Is now leased out, I die pronouncing it,
Like to a tenement or pelting farm:
England, bound in with the triumphant sea
Whose rocky shore beats back the envious siege
Of watery Neptune, is now bound in with shame,
With inky blots and rotten parchment bonds:
That England, that was wont to conquer others,
Hath made a shameful conquest of itself.
Ah, would the scandal vanish with my life,
How happy then were my ensuing death!
There is no serious argument against the premise that wealth disparities beyond some arbitrary point are destructive of societies and even eventually to the well being of the putative “winners”. One can look at objective data–there is a wealth of it to study–and come to a reasonable conclusion on more or less where that arbitrary point exists based on metrics having to do with societal health, broad educational and economic opportunity where meritocratic considerations outweigh the built in advantages of inherited wealth, the existence of a broad and viable middle class to fuel economic prosperity and many other factors I’m sure. There is also in the vicinity of that point, one where wealth concentration destroys even putatively democratic political systems as the political class becomes unduly influenced by a tiny demographic minority and the entire premise of democracy fails to apply any longer and government ceases to represent or serve the many but instead the few. And this point is a classic tipping point that inevitably becomes a self-reinforcing feedback loop– the wealthy rig the rules of the economic game incrementally further and further in their favor until the situation becomes untenable and great general misery and poverty ensue and society essentially disintegrates.
I would argue that it is self evident that the US has far surpassed that tipping point and unless strong correctives are devised and applied to stop and reverse the current trendlines, the economic, social and political future of the US is in existential peril.
Once this realization sets in we can begin to look at methods for addressing this knowing full well the headwinds will be howling against our accomplishing anything substantive. But in the end we are many and they are few and should a popular resolve coalesce that this needs fixing, there’s precious little the billionaires can do to stop it happening. There are plenteous historical precedents to accomplish a necessary leveling to a healthy sustainable point, from monetary policy, tax policy, electoral finance reform to New Deal-type programs to pitchforks and torches and tumbrels and guillotines. The less bloody should be tried first and if those efforts are stymied, then obviously the more bloody must be employed.



13 Comments

Nice diary! Rec’d
Not recognizing that it was Will you were quoting, I googled it and see why you might have left off the beginning bits.
It’s not even that the uber-wealthy cause the political system to be skewed for their benefit, but the financial system as well, as I’m sure all realize. That of course means that even the laws that are on the books can be flouted with impunity, and…are, ‘the best way to rob a bank is to own one’, etc. Add in the fact that the Fed is said to be printing (or virtually creating) a hundred and eighteen million dollars an hour, all to profit the big banks and multinationals whose profits continue to soar while Americans die for lack of food (at least healthy food), medicine and 43% of us earn less than the 1975 minimum wage equivalent…it’s even more criminally sick.
And gee, gollee; the DOW’s at just under 14,300 today! All we really mean to the Oligarchs is acting as their slaves, as potential revenue streams to be heisted for their benefit, and as objects of blame for a tough ‘recovery’, since consumers just aren’t consuming enough.
They’re smart to keep the food stamp program alive or more people seriously would be rising up and declaring this government invalid, and asking them all to resign.
But all that criminality is hideous, but if you add in Eternal War, the lies to sell it to the public, *and* the evil profiteers who are pushing it for their own gain, it gets even worse. Then add in the massive security state that’s poised to try to make sure that when we do rise up, we may be disappeared, killed, god knows what, then it all becomes nightmarish beyond nightmarish. And again, how many Americans know (read: sense, believe) the truth of what’s really going on?
I’ll choose ‘the easy way’, the nonviolent way, even knowing that I may not get a choice in the matter, Kurt Sperry.
Rec’d in outrage.
How many Americans feel this inequality, though? I think that’s when the real tipping point comes. I’d been guessing/researching tipping points in an as-yet four-part series, and
I do hope you come and make a conversation of this, dear Kurt Sperry.
The popular outrage tipping point is–unfortunately– not the same as the oligarchic self feeding death spiral tipping point. We don’t know where the first lies. When does popular discontent with the status quo reach a critical mass? When have the people had enough?
The American people have been beaten down, demoralized, disinformed, propagandized (beginning to channel Arlo there) and had examples made of dissenters to head off any thoughts of disruptive change. I don’t think anyone, either the oligarchs or us, really knows at what point enough will be enough. A lot of people are wondering the same thing and a lot is riding on the answer to that question. Your guess is a good, probably better, than mine.
Thank you; I missed which tipping point you’d formulated by reading too quickly. No, no one knows what will light a fuse for the people, and history may have to record the feedback loop. Thank you, Kurt Sperry; we’re so in the soup right now.
‘Arise like Lions from your slumber…’ ;o)
Noted and Liked. Thank you KS. Good comments too KS and wd.
I am thinking and tilting towards the Easy Way(s) will be closed out /shut out and shut down for too long too many times by American Empire ptb. Which finally led / leads to common beat down and brutalized beyond even USians rote learned levels of indifference and tolerance being compelled to attack and pull down the Castle and those inside it who stupidly pushed USians into doing so.
