Cross posted from Frederick Leatherman Law Blog.
O’Mara -“The client always calls the shots,” his lawyer, Mark O’Mara said Thursday.
One of the most contentious issues in the field of criminal defense is how to handle the difficult client.
Many lawyers are like Mark O’Mara and devote their efforts to assisting their clients to make informed decisions. I have seen some lawyers, for example, ask a jury to sentence their client to death because that is the outcome the client desired.
I have seen too many people change their minds after being sentenced to death, so I decided long ago to refuse to facilitate a client’s desire to commit suicide.
For some reason, I have had more than my share of difficult clients where we disagreed on strategy and desired outcomes. I refused to allow the client to drive the bus over a cliff and, if it came down to irreconcilable differences, I moved to withdraw.
GZ is the quintessential difficult client. He is paranoid, secretive, fearful, angry, stubborn, doesn’t trust anyone, controlling, believes he’s smarter than anyone else, manipulative, and probably delusional. It’s absolutely clear that he does not feel any emotional distress or regret for having killed TM.
His claim that TM died as part of “God’s Plan” exhibits a frightening dissociation from reality and a willingness to kill without any sense of responsibility or regret, if he deems it necessary to do so. In other words, if he should find himself in another situation where he believes he is cornered and needs to kill someone to save face or save his ass, I believe he’s likely to do so and excuse what he did as just carrying out God’s will.
I think he is a danger to himself or others and he belongs in a secure mental health facility or a jail. He needs a thorough mental health evaluation.
I fear that Mark O’Mara is a potential victim and I am concerned about his safety. He’s clearly lost control of GZ despite his protestations to the contrary. GZ clearly sees O’Mara in the way and O’Mara has to be very careful how he handles the “uncharted waters” (his words) in which he finds himself.
If he pushes too hard in an effort to regain control, assuming he ever had control, things could get ugly.
I think he needs to withdraw because there is basically nothing he can do at this point without potentially placing himself in danger. GZ is not going to listen to him anyway, so he might as well get out of the case. He needs to recognize that his dreams of fame and fortune have turned to dust. There is not going to be any money for him and he needs to get out while the gettin’ is good.
Now, back to the question of who should call the shots.
I firmly believe the lawyer has to call the shots with input from the client, obviously. According to the rules of professional conduct, the client only gets to decide whether to plead guilty or not guilty and whether to testify or not testify. The rules provide that the lawyer has the responsibility and the duty to make the other decisions using independent professional judgment in the best interests of the client.
In my professional opinion, O’Mara is abdicating that responsibility when he says the “client calls the shots.” Having said that, I do not believe that he would have succeeded in getting control of GZ, if he had attempted to do so. He certainly cannot do it now.
Regardless whether a person believes GZ is guilty of murder in the second degree or not guilty by reason of self-defense, I believe everyone needs to realize that GZ is a volcano waiting to explode, despite no trial date having been set. The pressure, anxiety and fear will only increase geometrically as the case gets closer to trial.
Ask yourself if you would show up without your lawyer dressed in a tee-shirt and jeans to meet Barbara Walters and her film crew to do an interview for her show, The View, and at the last possible moment try to change the deal to get ABC to pay for a month’s lodging in a hotel with a security detail.
Think about that. Who does something like that?
Consider also that he reactivated his website (therealgeorgezimmerman.com) Thursday after his disastrous interview with softball pitcher Sean Hannity on Wednesday night , after basically complaining that the website that O’Mara established for him was,
(1) failing to correct distortions and falsehoods published by the media (even though his games to hide the internet donations and his contradictory and false statements have been the source of most of what has been reported);
(2) failing to get his message across; and
(3) failing to raise enough money to fund his lifestyle, security detail and pay his lawyer’s fees.
This is crazy behavior that does not bode well for the future.
I believe he is going to crack before too long as he realizes that his support is evaporating and he sees the bills rising and the walls closing in. I believe he may take his own life, commit suicide by cop, or he may take the life of another who pushes his button.




66 Comments

I don’t think Zimmerman is crazy, he lies, in cold blooded fashion, to cover his ass. I think he is a narcissistic megalomaniac sadistic sociopath. There are lots of people, from my perspective, who are in prison with that same psychological profile, he will be fine in a regular prison.
crazy should be in quotations mark in the comment above
PS: recommended
I think that the incident described in the post with Barbara Walters is quite telling. GZ and/or MOM agree to an interview with BW. GZ cannot travel, so BW, her crew, and their equipment fly to FL. Think about that for a minute. How much did it cost? And I just looked up BW’s age. She looks wonderful, but she is 82. Her globetrotting days are long past. It cannot be easy for an octogenarian to make a trip like this.
