I watched the inauguration on CBS, and didn’t turn it off before I was exposed to the sophomoric punditry we get from both old and young on national TV. One of the talking heads informed us that the speech called for working together, which in mediaspeak means doing what Republicans want, and the rest of the comments reinforced that view. They had the text in advance, but they don’t get it; it didn’t fit their idiotic narrative. Now that we have it, let’s take a closer look.
I see three related themes. First, there is a reference to the Declaration of Independence, “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”. This theme starts with “Through blood drawn by lash and blood drawn by sword, we learned that no union founded on the principles of liberty and equality could survive half-slave and half-free. “ This is a reference to Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address:
Fondly do we hope, fervently do we pray, that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away. Yet, if God wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsman’s two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said “the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether.”
Obama makes this stick by talking about the struggles represented by “Seneca Falls, Selma, and Stonewall”. Those struggles are brought forward to today, and he adds to them fair treatment of all of our immigrants. This motif is reinforced by those participating in the ceremony, people from the communities who made up the winning coalition. Obama makes it clear that he knows who elected him and what they want, at least in the social sphere.
Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address is best known for this:
With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation’s wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.
I think we can assume that Obama knows this, and intended to say that he recognizes that the minority who loathe these changes do not lose their personal dignity, but that they have to change. Peterr made this point last Saturday, and obviously Obama has read and understood Lincoln’s powerful speech.
The second theme is the statement that the election was a defeat for the Republicans who demand that the rich be given a special place in the nation, that they are entitled to run things.
The patriots of 1776 did not fight to replace the tyranny of a king with the privileges of a few or the rule of a mob.
He says that the privileged few are the biggest beneficiaries of the collective efforts of the nation.
No single person can train all the math and science teachers we’ll need to equip our children for the future, or build the roads and networks and research labs that will bring new jobs and businesses to our shores. Now, more than ever, we must do these things together, as one nation, and one people.
… For we, the people, understand that our country cannot succeed when a shrinking few do very well and a growing many barely make it.
This is a beautiful restatement of Elizabeth Warren’s forceful statement that “nobody got rich on their own”.
The third theme is that the election was a massive defeat for every last one of the conservative principles espoused by loser Mitt Romney, and Obama knows it. First, he throws the Republican campaign themes back in their faces. First there is the Warren reference, which denies the premise of the Republican Convention. Then there is this:
The commitments we make to each other – through Medicare, and Medicaid, and Social Security – these things do not sap our initiative; they strengthen us. They do not make us a nation of takers; they free us to take the risks that make this country great.
This is a flat denial of the Republican makers and takers meme.
Second, there is no call for bipartisanship. Instead, there is as close to a demand for change in the losing party as we could hope for in a public speech:
Progress does not compel us to settle centuries-long debates about the role of government for all time – but it does require us to act in our time.
For now decisions are upon us, and we cannot afford delay. We cannot mistake absolutism for principle, or substitute spectacle for politics, or treat name-calling as reasoned debate. We must act, we must act knowing that our work will be imperfect.
Obama already has begun to act in this vein, as we saw on taxes. I want more. I hope he makes McConnell get that lemon-sucking look every single day as he realizes he failed in his mission to ruin this President. This speech is a hopeful first step on the road to change.
Photo by Gage Skidmore under Creative Commons license




104 Comments

A magnificent read, thank you masaccio.
Recommended (FDL)
Tweeted
Recommended (FB)
Thanks, BooRadley. It was a masterful speech.
So, a team of good writers wrote a nice inauguration speech.
I’ve been watching the propaganda show for most of the day.
Does not change one gee-damn thing.
He has a long way to stop the “war” and move to the Left
on a hundred issues before I’ll try to train my lip
not to go into the sneer that has become
reflexive whenever I see man now.
Sadly, I’m with the cynics on this one.
Never have pretty words been so freely spilled.
Thanks, masaccio.
Needless to say, given my great love and respect for this Prez [snark] I was NOT watching. [However my daughter was AT the inauguration. She's got a friend who works in Biden's office, so got good seats.]
Anyway, I’m glad to have these items pointed out. I’m still cynical and hurt, but hey, I’ll take whatever, even if it’s only for a few days or months.
