
Bankster Scrooge McDuck wonders where his White House invitation may be, while insisting on anonymity. (photo: dreamagicjp via Flickr)
Once again President Obama has failed to meet the needs of his constituents. This time, it’s the bankers he has failed.
On the mental list of slights and outrages that just about every major figure on Wall Street is believed to keep on President Barack Obama, add this one: When he met recently with a group of CEO’s at Blair House there was no representative from any of the six biggest banks in America.
Not one!
“If they don’t hate us anymore, why weren’t any of us there?” a senior executive at one of the Big Six banks said recently in trying to explain his hostility toward the president.
Maybe because he knew the only thing you want to talk about is you and your needs? Maybe because you have produced nothing for the rest of the country except loss and misery? Maybe because the President is embarrassed that he can’t afford that special shower that throws money directly onto your bare skin?
It’s all personal with these weepy people:
“You have to understand, it is very personal. He raised money from us,” one executive at a top six bank said. “Then he started calling us bad people. So forgive us for not wanting to buy him a drink after getting punched in the eye.”
We outsiders think it doesn’t count as a punch in the eye when Obama signs off on that tax gift in direct violation of his pledge to the rest of us, refuses to consider prosecutions for your crimes, rejects controls on your outrageous bonuses paid out of direct taxpayer transfers, agrees to wimpy regulation of your thieving industry, and appoints your drinking buddies to be his personal economic advisers. We like action. Your feelings are hurt by some words.
You Wall Streeters think Obama and the lackeys you sent to run the economy are ignorant putzes:
“You go down to the White House now and sit down to talk with members of the inner circle and the issue is no longer so much hostility as it is sheer incomprehension,” said one senior private equity executive. “You wind up talking about things they are not at all interested in and are generally outside their area of competence.”
So you admit that Geithner and Summers and the rest of that crowd are incompetent. That’s exactly what we all think, maybe for different reasons. I hope it means Obama has figured out that you are a bunch of crooks. That hope gets a tiny boost from this:
A senior Wall Street lobbyist explained his feelings this way: “This president came into office in the midst of an economic crisis and started off by demonizing insurance companies and then going after Wall Street banks. Never did he try to bring together CEOs and say, ‘We are in this together, we are Team America and we are going to go out and get things done.’ That’s the power you have as president. Instead this White House pushed people away and they did it consciously and they are still doing it.”
This is a perfect example of narcissism. I bet it never dawned on this arrogant jerk that from the far right of the political spectrum to the far left, and from the least to the most politically alert citizen, there is one area of absolute agreement: Team America was held hostage by Team Banker, Team Banker paid a corrupt congress and a compliant administration to salvage it from its gambling losses and theft, and Team America’s underwater homeowners, savers, retirees and workers were sold into serfdom to protect the wealth of Team Banker.
This time the President got it right: nobody can stomach you or your pestilential business. You got the money. You won’t get the love.



101 Comments

Masaccio:
I’m gonna bust out bawlin like baby.
*G*
Don’t cry. Just send $25 to Goldman Sachs and B of A and they’ll love you again.
I’d rather send $25 to muhself for food stuffs.
So I can feed me, mine, and others.
But I don’t HAVE $25.
So if all y’all could send me some money, I’ll feed me and mine, others and promise I won’t buy Merlot with teh leftover funds that I don’t use in soups or stocks.
Really.
*G*
Bless your heart, Masaccio! I adored your post!
“This time the President got it right: nobody can stomach you or your pestilential business. You got the money. You won’t get the love.”
I hate it that they got the money. They sure don’t deserve our love.
Thanks for all the great writing and analysis you do at the Lake!
Have a blessed Christmastide!
Oh, poor things….whoever knew that our money wasn’t enough, but that they must have our undying love as well?
Don’t they know the Beatles’ ditty “Money Can’t Buy You Love” is true?
Not that anybody cares.
At Least 42 Killed as US Drones Continue to Rock North Waziristan.
“You have to understand, it is very personal. He raised money from us,” one executive at a top six bank said. “Then he started calling us bad people. So forgive us for not wanting to buy him a drink after getting punched in the eye.”