When they arrive, GZ meets with BW, one of the most famous and influential women in the world, a woman who has interviewed Sadat, Castro, Indira Gandhi, and too many heads of state to list, a woman who is old enough to be his grandmother, wearing a t-shirt and jeans. He had been wearing a suit, so he changed his clothes so that he was wearing clothing as discordant as possible to the designer duds that BW would be wearing for an on-camera interview. He makes a last-minute demand and, when it is not met, reneges on the interview. The disrespect and arrogance are stunning.
He met with BW without MOM. The inference is that there was a disagreement about GZ’s last-minute demand, and GZ went off on his own over MOM’s objections.
I think you are right to be concerned, Mason.
I have to disagree tzar, GZ wouldn’t last more than thirty seconds in the general population in most prisons. I know of an inmate who was assaulted while standing in intake line before he ever saw a cell because it was widely known he had raped and murdered a nine year old girl. He spent his first month in the prison hospital with his jaw wired shut.
GZ has made himself notorious, and would probably require segregation much like Charles Manson, who other inmates fear so much that they would pre-emptively murder him should they find him in their midst.
GZ would come apart at the seams should he be incarcerated amongst people he fears so much, and towards whom he has focused murderous intent.
GZ has done nothing so far but call for more ‘rope’, and O’Mara has been assisting him.
I think Mason is correct, GZ may well end up blaming his lawyer for the predicament he has put himself in.
I think so also….if there are grounds to revoke his being out of bail, he would be contained. Seems like it should not be too difficult
to get a psych eval….I had wondered if some of this had been purposeful in order to mount a mental illness defense. Yes, narcissistic, but more.
well…technically GZ stands shoulder to shoulder with all these heads of state, consider his resume:
-He was individually selected as in instrument by the most the most powerful being known to man, “God”;
-He singlehandedly carried out actions that, “divided America”, a country still considered by many to be the most powerful in the world.
-He made his own website
How many of us can say that we have achieve
2/31/3 of those accomplishments. Case closed.hmmm…I am hard pressed to be bothered by any of that. I am really trying. Let us remember that GZ is a tough guy who patrolled the neighborhood and apprehended dangerous thugs, skipping or non-skipping. GZ is still the guy who was charming enough to raise over 200k in donations. GZ is still the guy who was lauded by other jailbirds and given a sign of “strength” from a group of them while he enjoyed some alone time in the yard. Let us remember the old adage, not doing the crime, if the time can not be done.
Au contraire mon frere, I think he may wind up being a boss in there.
I am trying to understand how this calculating and manipulative SOB is not being considered mentally incapable of understanding what he did enough to join general population/isolation of regular inmates…wait I think I may have answered my own query…so maybe I can ask a different question to those of you who want to put GZ in a mental institution:
(and please forgive my French, it is of no reflection to nay sort of degradation of my fraternity to you good and kindhearted people, who hold this view)
WHAT IN THE EVER LOVING F*CK WOULD YOU BE TREATING GZ FOR, IN A MENTAL INSTITUTION? AND HOW WOULD YOU EVER KNOW THAT HE IS CURED OR IMPROVING?
hmmm…I am hard pressed to be bothered by any of that. I am really trying. Let us remember that GZ is a tough guy who patrolled the neighborhood and apprehended dangerous thugs, skipping or non-skipping. GZ is still the guy who was charming enough to raise over 200k in donations. GZ is still the guy who was lauded by other jailbirds and given a sign of “strength” from a group of them while he enjoyed some alone time in the yard. Let us remember the old adage, not doing the crime, if the time can not be done.
Au contraire mon frere, I think he may wind up being a boss in there.
(READDRESS TO THE CORRECT POSTER)
I am trying to understand how this calculating and manipulative SOB is NOW being considered mentally incapable of understanding what he did enough to join general population/isolation of regular inmates…wait I think I may have answered my own query…so maybe I can ask a different question to those of you who want to put GZ in a mental institution:
(and please forgive my French, it is of no reflection to nay sort of degradation of my fraternity to you good and kindhearted people, who hold this view)
WHAT IN THE EVER LOVING F*CK WOULD YOU BE TREATING GZ FOR, IN A MENTAL INSTITUTION? AND HOW WOULD YOU EVER KNOW THAT HE IS CURED OR IMPROVING?
