The labor violence that escalated from the late 1800s to the late 1930s was eventually defused by the grand liberal bargain, enshrined in the Wagner Act. Unions were strengthened and given the tools to protect their members from the assault of capital. As productivity grew, the income of the workers grew. It was a fair bargain: it led to a rational sharing of the rewards from the economy. Sean Wilentz tells us that the Wagner Act was the culmination of decades of work by liberals. Senator Wagner himself was motivated by the Triangle Shirt Waist fire.
This chart from Larry Mishel at the Economic Policy Institute says all you need to know about the death of that bargain:
Mishel’s Note: “Hourly compensation is of production/nonsupervisory workers in the private sector and productivity is for the total economy. The chart tells us that in the mid-70s the bargain began to unravel. The initial break was related to the OPEC oil embargo and the inflation that resulted. Wages didn’t grow quickly, but after the initial shock, there was some recovery. Then we got another bout of inflation, and then the shock of the Reagan era, with its relentless effort to destroy unions. There is no longer any link between productivity and wages. Instead, all the gains go to the rich.
But even level wages aren’t enough. Corporations want their employees to work for less. Caterpillar workers have been on strike at the Joliet plant for nearly four months. The company is wildly profitable, but it demanded that its 800 workers accept a six year freeze on wages and pensions. With inflation, that amounts to gradually decreasing real wages. The workers had no real choice but to strike.
Their parent union, to which they have been paying part of their dues, refuses to provide any real support. The workers get only $150 a week, and are dependent on gifts from supporters like the SEIU and even Governor Pat Quinn of Illinois.
That’s not all. Caterpillar wants someone else to pay for injuries on the job. The CEO of Caterpillar “…has pushed for workers’ compensation reform and told Quinn that state legislators were making it harder for Caterpillar to remain in Illinois” according to the Chicago Tribune. The Guardian reminds us of the history of this bunch of management thugs:
When car-workers resisted company plans to impose a two-tier wage system in 1992, Caterpillar crushed two strikes before they surrendered unconditionally. When workers at a London, Ontario locomotive factory refused a 50% wage cut last year, the company locked them out and then shut down the plant. “Few companies are as willing to take on unions, and uproot entire communities, as Caterpillar,” says author Stephen Franklin, who covered the strikes for the Chicago Tribune.
That’s consistent with the history of corporations. Illinois is typical: it’s the home of the Pullman Strike, crushed by a corrupt alliance the U.S. army and armed federal marshals among others. That violence was and is everywhere.
The shocking decline in the wealth and income of average Americans is part and parcel of the normal violence of capitalism. A steady drumbeat of assaults on the weak while blaming them for their weakness is standard operating procedure. Setting one group against another to distract from the damage done to all by what the rich call “just business” is standard operating procedure.
Wilentz seems to think that liberals in the ruling elite are a countervailing force against the normal violence of capitalism. I repeat this challenge: where are the liberal members of the power elite? Where are their fabulous liberal plans for reform that will do something for someone besides themselves and their rich friends? When was the last time one of them did something about the class war besides cheer on the winners?




48 Comments

Thanks. Rec’d.
I look at that graph and think: Wow; we sure must have had the correct tax rates in 1950. Let’s go back to those good old days.
i look at that and think, “well that’s how the healthcare industry got all the money!” as well as “that’s why my compensation is flat. it’s going to more SSI for boomers and more for healthcare.
so it’s not just that wages are flat; it’s where did it go besides CEO compensation? it went to healthcare cost inflation AND the SSI fix under reagan
Does compensation include payroll taxes? Employer and employee? A million years ago when I was still working compensation did include that in our company.
We have neither liberal elites or liberal leaders. But part of that reflects Obama’s wishes or rather his personality.
Speaking of Caterpillar…
Shareholders to Caterpillar: ‘our product has become Israel’s weapon of choice for ethnic cleansing and potentially even war crimes’
*gah*
The war on the middle class began with right-to-work laws.
