Yesterday Alexander Cockburn reminded us of the news Israel Shamir and Paul Bennett broke at Counterpunch in September. Julian Assange’s chief accuser in Sweden has a significant history of work with anti-Castro groups, at least one of which is US funded and openly supported by a former CIA agent convicted in the mass murder of seventy three Cubans on an airliner he was involved in blowing up.
Anna Ardin (the official complainant) is often described by the media as a “leftist”. She has ties to the US-financed anti-Castro and anti-communist groups. She published her anti-Castro diatribes (see here and here) in the Swedish-language publication Revista de Asignaturas Cubanas put out by Misceláneas de Cuba. From Oslo, Professor Michael Seltzer points out that this periodical is the product of a well-financed anti-Castro organization in Sweden. He further notes that the group is connected with Union Liberal Cubana led by Carlos Alberto Montaner whose CIA ties were exposed here.
Quelle surprise, no? Shamir and Bennett went on to write about Ardin’s history in Cuba with a US funded group openly supported by a real terrorist: Luis Posada Carriles.
In Cuba she interacted with the feminist anti-Castro group Las damas de blanco (the Ladies in White). This group receives US government funds and the convicted anti-communist terrorist Luis Posada Carriles is a friend and supporter. Wikipedia quotes Hebe de Bonafini, president of the Argentine Madres de Plaza de Mayo as saying that “the so-called Ladies in White defend the terrorism of the United States.”
Who is Luis Posada Carriles? He’s a mass murderer, and former CIA agent. . . .
Luis Clemente Faustino Posada Carriles (born February 15, 1928) (nicknamed Bambi by some Cuban exiles)[1] is a Cuban-born Venezuelan anti-communist extremist. A former Central Intelligence Agency agent,[2] Posada has been convicted in absentia of involvement in various terrorist attacks and plots in the Americas, including: involvement in the 1976 bombing of a Cuban airliner that killed seventy-three people;[3][4] admitted involvement in a string of bombings in 1997 targeting fashionable Cuban hotels and nightspots;[5][6][7] involvement in the Bay of Pigs invasion; [and] involvement in the Iran-Contra affair…
Luis Posada Carriles is so evil that even the Bush administration wanted him behind bars:
In 2005, Posada was held by U.S. authorities in Texas on the charge of illegal presence on national territory before the charges were dismissed on May 8, 2007. On September 28, 2005 a U.S. immigration judge ruled that Posada cannot be deported, finding that he faces the threat of torture in Venezuela.[11] His release on bail on April 19, 2007 had elicited angry reactions from the Cuban and Venezuelan governments.[12] The U.S. Justice Department had urged the court to keep him in jail because he was “an admitted mastermind of terrorist plots and attacks”, a flight risk and a danger to the community.[7]
Who is Julian Assange’s chief accuser in Sweden? She’s a gender equity officer at Uppsula University – who chose to associate with a US funded group openly supported by a convicted terrorist and mass murderer. She just happens to have her work published by a very well funded group connected with Union Liberal Cubana – whose leader, Carlos Alberto Montaner, in turn just happened to pop up on right wing Colombian TV a few hours after the right-wing coup in Honduras. Where he joined the leader of the failed coup in Ecuador to savage Correa, the target of the coup. Montnaner also just happened to vociferously support the violent coup in Honduras, and chose to show up to sing the praises of the Honduran junta. Jean-Guy Allard, a retired Canadian journalist who now writes for Cuba’s Gramma, captured the moment
A strange pair appeared on NTN 24, the right-wing Colombian television channel aligned to the Fox Broadcasting Company the U.S. A few hours after the coup attempt in Quito, Ecuador, CIA agent Carlos Alberto Montaner, a fugitive from Cuban justice for acts of terrorism, joined with one of the leaders of the failed Ecuadorian coup, ex-Lieutenant Colonel Lucio Gutiérrez, to attack President Rafael Correa…
On the margin of his media news shows, Montaner’s is known for his fanatic support of the most extreme elements of the Cuban-American mafia.
Last year, in the wake of the coup d’état against Honduran President Manuel Zelaya, June 28, he became an fervent supporter of the dictator Roberto Micheletti, along with U.S. Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, and another Cuban-American terrorist and CIA collaborator, Armando Valladares.
Montaner showed up repeatedly in Tegucigalpa to “defend human rights,” and at the same time to applaud the fascist Honduran regime when it unleashed its police on demonstrations by the National Resistance Front.