Just more phrases to throw back in Obama’s face when he breaks THESE promises.
And why couldn’t the Talking Head Dimwits see the message you saw?
why do we even believe any of his ‘soaring speeches’
after 4 years of his behavior?
Obama is a fraud.
On occasion words spoken by a President can have a transcendent value. It is rare, but if the venue has sufficient gravitas, the timing propitious and the rhetoric resonates, words can move the world to a different place.
Today these spoken words accomplished this special feat.
In his next act as ‘strong negotiator’ Obama will try to re-negotiate the permanent $400,000 tax cut to $600,000 in exchange for massive cuts to the safety net.
Yep talks cheap but then again not as cheap as it was in 08 corp. has paid their dues as so has 0 to his corp masters. Please stop believing the lesser of the evil will do any different in the next 4yrs.
Thank you masaccio. I like your take on the speech in spite of what some of the commenters saw that contrasts with what you have written.
The one thing that probably ticked me off most (nice way of putting it) was when Scott Pelley asked Bob Schieffer for his comments and immediately he responded (and I am paraphrasing him here) that there were no take away lines such as “Ask not… and really the speech was unimpressive.” He repeated that mantra on the 5:30 CBS News again. Trying to downplay anything that Obama said today.
It is time for Mr. Schieffer (good friend of the Bush family) to be put out to pasture.
I wonder what he said after W’s two Inaugural speeches about the quality of those comments.
Yes and he well throw everyone under the bus in the next 4yrs that voted for him. The programs will sound great but nothing will back them up, please just look at what has happened in the last 4yrs of hopism. Sad day in the new Amerika. I hope I’m wrong.
Thanks to everyone that comments and to Jane.
But is that place out of range of drone strikes?
I saw Schieffer say that. So completely divorced from reality.
I really wished I could have seen this live, but thanks to the internet I got to see it after work and connecting with my home peeps as usual.
The line that sticks with me was near the top:
That is for damn sure. One has to keep after what is right, what we need, what we love. I’ve been in that LGBT fighter trench for over 30 years now, and know that first hand.
And I’ve learned that there isn’t some sort of “won, and done” thing that happens or is going to happen; we have to maintain the rights we have.
As regards SocSec and really, everything else we hold dear, the truth is we’re always going to have to work to protect them, and Never. Give. Up.
Because the rights and dignities afforded to us are indeed not “self-executing.” They’re always going to need ACTION to keep them.
You could make a paper quilt from all of Obama’s speechifying, but it won’t keep you warm.
Please do not use pictures of The Turtle during the dinner hour. The pain is terrible.
I have hope for the next four years but will wait to see what Obama does. It was a great speech.
People on the right saw the speech as fighting words; here’s David Frum’s take.
Once you step out like this, you pretty much have to keep going where it takes you.
There is a lot of hope and promise in those words.
Thanks oldgold, well said in your comment.
kabuki?
If I remember my history correctly, the pundits of 1865 pretty much did the same thing with Lincoln’s speech. Though he clearly called for reconciliation and forgiveness, many of the DC bobbleheads of the time insisted that what he really meant was that there should be some incredibly harsh reconstruction terms if the South could ever hope to join the Union again. Seems like the more things change, the more they stay the same. Of course Lincoln also had his detractors, saying things like
ObamaLincoln is a fraud.Margaret, you just brought back memories of the same way they attacked Lincoln after his delivery of the Gettysburg Address.
In Ken Burn’s documentary of the Civil War this was covered quite well.
Frum is right.
Obama took direct aim at Jim Inhofe and the Climate Change deniers, Paul Ryan and the Ayn Rand acolytes, and Michele Bachmann and the rest of the namecallers in the GOP. He didn’t name them, but he didn’t need to.
He also didn’t have to go after them, and in doing so anyway, it says to me that he’s done trying to work with folks who have no intentions of working with him.
If so, that’s progress.
I like that line too and a spot on analysis, Kelly. We can never sit back and relax because there will always be somebody who wants that money that goes into Social Security, somebody who believes they have the right to tell everyone else how to live, and there will always be those who cry “doom” and insist those of us manning the trenches throw up our hands in despair. There will always be people who insist that we employ extreme measures, while excusing themselves from taking action.
