Middletown was the title of two sociological studies of the transition from an agrarian economy to an industrial economy in Muncie, Indiana, published in 1929 and 1937, so Ron Fournier trotted off to find out the current state of things in the Heartland. Fournier is a student of the Thomas Friedman cab driver school of journalism: he visited for a few days, and published the results of his fly-by in an article titled In Nothing We Trust.
Fournier is a member of the Village Media. He was with the AP for years, leaving to attend the Harvard Insititute of Politics, and writing a book, Applebee America. He became the chief of the AP Washington Bureau after considering and rejecting a role with John McCain’s presidential campaign. It’s hard to imagine a worse person to carry on the tradition of the Middletown studies, except, of course, David Brooks.
The article is the familiar story of collapse in the wake of the Great Crash. The protagonist is a decent guy named Jerry Whitmire, a construction worker. In 2000 he and his wife, a state employee, bought a $40,000 house for no money down and a mortgage payment of $620. He was current until 2010, when his wife was fired and he was laid off. He got a trial mod that lowered his payment, but the bank dumped him for no apparent reason, and they filed bankruptcy. His lawyer correctly advised them to stay in the house until the bank foreclosed, but Whitmire left the keys on the table and moved out, explaining “I don’t believe in a free lunch.” Then the city fined him $300 for weeds in the yard. It turns out the bank didn’t foreclose, so he still owns the house. Fournier tells us Whitmire is angry, betrayed and fuming.
Fournier maunders along to discuss Muncie’s miserable public schools and the new charter schools which only open two days a week and home school the rest of the time; the slow demise of main-stream Churches; and a Jerry Springer scene at the Muncie City Council. That’s enough for him to draw the conclusion that all of our institutions have failed. It’s like the blinkers came off for a few minutes, and a Villager was confronted with life as it is lived in the America they created. Everything he sees is a sign of desperation and despair. All our institutions have failed. There is no way for them to recover. Nothing is arising to take their place. He is shocked and sad.
So I have a follow-up question for Fournier: What the hell did you think would happen?
You and your journalist buddies cheered on the destruction of those institutions, telling your readers that government is the enemy. You cheered for tax cuts for everyone. You cheered on the shipment of jobs overseas, in the name of economic efficiency. You cheered on the private equity firms that gutted the machine shops and tool and die factories in the Midwest in the name of profit. You beat unions with every stick you could find. You talked up the theology of the mega-churches and called the main-line churches dinosaurs.
It turns out that tax cuts meant less money to fund high schools. Crushed unions meant bad jobs where there were jobs. Lost factories meant the death of small plants and local businesses. The screaming politics you love to cover meant that government would fail. We see what those Mega-Churches do in politics, and it isn’t pretty.
Ah, well. Fournier may feel bad today, but I suspect he is just like Jane Austen’s Mr. Bennett:
“You must not be too severe upon yourself,” replied Elizabeth.
“You may well warn me against such an evil. Human nature is so prone to fall into it! No, Lizzy, let me once in my life feel how much I have been to blame. I am not afraid of being overpowered by the impression. It will pass away soon enough.”




35 Comments

Ron Fournier, Karl Rove’s best buddy, has always been allergic to facts in their proper context because reality has a well-known liberal bias.
The problem is that both of our two major parties lived to make these changes. Who except Nebraska Sen Dorgan protested the repeal of Glass Steagall? Who but a President Ralph Nader would have overseen a truly wise economic policy? After all, Obama’s “go financial guy” is also his “good buddy” – one Tim Geithner. Geithner is also the darling of AIG and Goldman Sachs.
And the city council allows for Jerry Whitmore, the poor man in the article, to be fined for the weeds in his house. What has this nation come to, that this is happening? In the Nineteen Thirties, local government officials were banning foreclosures. Some 35 plus states had laws banning foreclosures at the height of the Depression.
But now, most in our city and state legislatures are as bought and paid for as the Higher Officials such as Pres. Monsanto <oops, I meant Obama.
