In an article on the staggering compensation of CEOs of giant US companies, the New York Times adds arithmetic to the things that are too hard for the SEC, along with other hard things like investigating securities fraud on Wall Street. The Dodd-Frank bill requires corporations to state the ratio of CEO pay to the median income of employees of the company. But:
The requirement isn’t likely to come into effect any time soon, because many companies have complained to the S.E.C. that it would be a burden to comply with it, said Ms. Bowie of [Institutional Shareholder Services].
“There’s been a lot of pushback from companies on that,” she said.
Mary L. Schapiro, the chairwoman of the S.E.C., said at a Congressional hearing last month that the commission was trying to work through “a lot of technical issues” on how companies might calculate this.
Let me help.
Step 1. Make a list of your company’s subsidiaries and controlled entities and the company itself. HInt: see Exhibit 21 to your Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Step 2. Tell the accounting persons for each subsidiary on the list to prepare a list of each employee, and the sum of the amounts shown in Boxes 1, 10, 11,and 12, plus any contributions to a defined benefit plan for that employee which were not recorded in any of the boxes.
Step 3. Add all the lists to a database. Sort by the number next to the name.
Step 4. Count the names. Divide by 2. Count down that many names. Record the number. That is the median payment to employees. Call that X.
Step 5. Find the total amount paid to the CEO. Hint: see your Proxy Statement. Call that Y
Step 6. Divide Y by X.
Tell us the answer in boldface print at least as large as the font you use for the main document. I’m sure that isn’t perfect, but it’s close enough for government work, and see how easy it was?
Then add any explanation you like, using either Comic Sans or Symbol as you see fit. You will want to put in those technical details that might make it look less abusive. Show us your number, explaining how it is different from my number. Explain how awful the government is for making you do all this work. Tell us how many people you had to fire to pay for the intellectual effort of doing these calculations and making up your explanations about why that fabulous paycheck should go to the CEO instead of workers or shareholders. Explain the workings of the market in CEOs compared to the market in accounting and bookkeeping people, salespeople, the people who wrote the code that you sell and the people who actually put the steam turbines together. I love a good work of fiction.
Technical issues my foot. Try Captured Agency.




14 Comments

Yes, please.
SEC, EPA, DOT they’re all captured to one degree or another. Isn’t that what Fascism is all about?
I hope they use Symbol: Τηεν αδδ ανψ εξπλανατιον ψου λικε, υσινγ ειτηερ Χομιχ Σανσ ορ Σψμβολ ασ ψου σεε φιτ. Ψου ωιλλ ωαντ το πυτ ιν τηοσε τεχηνιχαλ δεταιλσ τηατ μιγητ μακε ιτ λοοκ λεσσ αβυσιϖε. Σηοω υσ ψουρ νυμβερ, εξπλαινινγ ηοω ιτ ισ διφφερεντ φρομ μψ νυμβερ. Εξπλαιν ηοω αωφυλ τηε γοϖερνμεντ ισ φορ μακινγ ψου δο αλλ τηισ ωορκ. Τελλ υσ ηοω μανψ πεοπλε ψου ηαδ το φιρε το παψ φορ τηε ιντελλεχτυαλ εφφορτ οφ δοινγ τηεσε χαλχυλατιονσ ανδ μακινγ υπ ψουρ εξπλανατιονσ αβουτ ωηψ τηατ φαβυλουσ παψχηεχκ σηουλδ γο το τηε ΧΕΟ ινστεαδ οφ ωορκερσ ορ σηαρεηολδερσ. Εξπλαιν τηε ωορκινγσ οφ τηε μαρκετ ιν ΧΕΟσ χομπαρεδ το τηε μαρκετ ιν αχχουντινγ ανδ βοοκκεεπινγ πεοπλε, σαλεσπεοπλε, τηε πεοπλε ωηο ωροτε τηε χοδε τηατ ψου σελλ ανδ τηε πεοπλε ωηο αχτυαλλψ πυτ τηε στεαμ τυρβινεσ τογετηερ. Ι λοϖε α γοοδ ωορκ οφ φιχτιον.