(I was a little emotional and made a serious error in that post, correction bolded, sorry for the mess, Mason)
You must love the sound of your own voice…give it a break.
These were my thoughts. Word for word. Just, word for word. The disrespect around this incident is just stunning.
Had the same conversation with someone yesterday. This is Barbara Walters we’re talking about! Sheesh.
Thanks for another great post Mason. Recommended.
Agreed. At least as far as, inmates won’t be played and they won’t be putting up with bullshit. Someone behaving in this manner would have a difficult time in general population. He has not been exposed to general population yet.
I make a general statement. Mr. Zimmerman could be acquitted, although he is not really helping to preserve himself. But, in the chance that he is convicted, well, to look at his own behavior would certainly be in his own best interest.
Sorry tzar, but there is a tremendous difference between acting like a tough guy and being a tuff guy.
Prison is the one place phony tuff guys should stay away from at all costs.
GZ is the leader of an army of one, but in a severely ‘normal’ environment like a prison, he’d be hard pressed to find any followers.
Have you watched the Faux news interview?
GZ strikes me as the ‘Georgey-Porgy’ type.
Me thinks Shellie has had enough.
Lots of fun lawyer quotes in this article.
I don’t believe there is any legal basis at this time to revoke his bond and take him into custody.
I also doubt that the police would pick him up and take him to the ER to be evaluated by a mental health screener to determine if he should be involuntarily committed for a 72-hour period to complete a psychiatric evaluation.
The legal test for an involuntary commitment is whether a mental health professional would find that a person is a danger to himself or to others, such that he needs to be confined to a locked ward for a period of 72 hours for a psychiatric evaluation.
Whether the patient would be released after that period would depend on whether the psychiatric evaluation confirmed that the patient was a danger to himself or to others and recommended the involuntary commitment be extended for a period of 30 days. A judge reviews the report and orders the patient released or confined. The patient has a right to be represented by counsel.
It’s extremely rare for a patient to be involuntarily committed for the 30-day period. The vast majority of patients are released after the 72-hour period.
Police officers know that a MHP screener will not involuntarily commit a person unless the person is threatening to kill someone or attempting suicide. Therefore, I don’t believe they would even attempt to take GZ to the ER, unless something dramatic happens. If it does, they might just kill him instead, especially if he shoots at them or displays a weapon.
We are in a waiting period, perhaps the calm before the storm.
And so deliberate. He was wearing a suit, the BW interview was supposed to be held immediately after the SH interview, so he went to the trouble of changing out of appropriate clothing into inappropriate clothing. And he and/or MOM went to some trouble to ensure that he would appear neat and well-groomed at the latest bond hearing: submitted a motion for GZ to be allowed to wear civilian clothing and not wear shackles, got him a haircut. Do you remember the preening behavior? GZ was smoothing his hair, MOM was picking lint off his lapels and shoulders.
From the article:
“The legal team has not been paid, he said, and the Hannity interview resulted in only a modest uptick in support.”
The reason they are out of money has to do with their own behavior. As much as I hate to say this, Mr. Zimmerman’s bet bet would have been to remain in jail, where he would not be constantly seeking more media attention, and where the 100,000 could be used for his defense. Hate to say it, but that is likely what I would have done in his shoes. Let’s face it. Jail can be awful, but Mr. Zimmerman was in a quiet cell alone with phone, TV, safety and meals. No, not the Hilton, but in the balance, probably better than what he is experiencing now. Fact is, his actions on the outside are off the hook, and he is creating more problems for himself.
O’Mara needs to regain control of his team and his client.
I’m of two minds about this evolving situation. (maybe I’m the one who needs the MH eval).
On the one hand, the notoriety of certain accused criminals who capture the public attention, such as GZ, are a huge media business these days, since the time of OJ, at least.
Trash TV renown and attendant controversy does not necessarily equal guilt. Especially, it seems, in Florida.
Playing to the racist tea party political zeitgeist has worked very well for GZ so far and may well be his ticket to a not guilty verdict, if he gets a sympathetic jury. Again, OJ. Only perhaps this time in reverse.
