Cross-posted from In These Times.
As you file your taxes this week, before complaining about how much you’re forking over to Uncle Sam, bear in mind that the tax man might not be the only one you’re writing a check to: Your boss might be getting a big cut, too.
Thanks to arcane state tax subsidies, thousands of companies have fattened their profit margins by poaching from workers’ paychecks. According to a report by the watchdog group Good Jobs First, nearly $700 million in taxpayer money is being siphoned off by corporations annually through clever deals with state governments that are supposedly aimed at “job creation.”
According to the report, the tax breaks allow companies to effectively skim money from workers’ state income tax withholdings “to provide lavish subsidies to corporations rather than paying for vital public services.” The beneficiaries include “more than 2,700 companies, including major firms such as Sears, Goldman Sachs and General Electric.”
These programs feature glowingly euphemistic names: Indiana’s Economic Development for a Growing Economy (EDGE) Tax Credit, the Mississippi Advantage Jobs Incentive Program, and, to emphasize that these aren’t just any old jobs we’re talking about, New Mexico’s High Wage Jobs Tax Credit.
A more fitting title, according to Good Jobs First, would be “job blackmail.” Tax breaks are the trophy state lawmakers offer while trying to pull businesses into their states, or keep businesses from moving out. But while tax breaks are often painted as a mechanism for attracting jobs, they’re actually more aimed at attracting bosses. The researchers explain that in this interstate “economic war,” shuffling businesses geographically does not amount to genuine development:
For example, Kansas gave AMC Entertainment $47 million in PEAK subsidies last year to get the movie theatre chain to move its headquarters from downtown Kansas City, Missouri about 10 miles across the state line to suburban Leawood. In Illinois, Motorola Mobility (now part of Google) last year got state officials to provide $100 million in EDGE tax credits over ten years to keep its headquarters in the Chicago suburb of Libertyville.
And yet at the local level, the wealth tends to trickle upward, not down. Good Jobs First has documented that nationwide, numerous state corporate subsidy programs have failed to foster sustainable, living wage jobs.
According to the report, which covers 16 states, the creative accounting can take many forms: some companies can simply pocket the money that would otherwise be remitted to the state in the form of workers’ income tax. Some programs dish out “incentives” in the form of grants, or credits against corporate income taxes, that effectively offset what workers pay in withholding taxes. The basic principle is that the company gets extra cash, the politicians get some publicity for “job creation,” and the public gets a perilously vague promise of local development, all the while wondering why their state can’t seem to keep schools and hospitals running.
The backdrop to these political theatrics is the yawning economic and fiscal crisis facing states across the country. Joblessness continues to plague states that are showering tax breaks on corporations. (With its recent unemployment rate of 9.5 percent, Mississippi’s “Advantage Jobs” apparently haven’t fully materialized.)
Adding insult to injury, while states spoonfeed tax breaks to big corporations, they are forcing struggling workers to bear a very heavy tax burden. According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, though some states have moved in recent years to provide some tax relief to low-income households, “No new states exempted working-poor families of four from income taxes in 2011, and in almost all of the 15 states where such families still pay income taxes, they saw their income taxes increase.”
On the federal level, the Obama administration too has sought to dangle various tax breaks before employers, supposedly to stimulate hiring. Good politics, bad math: critics say a tax giveaway is simply that—free money that doesn’t directly address a structural jobs deficit.
Maybe the shadiest part of these schemes is the lack of transparency. Companies are generally under no obligation to tell workers that their tax burden is tied to their bosses’ tax break. Good Jobs First Research Director Philip Mattera told In These Times, “We could find no subsidy program that requires workers to be notified on their pay stub or W-2, but Kentucky used to require employers to tell workers about the diversion after the company was approved for the subsidy.”
So on this tax day, if you’re grumpy about how much you owe the taxman, just think about how much workers have ended up paying to the boss man instead.



15 Comments

great post, one correction;
at ALL levels wealth migrates up, it NEVER trickles down, believing that wealth can actually trickle down is the same thing as believing the oceans are filled with the rain, the reverse is true in both cases
ALL wealth begins with labor, all of it, there is NOTHING that comes from the top down, it goes from the bottom up and that is all there is to it
here’s an example which a person on the right helped me develope;
if a few people were stranded on an island with absolutely nothing, no cloths no food no nothing, jobs would be there IMMEDIATELY and there wealth would follow from that
all wealth begins from the earth not the heavens
Gad.
The only criterion that counts is whether the subsidy brought a net dollar gain to the affected area. 100% of nothing (business doesn’t come) is still nothing.
The employees aren’t being taken advantage of, they have a job that didn’t exist before the company arrived.
If however, the deal ends up being a net loss, by all means blow the whistle.