Just a thought. The republicans are unlikely to pass an infrastructure program to help the unemployed, accept his nominees or agree with nearly anything he says. And they may play a game of rolling debt ceilings to extract concessions. They have always wanted, and still do, to defeat this man. So he had to find another path. It appears he will champion the hopes of the people for freedom and equality. That includes LGBT and minorities and economic justice. And, it will resonate with the people’s inherent belief in fairness and right. I hope he will remember also those who rely so heavily on our safety net. There is also the slim hope the republicans will overplay their hand and go into the night.
Yep. I see it as a commitment on his part. If he backs away now, he’ll be lamest of ducks ever to keep that seat warm for four years.
…Just more phrases to throw back in Obama’s face when he breaks THESE promises…
Aloha, MM…! Talk is mighty cheap indeed, where were those ‘comfortable shoes’ he’d once touted, when it counted…? 8-(
Yep! And while I think we’re in an age of very deep cynicism, I’d prefer it to morph into the age of realistic skepticism.
There’s a difference to my way of thinking. Because I think cynicism keeps one down, somehow off their “activities of doing-ness.” I think skepticism keeps one up, and on their toes about what they can actually do.
That’s the era I want it to be, whether it is or not; the era of “OK, I’m skeptical, but there’s no way I’m not doing what I can do.”
Hmph! Looks like even Bobo noticed.
Sure, as long as they don’t actually have to be backed up by any corresponding action and “moving the world to a different place” means getting folks to drink the Kool-Aid in order to win hollow political victories for lying demagogues who advance the agenda of the 1% by conning the 99% into voting for and supporting policies that are against their own interests.
When it comes time for actual leadership on issues that would challenge the interests of the 99% the only refrain we hear from the Obama-pologists is how weak an office the presidency is and how the “bully pulpit” is a myth.
Cynicism is accepting defeat, skepticism is expecting for someone to attempt to defeat you and preparing for it. Just my .02
“OK, I’m skeptical, but there’s no way I’m not doing what I can do.”
Exactly, Kelly…! But, that doesn’t entail denigrating other’s attempts…! 8-(
I appreciate masaccio’s elegant analysis, but I don’t listen to mainstream politicians’ speeches, and I’m with you on this one. Kevin points out that the war was going on even as Obama was claiming that he’s ending it. Enough said.
Not today. Apparently he thinks King meant “our individual freedom is inextricably bound to the freedom of every soul on Earth” unless they’re “suspected” of being
Viet CongAl Qaeda“militants”However, I agree that making the “Seneca Falls – Selma – Stonewall” connection in the speech was historic.
should read “challenge the interests of the 1%”
Link for @35
I think this speech signals Obama’s intention during the next four years to enter the political terrain of the bull. If so, like Belmonte, they will be his best days.
Good point.
Or mine either.
I have taken a lot of shit, and beatings, over the years, and it doesn’t bug me one inch to be critical of failed tactics, and have them criticizers be a-criticizing. Because they ain’t doing the one thing they need to do; get at least some of what they want.
What consistently amazes me is that me/my group’s tactics have been winning. And the criticizers marginalize me by saying things like “Crumbs! Crumbs! Crumbs!”
It’s always “all or nothing”. Those folks wouldn’t survive a week in my shoes. That’s just the reality of my life and my circumstances. That’s not a dig or a slight at them, it’s the way it is.
I don’t know why the talking heads can’t do basic textual analysis. I’ve been trying to think of an answer that isn’t snarky. Maybe they just don’t have the focus you need to read closely?
It’s pretty damning to not understand the message when even Bobo gets it…
If Obama is going to take on the kinds of issues implied in the “Seneca Falls, Selma, Stonewall” reference, that’s great and of course we should applaud. These issues aren’t to be dismissed as crumbs or tokens. They’re issues of survival, justice, equality, and everything else that’s important.
However, when Republicans take on these issues from the negative side, they do so partly to gain enough votes so they can move forward the rest of their agenda on the economy, the military, foreign policy, etc. When we evaluate Obama or the Democrats taking on these issues from what we would consider a positive side, we need to be vigilant about what other agenda items they are going for, and what we need to do about supporting or opposing the rest of that agenda.