Let’s see now – the rest of us have been being used as economic and political punching bags for DECADES, but because you gave Obama some money and NOW feel you did not get kissed in the morning, YOU are offended. Well, take a number and join the rest of us ‘f**king morons’ on the bench, guys. You can at least say that Obama is even-handed – he’s offensive to everyone. You think that somehow your feelings are more sensitive and important that the rest of us? Too f**king bad.
Masaccio, I don’t know why you are whining. You need to understand that in order for the bankers to start working for the good of the whole nation, they need to see love from us and be ostentatiously in the inner circles at the WH. Until they feel that love, they will continue not to try to build the economy, but only give themselves big bonuses to overcome the sadness. Just giving them money and power is not enough, abject surrender is required.
Textbook examples of the Whiny Ass Titty Baby
Nothing like a bunch of spoiled-brat Randroids.
Good morning, Massccio
And, as well, to the wisdoms here gathered.
I suspeculate yov’ve all laid out the truth of things.
However, I would wager that Obama will see the error of his ways and arrange a secret meeting, behind colsed doors, with those “astute” bankers. All will emerge smilin’ … and then …
Love yer posts, Masaccio, quite as much as the Bankers loathe them.
DW
I think the phrase is ‘for love or money,” not ‘for love AND money.’
The bankers are no better thasn the Poles — give them a pile of money and they spit in your eye. What good is money any more?
correction — Paks not Poles. (I’ve got Poland on my mind.)
blanktards every one of them
Thanks masaccio. I think you have managed to distill my feelings on this subject perfectly.
Oh, and fuck Politico for affording the spineless, whiny, pathetic, abused bankers anonymity. Chickenshit assholes all. Including Politico.
We supposed to love them now too? EEEEEyUcK!
Screwed and not even kissed (‘course, who’d wanna kiss from these pigs?)
Say Mas….did you dream this up in your fertile brain or did this really happen…Obama snubbed the banksters?
I also must have had pleasant dreams as I woke up feeling fine. Old Arthur isn’t tuning up too bad this morning, maybe that’s it. ;^)
Oh my frickin god. I kept waiting for the snark tag. And there isn’t one! I thought this was a joke post.
I should have known, now that we are in bizarro world, anything is possible.
Yep, I’m guessing that they really long for those past years like in the 90′s when they had almost everyone fooled for awhile and they did where able to have both the money and the love.
“This time the President got it right: nobody can stomach you or your pestilential business. You got the money. You won’t get the love.”
Do we really have to love them? Or can we just give them a reach around?? ;)
The assheads are so locked up that even a Moon sized enema won’t break them loose have their feelings hurt?
That shows you exactly how they feel about the taxpayers that bailed them out. Oh how I wish we could get around without using all their dollars. I’m ready for a barter system. Of course all us peasants have no money anyway. They’ve taken it all, are sitting on it like a clogged digestive tract.
I’d like to suggest a good dose of castor oil!
I agree. Why keep them in the shadows? We already know they are the biggest flimflam artists in the world.
Spot on. And there’s some rich irony considering that these people routinely dismiss other people’s feelings but theirs are oh so important that the whole world must stop revolving in horror at the slights that shattered their wittle feewings…
Cenk Uyger touched on this last night. I was aghast.
Capitalism as cancer.
The irony is that if Obama had been truly as mean to them as they keep saying he’s been, they would respect him and we’d all be a lot better off. But because he’s chasing campaign dollars, this is what happens. (Which is why I tell folks to look into http://www.publicampaign.org, which is CFR the Roberts Court can’t touch.)
Eh, Massacio.
With hat tips to the venerable Jim White and growling Oldnslow, I recommend we create a new tag for the TBTF bankers and call it,
“Filthy Rich Whining Little Chickenshits”
No kidding. You’d think that such hardass John Galt types would shrug off any bad words so long as they got their loot. But noooo.
Look for Obama to show some bankster love in 2011/2012.
