It isn’t just the US plutocrats like David Koch and Sheldon Adelson and the plutocrat wannabes at Romney $50K per plate dinners who want to screw up the economy and make sure Americans remain in blissful ignorance of the real world. Here’s an article in a French magazine Basta describing the efforts of French plutocrats to influence the US Elections and support right-wing right-think tanks. (Link is to Google translate. If it doesn’t work, insert this link: http://www.bastamag.net/article2758.html into google translate. Or read it in the original French.)
The article begins by pointing out that there is no limit on campaign contributions in the US, and no transparency. French companies are the fourth largest contributors to Senate and House campaigns behind Swiss, British and German companies. The article relies on OpenSecrets.org in reporting that French companies have admitted to giving $728K through October 1. Buyers include Sanofi (pharmaceuticals), Gulf Suez (energy), Lafarge (cement and building products), Areva (nuclear) and Louis-Dreyfus (commodities trading). French energy magnates fund 16 Republican global warming deniers and six adamantly opposed to any form of regulation of greenhouse gases. Several French companies support Illinois Congressman John Shimkus, probably because
He made headlines in 2009 by declaring that no one should fear rising sea levels because God promised Noah that mankind would never be threatened by a flood.
Another favorite is Dan Lundgren, currently trailing newcomer Ami Bera in California. Climate deniers would lose a major supporter if the results hold up. Another favorite is “flat-earth” candidate Anna Marie Buerkle, currently trailing Dan Maffei by 14,601 votes but unwilling to concede until the 14,442 provisional and absentee ballots are counted. Flat-earth candidates don’t do maths so good. All in all, not that great for the French contributions to stupid, but probably better than Karl Rove; at least the dollars were smaller.
Then there are regular French politicians. In their last elections, the people elected a Socialist, Francois Hollande, and gave him a working majority in the legislature. So right off, he appointed a French version of the inane Jack Welch to provide him with a report on needed changes in the economy. Louis Galois, a seasoned bureaucrat from European Aerospace Defense and Space (EADS), is a true representative of the plutocracy. His prescriptions read like Mitt Romney’s wet dreams: crush workers and use the profits to sweeten the pots of the rich. Sorry, I meant create jobs. In France.
The report calls for a payroll tax reduction of €30 billion, or $38 billion, a sum equivalent to about 1.5 percent of the French gross domestic product. The reduction would be in the form of a €20 billion tax break for businesses and a €10 billion break for workers on the lower end of the wage scale.
The government would offset the effect of the tax reductions on the budget through higher sales and carbon taxes, as well as cuts in government spending.
That sounds like a specific program to dump the costs on the working class, which now, of course, includes the middle class. And the new item: fracking for shale gas. As usual, the important thing is the destruction of regulations and the improvement of the animal spirits of the investing class.
A spokesman for Medef, the French employers union, says this is a great plan. And the Germans chime in with Jorg Kramer, who says that the French must change and not slide into the muck with Italy, Spain and Greece. And the Socialists are buying:
Firms will be offered tax credits worth up to €10bn next year, rising to €20bn by 2015, to be financed by an increase in VAT and €10bn in public spending cuts, as yet unspecified. That was less than the €30bn-a-year cut in payroll taxes that Gallois demanded, but far more than many analysts expected. The rebates will be proportionate to the size of a company’s payroll, up to a maximum of two-and-a-half times the minimum wage, in an attempt to support jobs./
I’m sure you recognize that the VAT hike will impact workers a lot, not so much the plutocrats. And I bet the spending cuts will not impact the rich. It looks like elections don’t matter much in France either, though the Socialists are raising the top tax rate to 75%, something we can never do here.
And the Greeks are in for more of the same austerity in the aftermath of another vote for it from their sleazy politicians. Elections don’t chanage things there either. Both leading parties vote for austerity, and both parties flatly refuse to investigate their tax-evading rich. The only important thing is to get another loan from the EU to “shore up its banks and pay off loans” to the rich.
The problem is that nations and their citizens owe a lot of money to the hyper-rich bastards who try to steal elections and keep us stupid so we won’t notice the oceans crashing into our cities or ask how the financial crisis happened. They want control so they can force us to repay those loans.
Just once, I’d like to hear a politician point out that there is an easy way to pay those debts: we tax the hell out of the plutocrats and use that money to “shore up the banks and pay off loans”.
Image from Economy in Crisis, used with permission.




23 Comments

Here’s more on the fallout from the Greek vote: https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/09/world/europe/defections-shake-greek-coalition.html
I’d guess the statement in the article that future budget reform will come from catching tax evaders is garbage. They’ll pry that money from the cold dead hands of the Greek plutocrats. It’ll be Lower Richistan that will be hammered next, and it will be a cold day in hell when Upper Greek Richistan pays up.
The easy way to pay the debt is to use other peoples money.
Exactly.