P.S. Money circulates. Mostly down.
Pinellas County/Tampa’s famous tax gift to Nielsen (TV program and web site ratings, ad spending ratings etc.) to produce new jobs -
followed by the owners outsourcing to India over half the jobs then in the county
with no recovery from Nielsen by the tax folks of the tax gift that was given Nielsen after that action
is a case study in how our tax dollars are welfare checks to corporations.
Evidence…?
Didn’t think so.
LOL
Yep – and the folks getting all that money that circulates down were called serfs and slaves – hell of a system. Those that had the “rents” coming in – the accumulated wealth – almost always got it via parents that got it via the government giving them some advantage – like today’s legacy kids get into good schools and via upbring get past the interviews and into good jobs – making 10 times what other folks make because “they work hard”.
Labor generated the wealth in every society – and rents were imposed to drain it upward in a system enforced by the government and the money of the wealthy to used enforce there wishes – and sold to everyone as preserving everyone’s freedom to get the gov to send some of those rents your way if you just worked hard.
Hmmm, so I am self-employed. How do I get my hands on that money to pay back myself?
I’m sure you’ve seen my observation that labor is a bunch of people standing around with nothing to do, until someone arrives with an idea and the money to pursue it, yes? I see that group of people standing around on the street corner looking to be hired for the day, or inhabiting unemployment offices.
If your assertion is true, why don’t the day labor guys build a house, or the folks in the unemployment office self organize into a business of some sort?
I looked into the NM program, which appears to have been in place since 2004, from what I can tell. One of the programs that is using this (potentially) appears to be “green energy” jobs. It looks like they can take up to $12K per year per employee. They call it the “high wage jobs act” or something similar, and since NM is very poor, I don’t know how “high” that wage would be. I am going to be asking my friends in the legislature about this. I guess this is one way to “incentivise” a program, though the employees are surely not aware of how the incentives are structured. I guess it looks better than if they just give everyone $12K subsidies per employee.
Yes, and I laughed very hard with you. Then I realized you were serious. So I laughed very hard at you.
People standing around with nothing to do die.
People do what they need to do – they do not need much of a leadership structure, if any. Getting people away from the farm and hunt and into factories required a reward based on wealth creation – and that wealth creation requires people – it again does not require much structure. If wealth is not created the workers have lost the sure thing of growing food – the boss loses capital – but that money came from his control of the state and is replenished by more taxes on those farmers.
Based on my life I have seen a few folks with ideas that added to society – but I have seen 1000 hired managers for each such idea person – and those managers are just leaches doing a job that 100,000 could do but for lack of the right parents. And the smart folks that developed Unix V6 public domain and released it in 1975 got nothing from the DOS/Windows/OSX/Linux/Android work that is all based on it. Indeed Gates did no original work at his company for the first 25 years of Microsoft – indeed Harvard’s complier and language writing programs were the basis for his 1970′s efforts (to be fair he did – or the two folks he hired did – write the best 8088 assembly language decompiler on the marker – albeit that was again with the Harvard computer and tools) but perhaps the skill those standing around need is a leader that can market into the legacy types running large corporations and governments. We once called such folks con-men if their parents were not in with the powers that be, but Gates had a corporate lawyer mom who had dinner with the head of IBM – so times have changed and we call them self-made men.
Now all this over-simplifies everything – nothing is other than grey – but the justification for the system that allows workers little put out by the rich and corporate may make them feel better, but it fails any observations I have made over my life.
double ps, it circulates, almost entirely up, it started from the bottom in the first place, it comes down like the rain that came from the oceans, not the other way around
I’m sure you’ve seen me expose that scenario numerous times, wealth comes from jobs not the other way around
the group of people “hanging around” are those looking for work at this particular spot because that’s where they can get work for now, they are waiting to be hired so someone can make money or save money from their labor, you can’t make money without labor there making it for you
I must have missed that.
My point exactly. Nothing happens before the idea and money to pursue it.
Labor is a natural resource like water, air, or oil. It’s everywhere. Good ideas and the money to pursue them are much more rare and universally required. Even then, most businesses fail.
your point fails
as you have seen time and again, there is no money without jobs, people persue their living with or without money, unless of course you believe nobody ever worked till money came along
you mean ignored it, it was you who helped me create the brutally obvious point;
if you were stranded on an island with a few other people left with nothing at all, no food cloths or shelter, you would have jobs, IMMEDIATLY and you would work for your living, NOBODY would have wealth until you went to work
so you can “miss” it again on the next thread you make believe you missed the point and shill for me again
thanks for the assist once again, see you on the next conversation
Really? You’re going to reduce a group of people to scavenger status and declare that a victory for labor? Apparently then Neanderthals were the first labor movement. Heh.