Our system of government will not survive unless we the people believe that it will respect, abide by, and enforce the Rule of Law, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights against all violators, regardless of race, ethnicity, gender, sexual preference, or class.
We rely on the Department of Justice and our various state attorneys general to protect our inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. They and the police departments they supervise and rely upon to investigate and prosecute crimes, are the law enforcement arms of our federal and state governments.
At the expense of we the people who are victims of the biggest financial fraud committed in history, the Obama Administration’s proposed settlement of the real estate forfeiture crisis protects the banks that willfully and intentionally committed the crime. Moreover, the crime continues and there is no assurance that it will stop if the state attorneys general agree to the proposed settlement.
This situation is upside down and all wrong because the proposed settlement protects and rewards the criminals who committed the biggest financial fraud in history. If this case settles, how can anyone who is not a member of the 1% have any faith that our government will enforce the Rule of Law, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights against all violators, regardless of race, ethnicity, gender, sexual preference, or class?
The answer is self-evident.
We have reached a critical turning point in our history. If the state attorneys general adopt this outrageous and obscene settlement proposal, what little faith people still have in our federal and state governments will evaporate like the morning dew as the Sun rises bringing massive civil unrest and increasingly violent revolution.
Millions of people have been irreparably harmed, including people who were fraudulently induced to purchase intentionally overpriced homes with little or no money down financed by adjustable rate mortgages that would later skyrocket beyond their ability to pay the monthly payments and institutional investors, particularly pension funds, suckered into buying worthless mortgage backed securities. In search of ever higher profits for shareholders and mult-imillion dollar bonuses for CEOs and upper management, the TBTF banks have severely compromised and probably destroyed a working legal system governing real estate transactions to prevent frauds that was developed over hundreds of years reducing risk by protecting the integrity of sales so that buyers and sellers knew what they were purchasing and whether there were any restrictions on their use of the property or clouds on title.
The system was relatively simple. Transactions were recorded in the counties where the properties were located and any member of the public could review who owned what, where it was located, the exact dimensions of property, and whether there were any encroachments, easements, other restrictions, or liens attached to it. There were legal and equitable remedies and insurance, if something went wrong, so that disputes could be resolved reasonably and equitably without violence. In service to their greed to avoid billions of dollars in recording fees and to facilitate the bundling of mortgages into mortgage backed securities to be sliced and diced into ever more exotic financial instruments of mass destruction for sale, the TBTF banks replaced this working legal system with MERS, which is little more than than a legal spreadsheet indicating who owns what. Meanwhile, most of the notes, mortgages, and other documentation no longer exist such that it is virtually impossible to verify the terms of any sales, including limitations on the use of property, the terms of the financial transactions, and who owns the note.
We use the criminal law to punish and deter others from committing similar acts of serious wrongdoing. There is no reasonable question any longer that the TBTF banks committed serious financial wrongdoing by willfully and intentionally engaging in a widespread conspiracy for profit by which they have destroyed the legal real estate recording system and caused trillions of dollars in losses.
The bankers who perpetrated this horrific financial crime must be held accountable by the criminal laws and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) in 18 USC 1961 is the perfect vehicle with which to prosecute them. If ever there were criminal enterprises worthy of being put out of business, the TBTF banks are such enterprises.
There is no mystery to the process because the Department of Justice has written the book on how to successfully prosecute criminal organizations using the RICO statute. I know what I am talking about because I have defended people they have prosecuted.
Under threat of long prison sentences if they do not cooperate and testify against higher-ups, flip the less culpable defendants with easy cases to prove (i.e., the robo-signers and their bosses for forgeries and false statements under oath) and move up the tree of rot branch by branch building your case against the big boys.
Then you take them down. Hard.
The distressed homeowners also need principal write-downs to current fair-market value with credit for all payments made.
As I said at the beginning. We the people rely on the government to protect our inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. If our federal and state governments through the Department of Justice and the state attorneys general sign-off on this settlement proposal, they will have joined the criminal predation leaving us with no recourse except to defend ourselves by fighting back with all means at our disposal.
It’s your move.



21 Comments

Made my calls/letters on an ongoing basis for quite awhile now.