This apparent discrepancy is not the result of the end of a “bargain” but just the way the economy works.
Labor productivity arises from the substitution of capital for labor. The benefits accrue to capital.
Substitution of CFL occurred in the 1960s bc capital was cheap and labor was expensive, owing to the low unemployment rate driving up labor costs. Substitution of CFL occurred in the 1980s, early 90s owing to medical benefits costs making labor expensive & capital cheap.
Blah blah blah.
I’ve explained this hundreds of times. Too much to do it again, but maybe since I hummed a few bars, y’all can pick it up.
Well ,we boomers pissed our power away with the two-party trap and the delusion that higher education made us smarter than a 5-yr.old .I bought my ticket to hell when I pitched “”harmonization”" as the word to to explain how the nation would enslave itself via corporate globalization .I parlayed the word with a cola ad’s imagining of a multikulti choir singing perfect harmony .I should be hanged for treason because ,to my surprise ,it worked so well .
That ,along with the Clinton/Gore crypto-agenda to quash the minimum wage via welfare reform .created its structural demise .
“Just the way it works.” Don’t care for that tune much.
Still the cumulative compensation was 113% and looks like nothing from seventies. Something seems amiss here. Mitchell wrote a piece a few months ago,pointing out,that average pay,for men hardly moved at all from the seventies. This confirms it.,
The Reagan administration is credited for killing “stagflation”, but all they did was kill the inflation and leave the stagnation.
So its not just my boomer nostalgia for my young manhood: 1976 is about as good as it ever got.
You can see it on these other charts for inequality and relative income also: http://inequality.org/income-inequality/
It just so happens that the wealth concentration started to grow at exactly the same time: http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2009/08/trickle-up.html
Strange coincidence you think?
Taft-Hartley, 1947. http://hnn.us/articles/1036.html
Even with the alleged productivity poison of workplace-internet; we’ve never worked harder! We are just were they want us to be, how would they ever be expected to give than up peacefully?
Labor productivity concentrated in mfg, primarily male employees.
Sounds rigght.
More than one cause can happen at the same time.
Its skewing is a function of tax changes & CEOs figuring out how to take advantage of the agency problem. Also MoI (Mafia of Intelligentsia, i.e., medical, law, & higher ed industries) figuring out how to take advantage of their knowledge gap.
I know people want simple solutions to complex issues, but I would discourage that way of looking at the problems in light of more in-depth research.
Railing about death of liberal bargain may make some people feel better emotionally, but doesn’t get at the causes.
Not that either approach will change anything.
BTW, I think the graph might be for nonfinancial corps., which is another problem.
Greenspan once corrected in his own pen, one of my reports and sent it back to me, bc I didn’t correctly define a productivity measure in terms of what it included & excluded. Lowered my opinion of him several notches, as he had nothing better to do with his time than nitpick. Then, when all you do is raise or lower interest rates every several months, I guess you have lotsa time for nitpicking.
Feel free to regale us with a more useful approach.
There isn’t one, more’s the pity.
Afterthought:
I personally enjoy the analysis, even if it has no chance of changing anything.
YMMV
OffT
Some of you know of my bee keeping hobby & may want to sign the petition.
Thanks for your consideration.
The ole goat had to stand tall before congress every so often. I think he really liked that, sort of hero worship.
It makes me feel better so let’s keep on railing.
I really enjoyed looking at the liver spotted top of his head while he read his congressional testimony. /s
Yes, I was thinking about that after I typed that comment.
Since neither approach will make any difference, as I typed more honestly in 22, do what makes you happy. Railing or analysis. Machts nichts.
After reading the Death of Liberalism by Chris Hedges .my only concern is that some won’t just throw the dirt over this school of meaningless gobbledegook that hides under the label of progressivism to avert the wimp status it deserves ,as affirmed by hiding .Either believe in socialism and have the economic model conform to the national weal or believe in capitalism and continue having a global investment model to which we conform . That’s the causal issue ,and when ignored ,what remains is tiny ,muddled thinking that always proves to be a road to nowhere .
