According to the annual Monitoring the Future survey released today by the National Institutes of Health, marijuana use is up and alcohol use is down amongst America’s teens.
Although U.S. Drug Czar Gil Kerlikowske has taken to the airwaves to tell us “we should be very concerned about these marijuana numbers,” those numbers might actually be indicative of progress.
Of course there are few (if any) people who think teenagers should be using marijuana or alcohol, and it would be wonderful if all teens chose to remain “drug free.” But if they are going to use an intoxicating substance — and we all know many of them will — the fact is that they pose far less harm to themselves and to others if they choose to use marijuana instead of alcohol.
After all, every objective study on marijuana has concluded that it is far safer than alcohol for the user and society. Whereas alcohol contributes to overdose deaths, significant long-term health problems, serious injuries, and violent crimes, marijuana has never been found to contribute to such problems. Thus, those teens choosing to use marijuana instead of alcohol are in fact making a safer choice.
Not surprisingly, the drug czar is singling out medical marijuana laws and the debate surrounding them as the be-all-end-all cause of teens’ ease in attitude toward marijuana. This from a guy overseeing a major anti-marijuana ad campaign that has actually been found to increase the likelihood that those frequently exposed to the ads will experiment with marijuana. And when’s the last time you heard him complain about all the TV ads and billboards — visible to young and older people alike — that tout beer and liquor as the key to a good time. . . .
Perhaps Kerlikowske is right and the growing public debate about medical marijuana has eased some younger people’s attitudes toward marijuana. But that would only be because they are now beginning to hear both sides of the story, as opposed to the one-sided propaganda and government misinformation they’ve been exposed to for years. Assuming teenagers are not complete idiots — which the drug czar clearly seems to think they are — they are simply listening to the medical marijuana debate and garnering facts regarding the substance’s effects and the potential harms it poses. They are then comparing them to the effects and harms of alcohol, the one other recreational intoxicant with which they are familiar. Then, in light of their not being complete idiots, they are beginning to take the relative harms of marijuana and alcohol into consideration when choosing which they prefer to use.
For most it’s a no-brainer. If they’re going to get intoxicated in some form, why not choose the less harmful of the two? This is not necessarily to say they are making a good choice when they decide to use marijuana. But it is to say they are making the safer choice, and that is certainly a step in the right direction.
Mason Tvert is the executive director of Safer Alternative For Enjoyable Recreation (SAFER) and coauthor of “Marijuana is Safer: So why are we driving people to drink?”




4 Comments

Good thing. Pot is physiologically less harmful than alcohol. Plus, have you ever met a violent or mean stoned person? :)
Well I’ve just had a pleasant surprise while looking at the “The NSDUH Report – State Estimates of Drunk and Drugged Driving” from SAMSHA. The fact that I had a pleasant surprise when looking at government statistics about “drugged” driving is a shocking surprise in itself.
——————————————————-
Trends in Driving under the Influence of Illicit Drugs
When combined 2002 to 2005 data are compared with combined 2006 to 2009 data, the Nation as a whole experienced a statistically significant reduction in the rate of past year drugged driving (from 4.8 to 4.3 percent), as did seven States: Alaska, California, Florida, Hawaii, Iowa, Michigan, and Pennsylvania (Table 2). No States had a statistically significant increase in the rate of drugged driving.
http://oas.samhsa.gov/2k10/205/DruggedDriving.htm
Well ain’t that a slap in the face of the “drugged driving” dangers the Know Nothings like to include in their standard issue hysterical rhetoric.
Should I mention that 4 of the 7 states cited by SAMSHA as having statistically significant reductions in “drugged” driving From 2002 to 2009 are medical cannabis states? Do we also point out that Michigan wasn’t a medical cannabis state until 2008?
This tidbit is also included:
Reductions in past year rates of drugged driving were found both among persons aged 16 to 25 (12.9 to 11.4 percent) and among persons aged 26 or older (3.0 to 2.8 percent).
Wow, I wonder why this report didn’t make the headlines. Perhaps it was just forgotten seeing how it was published way, way back in last week, on 12/09/2010.
Barns full o’ research data compiled here at FDL retrievable via the keyword search term, cannabidiol. It’ll blow your cranial brain (in a good way) and you’ll never want to touch the biochemical poison called alcohol again.
P.S. Nicotine is a non-specific beta receptor blocker in addition to the carcinogenic tars from smoking it and the industry-added additives that make it even more addictive (see http://www.tobaccofreekids.org/reports/insider ). For peak cognitive performance, you’ll want to drop kick that habit as well.
What % of alcohol sales are consumed by minors