Several banks have halted foreclosures in states that require courts to approve foreclosure, like Florida and Illinois. Bankruptcy can be used to stop foreclosures even in states that have non-judicial foreclosure like Tennessee. This chart tells you what kind of foreclosure you have in your state.
The minute you file bankruptcy, the automatic stay goes into effect. It is an injunction that prevents your creditors from taking any action to seize your assets until they get approval from the Bankruptcy Judge. The procedure for getting approval is called obtaining relief from the automatic stay, or stay relief.
This means that a lender cannot foreclose on you, no matter how far along it is in the process, starting at the moment you file, so long as it knows about the bankruptcy. The foreclosure is stopped until the Bankruptcy Court says it can proceed. By the way, the lender may have to start all over again, which means you live in the house free while the matter is pending and even longer.
The first step your lender takes is to file a proof of claim. This is a document filed under penalty of perjury showing the amount it claims you owe. The lender has to file copies of all relevant documents, also under penalty of perjury. The second step is to file a motion for stay relief. Again, this document is filed under penalty of perjury, and the lender has to attach the documents that show that it is entitled to foreclose. There won’t be a foreclosure until you have a chance to examine the documents. . . .
Only the holder of the note has standing to file a motion for stay relief. The original holder is the payee named in the note. The named payee can transfer the note to another person by endorsing it either to a specific person or in blank. Almost every note has been assigned, so the real holder is always someone other than the named payee.
Typically the note is transferred in blank. When it is sold, no one signs it. They just deliver the original to the buyer. When notes are transferred in blank, the person who has possession of the original note is the holder, and only the holder has the right to foreclose. The Bankruptcy Court should require the person seeking relief to produce the original note. A copy should not suffice, especially today, when electronic copies can be found all over the place.
Rarely will the documents show that the party seeking relief from the stay is the holder of your note. The documents usually show that the original lender is the holder. Frequently the corporation that filed the motion can’t find the original note with your actual signature.
Things happen quickly in bankruptcy cases. If the corporation doesn’t have the right documents, it might get one or two short continuances, but then the motion will be denied. You can also raise all the issues Cynthia Kouril has described in her series on foreclosures, which you can read here.
Let’s suppose you get lucky, and the actual holder doesn’t show up. Your next step is to file a motion to determine that the amount owed on your mortgage is $0. This is a motion, not a lawsuit which in bankruptcy is called an adversary proceeding. You are not questioning the validity of the mortgage, only the amount of debt that the mortgage secures. You have to serve a copy of this motion on everyone who might have an interest in the note.
Again, only the holder has standing to appear contest your assertion that the amount secured is $0. If your loan servicer shows up to try to say what the balance is, the Court should force it to show that it represents the actual holder. That isn’t likely, because if it knew who the holder is, they would have proved it on the motion for stay relief. The court orders that the balance on the mortgage is $0. You wait 10 days for the time to appeal to expire. Then you file a certified copy of that order with the register’s office or whatever it’s called in your state. Now you have effectively cleared the mortgage off your chain of title.
Several things might happen. You could convert to Chapter 13, and treat the lender as a creditor with a claim of $0, pursuant to the previous court order. Now you don’t owe a mortgage, so you can pay your other creditors in full and exit bankruptcy. Or the Chapter 7 Trustee might agree to sell you the house for enough to pay your other creditors and the fees and expenses of the bankruptcy. Or your family might step up to offer enough to buy the house at its current fair market value less selling expenses for the Trustee. At the worst, the Trustee will sell the house, and your lender won’t get a penny.
Or maybe the lender will magically find some documents. In that case, the Court may force a favorable outcome, or your lender may try to cut a deal with you, and the Trustee may agree.
And just in case some Chapter 7 Trustees are reading this, I assume I don’t have to explain how easy it is to take advantage of this situation even if the Debtor doesn’t.
[More investigative reporting on mortgage issues and foreclosures on the Firedoglake Foreclosure Fraud Page]




12 Comments




many thanks masaccio, news we can use.
Thanks masaccio. Sounds like a recipe fpr getting some justice.
admittedly looking for free advice here. My lawyers in Omaha are not as up to date as this site. I was in Chapter 13 bankruptcy. It will be resolved this month. GMAC still says I owe a bogus amount on my loan. They have not filed for foreclosure but sent me forms to “refinance” with them. I do not trust this process and I don’t think I owe what they say I do. My lawyer says I can file suit to force them to prove what I owe. Would this be the best thing to do or should I try to refinance? Refinancing will make them money and I fear it will just put me right where I have been. I didn’t expect them to send me refinance forms, I expected them to foreclose. Now I am all confused. I could sign up for the Hope program instead, AND sue for the bottom line? I am up to date on my mortgage according to the bankruptcy court.