Oh…and the “rape” charge that’s smeared Julian Assange’s name around the world? On Thursday James D. Catlin, the Melbourne barrister who represented Assange in London, wrote:
Apparently having consensual sex in Sweden without a condom is punishable by a term of imprisonment of a minimum of two years for rape. That is the basis for a reinstitution of rape charges against WikiLeaks figurehead Julian Assange that is destined to make Sweden and its justice system the laughing stock of the world and dramatically damage its reputation as a model of modernity.
Sweden’s Public Prosecutor’s Office was embarrassed in August this year when it leaked to the media that it was seeking to arrest Assange for rape, then on the same day withdrew the arrest warrant because in its own words there was “no evidence”. The damage to Assange’s reputation is incalculable. More than three quarters of internet references to his name refer to rape. Now, three months on and three prosecutors later, the Swedes seem to be clear on their basis to proceed. Consensual sex that started out with a condom ended up without one, ergo, the sex was not consensual.
I’ve spent much of my professional life as a psychiatrist helping women (and men) who are survivors of sexual violence. Rape is a hideous crime. Yet in Assange’s case his alleged victim – the gender equity officer at Uppsala University – chose to throw a party for her alleged assailant – after they’d had the sex that even Swedish prosecutors concede was consensual. Barrister Caitlin again:
[The] phenomena of social networking through the internet and mobile phones constrains Swedish authorities from augmenting the evidence against Assange because it would look even less credible in the face of tweets by Anna Ardin and SMS texts by Sofia Wilén boasting of their respective conquests after the “crimes”.
In the case of Ardin it is clear that she has thrown a party in Assange’s honour at her flat after the “crime” and tweeted to her followers that she is with the “the world’s coolest smartest people, it’s amazing!”. Go on the internet and see for yourself. That Ardin has sought unsuccessfully to delete these exculpatory tweets from the public record should be a matter of grave concern. That she has published on the internet a guide on how to get revenge on cheating boyfriends ever graver. The exact content of Wilén’s mobile phone texts is not yet known but their bragging and exculpatory character has been confirmed by Swedish prosecutors. Neither Wilén’s nor Ardin’s texts complain of rape.
Small world, isn’t it? Julian Assange is the human face of Wikileaks – the organization that’s enabled whistle-blowers to reveal hideous war crimes and expose much of America’s foreign policy to the world.
He just happens to meet a Swedish woman who just happens to have been publishing her work in a well-funded anti-Castro group that just happens to have links with a group led by a man at least one journalist describes as an agent of the CIA: the violent secret arm of America’s foreign policy.
And she just happens to have been expelled from Cuba, which just happens to be the global symbol of successful defiance of American foreign policy.
And – despite her work in Sweden upholding the human right of gender equity – in Cuba she just happens to end up associating with a group openly supported by an admitted CIA agent who himself committed mass murder when he actively participated in the terrorist bombing of a jetliner carrying a Cuban sports team…an act that was of a piece with America’s secret foreign policy of violent attacks against Cuban state interests.
And now she just happens – after admittedly consensual sex – to have gone to Swedish authorities to report the sex ended without a condom…which just happens to be the pretext for Interpol to issue a “Red Notice” informing the world’s police forces of charges against Julian Assange.
Who just happens to be the man America’s political class – the people who run America’s foreign policy – have been trying to silence. And who happens to be the man some of them have been calling to have murdered.
With a lust for vengeance like that, one could be forgiven for concluding they’ve just happened to have taken a page from Anna’s revenge manual.



74 Comments

this story has been troubling me, thanks for the details.
Thanks for this, Doctor!
That was stunningly exactly as expected.
The only thing that troubled me is I thought Ann Coulter would think of the idea first.
Great diary, I heard of the CIA association and bits of the condom story but nothing like what you have pulled together here. She should be judged by the company she keeps, and you can’t go lower than Carriles or Montaner. BTW- I think Jeb Bush is responsible for Carriles freedom. Anyway, there is no question this was a CIA political hit job.
Last week Anderson Cooper highlighted the sex charges against him, editting the original tape and removed the part showing how the reporter tanked the interview by trying to make those charges the story, and not wikileaks. He told her multiple times the charges were off limits and he would leave if she continued. She persisted and he walked. – -
The smear segment played repeatedly for two or three days. AC is a student recruit of the CIA himself, and it appears he’s still doing his duties.
This high profile case really exposes the Swiss Government as a US tool, and of course Australia as well.
That explains a lot.
Great post!
It does.
you mean Swedish government, right?
just wow!
This is truly amazing. I had heard a little about this, but thanks for filling in the details.
I don’t think this was a high level plot because a plot would have been more carefully orchestrated. It was likely a spontaneous decision on the part of the accusers to accuse him, and would have otherwise been dismissed were it not for the political climate. It makes me wonder if he really is untouchable as some suggest because of the mysterious “insurance” file.
