I’m just sure Elizabeth Warren had Jamie Dimon in mind when she said this to the Democratic Convention:
Wall Street CEOs—the same ones who wrecked our economy and destroyed millions of jobs—still strut around Congress, no shame, demanding favors, and acting like we should thank them.
Could there be a more obvious strutter than Jamie Dimon? Just look at this picture of the guy, and imagine his voice as he gently instructs his inferiors on the Senate Banking Committee in the ways of the world. Ben Protess and Michael J. de la Merced should be ashamed of their headline: “Proud” JPMorgan Chief Apologizes. That wasn’t an apology. The point of Dimon’s testimony was that the London Whale Trades were just exactly what banks are supposed to do, except for the losing billions of dollars part. But CEO Worship is part of the deal at the New York Times.
Dimon shamelessly demands favors.
“There are huge benefits to size,” Mr. Dimon said. He noted that JPMorgan’s size allowed it to be “a port in the storm” during the market turmoil of 2008. “Big banks have a function in society.”
The United States, he added, has the “best, widest, deepest and most transparent capital markets in the world.” Cautioning against needless reform, Mr. Dimon said, “Let’s make sure we keep that before we do a bunch of stupid stuff that destroys that.
There are benefits to size? Share with the class, Jamie, what are they? More money for CEOs? More room for inflated egos? More flunkies kowtowing to you? It certainly doesn’t have anything to do with lending money into the American economy. Loans as a percentage of JPMorgan’s total assets fell from 32.7% in 2010 to 31.9% in 2011. 2011 10-K, p. 179. Consumer loans in all categories fell. Commercial loans increased from an inconsequential 2.4% of total assets in 2010 to an inconsequential 2.9% of total assets in 2011. See page 318.
Dimon tells Congress and regulators not to do stupid stuff that will interfere with his glorious business. I’m a lot more worried about the stupid stuff Dimon and his flaccid management team do. Under Dimon’s leadership, JPMorgan lost billions of dollars in its claimed area of expertise, derivatives trading. JPMorgan has been involved in every area of fraud and abuse revealed by investigations since the Great Crash, including bribery in Jefferson County swaps deals, manipulation of LIBOR, foreclosure fraud and fraud in the sale of RMBSs, MF Global, the collapse of Lehman Brothers, illegally foreclosing on members of the armed forces, money laundering, Bernie Madoff’s Ponzi Scheme … it’s a complete list of the major frauds in banking sector, and who knows how many more examples are hidden away in their files?
Even members of the financial elites like Sanford Weill, who assembled Citigroup, and Sally Krawcheck, who headed up Merrill Lynch, see that these companies cannot be adequately regulated. Weill wants to break up the giant banks, and Krawcheck wants drastic increases in capital reserves for the riskier banks. Personally, I favor long prison sentences.
But Jamie Dimon is in charge, strutting and preening and telling any reporter in earshot that Congress should really worry about doing something stupid in regulating his operation. The business press regurgitates that arrogance and smothers the stench of corruption with incense of praise waved at savvy bankers.
Banks and their allies share with Geithner’s Treasury Department a deep and abiding contempt for the ability of the American people to comprehend the financial system. The business press thinks that finance is like the Large Hadron Collider, intricately pieced together and operating on theories too complicated for the average human. It’s a lie. Banks make money by cheating people, not by lending them money. And no one goes to jail.




35 Comments

Didn’t Obama pick Dimon to be his new “jobs czar”.
Can’t remember for sure…
Outstandkng piece.
Wall Street loved the seamless transition from the Bush/Paulsen/BerBanke regime to the Obama/Geithner/BerBanke regime. They hardly noticed.
No kidding. Barofsky’s book, Bailout, makes this perfectly clear. He thinks Geithner was worse than Paulson.
The business press thinks that finance is like the Large Hadron Collider…OR the Dimon(a) Reactor.