OTOH, isn’t it also quite possible that GZ may be apreading his notoriety Manson style, as someone noted, as a strategy to keep him out of the general prison population if he’s convicted. Also, fame is something of a perverse compensation for the heinousness of his crime and as we havealready seen, a definite financial bonanza.
I am sure the Prosecutor will ask him how does he know this and if he has heard voices confirming this.
Perhaps O’Mara is OK with everything Zimmerman is doing.
I am going to hazard a guess that GZ and MO’M are going for insanity defense. I agree with the posters above who have wondered — who would act like that on national TV with Bawbawa Wawters?
I also agree with C-S and others who have observed that his tuff-guy pose will not wear well in prison, should he end up there (don’t think he knows that, MO’M should but who knows…) There, bs dies.
I think he probably is crazy, in the true sense, and pretty clearly a ‘danger to himself’. And maybe to others, still. To MO’M? Could be, id this is for reals and not just for show. we shall see. whish I had more faith in the judicial process.
No Lawyer that indicates that you think you are smarter than the people on the View.
Did GZ get permission to leave the state for this is my next question seems unlikely if he went sans lawyer.
However to risk a chance in GZ’s mind at least to tell your side to all the people who watch the View including potential jurors over the demand for a months hotel bill and a security detail that indicates Delusions of Grandeur.
This indicates yes he could be violent if the Delusions of Grandeur ever Come Undone.
Have not seen the Hannity interview (I absolutely will not go there), but read this in the linked article:
Do you suppose that extended to $$$?
He is a grifter and sees this as his meal ticket plus he is insane there are lots of nice mostly White rural towns with very low rent GZ can find an apartment to hide out in. But instead he wants to hide out somewhere were he needs a security detail?
The guy obviously likes power and wants heck hopes to provoke violence perhaps to prove he is justified.
In his mind if African Americans were to attack him now he thinks this would prove he is justified.
I expect as his court case goes south GZ will appear in public and try and create just such a situation.
Question did the judge give GZ permission to leave the state for the Hannity interview?
Question how many lies did GZ say in the interview?
Question did Sean ever call GZ on any of the lies?
I am not an expert on this case or I would give a count myself of the lies and ask people if I missed any.
I’m not confident that this ignorant nimrod even understands who Barbara Walters is.
http://my.firedoglake.com/mason/2012/07/19/zimmerman-a-spectacular-fail/
If GZ showed up at the View which I believe does not film in Florida and he did this after he got out on bail then he left the State. Given the pictures I’ve seen this was not a remote interview but I admit I did not see the whole interview my battery life is not much and I did not want to waste it downloading Fox.
Plus watching Fox might give me high blood pressure. I admit I could be wrong.
Also given MOM mistakes as you have previously listed them shouldn’t MOM leave before he gets some BAR Association complaint of some kind?
I was not of the impression that he had left the state….Maybe I do not know where the interview took place.
No he did not leave the state or county to do the interview. Both Hannity and Barbara Walters came here. The Hannity interview was done in a hotel. The BW interview never took place.
You need to slow down, you’re thinking too fast.
I forgot to mention how funny I find the title of this post.
You must have had a brain fart about the old joke: diff betw dead snake & dead lawyer on the road is skid marks in front of the snake carcass.
Who would ever worry about a lawyer.
Funny, I soo hate lawyer jokes…awfully good to have around when you need one.
jesus kids, he reactivated his website ** for fundraising**(!) – which was exactly ALL the Hannity appearance was about
Indeed I do…Indeed I won’t
It seems my sarcasm was a bit too fine. Regardless, I don’t think any of the criteria presented so far should allow George to go to a mental institute vs. prison.
this is a guy who was slick and depraved enough to:
-Claim that the screams of his victim were his own.
-To tailor his description of the night to fit SYG (evidence be damned).
-Pander to the fellow sociopaths for more money.
-Orchestrate an elaborate scheme to hide his cash windfall from his attorney, his parents and the court.
-Orchestrate an elaborate B plan in order to flee if his case was not going well.
-Made jokes about his victim when he thought no one was listening
-Wrap himself in that good ole fashion “guns, god and ole glory” rhetoric trifecta, in order to pander to his assumed base of financial supporters and general American sentimentality(see his conversation with pastor Terry Jones from th released calls)
George Zimmerman is an evil person, plain an simple and deserve to carry the full moral weight of his actions, he should not get to excuse himself from that weight, by claiming mental incapacity.
