Bernie Sanders’ appearance on The Ed Show, was a sad one for me to see, because he tried to explain his joining the Democrats in voting for cloture on the Senate’s health care reform bill in two ways. First, of course, he waxes enthusiastic about the tremendous good that the measly $10 billion (about 0.1 of one percent of total expenditures under the bill) he secured for funding community health centers would do for the uninsured, clearly implying that it would have a substantial effect on the 45,000 annual fatalities we now see. But second, then he moves right to the false Democratic Party talking points we’ve been seeing from so many Party functionaries this week, and even much earlier in relation to supporting the stronger, but still pathetic House bill.
Bernie claims that the alternative to voting for the Senate’s bill, is to defeat health care reform and wait for five or ten years for another chance at reform while 45,000 annual deaths occur due to lack of insurance. And he also claims that even though he agrees with people who think this bill is a terrible one, that we can go back "the day after" we pass it and fight to improve it. I hesitate to say that Bernie is being dishonest, because I have never known him to be dishonest before. But, I’m afraid I’m in the usual position of those observing politicians of either questioning their honesty, or their intelligence.
Are we really to think that Bernie doesn’t know that community health centers can’t make a major difference in the fatalities, bankruptcies, and foreclosures due to lack of health insurance? Does he really think that these can reduce the expected fatalities, bankruptcies, and foreclosures by even 10%? If he did, why hasn’t he brought forth a health care reform proposal to find 10 times the number of community health care centers for $10 billion annually, since, very clearly, if he believes this, such a program would completely solve these three problems at a cost of only $10 Billion annually, and only $100 Billion over 10 years, without any need for mandates and subsidies for bailing out insurance companies?
Are we also to think that he believes that if he had refused to vote for cloture, the Administration would have walked away from health care reform because it could not get 60 votes, and not taken it up again until well into its next term, or perhaps never? Can the Administration afford to do that, or given the likely press narrative of “Obama fail” isn’t that an unacceptable result, leaving them no choice but to take it up again immediately? Why wouldn’t the Administration and Harry Reid, in that case turn toward reconciliation to pass a bill? And why wouldn’t Bernie Sanders have had a much better chance of helping to get a better bill than the current one under reconciliation? I guess the answers to these questions are just mysteries that we will never get Bernie to enlighten us about.
In addition, are we really to believe Bernie when he says that when the bill passes, the very day after ‘we” can go back and try to make it a better bill? Don’t we all know that if Obama gets a bill labeled health care reform, he will say that it is a great victory and that we now need to move on to other things and wait and see about further reform until we’ve given this “reform” a chance to work? In other words, didn’t Bernie really know that if he gave Obama and Reid, a health care reform bill, their need for further health care reform legislation, and desire to push for it would be gone either for years, or at least until the polls showed that the public thought that what they passed was going to be a miserable failure?
In short, it’s very difficult for me to accept that Bernie is so lacking in intelligence that he doesn’t understand any of the above. So, regretfully, and sadly, I have to conclude that he, like the Senators who officially belong to the Democratic Party, is knowingly giving us a cock and bull story to prevent us from drawing the conclusion that he purely and simply caved to the pressure from his colleagues, Harry Reid, and the President.
Is this Senate so bereft of character, that not a single Senator will stand up for the American people against the corporate juggernaut? Is their not a single Senator who will tell us the truth and nothing but the truth? And are we such a broken people that we won’t rise up and cast out every incumbent in either Party who casts their lot with the corporatists? Are we so far gone that we cannot even slow this march toward plutocracy?
(Also posted at the Alllifeisproblemsolving blogfiredoglake.com and Correntewire.com where there may be more comments)



25 Comments




You and Paula and her “Timely Quotes from an Intervention” (her diary is right above yours) are giving us the info we need to carry on. The truth shall set you free!
We are free to hold these corporate shills accountable. We have to do it. We owe them NOTHING!
Of course, it’s just the opposite. They’re taking our country and turning it over to the corporations who are killing it. We people need those resources.
How about these last few lines from today’s front page NYTimes article on scumbag slumlords:
Sanders has a shot at finding his courage and redeeming himself. He should make it clear that the bill he voted for wasn’t what he expects to be in front of him for for a final vote.
I realize how naive that may sound; but the only chance for anything good to come out of this mess will be for some Senator to actually be honest and vote their Conscience and not their fears.
Beautifully written diary, Letsgetitdone. Gut wrenching to read but so eloquent, especially this:
I too have been a big fan of Bernie’s and also of Sen. Russ Feingold. It really is painful to watch them act out their parts in this tragedy.
