The President has been hiding behind bipartisanship, Max Baucus, Harry Reid, Rahm Emanuel, and various MSM types, whose framing of the health insurance reform issues has constantly emphasized all of the obstacles making it unlikely that a robust public option would ever make it through the Congress. During the campaign the President told us all that he favored a robust public option. And since his inauguration, he has told us, from time-to-time, that his preference is for a reform bill with a public option, and on various occasions his statements in favor of a public option have been stronger than that. On the other hand, the Administration hasn’t introduced a reform bill of its own. It also hasn’t said which of the bills “on the table” in Congress are favored by the President. During the Senate Finance Committee amendment process, the Administration apparently did nothing to support Senators Rockefeller and Schumer in their attempts to include a public option in the bill. An Administration that favored a public option would have called various Senators and called in favors to get that Amendment passed. But this Administration went AWOL on its previous supporters.
The result is a situation in which the various interests in the House and the Senate remain divided over the key features of reform legislation. The President can now decide where he wants to throw his weight. If he really wants a bill with a public option, he can tell Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid that, in no uncertain terms. He can give a speech about it. He can phone various blue dogs and conservadems and let them know that he wants their vote for such a bill. He can tell Pelosi and Reed that he supports Congress using the reconciliation process to pass health insurance reform if the Democrats can’t get cloture. And finally, he can threaten to veto any health insurance reform bill that doesn’t include a public option open to all Americans. If he does these things, a bill with a PO cannot fail to pass, because there certainly will be 50 votes for it, and Joe Biden will do the President’s bidding in breaking the tie.
In short, over the next few weeks we will know for sure whether the President really wants the public option or not. If he doesn’t fight for it, we’ll know he doesn’t really want it. And we’ll also know, since he has the votes to get it under reconciliation, that he bears the responsibility for the failure of the kind of reform bill he promised in his campaign. In other words, if we don’t get that public option we’ll know that, flat out, he broke a campaign promise to those of us who believed in the audacity of hope. Mr. President, one of the bills you promised to pay in return for people supporting you during your campaign is now due. Pay It!
(Also posted at the Alllifeisproblemsolving blog where there may be more comments)



17 Comments




Yes, this is really his last chance to change his mind and start doing what he was elected to do.
(But wait! According to what I read elsewhere, we’ve got it all wrong. Obama never said he was a progressive or promised any such thing. We only read that into him, don’t you know, and it’s our own fault…..
That seems to be the new party line taking over from the master-plan, “11-dimensional chess”, now that it’s patently absurd to argue that any longer.)
11 dimentional chess was absurd to argue in the beginning.
Mandating purchase if crappy plans from the insurance cartel seems to be one of the “key features” that is in all the bills . . . I wonder why that is?
. . . maybe because the fix was in from the beginning!
the bill he is paying is to his corporate paymasters – they call the shots. The campaign rhetoric was all hot air, except for his pledge to ‘focus’ more HE on the people of Afghanistan.
Well presented, lets. President “Lucy and the Football” Obama. or “Waiting for Godot” Obama … the one we thought we were electing.
Yes, we will know, though a few weeks might be optimistic. I’d expect this question will be up in the air until the very end, so we’re talking Thanksgiving at the earliest, Christmas at the latest.
And even if “we” got what >we’ve” worked for in the possible/probable outcomes, we’re still sunk, according to Michael Moore in “Why the current bills don’t solve our health care crisis.” See http://wws.huffingpost.com/mic…..the…
He makes 13 very important points that I don’t see being addressed:
No cost controls on insurance companies
Insurance companies will continue to be able to cherry pick
No restrictions on denials of care they don’t want to pay
No challenge of insurance companies monopolies
Massive government bailout of the insurance companies via individual
mandate, public subsidies to purchase policies, no regulation of what insurance companies can charge, no restrictions on ability to decide what claims to pay
No control of drug prices
No single standard of care/ care will still be defined by ability to pay
Tax on comprehensive plans resulting in employers reducing benefits
Still no guarantee of universal coverage
No definition of covered benefits
No protection for public safety net further jeopardizing public hospitals and clinics as dumping ground of those the private system doesn’t want
Long delays in implementation; 2013 for some starts
Nothing changes in basic structure of the system.
“the bill he is paying is to his corporate paymasters – they call the shots. The campaign rhetoric was all hot air”
I’m thoroughly disgusted.
Thanks, Russ. That view really makes me laugh. Obama gave a pretty good imitation of being a progressive until he got in. A few years ago he even advocated for single-payer.
Yeah, lib. We know that he’s the one with the football; don’t we?
Maybe it was in from the beginning. But one thing puzzles me. During the last election he raised even more from small contributors than from the corporates. So why would he jeopardize that the next time around?
Hi Jason, the final result will be much later; but we’ll be able to see in the next few weeks whether he’s fighting or not, and how he’s setting the table for the final battle. We’ll be able to see whether he intends to take a dive or not.
Me too.
It sure was. I meant too absurd for even them to keep arguing it.
The other day I did come across a derivative version: that Michael Moore doesn’t really romanticize Obama like that, but has a Master Plan to criticize him at just the right moment.
What’s the story with Michael Moore’s agent is Rahm’s brother. Ya don’t think a little social cronyism may exist there?
I’m not sure the moment we’ll know is coming yet. I think he’ll ride the fence until the very very end. But we shall see…
If he keeps riding the fence then progressives need to get off it. That is, they need to state increasingly clearly, that if there isn’t a PO, and a better one than is in any bill right now, then there will be no health insurance reform bill this year.
I didn’t know about that. Doesn’t surprise me, though.
Seriously, if you wanted to lay out one big web, showing everyone’s interconnections (like the smaller ones we sometimes see in exposes), I wonder how big it would end up being.
Probably not that big at all.
They’re all part of the little community Barack is trying to facilitate.-:)