Completely different subject:
“DAMIEN ECHOLS: Once again, there’s almost no words, just because of how horrendous it is. You know, people think they have an idea of what the prison system is like. But they don’t. They have no idea.”
http://www.democracynow.org/2012/2/6/west_memphis_3_freed_death_row
I was a little inexact for failing to mention that many states have enacted statutes similar to the federal RICO statute and the Attorney General of any state that has such a law could indict and prosecute the TBTF banks for violating their state RICO statute.
I suspect, but do not know whether New York (Schneiderman), California (Harris), Delaware (Biden), Missouri (Koter), Massachusetts (Coakley),and Nevada (Masto) have such statutes. The AG in Minnesota (Swanson) also has expressed doubts about the settlement and she opted out of the negotiations awhile ago.
Here’s hoping the case doesn’t settle and the state AGs take the banks down with criminal prosecutions, lock-up their CEOs and top management, and force them to disgorge their obscene profits.
Although I do not believe Holder will carry out his duty as the Attorney General of the United States and prosecute the banks, there is a possibility that he might be embarrassed into doing it if the state AGs start prosecuting them and get some convictions for forgery and false statements. During an election year in what will probably be a close election, Obama could ill afford not to light a fire under Holder despite his desire to everything possible to help the banks avoid accountability.
Pass the popcorn and feel free to cheer or hurl spitballs at the TV.
Eloquent plea, but one that will fall on deaf, corrupted ears.
The banksters will win, because that is what Obama is determined to make happen.
Wish it wasn’t so, but it is.
America was nice while it lasted.
Thanks, Mason. Good points.
I just wrote to Martha Coakley (MA) to nix the settlement.
To my mind, it’s regrettable that she has a civil case out there when criminal cases are so easy to make, and so much better as deterrents.
But there is plenty of crime to go around.
Excellent summary of the facts, Mason; thank you.
I’ve sent a large part of this post to my AG, Lisa Madigan (Illinois.)
She’s been fighting, but I haven’t heard much from her lately re: the proposal(s) for settlement.
I’m hoping she won’t cave; perhaps your words will reach her ear.
thanks again for your post.
Well said.
Righteous … piece.
Sadly I must agree with some of the comments and nothing will happen.
Holder is theirs.
So is O.
The FBI, CIA, and all the fed depts., including HUD.
NY’s S is on he take. Just watch how that turns out. Fines amounting to nothing and no prison time.
So is CA’s H. Also on the take.
And Biden? Don’t make me laugh.
It’s all just kabuki to pacify the masses. Nothing prevents or has prevented them from taking action on their own in their own states. The year is now 2012. Will there be justice in 2016? When the “Affordable” “Care” Act kicks in? How many we lose every year due to lack of medical access? 50,000. Per year!
Dawg I hope I am wrong and this turns around to some level of sanity. But I stopped believing in Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy, and the magical “man” in the sky who grants wishes like a genie a long time ago.
I was going to pick nits about your main post, but you repeated the reference to crimes in this comment, so I will bring it up here. Please stop referring to the settlement as ending or blocking “criminal prosecutions.” Nothing in the pending multi-state settlement covers crimes of any kind, anywhere, committed by anybody. It just does not deal with crimes. It is a CIVIL settlement of alleged violations CIVIL law, and it completely sucks because it is just settlement fraud to cover up foreclosure fraud.
This is important because repeating the mistake of calling this a settlement of criminal cases will create the false impression that after the settlement deal is signed, none of the states can prosecute crimes committed by the banks in mortgage origination, creaion of RMBS securities, servicing of mortgages (including current mortgages) and foreclosures. All of those crimes are still waiting for thorough investigation & prosecution.
Most of the state AGs do not directly prosecute crimes, anyway. That job is assigned to District Attorneys and State’s Attorneys in individual counties, like the county prosecutors in Boone County, Missouri who convened a county grand jury to indict DOCX and its former CEO. (The fact that the Missouri AG intends to “lead” the trial does not mean that the Missouri AG by himself could have convened the grand jury and obtained the indictment.)
So even if a state AG signed a settlement that did cover some state criminal prosecutions, that state AG could not prohibit individual DAs from prosecuting crimes.