I understand and to some extent sympathize with his rationale. What I don’t understand, however, is why he caved now rather than dragging things out. He had leverage and gave it up when he didn’t have to.
Obama and friends keep telling us that the public option was insignificant and wouldn’t have made much difference. Wall Street clearly knows something that Obama and friends don’t, because there was a huge jump in prices of health insurers’ stocks once the public option went down.
Bernie is just another gutless pimp. Like Feingold, Sherrod Brown, Wyden, Weiner, et al, they talk a good game, esp, when it gets them camera face time. But they have no guts and no principles. They don’t actually believe in anything, except manipulating ways to get themselves re-elected, no matter how old and decrepit they are. (See Byrd, Robert.) They won’t go the reconciliation route because many of them don’t want to offend the health/pharma industry. They are simply hiding behind Nelson, Lincoln, Lieberman, etc., who make convenient shields. If a real reform bill, with a real public option, Medicare buy-in, cost controls, etc., ever came up via reconciliation these gutless types would have to cast a clear vote, either for the public or for their real constituents, the fat-cat special interest donors.
They don’t even have enough guts to put a scare into Team Obama. I understand the half-a-loaf argument, and it has some validity. But why cave so early in the bargaining?
Half a loaf? Quarter-loaf? Shit this isn’t even a spoonful of stale crumbs.
Bernie just looked old and in pain. And guilty.
Stock prices are not a rational indicator of anything predictive; other than how good people think they are at predicting the future.
If we had the Senate Bill + the House Public Option, this would still be a travesty, because the House Public Option is simply too weak to be worth anything.
Rouse me when there’s actually a half-loaf on the table. As it stands they’re going to forcibly take bread away from me, not just give me too little.
I have never understood whatever “logic” may lie behind this argument.
Is there some “rule” we don’t know about that says we have to wait five or ten years to try to get reform? [Answer: NO]
Finally the attention of the American public is focused on reform of the health care system. Now might be an EXCELLENT time to shitcan the lousy Senate bill in particular and start over.
The issues have been brought to the fore. If we had a LEADER who was willing to outline some basic requirements for any reform bill, we could now get somewhere.
The “we’ve gotta do it NOW” argument comes from the same larder as the rest of the crap Obama’s been shoveling, and is motivated only by his desire to get “a bill, any bill.”
It’s disturbing that so many “Democrats” are so blind, and none will stand up and say “stop.” The WH might hate whoever did that, but the public would love them.
I don’t understand that logic either. It fundamentally relies on the idea that pressures for reform (sky-rocketing costs and faux-insurance) are essentially static; they are not.
Passing “reform” that doesn’t do anything useful, what little of it there is, until 2013/2014 is a de facto license to ignore reform through the entirety of that gap; at the very least.
It was very painful to watch Sanders. As I watched, I kept thinking, “What do they have on him.” Sad, very sad…
Hi lindaj, thanks for your comment and the reference to PaulaT. Her post is a great one.
Hope you’re right.
Thanks fflambeau. It continues to be painful.
Isn’t that the puzzling thing? Perhaps it’s that they knew what he couldn’t refuse, namely his precious community health centers. I think that Bernie may think that they are the real path to single-payer, if only he can demonstrate that they work. Remember that they’re free, and implemented quickly. So maybe he thinks he can come back in two years and get 10 Billion per year for them, and then with more success that get most basic health care funneled through them.
I think the final PO was insignificant. the reason why Wall Street jumped when it was taken out is that Wall Street is a mob, and the mob perceived the removal of the PO as a “sign” or symbol of victory. So, they reacted to the symbol, not the reality. Sctually they won way back in June when the House came out with bills with POs that would cover only 10 to 12 million people, and which were very unlikely to have had much impact on insurance prices.
Bernie caved, but I still don’t think he’s a gutless pimp. He stuck with his opposition much longer than any of the other progressives. That said, he did cave, when he might have forced reconciliation.
He did look guilty. What did they threaten him with?
But that won’t start until 2014.
Also, if it’s a Senator, and they try to punish she or he, that person can come back at them with threats to place holds on all their appointments, bringing filibusters against all their legislation, and basically tying up all their Senate business. They can’t afford to punish anyone.
It is, and that is a very high price to pay for this shit-eating bill.
I call it kleptocracy and it is not so much a march to but an already there and getting worse situation.
We love to pin our hopes on this politician or that. I have seen posts here positive of Reid, Rockefeller, Brown, Feingold, Sanders, even Olympia Snowe. But let’s face it all these Senators have track records of never having a pair. So it was always unrealistic for anyone to think they would make a stand where it really counted.
Hugh, I’m afraid you’re right. There’s no reason to expect anyone to grow a pair. But one can always ask them too, and one can always hope.