The Democratic Platform seems to have missed the central point of the banking mess: the Obama administration did not investigate the disaster, and didn’t indict anyone for the crimes that led to the Great Crash. In fact, the administration specifically refused to follow up on criminal referrals from the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission regarding one of the Goldman Sachs mortgage deals, saying as it always does, that it stinks, but isn’t a crime.
The Platform admits that
For too long, we’ve had a financial system that stacked the deck against ordinary Americans. Banks on Wall Street played by different rules than businesses on Main Street and community banks. Without strong enough regulations, families were enticed, and sometimes tricked, into buying homes they couldn’t afford. Banks and investors were allowed to package and sell risky mortgages. Huge reckless bets were made with other people’s money on the line. That behavior not only nearly destroyed the financial system, it cost our economy millions of jobs, hurt middle class and poor families, and left taxpayers holding the bill.
Then we find out the solution offered by the party in power:
The path to restoring middle class security is through the basic values that made our country great. We are a nation that says anyone can make it if you try – no matter who you are, where you come from, or what you look like. We know that America is strongest when everybody has a seat at the table and when the same rules apply to everyone, from Main Street to Wall Street.
The only reason the banks were allowed to play by different rules is that the Obama administration mulishly refused to enforce the law against them. There is no doubt that the law was broken, over and over. But the candy-ass prosecutors at the Justice Department won’t act, and the craven time-servers at the SEC are so worried about their careers that they fall all over themselves in admiration of the thugs who stole all the money and kept it, while millions of Americans lost their life savings and their houses.
The platform ignores the reality that the bankers got away with theft, wire fraud, bank fraud, loan fraud, securities fraud, and commodities fraud. There are two causes for this, both the responsibility of the President and Democrats in the legislature. First, the President hired a bunch of known bank sympathizers and fellow travelers to head up every part of the financial sector. At the head of the list are Attorney General Holder and Treasury Secretary Geithner. Holder hired a slew of white collar defense lawyers from Covington and Burling, and he and they will all return to their civilian jobs with their hands unsoiled by something so ugly as criminal prosecutions of their former and future clients. Geithner is a product of the inbred financial sector, a man unable to conceptualize the possibility that any of his trainers was a common thief.
Second, the investigative arm of every financial regulator is full of time-servers. The first responsibility of every incoming administration is to get rid of the moles left from the prior administration, the wreckers, the foot-draggers, the bureaucratic sludge, the people waiting their turn at the revolving door. Obama failed to do that, and he failed to instruct the head of agencies to do it either.
The platform asserts that Dodd-Frank is a common sense solution to the problem, and will prevent future problems. Nonsense. The agencies have been so thoroughly captured by the financial sector that they can’t even get their regulations into effect. The biggest banks are much bigger than they were, and even more dangerous.
The platform says that Democrats are “… holding Wall Street accountable, bringing new transparency to financial markets, and ending taxpayer-funded bank bailouts and the era of “too big to fail” and by “… by requiring them to provide relief for homeowners still struggling to pay their mortgages and to change practices that took advantage of homeowners.
So holding people accountable means a) we told the banks not to do that again, and b) we asked banks to help some of the people damaged by the banks get a few bucks out of the stolen hundreds of billions.
That is not the rule of law applicable to all. That is just a load of garbage dumped on our heads as if to say: you people get what you deserve.




33 Comments

Great post.
Highly Recommended!
For more documentation that Obama and his administration have followed Bush policies and there is no difference between the Uniparties see
Economy – http://newprogs.org/blog/2011/11/10/economy-under-democraticrepublican-uni-party
Economic Graphs – http://newprogs.org/blog/2012/03/02/economic-graphs
This is ongoing fraud, comrade. Capitalism is fraud, capitalists are fraudsters, and capitalist politicians must be fraudsters. The only thing gonna stop this is anti-capitalists.
Quick someone ha to tell o what really happened..
So, ya’ think mayb he just wasn’t in the loop????
I think, and you know hom much that pains me, the he was paying off IOU’s to the banksters from the ’08 elections. Or is he just s shill for Wall Street???
I”ve decided I can’t stomach pulling the lever or pushing the button for Obama/Biden again no matter what. Looks like I’ll vote for Jill Stein and be able to go home with my conscience intact. If RMONEY gets in so be it, I don’t care and I now know how those Nader folks felt in 2000. I cannot call myself a Dem. anymore after 40 yrs. It’s over I want a divorce.
And whose job is this (as representatives of the people)?
