The New York Times served up another of those paeans to the victorious financial speculators on Sunday. This one glorifies a 38-year old Boaz Weinstein of Saba Capital. He is one of the people who early on recognized that something was going on with the credit default swaps market in the City of London. The NYT wants you to know that they are the winners and you are the losers.
The article has all the tropes of the genre. Weinstein wears the finery of Battle, as if flinging other people’s money around were the equivalent of standing up to IEDs or T-72 battle tanks. He is a member of a wolfpack, he “fanned the flames” of a trading mistake, he has a “preternatural appetite for risk and a take-no-prisoners style”. The “battle lines were drawn”. The JPMorgan Chase London Whale doubled down on his error, trying to scare off those who would profit, but Weinstein’s side “hits back in force” and in numbers.
All this warrior mentality comes in a hyper-smart package: he’s a philosophy major, a chess champion, a card-counter, a poker player, he picks up things faster than other people, and his mind is several steps ahead of other people.
He has the toys to go with all those smarts: he is buying a $24 million flat in New York, he drives a Maserati he won in a poker game, and he made more than $90 million last year. And he loves his mother, and he is a PR dream:
Now Mr. Weinstein is practically a featured attraction on Wall Street. He attends galas and charity events, and is sought out to speak at big events. Pictures of him clasping a drink at last night’s party appear with regularity on business Web sites.
I missed one of the tropes: “Mr. Weinstein is married to Tali Farhadian Weinstein, a rising lawyer in the Justice Department.” According to the wedding announcement in the NYT:
The bride, 35, is a lawyer with the United States Department of Justice. She was until June a counsel to the attorney general of the United States in Washington. From 2004 to 2006, she was a law clerk to Justice Sandra Day O’Connor of the Supreme Court. The bride graduated from Yale, from which she also received a law degree. She received a master’s in Oriental Studies from Oxford University in England, where she was a Rhodes Scholar.
That job in the Department of Justice was as one of Holder’s assistants. She’s now an assistant US Attorney in Brooklyn. And don’t you be hating her, like that nasty New York Post rag. She is one of the Obama 7, the lawyers who worked on Guantanamo cases and were subsequently hired into the Justice Department.
There are lots of copyrighted pictures of these people, including this one, which somehow seems perfect.
But you know, there are always nay-sayers. I, for example, think he is a parasite and a drain on society. Sure he made a bunch of money, but what did he produce? No jobs, no products, nothing to export, nothing to make life better for anyone else. The money disappeared from the shareholders of JPMorgan Chase and reappeared in the pockets of Weinstein and the rich people who invested in his $5.5 billion hedge fund. Why exactly should I admire a gambler? Do I want my children to live that useless life?
Maybe Mr. and Mrs. Weinstein can share their view on securities law enforcement with us. Something along the lines of greedy and immoral, but not criminal, and certainly not glorious.




21 Comments

Thank you, comrade massacio. A rich and intriguing story. And did you catch that Ms. Weinstein is Persian?
The meritocrats and technocrats will break all boundaries to fulfill the comprador mandate.
Me too. Great post.
Nice write up, Masaccio. I kept thinking that the only thing that happened here was this guy won! The Game against The Whale. Meanwhile as you say some poor saps lost. I guess the winners get to spend more on wine and such. You and me not so much.
One parasite feeding on another parasite who feeds on the many.
A question before my comment: Is it the case that the NYT simply doesn’t have any editors reading stuff before they print it, or is it that they’re all semi-literate, sibling-daters who don’t know it when a writer needs to work on an article?
This piece reminds me of a column that appeared after the Republican convention of 2008 in which a conservative writer’s (Jonah Goldberg? I forget.) rhapsodic, obsequious, googly-eyed glorification of Palin was assumed by all to be a description of what was going through his mind as he masturbated to her TV screen image. In this case it’s too bad Azam Ahmed didn’t just seek Weinstein out and give him a real blowjob instead of the literary one we see in his article. Would have saved some space for something more worthy.
Another of the kind that will be “First up against the wall when the revolution comes”.
This should be read by many people.
Thanks.
What is your problem, people? Don’t you understand that this is one of the job creators for whom we should reduce taxes and understand that if you make enough money and reduce taxes enough, jobs will appear. Just look at all of the jobs that were created by the mortgage fraud and credit default swaps. Don’t we now have an army of investigators working for eric schneiderman to unravel all of the dealing that savvy businessmen, friends of 0 did?
Franklin Delano Roosevelt
“Charles Geisst, a Professor of Finance at Manhattan College, recounts how Greenspan undermined the Glass-Steagall Act, first as a JP Morgan director and then as Chair of the Federal Reserve:
‘When (Greenspan) was a director of J.P. Morgan & Company in the 1980s, Morgan produced a pamphlet called “Rethinking Glass-Steagall,”{ in 1984, which he was obviously privy to and had contributed to…The pamphlet was advocating getting rid of the Glass-Steagall Act and the separation between commercial and investment banking, so that commercial bankers particularly could begin to underwrite corporate securities again, as they hadn’t done since before 1933.’”
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=JPMorgan_Chase
On a related note, DDay has a Kevin Bacon connection to this guy, who was a friend of DDay’s friend in college.
Gee, but for some scruples and humanity, DDay, too, could have a $24 mil condo.
Wot, you trying to make a comprador feel guilty?
That’s how it reads to me, too. The NYT has a history of writing this kind of puff piece, $2K baby buggies, expensive wine for brokers, and, of course, this.
Not I. I am unable to express how I truly feel about these savvy businessmen who are all good friends with 0 and create so many jobs for the rest of us.
This guy represents everything that is right in the world. Taking calculated risk and bringing efficiency back to the markets. Guys like this should be celebrated.
Please don’t make personal attacks on myFDL. -MyFDL Editor
What do you have against someone making a living for themselves?
It’s not about him. What has he done to better other’s lives?
*heh* Ya meant Rich Lowry and his infamous Starbursts post…! ;-)
Ah yes, founding father is a comprador.
founding father is merely a paid shill dupe/dope,nobody..the end
A comprador’s comprador puppet?