The nightmare for far too many is Cyborgs. The public fears HAL, the 2001 Space Odyssey computer that killed astronauts rather than forfeit its objective.
So terrified of the sentient machine, citizens overlook the allegory. The soft-spoken, reasonable-sounding HAL behaves exactly like a greed-driven, multi-national corporation. The corporate mission is profit. With 29 workers massacred in a Massey mine explosion and 11 slain in the BP oil rig explosion in just one month last year, greedy corporations have shown they’re willing to kill rather than forfeit their profit objective.
In America, the UK and Europe, the entities that should be feared — greedy corporations — are pulling politicians’ strings. Reckless speculation by multi-national financial corporations took down the world economy, creating the worst recession since the Great Depression. Governments – in the UK, Europe and America – used worker tax dollars to bail out the banks. Now those big banks are granting outsized bonuses and pay packages to their executives while demanding that governments balance recession-ruined budgets with cuts to social services, education, pay and pensions for government workers and worker’s rights to collectively bargaining for better lives.
Workers, students and pensioners in the UK and Europe have protested these measures for a year, from general strikes in Greece to national strikes in France. In the U.K. students, in the largest numbers since the 1960s, protested education fee increases. Last weekend, the U.K.’s Trades Union Congress (TUC) organized the March for the Alternative in which a quarter million demonstrators walked for five hours in London to protest austerity imposed on workers while corporations get breaks.
The diamond-crusted rich on both sides of the Atlantic have determined that workers and the vulnerable will pay the consequences of the bankster-caused recession. And they’re exploiting the financial crisis to strip workers of collective bargaining rights, preventing them from ever regaining what they’ve lost.
That is what’s going on in Wisconsin — and in a half dozen other American states where right-wing legislatures and governors are passing or pressing for legislation decimating workers’ rights to collectively bargain, even after workers accepted pay cuts to help balance budgets.
The disingenuousness of these right-wing governors in blaming public employees is clear. First of all, many of the state leaders granted huge tax breaks to corporations, lowering the states’ anticipated revenues, then demanded state workers bear the brunt of filling budget deficits.
Second, many of these governors didn’t stop at demanding public workers accept pay cuts. They also insisted on terminating workers’ rights to bargain for better pay, benefits and working conditions in the future. In addition, these right-wingers are meddling in the relationship between private sector unions and corporations. They want to forbid private employers from subtracting union dues from paychecks and remitting the money to the union. And they want to pass legislation intended to bankrupt unions and to prevent them from supporting progressive candidates who would treat workers fairly and protect their rights.
This is how it played out in Wisconsin: The governor, right-winger Scott Walker, gave corporations more than $100 million in tax cuts then decreed that public workers, such as teachers, nurses and librarians, take wage and benefit concessions. And Walker threatened to send out the National Guard, a state-run militia despite the name, to quell protests. This raised the specter of the May 4, 1970 massacre at Kent State when Ohio National Guardsmen called out by the governor gunned down unarmed students protesting the Vietnam War.
Contrary to Walker’s expectations, his threat energized opposition. Repeatedly, tens of thousands of workers, students, retirees, environmentalists, religious leaders and children poured into the streets and occupied the state capitol building in Madison, Wisconsin to protest the right-wingers’ plan.
Walker’s proposal passed in the state Assembly and needed a vote in the state Senate before it could get to his desk for final signature. To prevent a quorum needed to vote on the measure, all 14 Democratic senators left the state. They became known as the “Fab 14” as they remained holed up in hotels in Illinois for weeks, trying to negotiate a less draconian measure with the governor.
Although public opinion polls showed 60 percent of Wisconsin citizens opposed cutting collective bargaining rights, although workers already had accepted the pay reductions Gov. Walker had contended were vital to balance the budget, although protestors occupied the capitol building with a sit-in and sleep-in for weeks, the right wingers devised a scheme, in a secret meeting behind doors locked to the public, to vote without a quorum to deny government workers their collective bargaining rights.
In the midst of the dispute, Gov. Walker revealed his puppet masters – the Koch brothers, owners of the Georgia-Pacific paper company, with plants in the United States and the U.K. While contending he had no time to talk to progressive leaders or union officials about his union-busting legislation, Gov. Walker jumped on the phone for 20 minutes when told the caller was billionaire David Koch. The billionaire was Walker’s second largest campaign contributor; he provided $1 million to a fund to attack Walker’s opponent, and he bankrolls the right-wing’s right-wing, the Tea Party.