Your best grafs. In order, Yes. Yes. And Yes.
“We use the criminal law to punish and deter others from committing similar acts of serious wrongdoing. There is no reasonable question any longer that the TBTF banks committed serious financial wrongdoing by willfully and intentionally engaging in a widespread conspiracy for profit by which they have destroyed the legal real estate recording system and caused trillions of dollars in losses.
“The bankers who perpetrated this horrific financial crime must be held accountable by the criminal laws and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) in 18 USC 1961 is the perfect vehicle with which to prosecute them. If ever there were criminal enterprises worthy of being put out of business, the TBTF banks are such enterprises.
“There is no mystery to the process because the Department of Justice has written the book on how to successfully prosecute criminal organizations using the RICO statute. I know what I am talking about because I have defended people they have prosecuted.”
But none of the AGs who sign the multi-state settlement will gain any excuse for not encouraging & supporting criminal prosecutors in their states to do what you outlined. The settlement just does not block criminal prosecutions, period. So we must continue to organize to demand criminal prosecutions exactly as you prescribe. But if we mistakenly attack the multi-state deal as giving a pass to criminal banks, we will step on our own framing. The multi-state deal does NOT block criminal prosecutions. These outrageous crimes must be pursued whether or not the multi-state deal is finally announced.
Thank you, Mason.
This diary is very much appreciated, and I hope that you will consider sharing further thoughts on the biggest criminal fraud in history, for that is what it is. Your discussion of property, and the historic methods of recording, publicly, transfers, restrictions, and easements, as these things relate to the Rule of Law, is of very essential and most critical importance.
Recommended to the consideration of everyone at FDL.
DW
Fractal,
Reread my article because your comment indicates that you did not read it.
I neither said nor did I imply that this proposed settlement agreement settles criminal cases.
Of course, the settlement agreement does not require anyone to plead guilty to any crimes and that is one reason why I oppose it.
I want criminal prosecutions against the higher ups with convictions and long prison sentences. If all of the state attorneys general sign on to this agreement, there likely won’t be a thorough investigation and prosecution of the higher ups.
The state AGs have placed the cart before the horse. I do not believe there should be any discussion about settling civil claims at this point because, due to a lack of investigation, the state AGs lack sufficient information about the scope of this vast financial crime to engage in meaningful settlement negotiations. They will inevitably give away the farm, so to speak, if they settle now.
The point of my article is that they need to move forward with with investigations and criminal prosecutions.
Assuming the state AGs settle, you are deluding yourself, if you believe there will be anything other than some cosmetic prosecutions of minimal offenders for the sake of appearances.
I have represented clients in major white collar fraud cases, including clients charged with RICO violations and I know how these settlement agreements work or don’t work.
I will say it again. This proposed settlement agreement will result in the banks not being held accountable, if the state AGs sign off on it.
By the way, of course state AGs rarely try cases. You merely state the obvious. But they have assistant attorney generals who do and county DAs who try cases all the time just like US Attorneys try federal criminal cases all the time. The state AGs can create a joint task force and man it with some impressive prosecutors.
Nevertheless, there is no question that the Department of Justice with the assistance of US Attorneys and the FBI are better equipped to prosecute the criminal banksters. The feds always have more resources than the states. The problem is that Holder refuses to do it and the obamanable Obama obviously is OK with that. The banks own them.
I’m going to repeat myself since you didn’t get it.
I want criminal prosecutions against the higher ups with convictions and long prison sentences. If all of the state attorneys general sign on to this agreement, there likely won’t be a thorough investigation and prosecution of the higher ups.
OK – you want criminal charges against real people – as do I as only those change behavior – corporations are not people and do not go to jail.
But the AG’s are trying for fines of corporations and in NY he is trying to help his hedge fund folks takeover the shareholder equity in the banks.
No one – no AG – that “objects” – is pushing a few thousand, or a few dozen – people for criminal charges.
The “thorough investigation and prosecution of the higher ups” does not seem to depend on the settlement going through or not.
The settlement helps homeowners – nothing else on the horizon seems likely to do so (the Obama refi is DOA in Congress).