I don’t think he’s evil. I think he’s ignorant. He strikes me as a gun-toting neoconservative asshole. He’s manipulative and sly, sure, but he seems to be coming up with all these ‘moves’ that, if thought all the way through, would not benefit him.
I think he’s desperate, immature, ignorant, and slightly dangerous. Certainly not criminally insane.
Tomatoes, tomaahtoes, as long as he has to accept the moral weight and punishment of what he has done, as long as we send a message to the society that people who do what he did will have to accept the moral weight and punishment for doing what he did, I am fine with whatever we call it. But calling it insanity is insane, consider that would mean that the police/DA had the discretion to and sent home, an insane man after he killed an unarmed teenager. WTF? He has been given more than all the usual respect and benefit of the doubt that sane people get and just the same, he shall be imposed with all the punishment and castigations that sane people get when they behave the way he did.
I would worry about a lawyer. I think lawyers can be fantastically useful and personally, have a debt of generosity for one in particular because of the help they provided in a case involving a close family member. Moreover because of my appreciation for the concept of “The Law”, I have an intrinsic appreciation of lawyers.
considering that he opens the interview with “I have not have time to reflect on this situation” followed, a few seconds later by “I have had a lot of time reflect on this situation”, I’d say quite a few lies. Someone will make a video soon enough, detailing the inconsistencies and lies, just keep an eye out. I personally counted quite a few.
(paraphrasing his words but I am not too far off, it is the very first sentence he utters in the interview, it’s on youtube)
What do lawyers have to do with the law. The U.S. has an adversarial system. That means no holds barred (heh). I have nothing but contempt for what passes as U.S. legal system. My antipathy grows daily.
I too had one lawyer who helped me out of a very difficult situation. One out of 10-15 I’ve consulted at one point or another.
I also served on, and hung, a jury for 2nd degree murder.
You said,
Oh, I don’t know. Maybe his or her family, friends, other lawyers and people with empathy.
For starters.
good plan. i like hearing your voice.
in fact, i want to hear everyone’s voice. i think there’s only one commenter at fdl whose comments i sometimes skip over or skim.
“Who would ever worry about a lawyer.”
Me. My son is a new lawyer, and I am married to a retired one. There is always concern.
”
thank you.
Lawyers who deal with unstable clients are always vulnerable. Many lawyers get blamed for the misery of the clients. They should be careful.
He certainly does not meet the legal test for insanity because he has clearly lied to cover up what he did.
There is something obviously wrong with him and, if I were his attorney, I would want to get a handle on what it is out of concern for him and his best interests. After all, how could I help him, if I do not know what is wrong?
What if he has some sort of brain damage that impairs his ability to function? He would not meet the legal test for insanity because, notwithstanding his impaired functioning, he can tell right from wrong.
If he does have impaired functioning due to brain damage, that information might be useful in pegging this crime as a manslaughter rather than a murder 2.
I am not talking about him getting off without having to pay a penalty.
On the other hand, maybe the diagnosis would be narcissistic personality disorder and that would not be helpful to his defense. Nevertheless, I would know that I had not overlooked an impaired mental functioning issue.
I am not a lawyer but, I am going to venture to say that it is self evident that lawyers have a lot to do with the law. One simple example is their ability to challenge precedence and affect the range and limit of the application of laws.
In any case I appreciate the idea that there is someone who will know more than me and is committed to defending me or my rights in legal matters, just like I appreciate that a doctor will take care of me when I am sick.
I just don’t see what is different about George compared to the average criminal, I presume that if we did head CT/MRI on the gen. pop, we would find anomalies or that psych evaluations would find plenty of inmates with “narcissistic personality disorder”, but there they sit in prison like their other criminal buds. Something can be said to be generally wrong with anyone who commits an unnecessary violent crime, but the moral burden must be imposed if that same person can act normal enough to and show a desire to infiltrate regular society-Zimmerman sought and was given a leadership position in his community, he attended a college program and was a few credits shy of graduation, no one called him crazy then- and if that person has shown themselves to be submissive to the general social constructs of reward and punishment. Through such actions this person shows they are capable/worthy to enter into communion with society and worthy of the the associated moral burden. To relieve him of it is to indict the whole community that allowed him in as insane.