Why it’s the fucking Government’s.
A way to look at this is that the banking giants are an essential part of Americas global power. The banking giants are an essential part of The Nation and its endless quest for global ascendancy. Firstly by assuring the Treasury can borrow unlimited money at low low rates. They also help manage markets. Their giant size and obvious connection with The Nation is more and more helping to lure the worlds hot money held by the very wealthy here. This is crucial right now. All the trouble in Europe and China is attracting money here and the giant banks play a role in that.
The people, us, have nothing to do with it. Good governance and free markets may demand the rule of law for the banking giants but The Nation cannot tolerate that.
Vote your conscience and if Romney wins, be happy that the more effective evil lost.
Well, most of them have Wall Street *accountants*. But that’s not quite the same thing….
Ditto.
Barack Obama is certainly holding those Wall Street fatcats accountable! Just look at this fiery talk:
QUESTION: Let’s talk bonuses for a minute: Lloyd Blankfein, $9 million; Jamie Dimon, $17 million. Now, granted, those were in stock and less than what some had expected. But are those numbers okay?
THE PRESIDENT: Well, look, first of all, I know both those guys. They’re very savvy businessmen. And I, like most of the American people, don’t begrudge people success or wealth. That’s part of the free market system.
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2010/02/10/173125/paulson-obama-bonuses/
Go get ‘em, tiger!
Good stuff, MaC. No more bullshit. Thanks.
Thank you, masaccio.
Recommend.
Got that right. See the reporter threaten with arrest for asking a DNC fundraiser a political question? Even the seasoned reporter was in shock.
This is “unfettered fascist behavior” and a violation of 1st Amendment rights when reporters or anyone for that matters asks a political question and law enforcement threatens arrest? Where are we in, fucking Germany? Right out of Hitler’s fascist handbook.
This is utter fucking garbage and the threat to the nation comes from political parties and political/corporate operatives now shielded from questions asked by the press, by law enforcement?
“Demorats” and “Rethugs” are both in fascist fantasy land if they and their political operative think can suspend the first Amendment for political convenience, while fucking the republic.
Intimidation is the hallmark of the fascist bully. Threatening the press with arrest for exercising first amendment rights is intimidation and certainly qualifies as “fascist behavior.”
These folks must be smoking crack cocaine!
Your wrong Ludwig… It will be us American that will put and end to it…
Unless you live in one of the 12 counties in the five swing states, your vote does not matter. Since I do not live in one of those areas, I like you will be voting for Jill Stein.
Yep me to voted Peace & Freedom in 68 then for demodogs since but not ever again Go Jill.
Great post mas.
So the let the collapse happen again. The next time the heads of bankers and politicians will be on pikes.
Your statement implies that Americans cannot be anti-capitalists. I’m an American. Hell, I’m eligible to be a member of the Sons of the American Revolution.
I’m also a Socialist, which tends to make me an anti-capitalist.
Ludwig’s right, comrade. It is when Americans proclaim “We want something else!” besides capitalism that things will really change. It may not even be socialism.
It might be something new. What, I don’t know. But it sure as hell won’t be capitalist.
Good post, M. Thank you and recc’d.
If I did live in one of those areas I’d still be voting for Jill Stein.
I want to sink Obama. The democrats have to learn that there is a price for acting like a republican.
Here is an interesting essay on Currency crisis at
http://patriceayme.wordpress.com/2012/08/24/currency-crisis-in-a-nutshell/
where Patrice Ayme says “We are presently in a crisis similar to what struck Rome, a dearth of money for the real economy. Indeed, banks have diverted money creation away from the real economy, which is starved of investments (that is money and credit, from banks, for private industry).
The situation is even worse in Europe. In the Eurozone, states are supposed to be borrowing from banks. And the banks are unwilling to lend, as they have better things to do with their money, such as investing in derivatives. The result is a dearth of Euros (relative to the size of the Eurozone economy) and an overvaluation of the euro relative to the USA Dollar.
At least in the USA, the UK and Japan, central banks create as much fiat currency as needed. it’s all backed up by the mighty Pentagon, creating a virtuous, and, or vicious circle (depending upon one’s perspective.)”
