Not many links and no radiation in this post. Instead, I want to test a frame with my friends at FDL.
In 2008, President Obama ran on the Hope and Change platform, not as a liberal. It was clear enough then that he was a centrist, establishment candidate. He allowed people to see liberal “shadows” of his positions, but I do not recall ever thinking that he was advocating liberal ideas. That was an honest campaign. Voting for an African-American with the last name of “Obama” was liberating; voting for a intelligent, articulate and well-educated professional was a relief; and voting against the ditto-heads on the right was a necessity, but I do not recall ever thinking that I was voting for a liberal candidate. I voted against John McCain and You-Know-Who.
Three years later, Obama has governed more or less as Joe Lieberman would have done, even though it was already crystal clear that the Democratic Party would reject that kind of behavior. If voters want Republicans, they will vote for Republicans. The base of the party rejected Lieberman and Democrats voted against him in his independent Senate run; Short-Ride will never again hold elected office. This is the playbook that Barack Obama has been working from. He won the election, so that was his choice to make.
What I object to, and what I want to name and frame, is his current effort to pretend to be a liberal. This half-assed “jobs” bill is a joke, but just enough of a non-joke to make it hard for us on the Left to call him out. As far as I am concerned, it is too little, too late. We know who he is, what he has done, and what he is doing. He is polisquatting.
He has repeatedly, clearly and forcefully demonstrated his disdain for the “Professional Left”, yet now that the debt ceiling disaster that he engineered and encouraged in the ridiculous hope of obtaining his Grand Bargain of austerity, cuts for Medicare and Social Security, massive giveaways to the rich, and free money for financial elites (aka “miserable examples of humanity”) as far into the future as the eye can see (in the form of high real interest rates that go with nominal deflation); now that that total failure of a gameplan has made it clear to the country that his preferred bargaining technique of prepitulation is not even an attempt to protect the weakest Americans; now that his poll numbers are finally and probably irreversibly declining because it is finally clear to even the politically disengaged that he stands for nothing besides dropping freedom bombs on brown people and seeking harmony and Kumbaya singalongs with the very people who will do anything to America and Americans to emasculate him, to destroy the Left, and to impoverish their own parents as they try to crush all that is recognizably civilized in this country; NOW, when there is no chance of reducing unemployment before the next election, and after the tax cuts for the richest Americans are in the bank for another two years, NOW we are supposed to believe that he is actually anything other than Joe Lieberman’s long-lost brother.
Give us some credit, Mr. President. Run for reelection on who you are, and on the policies you really believe in. Win or lose next fall (and I suspect you will win) you are destroying what the Left stands for by squatting where Ted Kennedy proudly stood. Don’t pretend to care about the weak and the unfortunate while Tim Geithner is the Secretary of the Treasury. It is clear that you stand for corporate strength and bankster justice. Run on your record. I dare you.



19 Comments

Fukushima update of note: TEPCO says their liability for the Fukushima accidents, currently estimated to be around $60 billion, is so big that they need to restart their other nuclear power stations (whatever the locals might think).
Nobody could have predicted that one.
Gag.
I agree with your post. But then, I practically live here in the FDL ether waves.
All the ordinary Democrats I speak with who get their info from the MSM say one or both of two things: Look what he inherited when he came &/or The Republicans block everything he tries to do. It’s depressing to hear that over and over.
Tomorrow I go to the State Dept hearing in Austin on the Keystone XL pipeline. The hearing in Port Arthur, Texas, where the refineries are, was mostly for the pipeline because of the jobs. Those two will be the only hearings in Texas. Austin, being Austin, I expect will be hugely against. I’ll be lending my voice to that contingent.
Of course, if Obama was even remotely interested in the environment and what pollution does to the land and the people, it would already be squashed.
Austin! I envy you. Good luck with the hearing.
Right. Those things can be true AND he can be Joe Lieberman’s twin brother, too. I find myself in the camp that hopes the Republicans lose the presidential election, but I really, really don’t want Obama to pretend to be a liberal in this race.