I consider that DDay’s latest post,
http://news.firedoglake.com/2012/02/08/schneidermans-last-minute-cancellation-spells-trouble-for-foreclosure-fraud-settlement/#respond.
and my question may well tie into your comment …
DW
Yes, I think you’re right, the settlement would be a defacto victory in the court of public opinion if nothing else.
Any effort to bring criminal charges after that would be met with charges that the banks were being ‘gouged’ by the predatory government.
Compare this situation to the aftermath of the S&L scandal of the 1980s;
“In the wake of that debacle, special government task forces referred 1,100 cases to prosecutors, resulting in more than 800 bank officials going to jail. Among the best-known: Charles H. Keating Jr., of Lincoln Savings and Loan in Arizona, and David Paul, of Centrust Bank in Florida. “
From the NYT;
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/14/business/14prosecute.html?pagewanted=all
We’ve seen zero (0) felony prosecutions to date for a much much bigger bunch of crimes.
Hell, we haven’t even seen a credible investigation yet.
You never tire of talking out your ass do you?
Public perception is critical, Watt4Bob, and you are correct, the “anguished” cry would be that the banks had been “punished” enough, and that further prosecution would amount to “double jeopardy”.
Which is why Mason’s diaries are so very important to public education in the very best and truest sense.
DW
“The “thorough investigation and prosecution of the higher ups” does not seem to depend on the settlement going through or not.”
It most certainly does depend on whether the settlement goes through because in these times of starved state budgets, which is due in no small part to acts committed by the criminal banksters that directly and indirectly have resulted in reduced federal contributions to state budgets together with reduced property and income tax revenues collected, the states will have no ability and little incentive to assemble and finance the necessary resources to investigate and prosecute the offenders.
Notwithstanding the absence of any language in the proposed settlement agreement precluding criminal investigations and prosecutions, there will not likely be any, if this settlement goes through.
If we hear anything at all from the AGs after the settlement goes through, it will be something like, “We did everything we could, given the resources available to us. Don’t complain because at least we got something.”
And that probably will not even be the end of it because the forfeitures likely will continue.
Very good points made by all, and an excellent post, masoninblue. We non-legal folk are enlightened by both points, that criminal prosecution is vital and that a settlement on civil charges would not preclude that. However, the point is well taken that doing the latter will cloud the former in public perception and provide just one more glob of tar in the whole sorry mess. It simply ain’t the way things are usually done, OJSimpsonwise.
It is already so difficult to see the original points of fraud which masoninblue has laid out, as it sinks slowly down, the dinosaur that MERS and the banks created way back, that they intended to create, and which has most certainly tanked our economy in tandem with the migration of jobs and the refusal to make a governmental shift to clean, really clean, energy.
It’s a trifecta of magnificent proportions – magnificent for the oligarchs, who don’t seem to care if they or their kids actually have a planet to live on in the future. And they are taking the world down with them so that must be a source of intense satisfaction as they finance those mosquito nets and plastic computers.
Obama will be kicking the can way, way down the road. You can be absolutely sure of that.
Excellent post, mason, recommended and thank you for it. I tend to agree with you that the settlement would, in the real world of politics and law enforcement, tend to diminish the chances for aggressive criminal prosecutions afterwards. And criminal prosecutions are essential. IMO, the basic social contract is at stake on this one.
I join in the recommendation. The attack on housing is front and center in what is happening to this country. With the tie-ins to the indebtedness freeforall beginning with credit cards, going on through health care, and ending with climate catastrophe and job elimination or wage reduction – all reducing the power of the people in every aspect of our ordinary lives. It’s no longer about ideology; ideologies are a luxury in this debate which we can’t afford. It’s not even about compensation, though people are in such great need of that. It’s about justice and the Rule of Law. If we don’t have that, nothing else matters.
Thank you again, masoninblue.
Have you seen Beau Biden’s talk-show campaign tour promoting his part in working out the settlement? He brags that corporations come to Delaware “because we have the best courts,” overtly touting the pro-corporate corruption in Delaware courts and in his own office.
He appears to me to be advertising for bribes, as well as campaigning for the Presidency for his father and himself.
Agree with DW-Thanks for your input……….BOX