Brutal, Brutal Read |
|
| By: Larue-Clique Member Since LibbyGate Thursday August 6, 2009 5:54 pm | |
Brutal, Brutal Read |
|
| By: Larue-Clique Member Since LibbyGate Thursday August 6, 2009 5:54 pm | |
About MyFDL
MyFDL is the community site of progressive political blog Firedoglake. Anyone can participate by writing a diary, commenting on others’ diaries, or joining groups to find other people in your area. Content posted to MyFDL is the opinion of the author alone, and should not be attributed to Firedoglake.
Thanks for the link Larue, I’ll have to read it later
I knew this was going to happen once Obama locked out the Single-Payer advocates from his WH health care tête-à-tête
It was just a matter of time
PS How’s Mary McNurnin? Haven’t seen her for awhile
We knew the fix was in when the pharmaseuticals and the AMA pledged their support weeks ago. Apparently, Obama sell out as cheaply as the insurers wanted and they were able to cut a better deal through the Blue Dogs and Congress.
Here’s a link to an article describing the deal that has been cut with the drug companies: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08…..=4&hp
I’ve not yet seen any details about the deal that was made with the AMA.
I guess it’s gonna cost me extra now when I go in complaining my ass is sore from all the fucking I been getting lately from these assholes, huh?
progressives get taken for granted by the Democrats because their support is unconditional, corporate lobbyists get what they want from the Democrats because their support is conditional.
make them pay, or continue to get played.
hopefully, this terrible bill will fail, though, and the game can get replayed, with lessons learned, especially about who is actually on whose team.
she was on one of the threads a few nights ago. seemed fine. except for, like the rest of us, completely pissed off.
i saw this earlier, larue. shit. recommended.
Hey, GW, long time no see! How you doing, other than the previously mentioned state of aggravation?
There was no point in pushing a single payer bill if it was going to die the same death that the Clinton bill died back in September of 1994 — a fate that led directly to the Republicans taking over Congress barely a month later. The public option has a much better chance, but of course since it means that Big Med might feel some pinching of its mega-profits, they’re fighting it tooth and nail, as the BW article shows. (The very title of the BW piece refers to UnitedHealth’s apparent victory in killing the public option, which would have, like single payer, hurt their profit margins.
But Sherrod Brown begs to differ.)
PW, I just don’t get your point.
Are we dead in the water for HC Reform?
Are we screwed from White House sponsored co-op’s that are useless?
I don’t get your point . . . love ya, but I don’t get yer point.