I must say Assange has restored my faith in the future just a little bit. I keep feeling powerless against every form of injustice domestic and foreign and even more so now that we managed to elect Democrats who are taking us in the wrong direction. It’s nice to see the little guy give the big bad superpower a black eye. Maybe more revelations will lead to better policy? Who knows.
I pointed out at the beginning of all this that Sweden has always been a smug, self-contented, and thoroughly hypocritical place. It has always had an authoritarian streak to its government, brushed over as “social consensus” and has always had a strong, right-wing elite in the background controlling most major functions. Ironically, the cables explicitly proved this too. The links of these “leftist” girls to anti-Castro, CIA-funded organisations doesn’t really surprise me much. What sort of characters they have, one can only speculate. But it is not a pretty thought.
Assange is being set up.
That part about swedish rape law is bs. Using a condom has nothing to do what so what so ever about whether an act is a punishable offense. See chapter 6, paragraph 1 of the Swedish criminal code.
Wow, I missed that excellent Wonkette piece on Anderson Cooper. CNN appears to have been essentially taken over as governmental mouthpiece. This morning they were angry and spewing hatred against Wikileaks and Julian Assange as if they were literally the TV screen in the era of Big Brother, ranting about Goldstein.
I’m glad to see the CIA connections of Assange’s accusers are still being talked about, and much thanks, Dr. Murphy, for helping keep truth alive.
The connections between the accuser, the anti-Castro group and the plane bomber/terrorist Carriles, demonstrate something I’ve started saying regularly, hoping the meme gets picked up. It’s not the left or Wikileaks that is violent, it is this government which is violent and guilty of extreme violence and torture and murder. Their fear-mongering about terrorism and violence from Muslim fanatics and teenage angst-ridden youngsters (mentored by the Feds) is all about hiding their own monopoly on violence.
Turning a consensual sexual encounter into a supposed act of violence is an example of their technique on a very personal, intimate level. In the case of Assange, it is done with international repercussions.
Please illuminate us more on Chapter 6, Para 1 of the Swedish Criminal Code. Some readers here may be more unfamiliar with it than you are.
Thank you, Dr. Murphy. There’s so much information pulled together in this post.
Sure I’ll try to translate some of it. link is https://lagen.nu/1962:700#K6P1S1
“Den som genom misshandel eller annars med våld eller genom hot om brottslig gärning tvingar en person till samlag eller till att företa eller tåla en annan sexuell handling som med hänsyn till kränkningens art och omständigheterna i övrigt är jämförlig med samlag, döms för våldtäkt till fängelse i lägst två och högst sex år.” Is the first section of Ch6 §1.It says that what matters for an act to be considered rape is if violence or threat of committing a criminal act is used to force an act of intercourse or similar act comparable to intercourse. Sentence is at the minimum 2 and maximum 6 years of prison.
The second section of Ch6 §1 states “Detsamma gäller den som med en person genomför ett samlag eller en sexuell handling som enligt första stycket är jämförlig med samlag genom att otillbörligt utnyttja att personen på grund av medvetslöshet, sömn, berusning eller annan drogpåverkan, sjukdom, kroppsskada eller psykisk störning eller annars med hänsyn till omständigheterna befinner sig i ett hjälplöst tillstånd”
This says that it can also be considered rape if someone improperly takes advantages of someone due to unconsioness, sleep, intoxication or narcotic influence, illness, bodily injury or psychic disorder is used to force an act of intercourse or similar act comparable to intercourse.
Thanks. So to what section of the penal code was Australian barrister and writer James D. Caitlin referring Thursday, when he wrote:
Apparently having consensual sex in Sweden without a condom is punishable by a term of imprisonment of a minimum of two years for rape. That is the basis for a reinstitution of rape charges against WikiLeaks figurehead Julian Assange that is destined to make Sweden and its justice system the laughing stock of the world and dramatically damage its reputation as a model of modernity.
The section he just made up, condom as a word (in swedish) doesn’t exist in the entire Criminal Code.
Thank you for superb investigative reporting. Makes me proud to be a blogger.
The Swedes have a different law against fucking Ann Coulter.
When did they stop being “literally the TV screen in the era of Big Brother” ????? Did I miss something ?
You’re apparently misinterpreting the author’s words. He uses the word “apparently,” which means “according to appearances.” Sorry for the junior vocab lesson, but the author is pointing out that the action that led to a rape accusation was, in fact, consensual sex. Therefore, it *appears* that consensual sex without a condom amounts to rape in Sweden. It was a cynical statement about the accusation. Not a claim about what the law states. Only about how the law is being corruptly applied.
