In the FDL post "It’s Muh Daddy’s Fault" George Bush seems to be blaming his father and other politicians for the current economic problems.

I don’t know that Dubya is blaming his father. I think he is saying Wall Street more or less forced all kinds of politicians to deregulate and set up the dynamic which led to our recent disaster. He’s saying, “not me” AND “really nobody is to blame”.

But, when he refers to the “haves and have-mores” as his “base”, then I start thinking he means they’re his base, the base, his al qaeda.

Then when Al Qaeda says we’d better do what they want or they’ll kill our economy and stock market…and then the market crashes…and then AQ says they did it, despite the fact we have looked at it and can pinpoint precisely what caused it.

Well, all that makes me think Wall Street IS Al Qaeda and they’ve been blackmailing all politicians for over a decade to do what they want or else they’ll kill the economy. Zawahiri? Who knows, maybe they fund that organization and feed them lines to say.

But, now that the cat is out of the bag and we laugh at Zawahiri because we know it was changes to law instigated by Wall Street lobbyists, then what do we do? Obviously we fix the economy, but how do we provide proper justice to the guilty?

Does this mean we can connect the dots between Wall Street and AQ? At that point would AQ vanish into the mist as though they had never existed? Bin Laden? Gone forever or was he just a hired hand who shaved his beard and melted back into the crowd of his home country?

I can’t help but think the recent attack in Mumbai is nothing more than a fancy distraction. Find the link between that and Wall Street, not Lashkar-e-taiba, and the whole charade vanishes. Pull back the curtain on those little men!