It will come down to American Empire social/economic/political dereliction, a obscene held at top wealth aristocracy and corrupt culture of militarism/security stupidity in the twin forms of ignorance and arrogance taking place too long.
See 1776. See 1789. See 1917. In each of these Revolts by the time it was known what was happening it already had happened. Which was only way these events could and would happen. Those USians holed up in DHS,Pentagon and CIA won’t know the Start Line was passed long before they find themselves facing the Finish Line.
In the Xtians Bible ( 1 Thessalonians 5: 2-6 ) such an event is described ” as a thief comes in the night ” which luminates the point I am making about Revolts Start Lines well enough.
Recommended … again…thank you KS … stay with it
Interesting diary and comments.
I am curious though, is it possible that “this” status quo can continue indefinitely?
What I’m asking is, considering they own the place, the military, the police, and the government (jud, leg, exec, all major depts), instead of a revolt (which IMHO is highly unlikely with such massive delusional thinking of the masses), why can’t they just finish taking over?
Seems like the masses are controlled very well (you gotta give them props for their propaganda and level of control). So why couldn’t they just take over? They basically have anyway.
They’ve made all the laws and it favors the status quo.
Sure there are such issues as food, shelter, … that folks usually revolt over, … but seriously, will that happen here, ie. will people wake up or keep their heads buried in the sand. I see the latter more likely.
And even with food, as the food stamp comment above, isn’t this more about having a controlled explosion, ie. keep the numbers of disgruntled below the level you can easily take care of them. In, previous revolutions, those in control lacked the PTB’s current arsenal of all sorts of weaponry that can eliminate a good portion of the disgruntled. Thus, could they just choose to control the explosion? Keep the numbers that are disgruntled at any one time below the numbers needed to overwhelm the current arsenal. Thus perpetual control.
Kinda playing Devil’s advocate here, ie. different perspective, but seriously I’m just curious as to what people think. Discuss.
Recc’d. Thanks for showing the accurate bar graph.
http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/138844/jerry-z-muller/capitalism-and-inequality
I thought this was unbiased, even if it is posted on the CFR. Walks you through the history of capitalism and inequality and should fire some new neurons.
Good devil’s advocacy, tambershall, but could you say what ‘taking total control’ and ‘they’ you mean?
Random thoughts not knowing that:
The most efficient prison would be the one not even known. Propaganda works well because people prefer the comfortable lie to the truth. USians have dutifully bought into materialism as success themes brought to them on their teevees and taught in schools; ad agencies study behavior, psychology, neuroscience, control group responses to the manner info/spin/values are presented/pushed; BigPharma has made sure we’re taking mass amounts of happy pills; BigAg has assumed command and control of the food supply; extractive industry is taking control of the water supply; media consolidation meant almost total corporate control.
Factor in that propaganda for wars (think: Saddam stealing incubators, etc.), Generals (think: Petraeus), Dictators wanting US largesse and arms deals, are accomplished by the same Madison Ave. ad agencies. They know what we’ll collectively ‘buy’, and how divide and conquer works.
The military was cagey enough to end the military draft, and enlistment has become a jobs bill, and has become one way out of the massive debt Americans had accrued. Both parties want schools, the Commons, infrastructure that were built with tax dollars corporatized now. Well, you get my drift.
So while we refer to the PTB and the Larger Vampire Squid, I don’t even reckon there is an entity ‘they’, or that they need to have meetings. It’s more that greed and lust for power has shown the way to accruing more now, at a galloping rate since there’s so little in the way of opposing power, which is, of course…what we need to ally for.
Anyway, lol.
Agreed, we do not know the PTP. I do feel a vibe that people are becoming aware. The gun control issue whether you, agree or not, has people drawing the trite “line in the sand”. Perhaps when gun control goes into effect it will generate a TP, not because of guns but because of liberty. We also see hundreds of thousands protesting in Spain, Portugal and Italy, Of course those protests are not allowed to be shown in the lame stream reality.
haha sorry i guess I’m new, don’t understand the acronyms but its refreshing to see people discuss these issues.
Yes, entirely possible that the status quo or some (per)version of it will lumber on for the foreseeable future. This presupposes however that the oligarchs at some point have a “come to Jesus moment” and realize that even their collective interest will not be served by each individual oligarch maximizing their individual greed heedless the larger picture. One suspects this line of reasoning may however be fundamentally incompatible with existing programming or culture.
I think the best hope for the status quo being maintained longer term will be through the technological development and implementation of a sustainable, renewable energy infrastructure. Otherwise peak oil and other inherent finite resource constraints will call the whole party to a halt irrespective of policy legerdemain and propaganda as the shrinking wealth pie can no longer be papered over with fossil fueled subsidized junk food and e-circuses.
And of course a good portion of the petrodollar fueled oligarchy will fight this–literally–to the death as it would represent an existential threat to their personal income streams.
Essentially then maintaining the status quo longer term will require the oligarchy to take actions that run counter to their own individual short term interests. Bwahahahahahaha. Sorry.