That figures.
These whores don’t know how to speak a straight sentence.
Anybody got a copy of the indictment ? Is that honey online ? The Swedes got a blonde/beautiful PACER set up ?
Mirroring the Guardian –
Lawyers representing the WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange, say that they have been surveilled by members of the security services and have accused the US state department of behaving “inappropriately” by failing to respect attorney-client protocol.
Jennifer Robinson and Mark Stephens of the law firm Finers Stephens Innocent told the Guardian they had been watched by people parked outside their houses for the past week.
“I’ve noticed people consistently sitting outside my house in the same cars with newspapers,” said Robinson. “I probably noticed certain things a week ago, but mostly it’s been the last three or four days.”
Stephens said he, too, had had his home watched. Asked who he thought was monitoring him, he said: “The security services.”
Robinson said the legal team was also experiencing “other forms of pressure” from Washington.
She pointed to a letter from a state department legal adviser – addressed to both Assange and her – which appeared to bracket together client and lawyer as if to suggest that WikiLeaks and its lawyers were one and the same.
The letter, which was released to the press, begins: “Dear Ms Robinson and Mr Assange. I am writing in response to your 26 November 2010 letter to US Ambassador Louis B Susman regarding your intention to again publish on your WikiLeaks site what you claim to be classified US government documents.”
Robinson said: “By eliding client and lawyer, that was a very inappropriate attempt to implicate me. That is really inappropriate to come from the state department of all places; they understand very well the rules on attorney-client protocol.”
She said that although they had requested a public retraction from the state department, no answer had been received.
“It’s quite a serious situation,” she said, adding that, according to the UN’s Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers, governments should ensure that lawyers “are able to perform all of their professional functions without intimidation, hindrance, harassment or improper interference” and that “lawyers shall not be identified with their clients or their clients’ causes as a result of discharging their functions”.
A spokeswoman for the Home Office declined to comment on the lawyers’ surveillance claims.
Assange, who is staying in Britain, has come under growing pressure from politicians in the US and around the world after his site started publishing excerpts from a cache of 250,000 secret American diplomatic cables last week.
It emerged on Saturday that Australian police are investigating whether Assange, an Australian citizen, has broken any of the country’s laws and is liable to prosecution there.
The foreign minister, Kevin Rudd, said: “The Australian government unequivocally condemns the action by any of those responsible for the unauthorised release of classified and confidential information and diplomatic communications between states.”
Swedish prosecutors have sent an international arrest warrant to the Metropolitan police, seeking the extradition of Assange for questioning on allegations – which he strongly denies – of rape, sexual molestation and unlawful coercion.
Stephens today denounced the extradition warrant as a “political stunt” and said Assange would fight deportation to Sweden on the grounds that it could lead to him being handed over to the US, where senior politicians have called for him to be executed.
The former vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin has described him as “an anti-American operative with blood on his hands” and called for him to be hunted down like a Taliban leader, while another senior Republican, Mike Huckabee, has said that “anything less than execution is too kind a penalty” for his actions.
Stephens said that Sweden’s chief prosecutor had told Assange in September that there was no case for him to answer, following complaints against him by two women, but the investigation was revived following the intervention of a Swedish politician.
He said that Swedish prosecutors knew where Assange was and urged them to call him to discuss the case.
Stephens told BBC1′s Andrew Marr Show: “It is quite bizarre, because the chief prosecutor in Sweden dropped the entire case against him, saying there was absolutely nothing for him to find back in September, and then a few weeks later on – after the intervention of a Swedish politician – a new prosecutor, not in Stockholm where Julian and these women had been, but in Gothenburg, began a new case which has resulted in these warrants and the Interpol Red Notice being put out.”
He added: “It does seem to be a political stunt.”
***********
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/dec/05/julian-assange-lawyers-being-watched
Betcha the spooks got this done for less than $10,000.
Even Sweden has its cheap political hookers.
Thanks I missed that eventhough I read it several times.
Slerik, thank you greatly for sharing your expertise and knowledge. Should you wish to, our readers would learn a great deal if you could post a diary here at My FDL sharing what you’ve educated us about.
Now as for for the law being applied, thats what a court is for. This is merely a criminal investigation which the public prosecutor is statutorily obliged to do when a crime is being reported. If the law is applied corrupt… we simply don’t know that yet. That an international arrest warrant is being served is hardly suprising as the prosecutor haven’t even been able to talk to the person who is accused. Swedish papers today claimed that the prosecutor herself isn’t sure whether this will go to court. I beg you all to calm down and wait for this to be fully investigated and perhaps tried in court until you dismiss the entire swedish criminal justice system as corrupt with that I guess is very little knowledge of how it operates.