Or even easier, since most companies now outsource their payroll work, have the payroll company provide corporate with the numbers. In fact, the payroll company probably already has programs to help calculate the necessary.
The problem is that since our legislators and regulators have, in almost all cases, never had a real job, they don’t know about things like outside payroll companies. Consequently, they never know the right questions to ask when being arm-twisted by the corporate MOTU.
What you said!
Either:
a) Mary L. Schapiro is really dumb, or
b) Mary L. Schapiro is totally bought off, and/or
c) Mary L. Schapiro thinks everyone else is totally teh stoopit
or
d) Some combo of the above.
I’m going for b + c.
Thanks for the info. Sadly unsurprising. The 1% MOTU are giving us 99%ers the finger once again. Whoddaguessed???
I don’t think she’s stupid, I think she’s probably pretty smart. Unfortunately, she takes the complaints of the corporate contributors seriously, instead of laughing at their stupidity.
A good regulator can make people behave by calmly use of bureaucratic tricks, like mine. You state a simple solution. Everyone is required to post that number. Then they can add their [silly/implausible] explanation.
Come on Barbie, lets go party!
And bring on the bonuses! (No median to swerve!)
Let’s make it easy on these assholes: everything after the first million is taxed at 75%. EVERYTHING. Don’t like it? Get the hell out.
Gesundheit. And thanks for this post!
If they need help dealing with these guys I know about 40 million people who would be more than glad to tutor them on this issue. And make a couple of other ” small repairs ” to the incentive program while they’re at it. Heck, they won’t even bill the gov’t for their work. We could call it payback.
Note to CEOs: quite the gig if you can get it. Feudal lords didn’t have it this good.
Note to board members: most of you guys make the US Congress look like superstars. Corporate governance is a sick joke.
Note to shareholders: You are getting screwed. CEOs in India are REALLY CHEAP, and don’t require bonuses as they screw the company into the ground.
“The commission was trying to work through “a lot of technical issues” on how companies might calculate this.”
…
“Step 3. Add all the lists to a database. Sort by the number next to the name.”
Sadly, the corporate pushback is probably not entirely a subterfuge. I’ve worked on the IT side of a number of large corporations, and, over the last 15 years, I’ve learned to never underestimate the ignorance and rigidity of corporate management. I suspect that, for the average CEO/CTO/CFO/board member, math IS hard and fundamentals like databases are harder still. Management invariably copes with its ignorance by issuing the same diktat: never, ever use the database, much less modify it.
Now, I don’t by any means intend to excuse or even minimize the venality and criminality of our corporate masters. I just think that we need to remind ourselves that crime and stupidity are not mutually exclusive.
Is it really that easy these days?
I did not think the rules had changed that much since the Reagan years and if they have not their are a few problems.
First Companies are allowed to hide much of the CEO pay – the rules change over the years, but I do not recall a year when the numbers shown for the top 5 employees reflected all their pay. The SEC would need to get tough and actually require all comp, defining what is meant by the word “comp” (well perhaps not all comp – just the W-2 stuff and ignore the options and offshore stock and SPC accurals – but we used to put CEO w-2 wages into two dozen companies so as to hide it from the SEC, so rules are needed).
And then there is the math – median is well defined if there are an odd number of employees who are not the CEO, but if an even number what do you use for the median – a number half way between the middle two perhaps.
It is all so complicated!
Actually I suspect the real problem is a fear that the CEO’s comp – the real comp – will have to be disclosed. Putting a value on in the money options – that is unAmerican! Of course we would put a contingent into the option so it did not count for tax – with a Board agreement that covered why that contingent would never be triggered – Reagan’s IRS always allowed it. Indeed in the 90′s and later we set up special purpose corporations to convert all the income into capital gains via structured investments in the SPC. Hate to have a CEO pay more than 15% on that income. I wonder if the SPC “income” would have to be disclosed.
So many rules needed – best we drop that CEO ratio idea! /s