Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan once famously told an opponent in a debate: “Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.” I was reminded of that last Thursday when former corporate raider Mitt Romney, who made millions out-sourcing American jobs to foreign countries, expressed his opinion on the Supreme Court’s decision upholding Obamacare. In just one paragraph of his speech, Romney made six claims that bear no relation to the real world. He created “fake-facts” about health care reform and totally distorted the law’s real impact. This is an old Karl Rove campaign tactic – make things up – on steroids. It needs to be exposed.

Mitt Romney (Photo: Austen Hufford / Flickr)
1. Romney said Obamacare “cuts Medicare, by approximately $500 billion.” This claim is meant to scare seniors, but it is simply false. PolitiFact.com has this to say about this bogus claim: “The bill doesn’t take money out of the current Medicare budget but, rather, attempts to slow the program’s future growth, curtailing just over $500 billion in anticipated spending increases over the next 10 years.” Those savings come from a variety of administrative changes and things like requiring Medicare Advantage plans to reduce their inflated costs. The law makes no cuts to guaranteed Medicare benefits. In fact, it increases Medicare benefits by improving the prescription drug benefit and by making cancer screenings and other preventive services available without a co-pay.
2. Romney said Obamacare “raises taxes on the American people by approximately $500 billion.” False. In fact, families across the nation will save money as a result of the Obamacare reforms, such as state-based exchanges that come online in 2014. Families who purchase private health insurance through these exchanges will save up to $2,300 each year on their health care spending. Millions of Americans already see real savings as their out-of-pocket costs go down to zero for preventive care like flu shots or cancer screenings.
3. Romney says Obamacare “adds trillions to our deficits and to our national debt.” False. In fact, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that Obamacare will reduce the national deficit by $210 billion over the next 10 years.
4. Romney says Obamacare will force up to 20 million Americans to “lose the insurance they currently have.” False. Rather than losing insurance, millions of Americans will get insurance for the first time. CBO and the Joint Economic Committee estimate that the number of people without health insurance coverage will be reduced by 30 million to 33 million by 2016 if the states implement the law as intended.
5. Romney says Obamacare is “a job-killer.” False. It takes a lot of nerve for a politician who has endorsed the job-killing agenda of Paul Ryan and the House Republicans to try to label health care reform as a job-killer. In fact, one recent study suggests that the lower growth in health care costs through Obamacare will create 250,000 to 400,000 thousand new jobs in many industries annually throughout the next decade.
6. Romney says “Obamacare puts the federal government between you and your doctor.” False. Obamacare removes the insurance companies from their position between you and your doctor. Remember, under Obamacare, insurance companies can no longer end your health coverage if you become ill or deny you coverage because of a pre-existing condition. And insurance companies will have to spend 80 percent of the money they take in on health care – not on administrative costs or CEO salaries – and refund the money to their customers if they don’t meet the target. Before the end of the summer, 12.8 million Americans will receive rebates because their insurance company spent too much of their premium dollars on administrative costs or CEO bonuses.
What Mitt Romney is doing should be clear to everyone. His campaign has done some polling on what people don’t like and they have decided to attribute all those things to Obamacare, even when they bear no relation to reality. These are “fake-facts” designed to make an honest debate impossible. They are an insult to the intelligence of the American people and should be repudiated by any American who recognizes the value of a true debate about real facts.
It is clear that Romney and his allies have decided not to discuss Obamacare factually. They know that if they told the truth about the law, the public would not support their efforts to overturn it. Instead, they are creating a totally false picture of the legislation – they are inventing their own “fake-facts” – and hope to deceive the American public into opposing the far-reaching reforms that Americans have fought so hard to win over the decades. Pay attention as the campaign goes forward. When you hear Romney and other politicians say these things, tell your friends and coworkers that they are spreading lies. They are out of touch with reality. What they are doing is a disgrace. Don’t let them get away with it.