I’m a fan of mixed economy. Neither extreme works well.
Progressivism didn’t die. It was murdered.
Progressivism compromised itself out of existence and devolved into neoliberalism.
If the choice is between US financialized capitalism operating under the Pirate Flag and with no restraint on rapine, and Socialism of the French variety, I happily pick Socialism.
Once upon a time, there were other choices. Now I’m not sure. Ever been to Paris or Strasbourg?
Exactly.
No ,you are creating a false choice .I doubt that you actually believe that monopoly capitalism premised on industry is worth embracing.If you are proposing a command economy ,i.e. China, or something else ,it still must be rooted in my contention ,that political economy has a philosophical core of working for either social or capital needs .
So you think there is some liberal alternative, some law or regulation that will restrain Capital and restore some hope for the common man. Please share.
eCahn ,I won’t cut you the same slack with the false choice .I know you realize my axiom doesn’t preclude a mixed economy .If you just want to rumble .let’s rock,but other than matching wits.I can’t imagine why you would challenge me .You okay ?
Me too… FDL/comments is good at fleshing out the hopelessness.
Hey mas did you forget ,I loath fucking liberalism .I believe in full-scale forms of direct action ,with a primary emphasis on publicly financed elections .Unlike liberal pansies ,I wouldn’t lift a finger to change CU ,in fact ,I ‘m glad we have it .You don’t vote for change,you make change .Direct action by us or direct action against us .If you don’t agree ,do some of the lifting here and share with me .
I hate to correct one of the infallible know-it-alls around here, but the point of the “liberal bargain” or “social contract” is that each side agrees to not allow such imbalances to occur or persist.
That graph essentially characterizes the economy’s black box. Instead of getting all caught up in the inner workings of the economy, that graph tells you everything you have to know: what labor puts in – more and more – and what it gets out – less and less. And it ain’t no accident …
Z
A little bit more real history on how moneyed interests crush the little guy:
http://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com/2012/08/michael-parenti-functions-of-fascism.html
Thanks Glenjo ,I wasn’t hip to the site .Michael has been a commie most of his life ,so it was interesting to hear his balance dictum ,which was nicely contextualized .Are you a fan of his son ,Christian ,who’s advanced incredible environmental scholarship ?
Spot on comment. Goes and gets to the middle.
…X 2
Per the graph, that’s not how things happened in the 1950s and 60s.
In other words, duing both periods, labor was expensive. During the second period, starting in 1980, labor was expensive for perhaps a different reason, but that doesn’t explain why labor got an ever-diminishing piece of the pie during that period.
1973…10-year-old me watches the Watergate hearings on TV, watches the Mets rally to a hugely-unlikely pennant, wonders what Junior High School will be like, tries not to think about how nobody likes him…
…and all this time, unbeknownst, the Great Prosperity is ending, and the rest of my life would be spent with the country (and the world) slip-sliding-away into the sewer. Who knew?
Sigh.
Such an easy job being a liberal when there is no left to negotiate against. Liberals constituted a sham aristocracy.
And once the compensation of the great productivity of hegemonic American capitalism failed, liberals mock-obliviously sailed on into the American sunset.
As ecahn says, blah, blah, blah. Still, mixed economy? Good god, this insipid liberalism must be buried before neo-feudalists will be their acknowledged successors.
We are way past any liberal dichotomy ,which still refutes the egregious class warfare being waged against us .I still hope hope for transformation via direct action ,but I believe we are real close to victims militantly taking on their victimizers.I don’t give a fuck about the rentier class ,but its just desserts usually visit scapegoats .If such horror occurs ,the liberals ,not teabaggers ,should be blamed for the willful blindness and political inertia that invited chaos with no-plan b in tact .
It should also be noted that it was circa 1973 when floating currency exchange placed financial capitalism on steroids and catalyzed trade arbitrage to gut our industrial sector .
EXTERMINATE ALL EXTREMISTS… or elect them.