuts for the rich or their imperial wars are at issue. The truth is they could care less about deficits. It is all about opening up entitlements for looting. Every dollar that doesn’t go to Social Security and Medicare is another dollar they can steer to themselves.
Mark Twain didn’t go far enough. We do have a criminal class in our country, our elites.
All of Obama’s econ team came from one place? This Hamilton Project sounds like the land of Mordor.
So Barack Obama wants to destroy Social Security. His henchmen Geithner, Rubin, Summers and Bernanke are about the greatest thieves in America outside the Bushie Crime Family. I guess we have an Obama Crime Family. There is all that torture, assassination, war profiteering and all the coverups.
Wars are one thing, but attacking Social Security means Obama will be a one term President.
Notice all the talk of cuts but no push to end the war.
Shorter Hamiltonians: We have to destroy the society in order to save it.
Excellent diary. Although lots of investigative journalism focus has been on Goldman Sachs, very little of it has focused on the Hamilton Project. As pointed out in this diary and the author’s seminal diary (linked in this one) on the Hamilton Project, Robert Rubin and Goldman Sachs funded the Hamilton Project. The first three Directors of the Hamilton Project now work in the Obama administration (they are on their 4th, recently appointed director who comes from MIT).
Here’s an important point that this diary might have included. It’s revealing that Rubin and Goldman Sachs chose to embed their Rosemary’s baby into the Brookings Institution because Brookings is generally viewed as a liberal-leftist think tank. So in a sense, this is the same strategy that Rubin and Goldman have employed with Obama. They took something that they created and hid it, like a Trojan Horse, in a well known entity: thus camouflaging their creation to make it look benign and hiding its real purpose. Brookings also gave the Hamilton Project instant credibility.
The same tactic was used by Rubin and Goldman Sachs with Obama. They took an ambitious, unknown entity with a scant record who could be disguised to look like something he wasn’t (in Obama’s case a liberal) and sold him to Democrats and then the country at large. Had Obama’s true philosophical positions been known to most Democrats in the Democratic primaries, it is highly unlikely he could ever have gotten the nomination.
It’s also worthy looking at Obama’s inaugural address to the Hamilton Project (as this diarist trailblazing first diary on the subject did) and see Obama’s speech on a video clip. There Obama calls Robert Rubin “my friend Bob” and pays lavish tribute to him. Obama also calls for cuts in entitlements and says the country needs more NAFTA-type agreements. These are all core ideas of the Hamilton Project and of course, the people who fund it–Robert Rubin and Goldman Sachs.
My own belief is that Robert Rubin is the Master of the Universe, the de facto President of the United States. Obama is his hand-picked salesman for unpopular causes like escalating the wars, the Wall St. bailouts and coming next, cuts in entitlements like Social Security. Of course, Obama still gets to ride Air Force One but Rubin is the guy who calls the shots.
Kudos to the diarist for this!
Dr. Murphy!
Now to read…
If I remember correctly, this was predicted, and right here in these pages. A long time ago.
Thanks, Doctor.
Who is the alternative?
Kirk!!
Great to see ya posting again…
Great points, fflambeau. Thanks for your observation tonight and your kind assessment, for your great diaries on Obama/Hamilton..and for sharing the video of Obama’s appearance at the Project’s birth.
Thanks, newtonusr – good to see you!
You, or Cindy Sheehan, or Michael Moore, or John Mellenkamp, or Al Franken, or Van Jones and others. I think Jane Hamsher is too busy.
Nahant! So happy to see you, and tickled to be here tonight!
LOL.
Reading all those names – incestuous doesn’t even begin to describe the cluster-f***ing going on.
I have been missing your environmental posts.. Especially the whole chemical in the wild series..
Just imagine how sad it will be when he is forced against his will into working with a big bad Republican Congress and he has no choice but to accept their evil demands.
Thanks, nahant – I’m hoping I can make time to start writing some more enviro posts. I’ve been glad to see so many folks taking up the topic here, too… sadly, so many chemicals are running around on our planet a whole room full of writers couldn’t do the topic justice.
I sure wish someone had clued us into Obama’s relationship with The Hamilton Project before his nomination!
(Just kidding, Kirk — this all comes as no surprise whatsoever to anyone who paid attention to your writings around here in 2007-8. But there’s very little satisfaction is having your predictions come true, is there?)
Are you still local or have you Made your move north?
Well fuckity, fuck, fuck. They will have to pry my Social Security check out of my cold dead hands.
I do believe Mary, That is the plan
This last year and a half..stretching back to FISA…has felt like watching a friend perish from an incurable hideous disease I feared as soon as I heard of his initial symptom.
Worse still, this time I’m not only seeing the disease bring misery to my friend and his wife and daughter – along with everyone else, I’m watching our Republic perish and our real economy wither away. And all the while we know that – unlike astrocytic brain cancer – what ailed our freedoms and jobs could have been cured.
Though my inner pedant may not have been gratified, so wish my writings had proven utterly wrong. No such luck, I fear.