There are a lot of people out there who are convinced that all successful people are skilled bullsh*ters;
“If you can’t dazzle ‘em with your brilliance, baffle ‘em with your BS.”
No amount of evidence will convince these types that there are others who are more qualified, or more intelligent than they are, or that there are others who work harder than they do.
There are a lot of salesmen who think they’d make perfectly good lawyers, and of course Hannity was doing his best impression of an intelligent person when he interviewed GZ.
GZ may not be ‘broken’, but something seems to be missing besides a conscience.
“good plan. i like hearing your voice.
in fact, i want to hear everyone’s voice.”
Yep, me too.
You are much too trusting.
I also despise doctors.
Both part of the mafia of the intelligentsia.
BTW, half of what doctors know is wrong. They don’t know which half though.
That’s an opinion you are entitled to have.
That’s rather strong language
I have no idea how to respond to that. Have you considered forming a mafia of of ignorance to combat them?
Source? or should I trust your word on that…I would not want to be too trusting.
Just look at all the carbs recommended on the food pyramid and the scathing tone medical personnel take with low-carb diets. (Am reading Good Calories, Bad Calories by Gary Taubes; also have had success with the South Beach Diet but wow, the things my cousin’s nutritionist friend said to me….and then when I responded with some tidbits, she said “well yeah.” hahaha)
i just have one small request, mason. i am sooo tired of seeing gz’s photo every time i refresh. could we have an alternate? maybe your parrot. the ocean. trees and grass. anything.
The editors here added it when they front-paged it on MyFDL.
I’m glad they did, actually.
Sorry you don’t like it.
Can you fill us in on any of the interview with Trayvon’s parents? I think I saw that it had happened, but without any info. I can hardly imagine having to hear anything from GZ when you know what he’s done. I doubt that his lame apology was much comfort.
I don’t know anything about it.
I’ll check twitter.
Benjamin Crump tweeted this article:
Dear God, It Wasn’t Your Plan To Kill Trayvon.
By Michael Skolnik @ Global Grind dot Com.
I believe there will come a time in the not too distant future when he comes to deeply regret having said that.
What an astonishing excuse to make in refusing to accept responsibility for killing an unarmed innocent kid talking to his girlfriend on his cell phone on a rainy Sunday night.
I am still stunned by the depravity exhibited in that statement and in this one that may even exceed that one:
I do not regret killing your son, but I do regret that you had to bury him. I pray for you every night.
Mind boggling and Breathtaking
I have not seen anything on twitter about it.
Thanks…the above statement about killing your son is genuinely crazy…makes no sense. Thank you for your work.
Only U.S. presidents get to say it was God’s plan to kill….and get away with it.
Well, the bankers can, sort of, imply it … as great and dire misery, possibly even death, seems to accompany much of the “work” that the bankers claim to be doing in HIS name …
And our money proclaims in WHOM we “place” our trust …
Certain members of our no longer civil society seem hell-bent on foisting the blame onto other “shoulders”, that is for certain, SharonMI.
Once upon a time, certain people said “The Devil made me do it.”
Now, it is , “Goodness gracious! It’s all Dog’s Plan … I didn’t have nuthin’ ta do wid it … being merely an empty vessel, a agent, awaiting ‘the call’ …”
One might imagine it was all just crazy … except that it seems … deliberately contrived … and beneficial to the connivers … er contrivers.
It is a good thing we are such a religious nation, just consider where in hell we would “be” other … wise?
I ain’t worried about George and Mark …
Now the rest of us, on the other foot … we have some very serious problems … which we don’t seem very inclined to address … the Rule of Law … or its lack … coming in somewhere behind the state of the environment … and Earth’s capacity (willingness?, not that I blame her, mind)) to “support” human life.
LIFE is really what matters, it seems to me, rather than money, as far as being “human” is concerned.
And MONEY does seem to be “behind” a great deal of what is going “on”, these days.
Ah, well …
DW
Once a child molester was being put in solitary in county jail and was left alone by a guard for several minutes because he “forgot ” the key.
We all said in fake support of the child molester RUN the fire escape doors can be opened you are free of the handcuffs.
Also Prisoners are known to fake being nice to each other so as to better get your trust and really screw you, rob you etc.
Or and this might be the case in GZ’s case get to be his cell mate get GZ talking and then claim a jail house confession.
A jail house confession that helps nail GZ would I am sure be worth a suspended sentence.