Every country should have that law.
“Betcha the spooks got this done for less than $10,000.
“Even Sweden has its cheap political hookers.”
When I first wrote about possible motives on the part of Anna Ardin in this back on August 23rd, I was probably wrong in speculating that US intelligence had nothing to do with Ardin or Sofia Wilén and their incentives. I may have been right, though, about how complex their involvement may end up being:
“Even though Ardin’s possibly having been put up to making her tentative complaint to the authorities by some agency representing the U.S. government appears to be unlikely, we may be about to learn a lot about how complex underground politics in Sweden have become in the early 21st century.”
http://my.firedoglake.com/edwardteller/2010/08/23/the-strangest-blog-thread-yet-on-the-swedish-charges-uh-not-charges-against-julian-assange/
I’m stunned. I don’t know why (knowing how dirty the U.S. government can be) but none-the-less, I am stunned. This diary made me set up a Firedoglake account and I look forward to reading the excellent work here, comments and linking to you on my blog.
Swisslandia.
The question I have is, how did Assange ever get hooked up with this woman? Did she seek him out, and did he know her history?
You can read all the details of both ‘rapes’ here:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1307137/Supporters-dismissed-rape-accusations-WikiLeaks-founder-Julian-Assange–women-involved-tell-different-story.html
This might help explain why Sweden is acting like the bitch for the U.S. in the hunt for Assange.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=ROZ20100825&articleId=20766
What they’re saying in Sweden (in English).
http://www.thelocal.se/30606/20101203/
Keep going, you’re getting warmer. One day the lightbulb will go on and you’ll realize that the US government itself was responsible for dropping the towers and Building 7.
Posted at the Swedish blog TheLocal.
http://www.thelocal.se/30606/20101203/
Well, folks in Sweden are saying Swedish justice system is corrupt.
http://www.thelocal.se/30606/20101203/
Aloha, Doc…! I enjoyed reading your latest opus at Uruknet…! ;-)
Heh. The story was fishy from the beginning. The red flags went up for me when I read that Anna Ardin is a radical lesbian “all heterosexual sex is rape” feminist. It does not make sense that she would casually bed Assange *unless* there was an additional motive.
I’ve posted it at Progressive Alaska too. Way too busy reading and grading term papers to do an honest day’s wikileaks blogging myself today, Kirk.
Finally some details about the mysterious sex charge against Assange. Everyday Interpol seems to be “closing in” on the man “on the run” but they don’t go get him. I don’t think they want to get him. As long as he is “at large,” media gets to lead with this rapist sex crime story that smears his reputation. NBC’s Brian Williams puts the lawyer for the young women on the air but provides few details beyond the fact that they are 25 and 32. He paints Assange as a vicious sex criminal. It’s an obvious smear job; the reporting so biased. Discredit the source. Who wants to praise a person who’s a sex criminal or listen to anything he has to say?
But what I’ve heard is that Assange repeatedly offered himself for interview on these charges while he was in Sweden and enforcement declined. Before leaving for London, Assange “asked permission to leave,” and it was granted. His lawyers say that when he got to London, his contact info was given to authorities–so they know where he is. But why arrest him if media can continue to depict him as hiding out to avoid sex crime charges?
Bill Clinton should be sympathetic, the victim of right-wing smear jobs himself. The Paula Davis and his bent dick story come to mind. And of course we remember the story of Jeffrey Wigand–the insider, exec vp of Brown & Williamson tobacco–who was smeared by that corporation as a liar and kleptomaniac, a story that the Wall St Journal was about to publish before the 60 minutes producer stepped in and exposed the smear. B&W also followed him around and sent death threats–which makes me believe that this uproar isn’t about cables; that it’s about banks and corporations, the next target of Assange, which by the way are very cozy with the govt.
I think they are trying to beef up the charges so that Interpol doesn’t look like a laughingstock arresting a man for codomless sex! It’s in their interest to delay and let stories run wild rather than arrest the man and reveal the reason for it.
Funny how these details haven’t been reported in the MSM, who seems content to keep blasting the rapist Assange stories with no details. No worthwhile news editor would allow such biased reporting unless they were in cahoots with officials. Scary.
‘but the investigation was revived following the intervention of a Swedish politician.’
Do we know which ‘Politican’? and who is he connected to/with’?
The horror. The horror.