Since no one here @ FDL is going to show-up for him, he needs their financial support to win re-election.
To me, this is why it is better to work with the admin on their incremental approach as opposed to going nuclear on the admin.
You may now fire away at me … ;)
Again spot on. Why the (failed) DISCLOSE Act instead of some more real response to the citizens unite ruling and why so late? Because the Democrats were going after their piece of that cash engorged pie. We voted for Roosevelt and we got a half assed mix of Neville Chamberlain and Benito Mussolini.
Right? WTF?
ahhh, just how I love to start my mornings. a rant from masaccio against the “pestilential” bankers. perfect. can I have one every day? goes perfectly with my morning java.
I’m just not sure about this…
Obama wants to meet with CEOs, bankers don’t show. Bankers feel ignored and attacked. Bankers lash out.
Another point could be made that Obama isn’t meeting with the real people who are hurting and isn’t helping real people very much.
Okay I will: Monday you were a teabagger, Tuesday you were an establishment Republican and today you are an Obama apologist. What are you going to come back as tomorrow? Do you plan on trying something different every day until people here like you?
Ah, Linkins is talking about this too @ HuffPo:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/28/wall-street-whines-to-pol_n_801935.html
Oilbummer is a moron. He couldn’t care less about regular people. Poor persecuted banksters. Boo fucking hoo.
Off topic–I’m particularly incensed by Barry Cigarette’s tacit approval of that dog torturer Michael Vick. What can you say? Vick and Oilbummer deserve each other
Enjoyed meeting with you at lunch Monday. Thanks.
hey old! we know Politico knows who the whiny ass tiny baby bankers are, all the fox-huntin’ horse-stable ownin’ friends of the Allbrittons who keep the Allbrittons’ private equity stakes all plumped & fluffy.
They’re gonna pay BACK all that money they temporarily “needed” from the US Treasury … right ?
Oh, wait . . . .
that’s a stumper, Margaret. a singing Stalinist? a debonair dictator?
“Tacit”? He congratulated the owner of the team for hiring Vick. I had the temerity to go on TPM and point out that Michael Vick tortured and killed dogs so now I’m apparently a PETA loving “trollette”. I guess we know where the Obamabots went when they abandoned Daily Kos.
I’m confused.
I thought that sociopaths didn’t have feelings.
You people have no idea of the sacrifices that bank CEOs have had to make.
Screw the TPM jerks. PETA, say what you will about their tactics, is all right with me. But, of course, as a vegan you can guess how I feel. Barry Cigarette makes me sick.
““You have to understand, it is very personal. He raised money from us,” one …DFH…(sic) said. “Then he started calling us bad people. So forgive us for not wanting to buy him a drink after getting punched in the eye.”
Heh.
Stop whining, buck the f’k up bankers…oh yeah, and F off while yer at it.
Oops. No third yacht this year.
I would start up about the many signs that Vick threw last night’s game, being the felonious gambler that he is, but then bmaz would complain I brought out the trash too early …
new post up top…
About as terse an analysis of the situation as can communicate to low information voters:
So amazingly true. We have been propagandized relentlessly into believing that money=good, profit=productivity, that we assumed the banksters gobs of money would be useful to our economy. But no.
Among all officialdom, only the Brit central bankers so far have the balls to say that out loud. (Hope my blockquote tags worked.)
The banksters got a lump of coal in their overstuffed X-mas sock this yr. and it doesn’t look very nice framed with all the cash , diamonds, blonds and Mercedes, poor ( oxymoron) babies. Life’s a bitch isn’t it? Well next yr. will be a whole lot better for them because they’ll love the new Congress they bought.
I don’t embrace PETA or their tactics. I don’t loath them though as some people do. I’m pretty indifferent to them until they want to infringe upon my rights. I sure as hell don’t condone throwing paint on fur coats, nor do I wear fur. I think that in the twenty first century, we have got synthetics that are in every measure better than wearing furs. I have no such problem with wearing leather. I just don’t think the best way to prevent people buying fur is to ruin a fur, thus ensuring the owner will buy a new one.