…I have taken a lot of shit, and beatings, over the years…
*heh* Try being a scrawny white boy, where your younger sister, and yourself, are the only Ha’oles in the entire High School…? ;-)
Been there, Done that…!
Right.
I mean the whole “keeping on, keeping on” thing. That’s actually REAL. And we do it together.
I just don’t see it ever being different than that, and what probably pisses a lot of people off is that they see some perfect end-state, which I don’t.
I’m OK with an imperfect state and continual movement toward a better one. It just has to keep moving forward for me to be anywhere near content.
Sometimes it moves forward and for some periods it doesn’t, and that regulates the state of mind I get into, but not the state of activity to which I’ll attend.
I wish that was a more common way of looking at things.
Nothing wrong with seeing a perfect end state. The problem comes from expecting to reach a perfect end state. Because let’s face it, there will always be work to do and if there wasn’t, life would get pretty dull.
Behold:
Straight White Privileged Guy Compares High School Life to Minority’s Actual Life Beyond High School.
*heh* Privileged…? Since when…? ;-)
I didn’t hear the speech. Good job of summary and analysis, masaccio.
Seconding Boo’s thanks!
Compared to Kelly: Trust me, you are. And I am dead serious.
I won’t say any more because it’s not my place to describe his life history to God and everyone.
And you’re aware of my history, PW…? I’m better versed than you imply, M’dear…!
Cute, but no cigar.
How ’bout I do this? I’ll get Belch to take some pictures of my post-high school scars that are from assholes scarring me.
Like the 6 stitch scar on my right eye, from when I was 19? And that basher scarred me after I did his bidding, but he didn’t pay and I objected?
The one scar on my leg is pretty good too. 13 stitches. That asshole tried to keep me from leaving his house WHEN HIS WIFE was showing up. He stabbed me in my leg, trying to stab me to the goddamn floor. All he could think was that I should shut-up/be invisible. He actually pulled the knife out so I could escape.
Didn’t realize I would actually DO anything later, and yeah; the cops WOULDN’T and DIDN’T prosecute later. No no, I had an “accident.”
The scar on my right buttcheek is a total jewel. That was the serial robber dude. 7 Stitches. Right at the wallet area.
There are others – some invisible. But they’ve healed. Until I hear shit like this privilege crap, and then they get white fucking hot.
So you can just take that, and like it or lump it.
NO personal attacks are allowed on Firedoglake. -MyFDL Editor
Sadly, as far as my view of President Obama, there are three main issues: assassinations, assassinations, and assassinations! Once he’s out of office, I’ll be able to appreciate his human qualties; but willing cooperation with him on anything would seem to legitimate his policy of targeted extrajudicial killings.
…Yeah. And the horse you rode in on….
Ya know, Kelly, I truly empathize with what you’ve endured, but, was that necessary…? Really…? 8-(
I’ve had a broken nose and a few broken ribs along the way…! 8-(
What you don’t have is scars. What you do have is attempts to shame me.
I don’t care what you say Charles. I will not be shamed by you as you have nowhere ear my experience.
…What you do have is attempts to shame me…
Huh…? It what fashion, Kelly…? I harbor no ill-will to all your extensive efforts, Mi Amigo…!
It’s ironic that the person who signed indefinite detention without charges to US citizens essentially shredding a right or spying on Americans exercising their First Amendment right to assemble and exercise free speech a la Occupy would be the one to utter pretty words about “rights.”
But hey I’m sure this shindig that allowed him to play liberal of the day and emphasized the fact that Michelle rolled her eyes at Boehner is totally Obama turning over a new leaf(tongue firmly in cheek.)
I’ll happily get on the Obama bus when he makes good on things like a wage increase, drops increases in retirement benefits, actually cuts the Homeland Security/DoD/gargantuan military budget that dwarfs 10 other nations combined and actually DOES liberal things rather than just talks about them.
In what Fashion…?
I don’t think I’ll ever get back on the Obama bus. But if he’s going to say or do something positive now and then, that’s ok, and I don’t want to minimize the fact that it happened. However if he’s going to use “wedge issues” or “social issues” in the same way Republicans do – to sell along with his stand on those issues a corporate, war-mongering, authoritarian, etc. agenda, then we all lose in the end.