I’m reading Russ Baker’s book(Family of Secrets-The Bush Dynasty). Too many similarities with what goes on with Assange and Wikileaks. My feeling is that the focus is actually to prevent the report on the Bank and possibly the Financial system which might expose too much of what has been a network of clandestine occurrences way back in Bush family history, even possibly linking to the Kennedy killings. The revealings so far have been embarrassment to world figures, but when the advanced notification of the potential bank disclosures was released seems to be when the case against Wikileak and Assange intensified. The Cuban involvement and seemingly out of context assumptions of rape as explained from Sweden struck that Kennedy/Cuban memory that was reflected in Baker’s book. The lies that were manufactured even by the Bush family as to facts related to their whereabouts on Kennedy assassination day and their nurturing of Oswald and the Russian social connections in the oil industry and their involvement. All masked the financial network that was neatly set to hide funding for purpose of situations just like Assange, at least in my interpretation. I just hope that the financial bank report is revealed from some source for Assange, but mostly for knowledge since knowledge is truth. My inquiring mind would like to know.
As a swede i must say this is pretty embarassing. Just to clarify though: having consensual sex without a condom is not a punishable offence by any means. The case against Assange is – as far as we have understood, details are sketchy – that consensual sex turned nonconsensual after the condom broke/was taken off. Im not saying this in defence of the case, ive thought it smelled fishy from the start, but rather in defence of our legal system. However, seeing how easily the spanish justice system bent over for the US on the case of the killed journalists in Bagdad, i guess there is no guarantees whatsoever that our own system wouldnt do the same. This brings to mind the case in 2001 of two egyptians that swedish authorities aided the CIA in abducting and shipping away to torture.
WHat maybe some in the US dont realize is the extent to which Sweden has reoriented its foreign policy in later years. The compass is now steadily pointing to Washington, if ever it were otherwise. Assange was probably a bit too optimistic about the political climate in Sweden when he sought political asylum here. As the cables also reveal our politicians collaborate routinely with US authorities in spying on swedish citizens.
Can we be a little careful here? The speciousness of the rape charges, and the likelihood that political pressure contributed to their elevation and perpetuation, should be carefully and systematically dissected and documented based on facts. The credibility of the accusers is certainly a factor, but impugning credibility can be a slippery slope.
There may be some “there” there in pursuing the anti-Castro/CIA connection. Or not. But disproving the charges against Assange does not hinge on this connection. And throwing Posada Carriles into the kitchen sink just murks up the dishwater.
Counterpunch — a valuable outlet but not a news source one should accept out of hand — notes that Ardin “interacted with” an anti-Castro group that has an infamous terrorist as a “friend and supporter.” Counterpunch, and now Kirk, then goes off on Posada’s unquestionable evil.
Do we really want to apply the same standards to Ardin that the US Government applies to Islamic charities, labeling them terrorist because of a degree or two of separation from unsavory characters?
Do we really want to apply the same low standard of evidence to this discourse that the ADL and AIPAC use to smear Steven Walt and John Mearsheimer as antisemitic based on the fact that David Duke spoke approvingly of their study of the Israel lobby?
Need I mention the high [/snark] standard of proof applied to the “pro-terrorist” leanings of Barack Obama based on his “connection” with Bill Ayers? (Obama’s terrorist connection, IMHO, is more credibly supported by his drone policy.)
Blast the accusations out of the water based on the most solid evidence. By all means, use any post hoc boastings by Assange’s accusers of their consensual sexual conquest. If Ardin ever spoke approvingly of Posada’s terrorism, which I doubt, let’s hear it and note it, although it’s irrelevant to the Assange case. Otherwise, let’s not get all fluffed up about her possibly being a friend of a friend of the bastard.
I once wished a happy birthday to Noam Chomsky, who in the 1970s urged caution about preliminary reports of Khmer Rouge atrocities. Bet you didn’t know about FDL’s “connection” to Pol Pot.
Nasty, authoritarian country where the “little people” should jolly well know their place? In many ways like the Netherlands which has also successfully projected an image to outsiders of being “gezellig” (cosy and open and tolerant and fluffy bunnies) whilst in fact being a class-ridden, divided, ultra-elitist, smug, corrupt little place.
Sweden’s elites seem to be great fans of their “Nations” – harmless fun? One wonders. Repulsive to this outsider anyway.
I must admit, the Daily Mail article above which details the complaint does paint a markedly different picture to CIA conspiracy. It seems to hinge however on an inexplicable political intervention to reanimate these charges. The original complainants seem rather pathetic, but certainly not in the league of international espionage and honey traps. The political dimension, if there is one to this, developed independently of these two women by the look of it.
I somewhat agree with ralphbon, the links with cuban groups could be significant or could be a red herring. Best not to make too much of it before we know more. If this is a CIA honey trap, its pretty sloppily made. Maybe its simpler than that: the two women got jealous when they found out that Assange had courted them both (or rather it was they who courted him, as i understand it from the media) and decided to teach him a lesson?