That’s my .02.
he meets with bankers in private in the oval office,,,
See the Jaimie Diamond Head of JP MORGAN Chase) meeting a few days before this meeting…
They have a direct line all the time,,dont be stupid…
Don’t they know that coal will turn into a diamond if they squeeze it as hard as they’re squeezing the middle class? Good Lord, doesn’t anybody do science any more? ;)
These banker crybabies aren’t gonna fit through the eye of a knitting needle.
Of couse, I’d like everyone to stop eating meat, but I never prosletyze (except maybe this once). My thing is if you can’t condemn something so barbaric as dog fighting, you are dead to me. Sorry.
Good eye, Margaret.
Maybe he needs some bankster lurve.
They pulled the wool over the sheep’s eyes.
Obama is still the Darling of Wall Street, as was Clinton before him.
This is what happens when one is mesmerized by the Spectacle and deficient in fundamental analysis.
No apologies necessary. I find wearing fur barbaric too. I even still buy cage free eggs, though they cost much more than factory eggs. I’ll give up eating them before I buy something that came out of a factory where the animal is kept in a cage it’s entire life. Even chickens have lives we should respect.
Oh, but Oilbomber has QUIT! hadn’t you heard? It seems they’ll lie about even inconsequential things these days.
It’s all public perception you know? Betcha he supported Vick, in that clumsy PR way he has, to be seen as “supporting blacks”….as long as they’re in the NOOZZ
The rest of the blacks who cried for him can go hang for all he cares.
No, no they already HAVE. makes one wonder about the “deficit” if they paid it all back, doesn’t it?
Definitely wierd – eh? Don’t really give a sh*t anymore about this whiny putz, but it’s one of life’s little mysteries why they bother to barf out nothing at FDL. Guess they don’t *have a life.*
Thing is, here in Virginny, at least in rural southern Virginny, it’s a white man sport–dog fighting. So, people who say this is a racial thing are wrong. White people fight dogs as much as any other group.
Some truth in that.
I lost a whoooooole lotta respect for Whoopie Goldberg when she defended Vick. I’ll never look at her the same. Just like Mel Gibson, just like Ahhhnold.
I’m against wearing fur, too, but come from a family where the elder women – now all dying off – all had at least one fur coat. In the 1950s, that’s the way it was for better or worse. Then the conundrum becomes: what do you do with these rather decent fur coats, esp if you live in a cold climate?? Don’t have an answer for that one, but *some* women in their 50s & 60s these days are wearing fur because they got it when mom or auntie passed away, not bc they bought it new.
Thanks. That’s what I was thinking. It’s crystal clear that Obama & the filthy obscenely weathy could give a flying f*ck about anyone but themselves, esp when it comes to *sharing* together in running our nation. But NOW their widdle fweelings are hurt?? WTF??? And why should *I* care?????
Heh… in the most recent “Vanity Fair” mag, there was a huge article about how all these yachts weren’t being bought for a couple of years… but never fear! The oligarch zillionaires are starting to buy again… phew! /s
It’s difficult to analyze what’s true and what’s false in the words spoken by a consummate pathological liar. President Shameful is one of the best. Peace
Ain’t gonna get any FDL love…
These people have received trillions of dollars from American taxpayers and the Federal Reserve. Despite all this, they have done little to help the American economy, at least that part that might actually hire some of the unemployed. They should be kissing Obama’s ass.
When will Americans get that most of Wall Street and the financial commmunity only serves that community and no one else. Abolish the private banks and focus on community, cooperative, state, and Federal owned banks who don’t exist to simply make money on money.
Message to Obama or whoever is in charge. Next time, let the banks,all of them, go down the tubes.
Americans do get it, but are divided by social issues seeded by the very people they abhor.
I’m sure that will be a great comfort to me in my homelessness.
All banks exist simply to make money on money.
It’s from Politico. Enough said. Some sort of weird, Obama vs. bankers article. Pure hogwash.
Yes.
