By
Warren Mosler
(With permission of the author)
(Cross-posted from Correntewire.com)
Looking like it was another ‘buy the rumor sell the news’ near term.

Photo: Images of Money / Flickr.
After you do the maths it still doesn’t add up.
It can’t add up.
Ever.
Given today’s institutional structures- pension funds, insurance reserves, etc.- that include massive, tax advantaged, demand leakages where private sector credit expansion is bound to periodically fall short full employment levels,and with the private sector necessarily pro cyclical, counter cyclical fiscal adjustments are, for all practical purposes, entirely in the realm of the issuer of the currency- the ECB, and not the users of the currency- the euro member nations.
In other words, as previously discussed, the maths can’t add up without the ECB, directly or indirectly, writing the check.
And that includes the banking system, which, to serve public purpose, requires credible deposit insurance, again meaning support from the issuer of the currency.
The last few weeks have demonstrated that the ECB does ‘write the check’ for bank liquidity even though it’s not legally required to do that, (and even though some think it’s not acting within legal limits) but it won’t just come out and say it.
And, apart perhaps from the Greek PSI (100 billion euro bond tax), which they still call ‘voluntary’, no government has missed a payment, also with indirect ECB support either through bond buying or via the banking system, but, again, it won’t just come out and say it’s an ongoing policy.
So while the ECB can and has ‘written the check’ as needed, there has been no formal proclamation of any sort that it will continue to do so. Nor does it look like there will be any such over policy announcement for a considerable period of time.
This means any manager of ‘other people’s money’ with any fiduciary responsibility will continue to remain on the sidelines.
And even as markets fluctuate, and then some, underneath it all all payments are met on a timely basis and the banking system continues to function to service deposits and loans.
And budget deficits will continue to be deemed too large, (at least until private sector credit expansion exceeds the ‘savings desires’/demand leakages) ensuring the maths don’t ever add up without the assumption of the ECB writing the check.
One last thing.
Publicly, at least, they all still think the problem in the euro zone is that the public debts/deficits are too high. And to reduce debt the member nations need to cut spending and/or hike taxes, either immediately or down the road.
A good economy with rising debt and ECB support to keep it all going isn’t even a consideration.
They’ve painted themselves into an ideological corner.
And deficit spending, exacerbated by austerity, may nonetheless be high enough for it all to muddle through at current (deplorable) levels of economic performance.
This economic ‘torture chamber’ of mass unemployment can, operationally, persist indefinitely, even as, politically, it’s showing signs of coming apart.
The founders of the euro believed a single currency would work to prevent a third great war.
So they did what it took politically to get the consensus needed to create the euro. Ironically not realizing what they created to promote unity has turned out to be the instrument of social disintegration.



8 Comments

That’s not why they created the Euro comrade. Clever ending, but the poetry is getting in the way of truth (hmm, I wonder why?)
Don’t you realize capitalists don’t believe in capitalism anymore? And Keynesianism … chuck it. We’re still living through the consequences of a legendary privatized Keynesian bubble. It was a fraud from Volcker’s first time.
No wonder Reggie said greed is good. You have to be greedy to see any good in this fucking monstrosity.
Do you happen to be a broker, comrade?
In retrospect, the euro was a rightwing/neoliberal project. It was just sold as a feel good unity thing.
“They’ve painted themselves into an ideological corner.” ; sure have and they’re turned around, facing the corner.
How do you know Ludwig? Got any data refuting the idea that the Eurozone was originally popular because people were interested preventing another War?
Of course, I do. I don’t know if they ever believed in it. But what does that have to do with post?
Again, what does that have to do with the Post? Neither Warren nor I are Keynesians? Don’t you realize MMTers aren’t Keyensians?
And no, I’m not broker. Warren is a broker-dealer, but what does that have to with the price of eggs? Is anything he said, wrong?
Athena1, I’m not saying that’s not true. It certainly is a neo-liberal project now; but how do you know it was formulated with that kind of motive?
Good metaphor. They’re shrinking themselves into a singularity and will then become a Nova that may spread to the rest of the world.
In a really basic way, it was designed by neoliberal economists based on neoliberal NATO/IMF/infinite growth/etc ideas.
Also, the fact that there was no back up plan for major recessions that would preserve saftey nets is a bad sign.
And I suspect there’s some interesting reason the socialist Scandinavians never joined, although I haven’t looked it up yet.
Also, either Den Baker or Michael Hudson have written about how it was neoliberal from the outset. I can try and look up the article again if you want. Pretty sure it was at the guardian.
From The Guardian.
Unorthodox practices ?? Try out right theft, fraud, swindle….