For lack of a better analogy, it would be a bit like performing in blackface. Not a cool thing to do.
Obama is well to the right of Nixon. He will get the moderate Republican vote and the Evangelicals will have to decide between a Mormon and staying home. Obama will win and he doesn’t have to kill good governance in the process.
After Obama’s disgraceful hectoring of the CBC, someone ought to come up with a graphic of Obama in blackface. That isn’t exactly what I’m talking about in the post, but the point is in the same direction. He should not pretend to be more or less than he is, and what he values is rich people, not black people.
In 2008, he was content to be vague. In 2012, he should stand up for what he believes in and run on that, instead of bigfooting the left wing of the country.
Ok, I’m rambling…
You make an excellent point, but I do not believe he values honesty. Instead, he blends saying what he believes people want to hear and he manipulates through others with backdoor power games involving carrots and sticks, smoke and mirrors.
Someone here called him the Trojan Mouse and I think that is a pretty accurate characterization.
Since I do not listen to known liars or vote for war criminals, I will not be listening to what he has to say and I definitely will not be voting for him.
I want him to resign, effective immediately, as his preference for austerity, free trade agreements, and eliminating the safety net constitutes a clear and present danger to the health, safety, and welfare of 99% of the American people.
Recommended, btw.
The protest is going to start at 10:30 am with an Interfaith Prayer Vigil and Press Conference. Then the hearing from noon to 8 pm. At 6pm there’ll be a rally with Jim Hightower and some lovable state level politicians.
For any of you Texans who don’t already know about it, it’s at the LBJ School at the University of Texas.
What Mason said. Bush I could watch but not listen to. I can neither watch nor listen to Obama. I won’t work for his reelection and I won’t vote for him. And I sure ain’t voting for Perry either.
No, he won’t be honest and he also won’t resign. Trust me, I’d love to be wrong on either or both counts.
recommended and tweeted lobster
Excellent, while it is true that Obama did not pose as an outright liberal, he did skirt the edges of suggestion.
Throughout his campaign he was never totally upfront about being a corporate centrist. He always couched who he really is in terms of practicality. He stood for doing what he call “smart” actions.
And you are right. Now that he is back on the campaign trail again he is bringing out the same BS only even stronger.
Our only hope for the Democratic Party is that people like Obama, the Clintons, Claire McCaskill, John Kerry etc will get the hell out and join the Republican Party. I read yesterday that Roger Ailes said that he would like for Bill and HIllary to be commentator on Fox News. [I thought at the time: "if you offer them enough money they will"]
Good for you. Let us know how the hearing comes out. Write it up.
lobster — politicians never run on their actual records. The whole point is to run on fears of the other guy or hopes you’re someone you’re not. But running on your record? That would require they actually had a record worth running on. Who does, in these days?
Hey Lobster!
I am too disgusted with legacy party politics to contribute to this thread; however I thought about you last week when I first ran into this preview partial translation of a newly released book on the Fukishima cover-up by Takashi Hirose, if you haven’t yet run into this let me drop a link on ya:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2011/03/22/what-they-re-covering-up-at-fukushima/
And no hope for us until we get over that nasty habit of giving a damn what happens to the Democratic Party. Until and unless we get over that particular addiction, we’ll go down with the Democrats. Strange self-destructive behavior.
This is a HUGE international psychodrama! The denial is massive … even more than the denial over toxic dust at Ground Zero, and I haven’t gotten over the shock of that yet. Probably all akin to the denial over Monsanto’s “adventures in biology” that you have been reporting on, Robert.
Ran into someone the other day who essentially told me incredible lies with the covering that “it’s the truth because I know it’s the truth because I have been told it’s the truth over and over and over” … by the people who must keep telling the lies to cover up their past lies even though they have been shown to be liars.
Hmmmmmm. Sounds like politics, doesn’t it.
Oh, yeah, and when I didn’t believe the lies … I was told this truth came through secret channels from secret TRUSTED sources …. riiiiiiight.
Or go bankrupt.
TEPCO has not stated the complete set of choices.