Still here – let’s get together over the next couple of months!
You’ve got to hand it to Consigliere Rubin and the rest of his crime gang. They are now running the entire government for the benefit of the giant pus-spewing Vampire Squid. Matt Taibbi almost got it figured out but even he did not see the depth of the rot. The super-rich have stolen this country right out of the hands of the people so deftly that the people aren’t even onto the theft. And thanks to their partners in crime, the MSM, most Americans aren’t even aware of how badly they’ve been screwed.
If it weren’t so tragic it would be hysterically funny. It would have made a great screenplay except that it would have been rejected for being too freaking implausible.
Been thinking about a second Bay area pup meetup… not sure when but will have to see what the locals can get together.. But if ya down in RWC sheesh let me know we would love ta see ya Kirk.. You still have my email addy??
I’ll make sure I get to RWC while I’m here – it will be great to see you. I’ll double up on my prilosec for chili!
Ya missed the Jambalaya when we had a
meetup here last July… Just saying chili is not all I cook…
Aaagh! Yes, his support of nuclear power was the first red flag for me, then the FISA betrayal and the beating of the bushes on capital hill for the bailout both happened before the primaries were over. And now, here we are, fascism on the slick. We are in terrible danger as a country and a world with the depth of his enabling the worst excesses in every direction. I worked to get him elected. I deeply apologize.
Thank You. What the heck are we going to do about our situation?
I see I missed more than good friends and good chili – I missed your amazing cooking range!
But…seriously …would be happy to catch up over pretzels: amazing as the food may be, its the peeps who make life special :)
Great Diary, awful message… @fflambeau: “embedded Rosemary’s baby” -that’s a prize worthy description that could rate as high as Taibbi’s vampire squid.
Also congratulations to Peter Orszag for another shrunken head trophy to hand around his neck. Iceland.
So very true… so very true … good people are to be cherished..
i wish i knew. you got some ideas you want to bat around?
So now it’s a PUS-SPEWING Vampire Squid!This metaphor just keeps getting better.
A quick question from another country. Would it be bad if social security were income /assets tested, so that people like McCain etal were not entitled?
to fight the deficit terrorists, the best thing i can think of is to donate to this week’s teach-in:
http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/42614
i’ve been begging help for it, and i can’t even go. (please excuse the diary whoring kirk, it’s just the easiest way i have to give the links for donations and some explanation).
In the abstract, means testing would be just.
But…for us tribal primates, means testing would destroy the massive group identification with “entitelments” (Medicare/ Social Security).
A different way to get at funding would be to eliminate the cap on Social Security contributions, effectively forcing the wealth to fully ante up.
Right now – pardon the oxymoron – Social Security (and Medicare, IIRC) contributions are capped at a certin income (off the top of my head, either 75k or 175k).
THe result is that rich folks pay a smaller proportion of thier income to support SSI than do middle class and poor folks.
Thanks Kirk. I guess it is the total difference in our systems that really makes the difference. All our social security; unemployment, sickness, disability and aged pensions(all income and assets tested) as well as our medicare(that covers everyone-socialism)comes from consolidated revenue(?). Can’t imagine that would be possible with the attitude some US (very loud lot)citizens have about helping the less fortunate.
kirk, gov spending, including SS, is not funded by taxes (or borrowing). there’s more on this at the reading links in my diary. that said, i do think there are good reasons in general for progressive taxes (or at least not regressive ones like payroll taxes). but right now taxes are too high (and gov spending too low).
with the deficit hawks (deficit terrorists) and deficit doves (deficit errorists) out fighting over the fed budget and SS and medicare, conceding the false economic assumptions up front puts defense of SS and medicare at a big disadvantage.
USC 666 ‘The serfdom act’ – something for the future – the near future you understand. Bob and the boys need pool attendants, butlers, maids, gardeners, cooks, little men to look after the car pool etc. and they don’t want to have to be inconvenienced by paying them anything or them having any rights (civil or otherwise). Bonded labour is the ideal (and doubtless economically perfect) solution.
When will people start saying it out loud? You have already become a 3rd world nation.
Overlaps between the Hamilton Project and the Herndon Alliance might prove a fruitful avenue for progressive journalistic exploration. The Herndon Alliance, instrumental in diverting liberal/progressive energies and advocacy away from profit-purged solutions (single payer being one of several) and toward the chimeric “public option,” lists the Hamilton Project among its many partners.
Likewise the Hamilton Project, on its In the News page, descrbes the public option’s Jacob Hacker (as well as as Jonathan Gruber) among Hamilton Project Experts, although I note that Hacker no longer appears on the current list of official H.P. experts.
thanks ralphbon.
Consigliere! Spot on.
These are empty men. Mafia. They sing a false tune for they have no song within themselves.
The man that hath no music in himself,
Nor is not moved with concord of sweet sounds,
Is fit for treasons, stratagems, and spoils;
The motions of his spirit are dull as night,
And his affections dark as Erebus.
Let no such man be trusted.
- The Merchant of Venice, 5. 1
As for the deficit hawks and benefit looters in general….