Well yes, our elites are quite nasty. The cables has revealed more of their servile mindset towards the US than most swedes probably would have imagined. And its not only the centerright government – the social dems are in on it too. But on the other hand i doubt that the authoritarian mindset is more predominant here than in most other EU countries or the US.
No evidence Germany is particularly authoritarian thus far. Would love to know what Slime-meier really new about Murat Kurnaz though. Will be happier once he’s in jail (Slime-meier that is).
But those university “fraternities” of yours really bother me. That’s where the chinless wonder offspring of your oligarchy get into this whole “USA is great” gig. It is all just one big happy global family if you are a 0.001 percenter.
Unfortunately the “USA is great gig” plays for a bigger audience than just the elites. The normal condition here is pro-americanism, all the way. If the US does something horrendously stupid, like invade Irak or bomb Vietnam back to the middle ages, that might shift temporarily. But us swedes just cant get enough of american TV-series, movies, music and such, and somehow we just convince ourselves that Hollywood and the american musical subcultures are what the US is really like. Hey, why bother if our own govermnent is in cahoots (?) with the CIA in spying on swedish citizenry, its all for the greater good of “counterterrorism”, right?
BTW, Israel Shamir has been getting a lot of heat here (rightly so i deem) for antisemitic publishing. I would take whatever he writes with a grain of salt. And im not talking about “antisemitism” as in general critique of Israel here.
Thanks. I want to be clear that evidence of ideological motivation for making these accusations could be germane. But all the focus on Posada and rehashing of his crimes, in hopes of rubbing some of the evil off on the accusers, just spins the discussion off in a distracting and unnecessary direction.
In my heart I knew it was something as sleezy as this. Also I suspect the chief prosecutor Marianne Ny is being coerced to press on with this ridiculous case in the same way prosecutors in Spain were suborned by the US State Dept to drop the case against our torture draft authors.
Just reported at Business Insider:
“The Swiss Bank Post Finance today issues a press release stating that it had frozen Julian Assange’s defense fund and personal assets (31K EUR) after reviewing him as a “high profile” individual.
“The technicality used to seize the defense fund was that Mr. Assange, as a homeless refugee attempting to gain residency in Switzerland, had used his lawyers address in Geneva for the bank’s correspondence.
“Late last week, the internet payment giant PayPal, froze 60Keur of donations to the German charity the Wau Holland Foundation, which were targeted to promote the sharing of knowledge via WikiLeaks.
“WikiLeaks and Julian have lost 100Keur in assets this week.
“One of the most fascinating aspects of the Cablegate exposure is how it is throwing into relief the power dynamics between supposedly independent states like Switzerland, Sweden and Australia.
“WikiLeaks also has public bank accounts in Iceland (preferred) and Germany.
“Please help cover our expenditures while we fight to get our assets back.
“http://wikileaks.ch/support.html
“Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/julian-assanges-defense-fund-frozen-2010-12#ixzz17Ll5NZZH”
Am I breaking the law yet by posting a direct link to wikilinks.ch?
Interesting development.
You do have a point. But I wonder how many times Interpol has been used to issue a red notice for someone who had condomless sex?
Does this mean that the donation I made this weekend has been captured? I made it with a visa bank card.
A lawfully elected small “l” liberal (as opposed to the big “L” Liberal party, which in Australia is rightwing) government headed by Labour Party’s Gough Whitlam was overthrown by the CIA in 1975:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1975_Australian_constitutional_crisis
http://www.williambowles.info/spysrus/cia_australia.html
If you pay attention, whenever a new fed government is elected in Australia, the new PM almost immediately travels to the USA (within days of the election). Same goes when a new POTUS is elected in the USA.
I believe the bulk of the conversation between the POTUS and the Australian PM goes something like this: “Don’t forget what happened to Gough. Ok: see you when we need you to do something for us. TTFN.”
The “official line” in Aus will be to go against Assange, although Assange enjoys popular support from certain segments of the populace, believe me.
Yes. Like many, I have been reading both Stieg Larsson’s books, as well as Henning Mankell’s (Wallender series). Swedish fiction leaves little doubt as to what Sweden is really like; not quite the utopia that some came to believe. A lot of old-line authoritarianism, which used to be reflected in their formerly strong Swedish Nazi party back in the day (and perhaps ongoing thru today).
That almost goes with saying and was totally predictable. Assange knew this going in and hopefully has adequately prepared for it. Good luck to Assange, a modern-day hero, imo.
Good. Glad you’ve read about this. Sad to tell you that this is merely the tip of the ice berg in terms of how “dirty” the US govt is. Keep reading and learning; that’s what this is all about.
