Ami Bera connects with people. He is smart, personable, has local support and recognition in Congressional District Three of California. He has made Dan Lungren’s ethical lapses and lack of response to the needs of his constituents the center piece of his campaign. It is not hard to tar Lungren with the brush of incompetence and dishonesty. All one has to do is state the facts.
Bera hits Lungren for "double dipping" in taxpayer money by accepting both a Congressional salary and a pension from the state. He also knocks Lungren for accepting a 25 percent pay raise just before leaving the attorney general’s office, which increased his annual pension.
Bera also frequently points out how Lungren has ignored the needs constituents of the 3rd Congressional District. Even though California has the third highest unemployment rating in the country, and the Sacramento area was one of the hardest hit regions during the housing crash and jobless recovery, Lungren voted against extending unemployment insurance, against raising the minimum wage, and against measures to increase hiring of teachers, firefighters and policemen. . . .
Lungren also has been a big supporter of the oil industry. He is in favor of offshore drilling in California. Lungren has voted for $2.6 billion in tax breaks for the oil industry, for more offshore drilling and for tax loopholes for the industry.
The Bera Campaign has put together a website dedicated to the vacations and contributions given to Dan Lungren by lobbyists.
Bera has pledged not to privatize or cut social security. He knows that the health care reform act needs to be strengthened and changed. He believes that Congress should not give themselves pay raises until the deficit is under control. He supports gay marriage and is pro-choice. He supports tax cuts for the middle class but not for the wealthy. He believes that children should not be taught to "the test" but should be taught critical thinking skills. He is an advocate of "pay-go".
Here is the quote from his website concerning Afghanistan:
Afghanistan: Articulate a clear objective to end the mission. In the midst of a recession at home, we need the President to articulate a clear objective for our mission before we commit more resources to this conflict. Our brave service members have done an incredible job under unimaginable conditions. We need to support our troops by defining metrics that lead to finishing the job. In order to ensure that Afghanistan will never again be a safe haven for al Qaeda, we need to be both smart and tough in combating this threat – for instance, intelligence operations may be better suited to combating al Qaeda and the Taliban.
The way to Bera’s run for Congress was paved by Bill Durston. Durston ran against Lungren in ’06 and ’08. Each time Durston came closer to taking out Lungren in a district that has a slight majority of republican voters. Dan Lungren has a bloated ego so I am not sure how seriously he took this challenge. In the 2008 race 44% went to Durston and 49.4% went to Lungren. The Peace and Freedom Party ran a spoiler candidate that guaranteed a Lungren success.
Ami Bera has artfully taken the baton from Bill Durston and is effectively running a campaign that could well send Dan Lungren packing back to Southern California. (Lungren is considered a carpetbagger who moved to District 3 just to run. He is from Long Beach, CA.) He has out raised Lungren in contributions and has as a strong, well thought out, intern driven campaign.
Congressional Quarterly Politics changed its rating of the 3rd Congressional District contest from "leans Republican" to a "tossup" on September 21st, saying "there appears to be little doubt that (incumbent Rep. Dan) Lungren will have to fight to hold his seat."
I am personally very disappointed in the Obama administration and the Democrats. But my distaste for Dan Lungren and the damage he has done to California and to my neighborhood overrides this despair. Ami Bera can take down Lungren and I am not going to let my overt hostility to the Democratic party machine stand in the way of electing a good man who will do a good job.
Ami Bera is an internal medicine doctor who served as Associate Dean of UC Davis School of Medicine and was the former Chief Medical Officer for the County of Sacramento. He is married to Janine Bera and has a twelve year old daughter, Sydra.



13 Comments

now here is a Dem we can all get behind – Lundgren is an insufferable prick (although I probably owe insufferable pricks an apology) and thanks so much for the Bill Durston love
GOTV outnumbering the mouthbreathers in the foothills will be key here
rec.
recommended Senator! Send me an absentee ballot I would rather vote for the Doc Bera than for Ann Eshoo who sold out to big PHARMA!
Well, you are gonna have to move in with us to qualify. Do you have UHaul in the redness of wood?
But we can’t move Teacher Julie’s Music School…. Guess I will have to vote for that creep Anna could never bring myself to vote for a puke!!
Great job Mary…
Excellent diary. I have alway detested Lundgren. Bera should really be good – let’s hope he wins.
Thanks, Mary. Was just recently reading about Bera’s campaign. I don’t live in that district, but I wish Bera all the best. Cannot stand carpetbagger Lungren, either, and would love to see him skeddadle back to Long Beach. Lungren’s a condescending self-entitled jerk, imo.
recommended and tweeted.. thanks mary
Yea Lungren is an arrogant jerk and so is his campaign staff
I forget if it was the last election (2008), or in 2006, but there was a debate (I missed it), where he and his staff were standing outside drinking champagne out of those snooty pretentious long stemmed glasses like they were some kind of royalty
We need people’s, people. Not Corporation’s people, people!
It is called representation of people and being responsive to their real needs. Not marginalization of people for personal gain, Mr Lundgren!
“Afghanistan: Articulate a clear objective to end the mission. In the midst of a recession at home, we need the President to articulate a clear objective for our mission before we commit more resources to this conflict.”
Well done jobs in a jobless recovery not wars. Bonaparte Napoleon bankrupted France with his wars with Russia. Doing the same stupid over and over…
Thanks for the post Senator. Any news from Health Care for All?
Mary McCurnin was not being truthful when she said “In the 2008 race 44% went to Durston and 49.4% went to Lungren. The Peace and Freedom Party ran a spoiler candidate that guaranteed a Lungren success.” What she left out was that the Peace and Freedom Party, Dina Padilla and Bill Durston added together did not have as many votes as Dan Lungren. There was a fourth candidate, Douglas Tuma of the Libertarian Party. His votes would most surely have gone to Lungren had he not been in the race. Lungren and Tuma added together was over 50%. Undemocratic Democrats always say Peace and Freedom Party should not run candidates. Well Mary McCurnin, if the Democratic Party really wanted a situation where parties to their left would not be in a position to throw the election, they should create multi-member districts and use proportional representation. That way if Peace and Freedom Party received 10% of the vote they would receive 10% of the seats in the legislative body, not none. If the Democratic Party or Republican Party received 50% of the votes they would get 50% of the seats, not all. That is a win win situation where majority votes are protected and minority votes are represented.
I agree that proportional representation would probably work better and be more fair. But the fact is we do not have proportional representation and this was a very local race so the real grass roots folks that worked for Dr. Durston didn’t have the power to change the system state wide. They did work very, very hard to try and get Dr.Durston elected. And Dr. Durston’s politics is left of center and are not that different from the Peace and Freedom party. He believes in universal health care, is against wars of aggression, etc. etc. And he was willing to take on Dan Lungren in debates and went to Lungren’s townhall meetings to engage Lungren. Dr. Durston is a man of real integrity. He is one of the most principled men I have ever met. So, why would the Peace and Freedom party help Lungren get elected? Durston was a dream candidate for people who believe in peace and freedom. It is true that the race probably would have gone for Lungren anyway. And Tuma did get over 7000 votes. (I do apologize. I should have mentioned Tuma. I didn’t see him as being as relevent as the Peace and Freedom party. I was wrong about that.)But if the left had joined forces rather than splitting the vote who knows what might have happened. It is a shame, really.