
Romains de la decadence [Romans in the Decadent Times] by Thomas Couture hangs in the D’Orsay. It is an enormous painting, 25 feet wide and 15 feet high, and it is located on the main floor the focus of which is French statues from the second half of the 19th century. These statues set the mood for the Couture. Here are two examples: Woman Stung by a Serpent, by Auguste Clésinger and A Young Tarentine, by Alexandre Schoenewerk. Here is a video of The Young Tarentine, it gives a feel for the work and its location in the Museum.
These three pieces are so over the top, I need to point out that one of my favorite statues is here also, Cornelia, Mother of the Gracchi, so it isn’t all tortured souls.
The painting is set in a courtyard in Rome in the early evening, I’d say, judging by the sky. The Romans are having a party, and things are out of hand. There are lots of nudes and barely clothed people; clothing is strewn all around; and there are drinks and passed-out drunks. Someone knocked over a vase in the center. On the upper right, a naked man offers a drink to a statue, ignored by all but one woman. In the center, there is a woman clothed in white, the only fully clothed woman in the painting. All around the courtyard are statues of the ancient Romans, and classical columns. On the lower right there are two well-dressed and muscular men not participating. On the left, a poorly dressed young man sits looking away. The colors are dark, and the flesh of the debauched is sickly, with black or dark brown undertones. The image above is accurate on that score, the original might be a bit more pale. . . .
The painting couldn’t be more obvious. The Romans have lost the virtues that made them great, pride, austerity, purpose, all exemplified by the statues, with their disapproving glares. The two men on the right are standing in poses often seen in French court paintings, but their clothing is not the luxurious finery of the royalty but that of everyday people. I read this to say that virtue resides in the common people, that the royalty and the rich have no place in the future. Couture was a Jacobin and a Republican, and the painting may be an allegory, where the decadent Romans are the French aristocracy, and the two young men are the New French Citizens. Or not.
I have always loved this painting. The nude with her back to us on the lower left seems to refer to a standard pose of nudes, like this: La Grande Odalisque, by Ingres. The nude in the upper left reminds me of the tortured works of Michaelangelo, like this one, a detail from the Sistine Chapel depicting The Flood.
I love the bombastic morality, the size, and the references. Where would we be without grandiose Art?
[Image: Les Romains de la décadence, c. 1847 by Thomas Couture (source: Wikipedia)]



13 Comments

I look forward to your diaries about paintings every week and really enjoy them. Thank you
25 feet wide? Wow, I can’t imagine planning what went where.
Yeah, at that width and height, the figures here must approach life size. The degree of debauchery must be spectacular simply because of the overwhelming size of the painting — an experience to behold in person, I’m sure.
I thought of Ingres’ reclining nude when I saw the woman at the left, a very archetypal pose.
What’s really unsettling about this work is that no one is actually doing anything. They are frozen in action, but not actually doing much for such a large gathering. Mouths are open, but no one is talking or singing. Wine is passed, but it’s not being drunk. For so much implied action — like the people tugging on each other at the back of the painting — there’s really nothing going on. The entire painting suggests great ennui and listlessness, a surfeit of time and a dearth of energy and action.
[Edit: I should have added what I thought of the first time I clapped eyes on this when massacio and I discussed his plans to focus on this piece.
Wall Street banksters.]
If it’s worth doing, it’s worth overdoing. Big canvas, big decadence, big DEALS!
Put these folks on a corporate yacht, in corporate attire (and in various stages of removing said attire), and the translation would be complete.
Oh Peterr, they don’t wear corporate attire on their yachts.
They wear their Musto wind jackets, Eddie Bauer khakis, Sperry Topsiders and a Plymouth gin martini with a smile.
Peterr…great comment…my impression as well…
Rayne’s comments also…
Thank you massacio, your art choices are always thought provoking!
I’d have thought ‘J Crew’ or ‘Filson’ rather than ‘Eddie Bauer’, but yeah. (Something like these guys sell, anyway. ‘Eddie Bauer’ is way common.)
The yacht set won’t wear J. Crew, although their kids might. Their kids are more likely to wear Lucky brand and scrap with their folks about wearing jeans when khakis are expected.
Thanks. This one stuck in my memory from the first time I saw it many years ago. The entire floor is full of fascinating things, and I hope people click on those statues, they really tell us something about French Salon Art.
That *is* corporate attire — Corporate Casual, to be precise.
Sorry, you’re right, the banksters I rubbed shoulders with always wore this kind of crap — at least 8 to 5, Mon-Fri.
I avoided them on weekends, except if they were friends of the in-laws.
What has not been discussed is the grey-to-flesh colored values in the painting.
All the statues are “saints” values, norms to-be-adhered-to. The flesh colored folks as they move from grey to reality represent alleged “moral” stages to my eye.
Look at the second column from the left; whatever that Emperor is supposed to represent (I’m thinking one of the Gracchi) surely the luminescent woman is supposed to be France: Liberte.
And surely, the head between the feet of the satyr-looking man at about 4:00 in the painting is Jean Le Baptiste.
IMO, this is a wily and consummate portrait of current day affairs, rendered in acceptable visual patois of the day.
Oh, the Salon painters! I just love them. This is a superb painting, and it has such an impressive home. I love to wander this first floor — it makes me believe that I’m a participant at the annual Salon (but with less paintings). I’ve always loved 19th century French painting and sculpture, and it is a pleasure to explore this museum each and every time I visit. In this work, it is the expression on the faces that I find so interesting. MrCE tells me that Louis Phiippe was known as the citizen king, the leader of the July monarchy, until he abdicated in 1848. To me, this reflects the chaos of the political scene. As does Daumier.