Pretty sure you’re thinking of Jeff Immelt, the CEO of GE, who’s bent on GE paying no taxes and moving operations to China. But Jamie Dimon was one of Obama’s “savvy businessmen”.
You know, comrade.
Capitalism is fraud.
Frankly, that’s the money quote, and the likes of Jamie Dimon & his ilk are all master crooks & theives. They’d make Tony Soprano green with envy at how easily they get away with daylight robbery, whilst most of the masses cheer them in Ayn Randian stupors.
Elizabeth Warren may have been part of the solution at one point, but I doubt that’s she’s nothing more than part of the problem these days. Obummer has been known to blurt out populistic bullshit like that, too. Didn’t mean squat. They all lie & scratch each other’s backs.
And then Dimon & his old boys club chuck$ some million$ in the direction of their hired hands, like Obama, Clinton, Warren. What’s a few mill to someone like Dimon? Chump change, believe it.
Mark me down for longer prison sentences.
P.S. Why shouldn’t Dimon be arrogant?? Whotcha gonna dew aboud it? Who’s gunna bring him to justice? Not gonna happen.
Dimon’s got us all by the short ‘n curlies.
I’m over the adulation for Warren. She’s got the rhetoric down pat, but as evidenced by her inability to even fight to head the agency she created, it’s looking like Obama is her political model.
They need to take the investment arms out of the banks and break them up. Then if they go bust they go to hell.
Oh a few of them in jail would be ok too.
That’s the way it looks to me, as well. I don’t think we can count on her to do anything useful. Once anyone reaches a certain level, they’re just bought off. Done deal. Part of the machine.
If anyone is interested there will be a webinar at OWS. Some of the featured speakers will be several MMT economists. One topic of interest will be the financial crash. It will be on sept 17. Go to ows2.org.
“Banks and their allies share with Geithner’s Treasury Department a deep and abiding contempt for the ability of the American people to comprehend the financial system”
These people are so confident in their position that they don’t even need to pretend to be concerned.
Best quote I have read in years on any subject was the Senator who mistakenly spoke the truth “The Banks, frankly, own the place”
Mr. Scarecrow you have a tremendous ability to cut with eloquence and simplicity, right to the rotten core.
sorry, wrong poster, right description. (for both of you)
nobody can impede the progress of the Highwaymen
Randy Wray, Stephanie Kelton, and Michael Hudson representing MMT!
Right on, masaccio!
Highwaymen thrived in England in the seventeenth and eighteenth century,
becoming legendary and romantic figures. Highwaymen were “as common as crows” from around 1650 to 1800. In an age where travel was already hazardous due to the lack of decent roads, no one rode alone without fear of being robbed, and people often joined company or hired escorts.
Travelers often wrote their wills before they traveled.
Nice post mas .These banksters will always say we need them to remain globally competitive .This is absurd .We don’t need them .We don’t need their fiat money ,We don’t need corporate globalism and its post-GATT premise of giving up our sovereignty for a world of interdependent markets .which was justified as a means of realigning national interests to prevent war without costly militarism .This export-driven model was seen as bullshit at the time but two nations imposed their will against the majority in this U.N. post-WW2 vote. Guess who ?
We need public banking ,to regain our sovereign integrity and use MMT modeling in this context with publicly funded elections.Eliminate the WTO ,IMF ,the World Bank and every vestige of global government before its forthcoming centralized banking apparatus is harvested via disaster capitalism .
We can’t prevent the oncoming economic collapse ,nor can we use the instruments of power to eliminate the instruments of power ,but if we have no plan-b when a more horrific 08 redux occurs ,then the “”check”" will stop .the blood will flow ,while the well-prepared teabaggers and Wall.St. feudalists then mete out our just deserts .
Jamie wear’s Barack’s cufflinks to congressional hearings. Barack wears a locket under his shirt with Jamie’s picture in it.