Events in some other countries show it doesn’t have to be this way. Brazil just passed a law giving unions a director’s seat on each board of a state-owned company. And in Australia, progressive labor legislation has enabled unions to increase membership by 20 percent in the past two years.
There are some signs of success in U.S. workers’ struggle to stop the corporate-backed right-wing campaigns. A Wisconsin judge has halted implementation of the union-busting measure because the way conservatives passed it appears illegal. And progressives are working to recall – or remove from office – eight right-wing Wisconsin senators who voted against worker rights. They’ve pledged to mount a recall campaign against Gov. Walker as soon as it’s legally possible.
In addition, labor activists and their supports have derailed proposed anti-union legislation in Indiana and Missouri.
That’s an indication of what coordinated coalitions of citizen protesters can do. That’s an indication that organized workers with their allies can take on global capital and win.
The difference between HAL and corporations is that HAL is fictional while greedy multi-national corporations are real threats. In the end, a human defeated HAL. In democracies, workers united with their allies can take on corporations and win as well.




15 Comments

No, Leo, the real threat isn’t corporations — it’s faux unions and their faux leaders like you who talk a good game but are missing in action when it counts. As long as union leaders like you continue to back the hard right-wing policies of Barack The Liar Obama and his sellout cronies in the pretend-Democratic Party there is no hope for real reform or real gains by private sector workers.
You don’t care about workers. The only reason you’re upset about the attack on public employee unions is that if those unions are busted then the entire labor movement will lose what little power and position it is still accorded. And you’ll stop getting invited to those cocktail weenie affairs in the District of Corruption.
Hey Beach Populist, got back to sunning yourself at the seashore. You don’t know what you are talking about.
Beach’s hostility aside, I would like to know what your thoughts are on Obama’s refusal to live up to his campaign promise to get out and join picketing workers on strike. Because at a time when Obama and the Democrats should be pushing for and passing legislation that would protect workers’ rights, they’ve instead joined the Republicans in pushing for harsh austerity measures and cutting what remains of the social safety net.
Same here. Please address what Michael asked.
It is perplexing to people like me who have always supported the unions, exactly why Union leaders do still support this banker loving , decidedly non union supporting President..?
Can you speak about this?
In the movie, Hal went nuts, he had all the earmarks of a control freak, perfect strange… androgynous modulated voice, total creep. I don’t know who they modeled that character after.
Today you make a phone call to just about any office anywhere, including unions, you get automation, so it is here, and what manufacturing that is left is robot. Even little jobs answering the phone is gone, the companies hide and avoid a lot of exposure, the costs were not the reason. The will play phone tag while you hold that bag, it’s been a huge decline in the quality of life, done in that area alone. Not everybody sees the computor as a good offset to human accountability. Humans better wonder where the future is going, cause a lot of em aren’t needed and that doesn’t play out well projection wise.
I think unions need to branch out to take on things on the periphery of work, like… survival in the post industrial era. Well they done that forever true, but the sad outlook for jobs today, not everybody can have one, and while righty types are happily disparaging all things in the social safety net, or “Entitlement” designation, (as you payed for it you’re entitled to get it… ) one thing that needs more promotion is early retirement, it should be seen as a must to free up jobs for younger workers.
PS: Leo you did a good job on “the week” last week, I was hoping some of the other panel members would shut up and let you talk, what’s the matter with em they must a got a bonus offer if they tout neocon points.
Anybody who has been in the labor movement has seen it a few times… you get some “glad hand”piecard” who seems like he would be a good egg, and turns out to go company all the way. Unions have had experience at the ground on democracy issues, and human frailties and stuff, I can’t imagine how you expect a chameleon to “change” his ( leopard spots… this late in the game. He didn’t even go buy a pair a shoes, did he? (to walk the line…with em… )?
Thanks Leo,
of course unions need to be supported. I think that a lot of us just wish that our unions were not so timid.
Unions need to start raising less corn and more hell w/regard to our corporate political system. That would include both political parties and the man in the White House.
Ditto x 2!!
Anybody else notice that once Leo was confronted by Michael’s question, he gave no response?
Just proves what I said in my comment @1.
~~~Edited by Moderator. Disagree without insulting~~~ — Unionist In Name Only.
Leo, oh Leo. where art thou?
Insulting? Doesn’t Gerard insult us when he comes in here with his PR-spin crap and then ducks hard questions like the one Michael asked?
As a private sector union member, former member of two other unions, and progeny of a hard-core union family I contend that Leo is a disgrace to the traditional union movement in this country.
That cyborg above looks like a Wall Street CEO.
I would also like to know your thoughts on why Obama is not protesting with striking workers.
Or maybe a union leader?