In the comments Patrice has this:
”
FIAT currency is all about military power, and the willingness and capability to use it decisively INSIDE out. That’s why France, Germany and the USA have negative or very low interest rates. Nobody doubt that, if push comes to shove, these countries will use military force to set things financial right.(Or at least France and the USA will, and the German dobberman will follow…)
T bill investors trust that there will a USA or French money tomorrow, come what may… That’s what is meant by the safest…
Between the lines in what I said about Rome, was the fact, that Rome was incapable to use military force against her own plutocrats. Why?(my computer is refusing to type the interrogation sign… I am waiting for windows 8 to buy a new one…)
Because starting when Tiberius allowed plutocrats to default and then replenished them (just as ‘we’ did in 2008), the plutocrats were really in command. The emperor was really ‘first’ among plutocrats.
The Franks had no such qualms. Per the nature of the Imperium Francorum, new men (or women!) were coming to the fore, all the time, and thanks to military prowess, not fortune. So Charles Martel nationalized the numero uno plutocratic organization, the catholic church… To pay a vast army for the destruction of the Muslims invaders, something that Rome/Constantinople had proven unable to do…
When the Frankish government was saying such and such a coin was worth such and such, so it was. And only the government created money. Others who tried were, by law, boiled. ALIVE. So they could meditate upon the error of their ways, and beg for mercy.
HMMM… Maybe such is the solution of the banksters’problem: boiling…. That would be more constructive than steaming with rage…
Inflation is confined to financial derivatives and the like. And the more those inflate, the more the rest of the economy deflates… even Krugman has no understood that one… Or maybe does not want to… Lest he thinks lowly of his Pluto friends…
PA”
Would you vote for Obama if you lived in a swing state? I know the question is moot, but seriously, voting for Obama because you live in a swing state is a terrible way to look at one’s vote: “I’ll compromise and vote for the war criminal because I live in a swing state.” What does that say about us?
Firstly, great article masaccio, and thanks for it.
Secondly, is anyone actually surprised at this stuff? The Democratic Party is a wholely owned subsidiary of Wall Street not Main Street as it used to be thirty or more years ago. The Big Tent has been mortgaged and refinanced to the point of its now being a rather small pup tent.
Those who advocate for voting for that party are, in my own opinion, living in the long ago past. But, if one is committed to the two party system so be it, work to cleanse your party of the chains that bind it to the Goldman sachs’ of this world. I wish you much good luck with that effort but can and do applaud you for your efforts.
I spent many years, stretching into decades, at the grassroots Democratic Party level, working to reach the ears of the state and national party leaders ( rulers), all to no avail. I discovered, and rediscovered ad infinitum, that this organisation is a top down structure, especially after the ascendancy of the DLC, thanks Bill!
I now work to see third party presence in our system. Admittedly an arduous task as well. But one I hold more hope for than reformation of a once proud, now sad, party. But, to those working to bend the course of the Democratic Party, I say good luck. To those who work to convince all of us to vote democratic but do or say nothing about the current course of that party I say nothing but shake my head.
Masaccio, you hit the ball out of the park with this one.
“Second, the investigative arm of every financial regulator is full of time-servers. The first responsibility of every incoming administration is to get rid of the moles left from the prior administration, the wreckers, the foot-draggers, the bureaucratic sludge, the people waiting their turn at the revolving door. Obama failed to do that, and he failed to instruct the head of agencies to do it either.”
This no more than a third term for the Bush Administration, or I should say the “Dick Cheney” administration, that would be more correct. He ran the government while “W” watched cartoons or read comic books.
Since I just discovered this after “O” was elected I haven’t been active in any third party, but now I see this is the only option, and I wish you success.
as long as you are willing to eat political crap thats what is going to be offered to you. the dem leadership are all sellouts without exception. the fdr dems in dc are there for window dressing
No you won’t cause you’re the fools who let it happen. And it will go on because you’re still fools.
lakota, thanks for the good wishes and come on and join me in the effort. You can register third party, work to register others, research the benefits of such a system and spread the word. Please vote third party too.
In November of 08, after Borack Obama had been elected President, Ben Bernanke, George Bush, and Dick Cheney, ran the 30 year T-Bond market up past 140. China owned 450 billion in T-Bonds before that move, those very same bonds were worth a lot more after that move; they were worth 75 billion dollars more, and so were the bonds in foreign treasuries all over the planet. This reduced the value of the dollar, and the price of gold shot up, at a time when Borack Obama was celebrating his election victory. Republicans were “sniggling” and buying gold.
He kept Ben Bernanke on, even after Ben helped to ruin the Obama economy before Obama even took office. Although everyone thought the price of oil was going up, after this, the reality was the value of the dollar was going down.
After I get over my voter “neuropsychosis” from voting for Obama, I will certainly consider that option, I’ve still got time.