Unless I’m way behind the latest changes to Obama’s administration he has the CEO of GE, Jeffery Immelt, as his jobs czar. Dimion is however one of the savvy businessmen he so loves to use as an example of American entrepreneurship. After all as Obama says ‘we do not disparage wealth in America’.
There’s a sea change coming, friends. the repubs are done in this cycle. The circle is complete. David Brooks on the NewsHour admitted: “Romney is going down.”
Game. Set. Match. Rombot is done.
Lefties should be planning how to best exercise some influence over the POTUS in the coming second term now that we know whom the likely winner will be. Maybe try to build the majority in the Senate and take over the House. Elizabeth Warren in Massachusetts is a good start.
I will dream of guillotines tonight.
Dimon’s wiki used to say that Obama had appointed Dimon something or other. I could not remember the title, so I just checked the wiki. Today, though, it says nothing about an Obama appointment.
Dimon’s wiki today still says a lot about his ties to Rahm, Obama and Geithner, So does this truthdig article. http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/obama_cant_knock_the_hustle_20120517/
Carroll Quigley said that financial markets don’t want elections to change much. Bill Clinton had Quigley as a professor and cited him as a huge influence.
The Koch brothers donated to the Democratic Leadership Council. Of course, that was before the DLC morphed into the Democratic Party.
Er, I mean, of course, the financial markets will never, ever have what Quigley says they want. That would require the Democrats to be much like the Republicans, with the possible exception of a couple of social issues, which the plutocrats could care less about.
If the French people had dreamt of guillotines, Louis LVI would be in Versailles as we post.
If they did not hold general strikes, their vacations would be the same length as ours.
But, we have the vote. Well, at least we have the vote until the votes get “counted.”
No, the sea change took place decades ago, when Democrats morphed into Republicans. Heads, the Koch brothers win. Tails, the Koch brothers don’t lose.
The most concerted effort to influence a vote that I’ve ever witnessed was the effort to get a public option in the health insurance bailout bill. At that time, people still thought they could influence Democratic politicians with things like online polls, emails. phone calls, etc. And Obama was in theory still very susceptible to influence, what with his wanting re-election and all.
I wonder how you think people will believe again that they can influence Obama and why Obama will be more susceptible to being influenced in his second term than he was in his first term.
IMO, he is really going to go full bore neoliberal in his next term.
If only someone had thought of something like that during the Great Depression.
Someone like, oh, I don’t know, maybe Senator Carter Glass (D) of Virginia? Or Representative Henry B. Steagall (D) of Alabama?
Of course WI
Attorney GeneralMerit Pay Hack JB Van Hollen will arrogantly fight it, but for now a Wisconsin Judge Rules Walker’s Anti-Labor Law ‘Null and Void.’The voters have spoken says Walker and his cohorts on collective bargaining, but, when they lost a state Senate race in recall Racine last summer, then the “other,” party surely must have simply cheated.
I’m sad to see you come to that conclusion about Warren. I disagree. Spend some time looking at the overwhelming opposition to her candidacy among the local MA Democrats. They’re pissed that someone outside their “group” dares to run for an office they think they’re entitled to.
And please note that Obama gave her NO support and continues not to do so.
It’s difficult, at the level of running for Senator, to do and be all that we on the Left might like. I think she’s doing as good a job as she can, and she’s miles ahead of others.
I am willing to stand corrected, and I confess to being beyond cynical at this point. I sincerely hope you are correct, and that, in this case, I’m dead wrong. Believe me, nothing would make me happier. Best of luck to Warren. I don’t live in MA, so I cannot vote for her.
I couldn't agree more. Except that he is already full-bore neoliberal. Just that there will be no purpose to hide it.
Now that he is no longer susceptible to re-election, he has no compulsion to obey the dictates of Emanuel's "fucking retards". Throughout the past four years the only group he didn't compromise with are the progressives. It will be interesting to see how they are blamed by partisan loyalists for what the Democratic party does in his coming term.