Sickening sycophancy.
That you can’t see it, isn’t surprising to me.
Any ‘mo reading this thread will get my meaning, easily.
You conflate being a scrawny white guy with being a gay guy/lgbt person, and that is wrong, since you aren’t one, never have been and won’t be one.
So sorry for your privilege, and that you don’t even get it.
I don’t know about CTuttle, but I’ll speak for myself. I’m not privileged. Not at all. My net worth is under $1000.00 right now. I’m lucky to have home internet access.
Do you even have a clue about what I’m talking about? Or are you going to go all Republican on me and say my circumstances are caused by MY choices?
I totally concur that I can’t possibly fathom the full duress that you were subjected to, Kelly, but, again, you fail to grasp other’s experience’s outside of the LBGT prism…! 8-(
Prism!
Perfect Republicanism. Yes I only see through LGBT eyes. /s
NO personal attacks are allowed on Firedoglake. -MyFDL Editor
There you go again, conflating the whole gay equality thing with YOUR economic equality.
You don’t really get either concept very well, and that they are inextricably tied together, do you?
I suppose that is why you’re still a Barbarian.
NO personal attacks are allowed on Firedoglake. -MyFDL Editor
I hope you’re right.
I think Obama’s best chance to be a “transformational” President (as he professes) like Reagan, is to take apart Reagan’s legacy.
Yer on a roll, Kelly…! Funny, how I’ve always considered myself more of a Wilsonian Democrat…! ;-)
So I can’t think because I don’t share your world view?. Because I’m straight? That’s prejudiced, man.
Please flag comments then move on. Declaring you are flagging people is just a way to perpetuate the drama. -MyFDL Editor
Doug Henwood on the inauguration speech:
Are words so special they can substitute for action?
Obama often does the opposite of what his words lead us to expect.
The things that Obama said that do matter related to equal rights for gays. Yes, DOMA is still the law of the land. But, it matters very much that the inauguration speech of a popular POTUS urged equal rights for gay people. So, simply saying the words was meaningful, even if he never does another thing with respect to that issue.
When it comes to other things, I’ve learned to wait and see what actually happens, because Obama has sometimes done the direct opposite of what he promised.
The best thing about this speech is that it was mercifully short. Just flowery, soaring rhetoric, though. Obama did not once say what he actually intended to try to DO, which, I suspect, is nothing.
He’s got 4 years to prove me wrong. Over four years ago, I voted for the SOB, and he broke every promise he made to the likes of me almost immediately. So I didn’t vote for him again, and I don’t believe him now.
Still, nice synopsis.
Why would Obama do that?
During the last round of primaries, both he and Hillary put Reagan on their ten best Presidents ever list.
It meant slightly more that Reagan was on Hillary’s list because she pretty much had to put Bubba on her list. Obama left him out.
So, she had only 9 slots to work with, while Obama had all ten. Still, she gave Ronnie one of her nine and Obama gave Ronnie one of his ten.
Murders.
Even “assassination” dignifies what he does. He murders. He’s a serial killer.
Can you imagine any U.S. President doing anything remotely similar to suspected terrorists (and innocent bystanders) in England or France? Or the world allowing it?
Talking heads are not scholars or even journalists. They are television personalities.
Most often, they are reading from a teleprompter material that someone else prepared for them.
This is in contrast to their predecessors, many of whom started their careers as newspaper reporters or maybe radio personalities back in the day when radio personalities did their own research and writing.
Don’t expect much from someone like Gregory.
FWIW, I apologize to you for the comments being made to you on this thread.
I am sorry that they were made, sorry that you have to put up with them, in addition to everything else that you have to put up with on a daily basis and have had to put up with on a daily basis for most of your life to date.
Boy, Obama must be doing something right. He’s pissing everybody off. Tough crowd eh?
