Cross posted from Frederick Leatherman Law Blog.
I have always been drawn to the deeper questions in life.
I spent quite a bit of my life confronting those questions on a daily basis while defending clients charged with death penalty offenses.
I am opposed to the death penalty in all cases. I believe that, as long as we remain alive, we have an opportunity for redemption, no matter what we have done.
As we tread water waiting for Judge Lester’s decision on Friday regarding the defense motion to disqualify, I have taken the opportunity to establish some guidelines and rules for the site.
To further set the tone for a new way in the blogosphere to learn about law and grow in wisdom together, I decided to provoke some philosophical thought and discussion regarding Rabbi Hillel’s famous three questions. Rabbi Hillel Wikipedia states:
Hillel (הלל) (born Babylon traditionally c.110 BCE, died 10 CE[1] in Jerusalem) was a famous Jewish religious leader, one of the most important figures in Jewish history. He is associated with the development of the Mishnah and the Talmud. Renowned within Judaism as a sage and scholar, he was the founder of the House of Hillel school for Tannaïm (Sages of the Mishnah) and the founder of a dynasty of Sages who stood at the head of the Jews living in the land of Israel until roughly the fifth century of the Christian Era.
He is known for many things, including this expression of the Golden Rule:
“That which is hateful to you, do not do to your fellow. That is the whole Torah; the rest is the explanation; go and learn.
The man had a way of cutting through the bullshit and getting to the essence of things.
I do not mention him for any religious purpose. Instead, I mention him as a sage and, specifically, for the following three questions he asked his students.
If I am not for myself, who will be for me?
But if I am only for myself, who am I?
If not now, when?
What are your thoughts?



16 Comments

What do you know for sure?
How do you know it?
My favorite questions.
The best questions usually lead to more questions, as opposed to answers.
I suspect the Rabbi Hillel’s questions are of that sort.
Fred — thanks! (And check your post again — you need to edit it…)
If I am not for you, will you be for me?
But if I am only for myself, what am I?
If not now, why?
Thanks and recommended
Mason, as always, I am most appreciative of your perspectives and the superb moral compass which, clearly, informs those perspectives.
Your “guidelines and rules for the site” are clear, concise, and necessary to reasoned, rational, and informed debate. I thank you for posting them and making clear that they will be enforced.
As I have told you, previously, your posts are a true education and the comments an opportunity of deep understanding and of possibilities that define the role and the function of the Rule of Law in the furtherance of sane, sustainable, and humane civil society … among many, many other things.
I thank you, Mason … Frederick Leatherman, for all that you do in the service of honest understanding and for all of the very many “things”, and thinks, that you consistently and lovingly contribute to the family of humankind. This diary, and the deep, meaningful insights which it shares and invites, being a prime example
Namaste
DW
Thanks, PW for the heads-up about the need to edit.
Yikes! I don’t know what I did, but I royally screwed up the post.
Anyway, I fixed it.
Thanks, again.
I hate it when I do that.
That is surely the question for our time, is it not?
“When we have enough votes!”
Shouts the chorus.
Reminds of of Chapter 13 of the Tao Te Ching
Accept disgrace willingly.
Accept misfortune as the human condition.
What do you mean by “Accept disgrace willingly”?
Accept being unimportant.
Do not be concerned with loss or gain.
This is called “accepting disgrace willingly.”
What do you mean by “Accept misfortune as the human condition”?
Misfortune comes from having a body.
Without a body, how could there be misfortune?
Surrender yourself humbly; then you can be trusted to care for all things.
Love the world as your own self; then you can truly care for all things.
I second that….rules for kindness in the blogosphere…Go figure. Many thanks.
Consider the general line of restrictions of the Ten Commandments. These proscribe your behavior and limits thereof. But, how does that relate to someone else you might encounter?
In psychology there are entire branches devoted to relationships and how we might behave to or relative to others. What behavior elicits what response? What kind of behavior is okay with one person, but repugnant with another?
So, I look at the caution “that which is hateful to you” and ask if that’s really relevant to another person?
For example, does throwing a shoe at someone in Indiana mean the same as in Cairo or Baghdad? Does shaking hands with someone using your left hand mean the same in Toronto as in Mumbai? What matters to you and especially what offends you isn’t necessarily relevant to another person. Would I have to know only what offends me to avoid offending all others? No.
OTOH, how can we relate to others whose customs and beliefs we don’t know?
There’s no easy answer to human relations.
I have a simple answer to your point.
You make it your business to know what is hateful to others and refrain from doing nit to them as you would likewise want them to know about and refrain from doing to you.
I do not believe humans are so different that a universal effort to practice the Golden Rule in its positive and negative expressions would immediately and radically transform human life for the better worldwide.
Aw, shucks Dee Dub.
Thanks.
Namaste
Breaking:
ToshaMakia @TOSHAMAKIA
Zimmerman’s Request For New Judge Denied!! http://bit.ly/R7YdWH via @globalgrind
Expand
Reply Retweet Favorite
35m Global Grind @GlobalGrind
BREAKING! Judge Lester makes significant ruling in George Zimmerman’s case…
Rachel @CraneStation
Here is Judge Lester’s totally fucking brutal one-sentence order: http://media.cmgdigital.com/shared/news/documents/2012/08/01/Order_Dismissing_Defendants_Motion_to_Disqualify_Trial_Judge.pdf …
Expand
Reply Delete Favorite
I’m surprised that this thread hasn’t attracted more discussion.
I think every blog to which I return has one thing in common over time;
The people there are asking what we are to do?
How are we to live, what are we to do, in light of the conditions in which we find ourselves?
I think Hillel’s questions invite us to understand our own questions more clearly.
We must take care of ourselves, we must consider others, and we must do what must be done, and not avoid what is necessary just because it involves difficulty.
I take his last question to also mean “Don’t make excuses.”
I have responsibilities, we have resposibilities, and now is the time to for us to act on those responsibilities.
All the rest is needless fluff.
Gee you’re fast. I thought I had breaking news but you beat me to it.
Just as Mason had predicted.
So true.