Went ahead and fixed it up for you.
Another great piece, Masaccio. Thanks for your work.
It will pass away soon enough. And therein lies the entire raison d’etre for the Romney-Rupert-Rogering of America.
What did you think compradors in the cockroach race would/will say after the demolition is self-perpetuating?
Well, not quite. They’re all practicing compradors, but O’bummer’s got to believe … or else.
Byron Dorgan was the Senator from North Dakota and he was quite prescient in his prediction in.re. the bipartisan repeal of Glass-Steagall that was signed and lauded by Bill Clinton. Little Timmy is a disciple of the infamous war criminal Henry Kissinger, as well as the tool of Wall Street.
Indeed.
Hey, Ludwig –
Why don’t you give the “compradors” term a little rest. You’re the only one that uses it, and I really don’t think it’s going to catch on, so there won’t be much credit to be had for being the first to use it here. You’re a bright guy/gal, I’m sure you can find suitable alternatives.
So, whose left @ the end of the day? The Rich and they’re Corps. on the one hand and those few lucky enough or connected enough to have Public sector jobs. Now the Rich have turned on the people with the Psector jobs and are moving in to finish them off as well. I’d like to have some sympathy for them, but when I had my small biz back when, they did everything and anything to try and screw me and so….. right, I have little sympathy. The sad truth is many of us out here feel trapped between the greed of the 1% and the those with Public jobs who thought they could endlessly increase our taxes without any care for the rest of us. Its a shitty situation for everyone but the 1% and those at the very top of the Public system. A Pox on both their greedy houses is how I see it.
I truly feel badly for Mr. & Mrs. Whitmire. What’s really sad is that, while the Whitmire’s display a good attitude about not trying to bilk the system (or some such), they obviously didn’t realize that their 1% “betters” also don’t believe in a free lunch. No, the 1% *expects* proles like the Whitmires to *pay handsomely* for the lunch and more of the 1%.
Mr. Whitmire should feel betrayed because he has been betrayed and worse. Duped by suck ups like Fornier, who makes a living sucking off the 1% and spitting on the likes of the Whitmires.
It appears that Fournier offers no “solutions,” even though solutions abound. It’s just that Fournier’s whore-masters won’t pay him to tell the truth.
ptoui!
Sorry for your trevails, but I think you’re painting with a rather broad brush here. Most public sector *workers* had little to do with raising taxes, nor how those taxes were spent once they were raised. Most public sector *workers* had little to do with how their pay and benefits were determined. Most of the *workers* applied for and got jobs and then did them.
Nowadays most public sector *workers* are in similar precarious positions to what you appear to be depicting about your situation. It’s my *observation* that you appear to be falling into the trap of pitting yourself against others in the 99%. I suggest that this might cause you to not see where the roots of our nations economic woes reside. It’s not because of public sector *workers* having reasonable salaries. Truly, that’s not the issue, although the propoganda media does work overtime to pump out propoganda making it seem like it.
Just saying…
Like what, comrade?
Seems Ron is up to the same thing today that he was up to in 2008 — projecting whatever message he wants to send onto whatever person/situation/setting is in front of him.
From the FDL archives . . .
Jane: In March 2008 Fournier wrote “that Obama is “a bit too cocky,” and that he and Michelle “ooze a sense of entitlement” and by August, he’s named AP’s Washington bureau chief.
Julia goes farther, noting how Fournier went after all the Dems in that race, but has a sweet spot for John McCain. As Julia put it in 2008:
Ron won’t feel bad today, masaccio. The memes he’s constructing today are the building blocks for the electoral result he wants to see in the fall.
Nice post. BTW, Fournier was peddling his stuff on NPR’s Onpoint recently.
http://www.onpoint.wbur.org/2012/04/25/losing
The greedy do-gooder system was boosted when it began to fall apart – Capitalists doubled down on their moralisms. Those Public jobs were constructed to mitigate the excesses of Capitalism and now that lift-all-boats-capitalism is exhausted, they will be cast away.