…good comment cwz … can/will stand up and step up to the X 2 line…
POTUS Obama can and does make good speeches ( who composed this one? anyone know? ) but when it comes to putting on ( Obama did say he had some did he not ? ) Obama’s Walk The Talk shoes and taking a walk? B.H.Obama has been MIA time and time again…
As a POTUS who has let me down too many times on/about choices selected and made I am way past done thinking B.H.Obama has much intention beyond giving nice speeches and talking about high ideas and ideals but who then tells me/is telling me with his acts/actions to take a hike…
I doubt B.H.Obama has a willingness/capacity to walk the talk because despite all the nice speeches Obama as POTUS has given these speeches seem to end with the talking — not the doing/getting/being done….
Looking at what POTUS Obama has done/not done since Jan.20,2009 — then to get this POTUS Obama 2nd Inaugural speech in late Jan. 2013?…… just not seeing the Hope and Change …
I’ve read masaccio’s post, and the excerpts of the speech he included, though I’ve not read or heard the whole speech, and may not anytime soon. This is because I like masaccio and don’t like Obama.
However, even going by these excerpts, I see plenty of the familiar Obama:
Leaving aside the de rigueur patriotic mythologizing as a substitute for a realistic take on that period, are these two threats really looming over us to an equal degree? Has mob rule actually been making inroads comparable to the concentration of power and privilege among a shrinking elite?
A few weeks ago, Obama’s Justice Department explained that enforcing the criminal law against HSBC for money laundering was impossible because doing so could destabilize our precious financial system. Have we heard of any such reticence about throwing the book at either common (i.e. non-financial-and-governmental elite) criminals or activists because of fears the mob would rise up against duly constituted authorities?
All I have to say is that I would think we should all have Obama antennae enough by this point to note that this quote can be read just as easily as being directed against “the professional left” as against the lunatic-plutocrat condominium on the right.
And is Obama continuing to rub the right’s faces in their campaign-era “you didn’t build that” distortion less lame than the Republicans’ building their whole nominating convention around it? The answer is yes … but by how much, really?
I’m glad this was the inaugural speech that finally acknowledged different sexual orientations, and the claims of that diversity on political space, but I think the readership here knows enough to grade Obama appropriately for leadership on that issue.
I’m glad Obama mentioned climate change, as I read somewhere else he did. And that’ll be about that in terms of meaningful action.
The fact that masaccio found the speech masterful is encouraging to me; the fact that these are the passages he chose to illustrate the point, much less so.
I was trying to watch “Lockup.”
http://youtu.be/_4cElnK2O-8
NO personal attacks are allowed on Firedoglake. -MyFDL Editor
Comparing what you went through in high school, (while I’m sure it made an impression on you), to what LGBT people face on a daily basis is absurd. Let me know when the state of Hawaii passes laws preventing Ha’oles from full citizenship, then we’ll plan a strategy together.
Pissing off everyone means he is doing something right?
lol!
Did any drones fly on Monday, did any mothers and their children die?
Your actual other choice in the election was Willardbot. If you want the President to act more along the lines of how you want him to act, gather into large groups and make sure he gets that message. Sitting on the sidelines and whining about how this isn’t Utopia just makes you look bad.
People here and around the country have been sending that message from marches, rallies, Occupy encampments, petitions, email and phone campaigns, local organizing, voting for third party candidate, trying to primary conservative Dems, etc.
People have given time, effort, and money, and risked getting infiltrated, spied on, arrested, beaten up, their cameras smashed, etc.
No one was looking for Utopia. No one on this thread was looking for Utopia.
If the only thing people expect from their elected officils is that they not be Mitt Romney, we will never solve our problems.
Yeah, something. Uh-huh.
4 were killed in Yemen. We don’t know their ages or genders yet.
Romney recently pissed off even more people. Apply your logic to that one.
Speaking of which, isn’t today “disposition matrix Tuesday”?? Time for our President to decide which of the world’s citizens must die. Gave a great speech though on Monday.
Good points, especially given his history. I’m inclined to think we say a bit of real action on the tax thing and the debt ceiling thing, and as the results of the election have sunk in, it looks like Obama might be starting to change. It seems to me important that there was no call for bipartisanship in service of the nation, which to me is a recognition that Republicans won’t work with him unless they are forced to. This speech is a way of saying that Obama will make them eat their hatred of him at the polls. The Republicans read it that way also.
