Yesterday was a big day for independent media. We saw the release of gun camera footage, which showed how US troops killed an Iraqi journalist after mistaking a camera for an assault weapon.
Today was a big day for the mainstream media, as the US Court of appeals dissolved some FCC internet regulations protecting peer to peer networking.
http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/1U2jZF/www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2010/04/fcc_net_neutrality_ruling.html?ft=1&f=103943429/r:t
and
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/06/net-neutrality-us-court-r_n_526972.html
Is it just a coincidence that yesterday’s leak on P2P preceded today’s legal loss for P2P users? Of course not.
Let’s look at the legal decision.
The particular problem for Comcast is that Bittorrent users were using the network. That is, they were filling up the tubes with stuff that made comcast no money at all. Comcast then shut off the downloads (secretly, they wouldn’t admit to it) Later on, users petitioned the FCC to stop Comcast from shutting down peer to peer networking, in particular, bittorrent downloads. Today’s Court ruling by the US court of appeals says that the FCC has no authority to regulate Comcast in these instances. A big loss for anyone who wants to download peer to peer. Like Wikileaks users.
After the ruling, we can expect Comcast to slow or shut off bittorrent. As of right now, the Collateral Murder site has video hosted by youtube and other video hosts. But if you want the source footage, your only option is bittorrent. Effecively the courts have let Comcast turn the internet into a private lake, where non-profits like wikileaks aren’t allowed.
Read the US Appeals court case:
http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/common/opinions/201004/08-1291-1238302.pdf
Watch the gun camera footage:
http://collateralmurder.com/



5 Comments







http://www.freepress.net/press-release/2010/4/6/court-decision-endangers-fccs-ability-protect-net-neutrality-and-implement-na
press release by freepress.net
I had wondered whether Obama would push for a Net Neutrality law to be passed, and now I realize that he has no reason to do so. His administration will love nothing more than to see a shutdown of the kind of independent reporting that wikileaks is doing. He can allow the telecoms to just railroad the independent journalists out of the discussion, and all his administration has to do is sit and watch (while claiming to be “for” net neutrality, but scared that there are not “enough votes in the senate” to warrant taking a leadership position on it).
In essence, he will use his public option strategy on this one as well, and ultimately make the telecoms very happy to fund his reelection bid, as well as making sure no more embarrassing videos from the war front show up in people’s computers.
We really thought he would be a Progressive President. Gosh were we wrong.
I don’t think you are right about Obama on this matter. He has assigned some people truly committed to net neutrality.
You are conflating whistle blower protections, Freedom of information and transparency with net neutrality.
I don’t trust anything Obamarahma says anymore. Cong. Wilson was right, he’s friggin liar.
Yeah, hook you bittorrent wagon to Wikileaks. That’s the ticket. Nice try.