Even compradors get screwed, comrade.
Hey, Sunshine, good to see you here again. Haven’t seen you in what seems quite a while.
BTW, aren’t you the “owner” of Louiza, the Intrepid Snow Kitty?
I second that motion.
I work in the public sector. Does that make me a comprador, comrade?
Hear, hear!
I like both your article and elisemattu’s comment. Nicely done, as usual, Masaccio. Recc’d.
Fournier is great friends with rove. Which came first the job or the friendship? Is the job the result of the friendship or the other way around?
Could the corruption of our institutions, the looting of our country, the ascent of stupidity and selfishness have been possible without the active participation and support of big media?
No. But it’s doesn’t exonerate you either. Are you?
Well, I’m not a native agent for a colonial power, which is the original meaning of the word. I’m really not sure what you mean by it.
Well I could imagine David Broder.
Oh, wait, he’s dead, right?
So check out the David Brooks link in the post. I think you’ll agree with me.
Because you’re not a native? A domestic comprador is still a comprador.
Masaccio, the most amazing thing about this article to me is that Eric Schneiderman tweeted a link to it as inspirational:
I have no idea what he’s referring to as the way how to restore confidence in America’s institutions. Because you glossed over something that’s pretty strange and important. Whitmire believes the bank owns his house (“The city dinged me for tall weeds at my bank’s house.”), and the city’s attorney confirmed that to him when he told him Whitmire’s name was still on the title.
So that’s one pretty messed up title, no? Is the tweeting AG and his mortgage taskfarce or the city attorney able to figure that out? They’re not even trying. So Whitmire is going to keep living in a trailer, mowing the lawn on the house he wants to someday buy back in order to not get dinged $300 a pop for weeds. The city puts a lien on the house that the next buyer has to pay (who owns it? how can it be sold?) And Citibank — who knows? Fournier didn’t ask.
That’s — inspirational?
Of course it’s inspirational to a comprador; a guileless Amurican with heart, charter schools, and the fast-growing multibillion-dollar religious industry with social, psychological & moral policy for the t-shirted and tennis-shoed.
Hope for the bankrupt.
Msr. Schneiderman pines to “find it easier to persuade the public to make sacrifices for the common good” because that’s the only option open to compradors imagining they’re in public service. Did you catch that politicians spin, pander and lie to us because we “don’t like hard truths? Yes, this flack provides a balm to the comprador’s meritocratic soul.
Capitalism desperately needs a jubilee – but how can it, with so much blood on it’s hands?
He must have plenty of free time on is hands these days.
I’d guess the title situation is that the bank didn’t foreclose. When you foreclose, title is transferred to the purchaser at the foreclosure sale. So, if the City Attorney says that the title is in Whitmire’s name, he still owns the house. That’s why I say that Whitmire’s lawyer was right to advise him to stay in the house until the foreclosure happened.
I read that article twice, and I don’t see a single thing to suggest how things will get better, how social institutions will arise to replace those that have failed.
I wonder what Schneiderman was thinking?
I hope this moves to the FDL front page.
Thanks, masaccio.
Hi masaccio, I really love this post. It’s an eloquent masterpiece!
Good it was posted there! I somehow missed it yesterday.
See, that’s the thing. We can all guess, but the city attorney told him two different things, one, that his name is on the title, and two, he doesn’t own it but is liable for damages. And the city council passed a resolution that IF Whitmire is the NEXT buyer of the house, in recognition of his ongoing mowing efforts now he alone won’t be charged the lien they’re placing.
See slide 18 in this powerpoint PDF (linked from David Dayen’s 1/6/11 post Florida’s Killer Presentation on Foreclosure Fraud. It shows MC Escher’s stairs with the caption, “If the mortgage is not properly assigned…. the result is chaos.”
And Schneiderman tweets a rec!