Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX) took to the airwaves Tuesday to decry increases in marijuana use amongst the American public and call for a ramping up of marijuana enforcement nationwide.
At first glance, some might think Smith is genuinely concerned about marijuana use and its impact on public safety. Yet it’s hard to take him at his word when he is in fact receiving money from the alcohol industry, which produces, distributes and promotes a far more harmful substance.
If Smith is so concerned about public safety he should be thrilled that more Americans are making the rational, safer choice to use marijuana instead of alcohol when they relax and recreate. Unlike marijuana, alcohol use contributes to domestic violence, sexual assaults, and other serious problems. If promoting public safety is his motive, it’s time he explained his reason for preferring adults use alcohol — a substance whose use alone kills more than 30,000 Americans per year — instead of marijuana, which has never resulted in a single death in history.
Another explanation for Smith’s anti-marijuana action could be his ties to the booze industry, which appears to be working to keep marijuana illegal and protect its status as the nation’s sole legal intoxicant. Late last week it was discovered that the alcohol industry is financing a campaign to defeat a marijuana legalization initiative in California, resulting in headlines nationwide and sparking outrage and action amongst supporters of marijuana policy reform.
According to OpenSecrets.org, Smith has received at least $20,000 from the beer, wine, and liquor industry this campaign cycle, including a $10,000 donation from the National Beer Wholesalers Association, a $5,000 contribution from the Wine and Spirits Wholesalers of America, and $5,000 from Constellation Brands Premium Wine and Spirits Company.
With marijuana legalization becoming increasingly popular, it appears the alcohol industry and its good friends in Washington are beginning to recognize that marijuana legalization is imminent. So it would make sense for them to protect their turf by bashing marijuana and those who support making it legal, and working to scare the public into thinking marijuana is just too dangerous to make legal. (It should also be noted that some alcohol companies are speaking out to ensure consumers know they are NOT part of the anti-marijuana efforts.)
If that’s the fight Big Alcohol wants to pick, so be it. It has an increasingly uphill battle, but the industry has every right to take on the growing movement to reform marijuana laws. But as for Lamar Smith, he should come clean and explain what his motivation is for attacking marijuana policy reform and calling for increased enforcement. If it’s his concern for public safety, he’s a hypocrite who needs to stop and think about the impact of laws that drive Americans to drink by outlawing a safer alternative. And if it’s his ties to booze money, it’s simply unethical.
Mason Tvert is executive director of Safer Alternative For Enjoyable Recreation (SAFER) and coauthor of "Marijuana is Safer: So why are we driving people to drink?"



25 Comments




Thanks Mason – recommended.
Great job on CNN.
My thoughts exactly.
Lamar Smith(R) Come Clean? He’s a Texas Republican working for tips from Big Alcohol.
tips-to insure prompt service.
Wow, an MSM doing a good job, I am impressed
I don’t know….I’m watching the new HBO show ‘Boardwalk’ and it shows the celebration by the bootleggers when prohibition started. I’m thinking all the drug cartels are throwing some bucks into anti-marijuana ads along with the liquor companies. Maybe these legislators have more support than they realize.
Thanks Mason – recommended.
Good post. Totally predictable. As always: follow the money. Of course Big Alcohol is opposed to legalizing marijuana. That was a given.
The next thing will be removing the word Marijuana and replacing it with Psychoactive Cannabis on the Information part of the ballot.
Anyone who takes big booze money should remove themselves from votes on Pot yes including Jon Kept by the wife’s Booze money McCain.
Can we sue or otherwise seek an injunction on this? the last thing the GOP wants is Pols being banned from taking money but I think its the next step of democracy.
Are you the Mason I normally talk to or are you new?
Yes I’m sure drug dealers are giving them cash too to protect their profits and gunmakers too.
Mason the Bullshit Slayer!
Seriously outstanding job, sir.
Lamar Smith wants to “ramp up” marijuana law enforcement? We currently arrest more than 800,000 Americans a year, most of them for possession of small amounts. Reefer madness, indeed.
Lamar Alexander….. Go fuck yourself! You are and ignorant asshole and black men who smoke pot do not rape white woman. Plenty of white Daddy’s came home drunk, tooled up mom in a rage and diddled the daughter! You are a loser! Lamar Alexander, go live with the Taliban. You would fit in well with the absolutist moralizing assholes. Send Lamar a link of these post, the asshole! Alcoholism destroyed my family. Marijuana did not! It would have been a welcome substitute, to the alcohol induced stupidity which decimates families you asinine fucking loser!!
The unending bullshit of a POS!
Lamar YOU SUCK!
“Lamar Smith!” I had “Alexander” on my brain due to the fact I’ve been working on an article entitle, “Alexander The Great,” More on the Ball than Teabaggers! I apologize to Lamar Alexander, that is if his position is “not” in line with Representative Lamar Smith. My bad what a dope! Sorry!
“which produces, distributes and promotes a far more harmful substance.” Please. I’m drinking a beer right now, and I’m pretty sure I won’t keel over dead when I’m finished with it.
This booze guy in the video sucks I would ask for my money back if I were the booze lobby. of course he had nothing to work with I heard and dismissed his taking points in the 80′s.
Odds are better if you were doing Pot no overdose deaths.
Judge: State pot law no defense for drug charges
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jubwI-ZzMMd4Arwz-Hm_nLn7NIWAD9IDAIPO0
Funny thing…I am down in Texas on business and was watching local TeeVee in the hotel. a headline came across the screen about an upcoming story. The headline said something about “heavy marijuana use” days before someone apparently fell asleep and I guess killed some people in an accident or some such shit (dont remeber exactly). But CLEARLY the implication was “marijuana bad!”. I could not believe it…heavy marijuana use days before? It was an obvious effort to influence the debate on marijuana and prop 19. And it was in Texas.
The American CorpoRats at it again. There really needs to a full blown attack on the corporations and their influence on this nation.
Alcohol is my drug of choice, so I was intrigued and amused in the last month or so when I breezed by 2 articles that claimed how good liquor is for your health. For example, one was focused on how people who take a couple of drinks/day live longer, adjusted for all other diffs, than people who don’t. The other article claimed that, plus a few other health benefits. Then I saw the article on how liquor producers are fighting against Prop 19 and I began to wonder. The links to the two pro-liquor ‘studies’ are lost to history, but I’m keeping my eyes open now for the next one to see who sponsored the study.
I have noticed big media doing that for years. I have emailed to MSNBC complaining about it.
Since pot can be a real lifesaver for treating alcoholism, I framed it as genocide to Native Americans. Do you think that changed their coverage?
Not a bit.
It is a conspiracy to commit torture and it is religious.
I was pleasantly surprised as well, but he missed a spot. When the alcohol rep claimed this would create a DUI exemption for marijuana as there would be no way to gauge intoxication, my followup would have been, “How would the law change that from the current situation?”
Or am I the only one to whom it’s news that I can drive stoned now and just get dinged for crappy driving but not DUI?