The American Banker led a panel discussion of some of its members, allowing them to demonstrate once again their ignorance of their own situation. US Bankcorp CEO Richard Davis says that the big problem facing Geithner’s successor is “helping the industry handle international regulations”, lest they “overwhelm U.S. banks, or make them scale back their operations.” He isn’t saying what “operations” will have to be scaled back, probably because he doesn’t want to admit that 99.9% of us would be happy to see them scale back their money laundering, their overpriced derivatives, their fraudulent foreclosures and their participation in proprietary trading. But that is clearly the part of the business he intends to keep doing.
Davis also reiterated the frequent industry warning that regulation will make it too costly for banks to do business with many customers.
“Banking services will become less and less available to more and more people. And we’re not threatening, we’re not being mean, we’re not trying to make a point. But now you have credit risk and all those other risks” to worry about, he said. “That next scream you’ll hear from Congress a couple of years forward will be wondering where the banks are.”
So, those terrible international regulations will restrict lending to small business. Amazing how regulations directed at money-laundering, overpriced derivatives, thuggish proprietary trading and fraudulent foreclosures will result in reduced lending, the only thing most of us think is the business of banks. And of course all banks face the same rules, so Davis shouldn’t worry that US banks will lose out in international competition.
More whimpering:
James Rohr, the CEO of PNC Financial Services Group (PNC), said his first priority for a new Treasury Secretary would be eliminating economic uncertainty, including many businesses’ concerns over the fiscal cliff, health care reform and taxes. Such worries are keeping many bank customers, especially small businesses, from borrowing.
Only a banker completely insulated from the actual business community would say something this wrong. Let me help, Mr. Rohr: read this post by Paul Krugman titled Culture of Fraud and all the linked discussions and papers. I promise you it’s not too hard; even non-bankers like Krugman’s readers understand it quite clearly. You will feel much better about the future of lending when you get done.
We don’t want to forget the big problem facing banks, the fact that their reputation sucks.
“There are no allies for banks. There’s nobody speaking on behalf of banks,” Davis said during the panel. “We still have to build a reputation story.”
Really? No allies? How about those millions spent on politics? How about all that money for losers like Scott Brown and Mitt Romney? Didn’t you buy a bunch of allies? Oh well, I guess you’ll have to rely on all those senators and representatives of both parties who got millions and who get lobbied at the cost of millions more, and the Fed, the OCC, and the Treasury Department and all the rest of those allies you have cosseted and paid off for decades. Not to mention a Department of Justice that can’t find any criminals in your midst.
But those allies can’t fix your reputation when your industry is riddled with fraud and corruption, and when absolutely no single person can be found who is criminally liable for that fraud and corruption.
Davis has a great idea: you have to make your colossal bank more neighborly.
Davis said that banks wanting to repair their reputation should play up their similarities to smaller companies, with their generally tight-knit relationships in the communities where they work.
That’ll be interesting. Banks don’t pay interest, they arrange things to maximize their fees, and they don’t lend much to small businesses. They destroyed the financial futures of millions of people. And if we don’t change things to suit Davis, he’ll just stop serving local customers. That’ll show them.
I think these guys need to step up the threat level. They need to be competitive with Robert Murray of Murray Coal; the guy who blamed his mine collapse on an earthquake or Obama, I forget which, and who fired 156 workers because Obama won the election after he spent untold dollars to defeat him and other democrats.




20 Comments

Not to mention lying sack of shit and Papa John’s CEO John Schnatter, he of the 40,000-square-foot mansion in Louisville, who falsely upped the ACA cost to him by nearly an entire order of magnitude:
This is the complaint of an incompetent, looking for “HELP!! I’m lost.”
This is a wounded animal situation. They know their excesses and crimes are eventually going to come to an end so they’re trying as hard as they can to scare us into giving them their way. Don’t fall for the bullshit.
It’s not a matter of profit and loss. It’s profit and less profit. They know it and hope we don’t.
Well done, masaccio! Exasperation is tiring, and I simply can’t chase the bubbles any more.
Just ask the people of Jefferson County Alabama about the cost of their tight-knit relationship with the big W$ Banks.
From RollingStone’s Looting Main Street;
It was just this sort of fianacial wizardry on the part of Big Banks that ‘helped’ Greece paint it self into the corner that it’s in.
On a side note, when history is written… who will be given more credit for the new gilded age?
Considering that Bush took down MCI, Worldcom, Enron, etc… I suspect it’ll be Obama who will be most credited with ushering in the return of the robber barons.
These guys are hysterical. They don’t think it is fair that they should be the primary target of the tax hikes. Never mind they’ve been the primary beneficiaries of the tax cuts.
St. Ronnie more than any other, ‘ushered in’ the return of the robber barons, Clinton set the table, and stocked the bar, Bush frosted the cake, and provided the get-away car, and Obama signed the get-out-of-jail-free card, and is busy trying to put Humpty-Dumpty back together again.
I hope that’s not too many metaphors for ya.
Bankers are still playing games with American business and American jobs – one of the US’s last remaining vertically-integrated clothing manufacturers could not hang on long enough and is closing. One major reason is: banks refused to give them a loan to tide them over. http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/112-year-us-apparel-maker-pa-close-17637800#.UKZcUWeZgtA
We don’t even eat papa john’s pizza, free or not. We just don’t like it.
I have the same issue: support local businesses. These boycotts are just meaningless to me.
“To John Dillinger, in hope he is still alive:”
When any CEO (or the politicians who represent them) starts telling us about how concerned they are with the economic health of “small businesses,” we can all rest assured that not only are they feeding us bullshit, but also that they mean to do something against the interests of whatever “small businesses” still exist.
““We still have to build a reputation story.””
Brilliant and revealing language: They are not intersted in building and actual reputation, but instead a reputation story. I’m sure that doling out more public relations fraud will help an industry whose reputation is soiled due to their fraud.
not to mention that pizza delivery drivers are such obnoxious assholes, at least on city streets. Papa John’s and all the rest.
True.
I had to go away and stew awhile before I could make a comment about your diary, masaccio. I still can’t make any coherent statement. I can only scream because we know that they are getting away with felonies and still want to be admired for their “good works” of lending money for the “good of the community;” even though we know that they are not lending much and have no intention of lending to small business. ben bernanke is helping them to line their pockets and they want the rules changed so that there are no longer any rules governing them.
Davis said that banks wanting to repair their reputation should play up their similarities to smaller companies, with their generally tight-knit relationships in the communities where they work
yes those home town bankers..maybe they will come out of thier gated castles in CT and a have beer w/the comon folks!
These bankers would like the crime of usury to be turned into a public virtue. As parasites, they would like to imagine that what makes them thrive is good (and perhaps from a very narrow, exclusive, selfish perspective that is the case). They argue that their parasitism, as necessary to their survival, should go unchecked–if some is good, why wouldn’t more be better? What sort of organism is interested in foregoing a symbiotic relationship for one in which it devours its host? A sociopathic and ultimately suicidal one.
Yes, sociopathic and paracitic. Good summary.
hmmmmn. some people may no longer get banking services. cuz the banksters will be going a little galt-ish. galt-lite, so to speak. or just a tiny bit galt-y. cuz i can’t see these people surviving long on some island in the middle of nowhere.
Maybe Capri or Majorca but that’d be the limit.