
Image: China Labor Watch
Cross-posted from In These Times
If you believe the hype about living in the “Pacific Century,” then the new millennium is bound to be a pretty rowdy one.
A few days ago about 1,000 workers in the heart of China’s manufacturing belt walked off the job at the Taiwan-owned Jingmo Electronics Corporation, saying they were tired of being cheated by overtime pay. Around the same time in the Guangdong boomtown known as Dongguan, thousands of shoe factory workers protested over overtime pay and marched with their grievances to a local government office.
This may seem like a reprise of the powerful 2010 strike wave that rippled through big-name manufacturing plants, including Toyota and Honda. Last year, workers’ newfound militancy yielded some significant gains—mainly in the form of pay hikes and other concessions. But whether they’ll be able to wrest a fairer paycheck from the management this time around hinges not so much on workers’ will, as on the global economic house of cards that’s getting rocked by countless factors that the labor force can’t control. Though concessions could be coming down the pipeline for some workers, in the backdrop is an alarming slowdown in China’s exports, which drive the country’s development and stuff consumers in rich countries with an endless stream of cheap goods.
November brought news of a a sharp drop in exports to Europe, coinciding with a burgeoning financial crisis in the Eurozone, as well as premonitions that China’s housing market might soon start to go pop.
According to the watchdog organization China Labour Bulletin, the state has worked with the companies to squelch protests, and even management staff is feeling the pain:
Photographs posted online showed large numbers of police on the street and bloodied workers who claimed to have been beaten by the police. Several other workers had reportedly been detained.
The strike at the Yue Cheng factory in Huang Jiang township was triggered by the dismissal of 18 managers in late October. The company claimed they had been dismissed because of the factory’s decreasing orders and sluggish business. But one of the managers told China Business News that the real reason behind their dismissal was that the factory planned to shift production to Jiangxi in a bid to combat rising costs in the Pearl River Delta.
“We’ve been loyal workers for over a decade in this factory. But now the factory decided to fire us on the sole excuse of bad business operations and cost pressures. How can they be so irresponsible?” one dismissed manager wrote on his internet post.
2010′s summer of unrest saw workers’ aspirations catching up to their demands for workplace justice, and both bosses and local governments seemed willing to placate workers with pay raises and minimum-wage hikes. But the promise of continued growth and rising standards of living may be finally petering out.
CLB editor Geoffrey Crothall told ITT:
Last year the economy was booming and employers clearly could afford to give workers substantial pay raises. That is no longer the case and many businesses are struggling. There is less profit to go around and workers demands now seem more tailored to trying to hang on to what meager benefits they did win in last few years rather than push for substantial pay increases. But even these modest demands are meeting resistance from employers and often workers will only begrudgingly agree to go back to work on the promise to fully resolve grievances at a later date.
Now that’s running up against sagging demand and factory relocations to cheaper and cheaper areas, either within China or to even poorer Asian countries. This means that the growing energy among organized workers lacks the momentum to brake the downward spiral. But according to Li Qiang of the advocacy group China Labor Watch, the power of collective consciousness still counts:
the difficult global economy undoubtedly impacts China’s exporting market, decreasing the jobs and lowering the salary. These are some of the reasons why we see a rash of workers’ unrest in China. But we think more importantly, the strike signals the workers’ arising awareness of their rights and conception of empowering themselves. Tracing back to 10 years ago, the word “right” never came to the workers’ minds, not even mentioning fighting for it. In retrospect, we can see that they are more organized and prepared now than ever before. The collectivity also helps the workers to get their voice heard.
That’s inspiring to hear, but if China’s capitalist “miracle” is beginning its implosion (just as it has in America), sooner or later, bosses will calculate that it’s simply more profitable to ship off to Bangaldesh and other countries with a less regulated, more impoverished “business climate.”
There is, however, the potential for workers across Asia to do what their corporate counterparts have accomplished so skillfully—consolidating to the point that they wield power across borders. Campaigns that take a global approach to fair-wage standards and regulations, or champion a broad “social protection floor,” are just starting to ripen, as are cross-border organizing campaigns in North America.
For now, those embryonic efforts won’t reach the workers struggling in Shenzhen today. But if “rights” is becoming a new part of their vocabulary, then a redefinition of “power” and “democracy” shouldn’t be too far off.



6 Comments

The companies that spurned China (not to mention the home nations of their own CEOs) for Thailand, which is the current spot of choice for those companies who think China is too expensive, are now suffering the effects of the climate-change-enhanced superfloods that have been hitting the country.
And Bangladesh, being mostly on a giant river delta sitting less than forty feet above sea level, is far more vulnerable to storms and flooding, in large part because the forests that once served as storm buffers (and which held the topsoil in place) have long since been chopped up for cooking fuel and other uses.
Oh, and did I mention that Bangladesh is desperately overcrowded?
In a globalized economy the floor of the rights of workers in any part of the world profoundly affect the rights of workers in all other parts of that globalized economy, thus the struggles of workers to obtain fair wages, working conditions and the right to collectively bargain anywhere are the struggles of workers everywhere. It is thus in our interests in the West to advocate for and champion workers’ rights globally. Corporate multinationalism must be countered with effective multinational institutions representing labor interests.
Sooner or later the predatory capitalists are going to run out of places in which to relocate and local populations willing to be worked to death in atrocious conditions and enslaved in debt.
Maximizing short term profits by exploiting and enslaving the labor force that produces a corporation’s products for sale ultimately is a self-destructive policy because it produces an angry and increasingly radicalized population of impoverished workers with unmet expectations and nothing to lose by attacking the corporation. The corporation also loses money because wage slaves amid an impoverished population cannot afford to purchase any of its products.
Exporting its products to countries whose economies it has wrecked with its predatory practices will not be an option because the people who live there will not be able to afford the products either.
Ironically, their predation will ultimately unite all the workers in the world against them and when that happens there will be no place on earth where they can escape the destiny that awaits them.
Greed kills.
Recommended.
Here’s alittle something to go along with this and if you have a chance read Wolfs book on Branding.
http://www.counterpunch.org/2011/12/02/outsourcing-jobs-offshoring-markets/
Masoninblue I agree it just won’t be soon enough for me.
Thanks for share link her which is very useful for newbie like me,
Spurned China? Oh, poor baby. And what do you say to the workers in Dongguan about global warming, Phoenix Woman? Their air is thick enough to cut with a knife, and their children have been deemed at risk for brain damage from the lead levels in their water supply. The Brown Cloud hovers overhead. How about the Beijing factory workers who live on the overpasses, having been displaced from the hutongs for the Olympics? Do they fit in to the wonderful dream? Is the air they breathe good enough? A blue sky day every couple of weeks during the summertime?
China is the world’s number one producer of greenhouse gases, even without accounting for the gasses produced in shipping their products to their destinations. If their workers were paid their due, and the destination countries turned to their own economies to produce again, you could almost see them finding ways to not produce at such carbon levels, if only to save their own hides from the damage.
Who would that ultimately benefit? The mandarins in the communist party or the unpaid little people who get blown to bits when the aluminum dust ignites explosively at Foxconn?
It isn’t a crime to bring manufacturing back and force the Chinese to learn to build a real economy. They really aren’t building Shangri-La there, and some of us have known that since the 1970s.