10 Comments

I prefer Obama’s fake facts, you know, like:
- “I will insist on a Public Option.”
- “Mine will be the most transparent administration ever.”
- “I will end the Bush tax cuts.”
Plus all the others about not putting Wall Street ahead of Main Street, restoring civil liberties, etc.
Fuck Obama. Fuck the ACA. Fuck the DemocRATS.
No, fuck you.
I believe the topic is “false facts” and not “wanna-do” stuff.
Asserting a lie as a fact seems quite different than expressing things you want to accomplish and have not yet gotten around to doing.
Now you KNOW I’m no fan of Obamacare. Still the author was pointing out Willard’s lies about it, not endorsing the policy or the authors. Pointing out that Willard lies doesn’t automatically mean that this is a pro Obama post. That being said, the best attack Romney could launch against the ACA is that it is modeled on the Heritage Foundation’s alternative to “Hillarycare”. That’s condemnation in sooth.
Both parties distort the facts.
For instance:
“The bill doesn’t take money out of the current Medicare budget but, rather, attempts to slow the program’s future growth, curtailing just over $500 billion in anticipated spending increases over the next 10 years.”
Paragraph #1. This is the same confusing language that folks will hear from both parties, regarding Social Security Reform. The most simple illustration is the proposed changed in the CPI Index (which, BTW, is one proposed reform which will apply to all beneficiaries, current and future).
The proposed formula will “slow the growth” of inflationary adjustment on Social Security monthly benefit payments. THAT IS A CUT! When folks receive “LESS” of a benefit, than they would have received under current law, that is a CUT, pure and simple.
Paragraph #2 is partly false (or true). IF you notice, there is not a refutation that taxes will be raised. (And they will be, if not the exact figure that Romney claims–read the law). They simply make assertions about possible savings for folks in the proposed “exchange,” of up to $2,300 per year. Meantime, they conveniently leave out the fact that many folks covered under “group health insurance” have seen tremendous double-digit increases, since ACA was signed into law. A whopping 15% increase for our premium, this year alone. Some increase would have been likely, I concede, without the passage of this law. But I doubt very seriously that some group health insurance premiums would have doubled, were it not for this law.
Please, folks, take assertions from BOTH parties with a grain of salt.
And read the act for yourselves. Here’s a link:
http://housedocs.house.gov/energycommerce/ppacacon.pdf
Blue
Not got around to doing?
- President Pinocchio spent nine months talking about supporting the Public Option after he’d already sold out to Big Pharma and AHIP by promising that there wouldn’t be a PO in Obamacare. That is a fact. (Read Tom Daschle’s book, and/or go source other stories — der Google — to see for yourself.)
- How do you “not get around” to being “the most transparent administration” ever? Oh, I know, by prosecuting more whistleblowers than all other previous Presidents combined. By not only invoking the State Secrets Privilege more than any other president, but expanding the claimed coverage of the privilege.
- Not “got around” to ending Bush tax cuts, which are now the Obama tax cuts? All he and the Dems who follow his lead had to do was let all the Bush tax cuts expire, then come back after the first of the year and put forth a new bill to reinstate those breaks but only for those making under $200K or $250K. But he/they didn’t, and that, too, is a fact.
Get a clue, man.
As we all argue over the remaining crumbs on the floor the room is heating rapidly and the future is blowing away in the coming Planet wide dust bowl ( think DUNE) and acid bath ( the acidification of the Oceans.) In a generation all these arguments will seem trivial.
Just so. Similarly, in item 4, an accurate response is not “False!” but “Weasel words!” Romney’s claim, taken verbatim, is conceivable but irrelevant. He’s not literally claiming that Obamneycare would result in a net loss of 20 million insured. He said that up to 20 million people would lose the insurance they had. For most, it would be readily replaced, possibly by something better, all the in context of the net increase in insured that the diarist highlights. Moreover, a portion of the up-to-20 million (the absolute worst case of several hypothetical scenarios reviewed by the CBO) would be people who ditched their employers’ policies deliberately in favor of alternatives.
Actually, the words Romney says immediately after the quoted phrase come much closer to straight-up lying, per PolitiFact.
But I can’t go on. I’ve just used PolitiFact to clarify a pro-Obamneycare argument, which makes me feel filthy filthy filthy, and I must go take a shower.
Lee, oh Lee, where are thou? Not here to defend this absurd pro-Obama post?
Maybe you’re this Lee A. Saunders?:
Ah, yes, another person high up in the hierarchy of the labor movement which has consistently sold out labor to support the D branch of the 1% Uniparty?
Rahm, is that you?
Or is it Cass?
Or maybe you’re just an intern for Lee?