Day and Night by M. C. Escher hangs at the M. C. Escher Museum in The Hague, Netherlands. It was made from two wood blocks and black ink. At the bottom center, two roads meet at a 90-degree angle. To the left, we see fields, farm buildings and a windmill, and a canal from the river. There is a town to the north of the canal with a bridge over the river, leading to another group of roads, fields and canals. This is the day side. To the right, we see the same things, only on this side it is night. These parts of the print are symmetrical.
Look inside the Vee of the roads at the first white field. It is not a square, so we know this part is not symmetrical. It isn’t a rectangle either. Two sides are straight lines, but the other two aren’t, and the shape is longer to the left than the right. From there we can watch the fields change shape as they move up towards the top of the print. The second row of gray fields start to look like the heads of birds, and as we move up, the shapes morph into actual birds, white birds flying to the right and black birds flying to the left. . . .
In the center of the print, two canals seem poised to meet, but that confluence isn’t shown because it is behind the birds. Above those two canals the print seems to return to symmetry.
The center of the print seems to rise up at an angle to the earth, as if it were on an axis set at about 45 degrees to the plane of the earth in the print. It gives a strong sense of lift, an updraft, as you would expect to experience with birds.
My mother gave me a copy of this print when I was in my teens. It hung over my the table that served as a desk when I was in high school. Things that we have for a long time, things that we use and look at intentionally, become part of the vocabulary of the mind. They aren’t just objects, they are part of the way we comprehend the universe. This is one of those objects for me. Bach’s Two and Three Part Inventions are another. They are linked through a book, Godel, Escher and Bach, An Eternal Golden Braid, by Douglas Hofstadter.
Some of Escher’s works are simply about confusing dimensions, like Up and Down Some are tessellations, groups of odd shapes that can be laid side to side and which cover an infinite plane with no gaps. Sun and Moon is a good example. Others are more or less representational, like Castrovalva. Some illustrate mathematical principles, like this recursive print, Drawing Hands, or Moebius Strip II (Ants).
Day and Night is a lyrical combination of these elements. The birds soar from the tiled plane and fly into action or into dreams.




31 Comments

Sweet – I’ve always been an Escher fan.
And Goedel Escher Bach is one of my most favorite books. I have a copy that is so dog eared it’s ridiculous.
I love Escher’s work. My favorite is Puddle.
I see his influence in this quilt It Snowed on the Mountain Last Night.
I used to run in a lot of road races. There is a 10 mile run around Lake Cazenovia on July 4th every year. You start just outside of a Cazenovia city park and end there. The course goes up hill around the lake so much that you feel that you are running in one of the Escher stairways. When you finish, it is almost at though you have run up hill from start to finish even though the finish is just a few yards from the start.
Massacio, did you ever notice the similarities between Escher’s art and some of the early middle eastern mosaics? I wonder if he drew inspiration from them.
Many of these works toured the US back in the 70′s and I have some absolutely beautiful full sized prints done for a show at the Vorpal Gallery in SF in that era. In fact I have a full sized print of Day and Night. I used them on the walls of my business for over a decade. Today they are sitting in my attic. They’re to big for the walls in my house and a bit to modern.
wow — i think i could stare at this for hours. thanks for the eye candy and pointing out things that i’d not noticed.
I look hard at Escher’s work hoping for his sake that the pieces are easier to create than it seems.
eye candy indeed!
I have a signed print of Drawing hands. The brilliant thing about Escher is that he didn’t consider making the woodcuts or the litho blocks from which he made his prints as creative. he considered those strictly mechanical and the creative part came before when he planned the piece. Gazebo was the very drawing that got me interested in art when I was in my very early years. My dad had a print and I would stare at it for hours. Then I began to copy it and after that extrapolate on it. I owe Escher a lot. Thanks for this topic.
Just about everything he did can get you lost in thought at the concept whilst marveling at the execution .. I think for me the ultimate Escher is that square thing with people on up- and down- stairs going either/both ways .. so mindless and Sisiphyean, but perfect and ordered ..
Stairs by Escher is a great example of his playing with perspective. In it, we can see two people walking in the same direction on the same staircase but one person is going up the stairs while another one is going down.
Guess I owe you a drink. In fairness though, I was looking it up to link to it. :)
Robert Gibbs: “This statement is a lie.”
My mistake. The one that inspired me so much when I was little wasn’t called gazebo, it was called Belvedere
Ok, that one officially makes me feel crazy.
Think that’s great, take a look at the Belvedere link below. I still stare at it and stare at it.
My parents had that print. I spent hours dreaming over it.
I’ve always said that nobody can grow up intellectually lazy if they are exposed to MC Escher at an early age. Well, not always but often.
Yes, Escher and Thomas Kinkade, The Painter of Light.
(I apologize. Couldn’t help myself.)
Interesting, got a link?
LOL
But did Escher piss in elevators?
Nice post, masaccio. I enjoyed Escher’s thought experiments.
Fortunately in the US today no words have meaning so that sentence is both true and false and neither. Also.
I’ve always liked Escher, too. I use “Encounter” as a desktop image on one of my computers. I also really like a couple of the less typical works, “Three Worlds,” and the one of a puddle in the muddy tire track.
I’m sure they are MORE difficult to create than they look. I blows me away that he only used two blocks for the prints.
Any real artist is going to challenge him/herself as far as they can go….it’s the nature of the beats. Easy is never a word that occurs to someone in the fine arts.
If anyone lives in the northeast and is a fan of Escher’s work then they owe it to themselves to go to the New Britain Museum of American Art’s exhibit “M.C. Escher: Impossible Reality”. It is a very good exhibition of 130 of his works. Unfortunately the Escher exhibit will close next Sunday the 14th.
http://www.nbmaa.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=32&Itemid=56
Some of my favorites are BUTTERFLIES, BOND OF UNION, and LIBERATION.
Escher’s tricky optical stuff is always fun, but since I’m a surfer and have also spent a large and profound part of my life exploring the seashore at night (which believe me is every bit as beautiful and inspiring as day,) I have always had a soft spot for Phosphorescent Sea.http://
I loved it so much I copied it almost exactly with black construction paper and colored pencil. The linked photo of it is actually reproduced too light. The print I originally copied from was darker and more accurately captured the sense of haunting eternity which is the ocean nocturne.
Escher’s tricky optical stuff is always fun, but since I’m a surfer and have also spent a large and profound part of my life exploring the seashore at night (which believe me is every bit as beautiful and inspiring as day,) I have always had a soft spot for Phosphorescent Sea.
I loved it so much I copied it almost exactly with black construction paper and colored pencil. The linked photo of it is actually reproduced too light. The print I originally copied from was darker and more accurately captured the sense of haunting eternity which is the ocean nocturne.
I had not seen this one, thanks.
Di nadi. Did you notice the Big Dipper?