You taught me first to beg; and now methinks
You teach me how a beggar should be answered.
- The Merchant of Venice, 4. 1
I must be missing the code book. Because as much as I reread and reread this post, I cannot find in it a cogent explanation of what you claim President Obama is trying to do with or to social security. Can someone enlighten me in a paragraph or two? Without elucidation, this comment and most posts reflect to me a silly “we want everything” attitude that ignores just how much better off we are under this president. Criticize him, of course, but please, keep things in perspective, folks.
It’s going to take more than a paragraph or two. You see, there’s these things called “economic hit jobs.”
Has that sunk in? Have you realized that economics has been weaponized? That corporations covet any and all wealth they don’t already own?
Ask yourself: was John Perkins the only EHM in American history? Were his projects the only ones ever? If not, then where TF are the rest of them, and what TF are they up to right now?
With what power have we been jacked into this Waste Land? The power of our own dreams; namely, the American dream of home ownership was used first to inflate the bubble, then to suck the equity out of the housing market.
Up next: entitlements. Get it?
If not, maybe I should note the odd fact that then-Senator Obama was the only senator at the effing Hamilton Project’s original launch.
Get it yet? Brand Obama is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the corporatist Wall Street Democrats, many of whom bear direct responsibility for the Great Collapse. Murder, mayhem, economic catastrophe–all in a day’s work for EHMs.
What, do you think that will sate their infinite greed? If so, I’ve got a great health insurance policy I’d like to sell you. And if you don’t buy it, the tax man is already on the way.
Perspective on this issue requires some knowledge of the Hamilton Project and the people surrounding it.
The author provides a Social Security related example in one of his links.
But to zoom in and put it in a nutshell. This sentence from Obama’s speech at the Hamilton Project back in 2006 is pretty much a red flag:
Or just look at who Obama put on his deficit commission. Alice Rivlin on the “liberal” side of the commission is a published benefit cutter AND a member of the Hamilton Project. And Alan Simpson, the co chair on the conservative side of the commission, does things like go on NPR and liken the current state of retirement benefits to ” 70 and 80 year old people driving thier Lexus’s to get thier AARP discounts”.
And what due date did Obama set for his deficit commission? Dec 1 of this year. Right after mid term elections but before the lame ducks that have been voted out actually leave office. They are going to vote on the commissions results using people that already know they’ve been voted out of office.
Aye aye, skipper. That’s a nice nugget about Obama, I’m going to be using that. Thanks.
Obama will only be a one term president if he’s able to eliminate Social Security in that time frame. If he doesn’t succeed then he will be given a second term without a doubt. I’ve often said here that Obama was chosen for this office because a black Democratic president can do away with things Republicans would never be able to touch.
Hell, look at what a cracker Democrat was able to do – eliminate welfare, push through NAFTA, GATT, WTO, deregulation and consolidation in the cable industry, repeal of Glass-Steagall, war crimes through NATO in former Yugoslavia, war crimes against Iraqi women and children by sanctions, not to mention rigging the computing of CPI so that retirees could be screwed out of cost-of-living allowances in Social Security.
Obama’s not going anywhere UNTIL he destroys Social Security.
Is this sort of an ‘only Nixon could go to China’ kind of thing?
Also, the push to eliminate SS and Medicare; is that in order to fund future bail-outs? Or what?
Thanks.
I’ve always been in favor of “means testing” for social security [and I'm on it now]. It fries me that there’s a cohort of “greedy geezers” whizzing around on their golf carts in FL, collecting social security at the same time they collect generous retirement pensions and income from their investments, while those who could use ss for support starve.
One place to start is to dispel the whole myth that “your” social security account consists of “your” money/contributions. Not only is that false ["your" contributions went to pay others' benefits long ago; "your" benefits will be paid by taxes on current workers], it also avoids the financial truth: most folks nowadays receive FAR more in “benefits” than they paid in in taxes.
But to another point:
I’m adamantly in favor of this, EXCEPT there has to be both a means test [re receiving benefits] and cap on benefits. I.e., rich guys need to pay in more, but their “benefits” shouldn’t be based on their contributions. [Otherwise they'll bleed the system dry.]
All of this really points in favor of a “national retirement support” or “pension,” like they have in Western Europe. I.e., taxes paid in on a progressive scale [the current method of ss + FISA is incredibly regressive and hurts young workers], paid out more equally.
But if you thought the firestorm over “national health care” was big . . .
Everyone thinks “that’s MY money” in their little ss account, and they’ll be damned if it can go anywhere but to them.
Social Security is already taxed and the payouts calculations are already progressive. People on the low end get more bang for thier buck that people on the top end. The first bit of contributions are weighted at 90%, the next bit at 30% and the top bit at 15%. Rich folks cannot bleed the system dry via increased contributions.
So what’s the point of means testing? That just sounds like a way to make Social Security unpopular and eventually break it.
Regarding “greedy geezers”, there’s only so many of them. And a better approach to them would be to increase taxes on capital gains and dividends.