This is the real ‘entitlement’ reform that needs to happen in our country, and in Europe. The hyper-rich profit from government-developed and owned infrastructure, government-regulated industries, government R&D investments, government technology…
They would not be rich without the environment, provided by government, that they operate within.
I know you were being sarcastic, but you’ve raised a good point. Just that, instead of seeing it as other people’s money, try to see it as money owed for services rendered.
The rich, both here and abroad, have been receiving far too much while giving back far too little.
Actually considering the war didn’t really benefit the Burger King workers who had their retirement accounts robbed, I’d argue that a tax increase would be forcing those that have benefitted to pay back the money that they took.
The plutocrats have created toxic dumps to last for geologic periods and have done it all over the world via the secret activities of their banks, central governments, and the militaries. Now, Toronto residents have discovered a secret GE-Hitachi nuclear facility in the city at 1025 Lansdowne Avenue (Lansdowne and Dupont).
[Vid] GE’s Toronto Uranium Secret – (Public Meeting, 15Nov2012, 1900 Davenport Rd, 7pm!)
Get lost, troll-boy.
Is it illegal for American politicians to accept foreign contributions to their campaigns? Yes or no.
Using the money that the plutocrats stole from us would work.
Oh and can you remind me again who issues money?
It’s nice that the richest of the rich claim ownership of everything but just because they’ve done so doesn’t make it so.
The con is the government creates the money yet somehow can never own it. Yet once the rich manage to obtain money by hook or crook it’s totally “all theirs” and any attempts to get some of it back to benefit others is some horrible, terrible awful unfairness.
It’s laughable.
How about we decommission the plutocrats? I hear there’s a final resting place for the low level radioactive pieces left over to sit out their period of toxicity out in New Mexico.
I cannot for the life of me figure out why that comment led to you being labelled a troll.
Alan, I rarely agree with you POV, but a troll you are not.
Never fails to amaze me that conservatives whine & wail over the 1% being taxed FAIRLY. The 1% – via various means – has ensured that they benefit from every tax loophole, tax incentive, and tax rip off possible. RMoney refused to show his tax returns bc it would’ve undoubtedly shown what a tax CHEAT he is.
As others have rightly pointed out, the US & State & Local govts (can’t speak for other govt) have provided a very rich environment in which these rapacious 1%ers have amassed great fortunes, often to the detriment of hard-working middle & working class citizens.
Yet when it’s proposed that a fairer tax system be enacted, conservatives rise up in their hive mind to complain & wail about how unfair this. Why? Why is it “fair” for some mega-rich shit to rip me off, as a hard-working middle class (just barely anymore) citizen via a ton of tax-cheating, but when I attempt to have that rich-shit taxed FAIRLY, it’s somehow the end of the world??
Why conservatives, who are just as much ripped off by the 1% as I am (just try driving on your local roads), want to defend highway robbery of the 1% is an unending, but extremely frustrating, mystery to me.
bah humbug
Tax the bastards… just like ME.
I’d like to “second” that idea.
alan, you’re brilliant.
Still don’t know the status of the “world’s first private nuclear weapons facility” (Honeywell) in Kansas City, MO supported by tax payers.
And Kris, you are eaually brilliant.
At the risk of sounding immodest, funny, all three of us brilliant people from Texas. I hope FDL knows how lucky they are to have us as regular contributors.
I like that plan. Let’s get some people working on implementing it.
To further document your point, the OECD has a report out that argues the Plutocrats are sucking the life out of everyone in developed countries and recommends more middle & lower class wealth, higher taxes on wealthy etc. …
How exactly did they come by that money? Now a libertarian would say they built that. But a realist would point out that society makes it possible, and when it isn’t useful to let them keep it, well, taxation is a very plausible solution. Or do you think the French Aristos were in the right?
From the traditional folk song “Its the Same the Whole World Over”:
CHORUS:
It’s the same the whole world over,
It’s the poor that get the blame,
It’s the rich that get the pleasure,
Ain’t it all a bloody shame.
Things never change, do they?
Donald, Donald Trump! Didn’t recognize you behind the alan1tx sunglasses.
Oh, she was poor but she was honest,
the victim of a rich man’s whim,
and ‘e wooed her and ‘e wooed her,
til she ‘ad a child by ‘im,
Now ‘e’s in the ‘ouse of commons making laws to aid the poor,
and this miserable maiden is nothing but a village whore.
Oh it’s the sime the ‘ole world over,
ain’t it all a bloody shime’ it’s the rich wot gets the gravy’
it’s the poor what gets the blime.
My Parents used to sing that with other depression babies at parties.
What a flashback
Hey MZ we have enough toxic waste here in NM already send them to AZ.
[...]
- excerpt from “Eddy-Lea Energy Alliance envisions Southeastern New Mexico home for spent nuclear fuel” (Carsbad Current-Argus, by Taryn Walker, twalker@currentargus.com, Oct. 4, 2012)