In reply to wavpeac @ 3
Has GMAC ‘produced the note’? Have they proven that they own your mortgage? Unless your lawyer is certain that GMAC actually has standing, rather than just the usual LPS-fabricated, robo-signed affidavits, I wouldn’t refinance, because this wipes the slate clean for them and definitely gives them the power to mess with you. Given all the facts coming out now, you may soon learn things that put you in a stronger position to make demands and wind up in a far better position than refinancing now when the **** is hitting the fan furiously with new revelations every day. I’d stall for time before I’d agree to do anything that GMAC suggests after all they’ve already put you through.
People have been foreclosed on while in Chapter 13.
Was your mortgage securitized? If so, there’s the possibility that no one can prove standing, as the mortgage may still be unassigned from the originator, who received payment for it, and thus no longer has standing, and if the originator is out of business then only the trustee can assign your mortgage. One of the problems with the back-dated robo-signed documents is that they purport to assign mortgages from the originator to another entity after the originator was already out of business, which can’t be done legally, other than by the trustee.
If GMAC is merely the servicer designee under contract to an MBS into which your mortgage was supposedly conveyed, you need to ascertain whether the conveyance really happened, or is it still sitting in the MERS database….in which case what gives GMAC the right to take your money and offer a refinance?
IANAL, I’ve just been obsessively reading and absorbing lots about the foreclosure mess.
Thanks…lots to think about.. Since the beginning of all this, my research has been faster and better than that of the lawyers. Not faulting lawyers is just that they were losing the big battles, many gave up, there was no way to make money and they didn’t know what was really going on. I knew they were lying but, for instance, my lawyer wants me to record every single payment I have made since 2001 in a data base based on my banking statements. Fine, I get the reason for this, but it’s expensive to get all my statements and very, very time consuming to record them all. When all this is going on, I would rather go after making them show the note and having them prove what I owe. Basically I think my lawyer is afraid I didn’t really make the payments I said I did or something.
Anyway, thanks for the info…Homecomings used MERS system. I do not know if my mortgage was in the mers system or not. My loan originated in 2001, however, they refinanced me in 2004, and I think at that time it changed hands. I know at one point I got a new account number and new balance. It was never explained and suddenly I was sending payments to KY instead of TX.
These mortgages, lacking all documentation, are the basis of those toxic asset bundles our banks are holding, still trying to get them assessed at the original valuation. Big problem.
@wavpeac, I am not a lawyer, but for what it’s worth, if I were in your shoes, I would want to find out if GMAC actually holds the note. If they do not, then you own $0 on your mortgage! That is worth finding out, i think. And it is kind of suspicious that they are offering to refinance instead of just foreclosing, isn’t it?
I do know there is a class action suit in kentucky where GMAC is a defendant for its practice of not holding the note. http://4closurefraud.org/2010/10/03/kaboom-class-action-vs-mortgage-electronic-registration-systems-gmac-deutsche-bank-nationstar-aurora-bac-citi-us-bank-lps-et-al/
So, how do I get them to prove they have the note? My thinking and the lawyers was that if they sue me then we would ask them to produce the note in court. How do I find out if they have it? Do they have a legal obligation to produce the note if I ask for it outside of a legal proceeding. I think it’s suspicious that they have not given me my payment history as well. My lawyer and I have asked twice. To not respond is a RESPA violation. I was sending payments to KY address for a while. I will check into the class action.
Your lawyers suggest that you file a motion (as opposed to an adversary proceeding) to ascertain the balance of the note. They could seek discovery and determine whether GMAC has the note in connection with that motion.
My view is that only the noteholder can state the amount owed on the note. They can do it through their servicer, of course. But one way or the other, only the person who actually holds the note can argue about the amount owed.
thanks masaccio, rec.
The phrase “under penalty of perjury” seems to pop up a great deal here. I wonder if the banks and document mills are familiar with it.
If not, I suspect they might become familiar with it shortly, the way some of these cases are going.
There are stories on the Web about GMAC? sending checks to homeowners out of the clear blue sky, trying to get them to cash them for reasons not yet made clear.
Also they say in some states a refi becomes a recourse loan, and GMAC would have a fresh set of wet ink signatures for their note. There seems to be a lot of money for the mortgage servicing end of the business to scam up through a number of schemes, including making you a refi offer.