Welcome to FDL!!
Depends on whether you slipped a condom on the card first.
Err, Assange’s lawyers say that their client is quite willing to talk to the prosecutor via video conferencing. In short, a claim that “the prosecutor hasn’t been able to talk to the person who is accused” means someone is lying. Are you saying that Assange’s lawyers are lying? Or is the prosecutor lying? Curious penguins are… curious!
The Daily Mail is one of the most unreliable papers in the UK and is known to publish a lot very speculative and unsubstantiated stuff. Just look at how the story is written to lean towards the credibility of the accusations against Assange.
I am a progressive, and I find this article (a) offensive and (b) built upon innuendo stacked upon innuendo.
First, the article is offensive because it constructs a “crazy feminist” and “crying rape” narrative to describe the alleged victims. Assange deserves due process like any other person, but the portrayal of the victims in this article is hardly something worthy of praise by progressive.s
Second, the article is unreliable because it contains too many unsubstantiated and fuzzy claims. The article accuses the alleged victims as being “connected with” unsavory people who “supporting” terrorism in US. Yet, it is very light on details.
Splashing CIA, anti-Castro, US terrorism in an article might cause some liberals to salivate, but it does not prove your point.
What can you say, this is just Sweden.. and I am from Sweden so I should know..
There is no conspiracy here.
And I am a socialist or “Communist” as some (in your country) might say and I can guarantee you that its not because she (Ardin) is a “anti-communist” or that this is a “anti-communist conspiracy”..
Its a pretty common practice for “lefties” in Sweden (like Ardin) to visit Cuba.
You should know that all of these policies and principles (the “progressive” view of rape in Sweden) is a result of far-left feminism(of some of which that I agree with) that you shouldnt “attack”, particularly here that should champion those policies as one of the most “left” websites even in the internet-”left” community in the USA.
I think some of you should reflect a bit longer and understand the complexity of this case in what is, probably the most feminism influenced country in the world, context.
What is even more troubling is the gullible way in which so-called progressives are reacting to this “analysis.” I already criticized it below — but here’s more. The so-called description of rape law in Sweden (illegal to have sex without a condom) comes from Assange’s lawyer — not from Sweden’s penal code. Well, Interpol has provisions of the code online. Rape in Sweden, unsurprisingly, is defined the way it is in the rest of Western society. http://www.interpol.int/public/Children/SexualAbuse/NationalLaws/csaSweden.asp
FDL is usually a very thoughtful blog. This post falls far short of the mark.
http://vancouver.mediacoop.ca/blog/sandracuffe/5363
“I’ve spent much of my professional life as a psychiatrist helping women (and men) who are survivors of sexual violence. Rape is a hideous crime. Yet in Assange’s case his alleged victim – the gender equity officer at Uppsula University – chose to throw a party for her alleged assailant…”
Do I need to hold anyone’s hand through this? I’m a big dick shrink and therefore I get to say when it’s rape and when it’s not. Her job as a gender equity officer at a University means she can’t possible be raped. She knew her alledged assailant, so she couldn’t have been raped. She threw him a party, so she *definitely* couldn’t have been raped. Wow, it’s like a course! The Perpetuation of Rape Myths 101.
——————————–
You should all be ashamed of yourselves.
this is more shit than a little bit.
both manning and assange should be defended to the max against any and all charges, not because of this nitpicking point or that tie to “anti-castro” group or scumbag murderer, but because they are helping to expose and tear down the evil empire of all evil empires, along with it’s various client states.
otherwise you’re in the same boat with fuckin huckabee.
For the record, some of the above commenters have strong points about the narrative here (my comments included) being anti-feminist. I *am* anti-feminist if all feminism is lumped into one pile of Andrea Dworkin/Katherine McKinnon inspired denial of heterosexual female desire. Fortunately, not all feminists and feminism is tainted by the notion that *all* sexual contact between man and woman is rape.
Is failing to use a condom when asked to do so in an otherwise consensual sexual situation rape? Very possibly. It should certainly have some strong repercussions for the offending man.
From previous threads on this topic (see ET’s link) we learned that Anna Ardin is a radical *all heterosexual sex is rape* lesbian feminist. She is also human, so if she has any sexual desire at all for a man, she may have acted on that with Assange. However, to do so would violate her beliefs–she essentially allowed herself to be raped in her own twisted definition, whether Assange refused to wear a condom or not.
It is there that I find trouble with the story. Because if a woman believes that all heterosexual sex is rape, she would not have sex with a man. If she did have sex with a man, she would be much more likely to regard it as rape whether there was an actual rape or not.