Turning to your specific points, I take the rule of mob line as a slam against the Tea Party; I’m thinking of the craziness at the Town Hall Meetings and their subsequent spoiled child behavior, but I see your point.
It’s true that the second point could be read as demanding the left bargain, but the language is “name-calling” and “spectacle” both attributable to the right but barely to the left. Anyway, we don’t have any power, and barely any influence, so that seems like a less important point to Obama.
You make a good case for watchful waiting, and continued effort to defend and attack where possible, as our friend Kelly says above.
Thanks so much for the reply. And, as I disclosed above, I haven’t actually read/heard the speech, so I gratefully and hopefully accept your interpretations. Believe me, I’m not so picky that I won’t take any good news as it comes.
Still, with Obama, I see a hard ceiling on expectations insofar as I believe so many of the things he actually wants are friendly to concentrated wealth and militarism.
But, hey, that’s why they play the games. Let’s see how it goes!
I have to back off a bit.
I do not sneer every time I see the man.
He is not as bad as he could be.
What a sad state we have decended to where lowered expectations are celebrated as progress. Watching people roll over and submit like abused puppies because our Ruler smoothly mouthes soothing words is beyond sad it’s hopeless.
The fact that Obama was sworn in on MLK’s holiday and bible is a double thrust of the knife to the memory of a truly radical leader. The final obscenity is that Obama and Roberts have defaced that book with writing from their bloody hands.
Why do you believe McConnell and Boehner are Rulers?
Why do you give them such authority?
Congress is the first among equals, and the most powerful, the only one that truly governs, because it represents We the People.
It was after all Congress that declared endless global war on individuals back in September 2001, a act that the voters have ratified in 2002, 2004, 2006, 2008, 2010, 2012. That war declaration makes no mention of Afghanistan or any other nation or any specific group.
Only Congress can change the law, and until that is done, the president is sworn to carry out the unending global war on individuals.
Kapock, you get it. Thank you for saving me a lot of typing,
It is no wonder that the Congressional Progressive Caucus gets so easily rolled when I read some of the smiling, hopeful comments here. All it takes is ANOTHER pretty speech and chronic Democrats sit on their hind legs and start slobbering.
And of course Obama drops the LGBT crumb and has the undying love of that faction. Yes we all are for marrying whoever you want but it doesn’t help much if you don’t have a job, or are foreclosed on, and the bankers who do these things are all free to do it all over again. Or you are arrested, detained, renditioned, tortured, assassinated all on Presidential order with no trial or even being told why this is happening to you. Or you are billy-clubbed and uprooted for simply gathering peacefully.
Obama is a PISO. Progressive In Speeches Only. Otherwise, expect the same old abuse.
I get that you’re not a civil war scholar, but comparing Obama to Lincoln?
Really?
I didn’t compare Obama to Lincoln. If you had actually read the comment, you would have seen that I was comparing the pundits and bobbleheads, not the Presidents.
Seconded.
It’s dispiriting that after four years of being kicked in the head there are still nominal progressives willing to carry water for Obama. The more they get mistreated the greater their desperation to disbelieve their lyin’ eyes.
Anyway, I’m just going to make one point: for the president of the United States to claim Seneca Falls, Selma and Stonewall as victories for the establishment he heads should strike any person with an inkling of historical sensibility as absurdity bordering on the grotesque. Each of those struggles was waged by disenfranchised outsiders AGAINST the establishment. It’s a measure of their (eventual) success that the powers that be feel the need to retrospectively rewrite history to place themselves on the right side of it (say it with me know: “the Republicans are the party of Lincoln!”)
Of course in each of those cases the disenfranchised outsiders at least had the advantage of knowing that they were disenfranchised and outsiders and that their agendas were being opposed by powerful entrenched interests.
As the posts in this thread make clear a great many progressives are still a very long way from realizing any of these things.
Thank you for writing this, masaccio. Frankly, I’m sort of having difficulty trying to read about Obama right now, but I’ll try to come back to this if I can.
Thanks for the positive feedback to my comment. I do hope intelligent observers like masaccio are detecting some real change, at least at the margins.
That’s all well and good, but we still have to settle the question of who has suffered/still suffers the most in life, Kelly or Margaret, but I think it should be a separate diary.