“whoever is in charge” is the fundamental problem…
Get rid of the Federal Reserve Bank first. The so-called social issues are the invention of the oligarchy meant to divide and conquer the sheeple. Which is what you said, no? Peace Peace
So who ‘IS’ in charge? It’s certainly not “we the people.” Peace
They should not feel bad.
At least he did call them names, like his base.
Those who internationally control all the wealth in the world.
Yes.
I nominate Margaret @ 7:23 am for best line of this thread (and so far best line of the morning from the few threads I followed):
The oligarchy? Peace
What does that comparison mean to you? What was Chamberlain’s sin? What did Musssolini believe that Roosevelt also believed? Peace
As if the banksters don’t have a 24/7 hotline to the Oval Office via Timmy Geithner. Why on earth should they have to stop what they’re doing – making gobs of money through any means, fair or foul – travel to DC and actually meet the guy that does what they want? What a waste of time that would be; it might also lead to confusion about which one is the hired help.
“This time the President got it right: nobody can stomach you or your pestilential business.”
Exactly. These sociopathic and narcisstic thieves are societal parasites only looking after their own interest. And when someone calls their bluff they start their insufferable infantile whining. Please spare me or we’ll have to send these lords of the manor to time out, which for them should be defined as a long prison sentence.
These repulsive robber baron capos deserve nothing but contempt because that is what they earned through their shakedown of America.
If the Wall Street bankers think that the treatment they receive hurts, they should try long-term unemployment instead and see how they like that…
whaa…..
Geez, if bailing out the banks at 100 cents on the dollar, passing along hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars, not regulating or restructuring them in any meaningful way, giving them tender loving care from the Fed discount window, and letting record Wall Street bonuses be paid out with taxpayer money qualifies as “hate” after they torpedo the world economy and put millions of people out of work, please send some of that hate my way.
Taking an “incremental approach” to shoving Americans off the boat isn’t anything we should be supporting.
What i remember hearing while growing up: “Keep it up and you’ll get something to really cry about!”
Spare the rod and spoil the banker.
Seems like Politico Theater to me.
Besides, the banks sent their errand boy Obama to represent them.
Why bother buying a President if you’re not going to put him to good use.
It was certainly fun to meet you. I hope to see you again on my next visit to Florida.
I want to tell all the firepups that SouthernDragon is great to talk to.
This post is a ridiculous exaggeratio” as he slows the collapse of the economy. Making everyone expectation improvement rather than being thankful that they aren’t starving. not avoiding starvation,
The manufacturing jobs are gone, the internet hires in the direction of the lowest paid parts of the world. Math, Science schooling isn’t up to par. The Western World in general is hurting, Australia, an exception, has a booming economy along with very high unemployment
my.firedoglake.com/richardkanepa/2010/12/29/obama-vs-churchill-blood-sweat-and-tears/
***”He raised money from us,” one executive at a top six bank said. “Then he started calling us bad people. So forgive us for not wanting to buy him a drink after getting punched in the eye.”***
Are you sure this guy is a BANKER and not a DFH?
[Ironically, Obama can probably hear, and will respond to, the wailings of the Rich Louts. Cries from DFH -- not so much.]
I posted a comment to Linkins that the REAL story was that Politico printed this drivel.
This is a trumpted up PR stunt by the White House to once again fool the gullible Liberals into thinking Obama is against the banks, wake up.
well I won’t be able to find competent help to work on my yachits… oh…
Two PR stunts: 1) that the banks — who have received an embarrassment of riches from the WH — are now upset by Obama.
Obama politically needs the banks as a foil; the banks politically/economically need to make it seem that Obama is not giving them everything that they want, and more.
The same with the Fed/ Fannie/ Freddy — while continuing to bailout the banks to the tune of trillions of dollars — they are threatening to force the banks to take back a few billion dollars in toxic securities unloaded on these agencies. Theater of the absurd – given the fact that most of the trillions of dollars of securities in the hands of the Fed/Fannie/Freddie are toxic.
well I won’t be able to find competent help to work on my yachits… oh… ahem
Oh about your post… tut tut, what a sad little piece of work is our puppet.
I must tell the carpenters to make a better one nest year…