There aren’t many jobs in the U.S. that are tougher than farmwork–spending the day picking crops under a sweltering sun, earning just enough to survive, jumping from one unstable seasonal job to another. But the job is especially unbearable if you have to work yourself to exhaustion all day under the watch of the man who raped you.
There have over the years been numerous reports of widespread sexual abuse of women farmworkers–everything from being called demeaning names by supervisors to brutal sexual assault. Many of the victims suffer in silence, cut off from law enforcement and social services and fearful of losing their jobs if they come forward to authorities, according to a report on sexual violence in agricultural work by Human Rights Watch.
The report, based on dozens of interviews with survivors and advocates, outlines the multiple barriers to justice that women face–not just institutional sexism but also crippling poverty and discrimination in law enforcement. Women may feel they have little choice but to suffer humiliating treatment and abuse in order to support their families. The consequences of reporting sexual violence can be devastating for the whole household, because the boss might fire both the victim and the family members who work alongside her.
Women make up a sizable minority in a male-dominated agricultural workforce, and the economic oppression that afflicts the farmworker population generally is exacerbated by a climate of gender oppression, in which women are viewed as sexual objects, and victims of abuse may face devastating social stigma even from their own community. Single women, indigenous, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender workers are especially at risk, according to HRW researchers.
The testimonial of Angela G. describes how her abuse was enforced by layers of silence and impunity ingrained in the workplace culture:
In her experience, women in general were not valued by the supervisors and the foremen, but Angela reported that because she did not have a partner, she was singled out for abuse. “I was called a dyke; they said I was a lesbian…. [The supervisor] and the foreman would laugh.” She was afraid to say anything because others who had complained of sexual harassment had been fired immediately. But to listen in silence day after day caused her a great deal of pain…
Angela stayed on, however, because she wanted to get promoted, earn a higher salary, and be better able to support her family. And then one day, a supervisor asked her to come over to his house to pick up some boxes. Angela reported that after she entered the house, he raped her.
Angela said she felt powerless: “For me, it felt like an eternity. I wanted to scream but I couldn’t. Afterward, he said I should remember that it’s because of him that I have this job, and if I say anything, I’ll lose my job…. I was afraid to call the police, to do anything. I didn’t know what to do. My mind was completely blocked off.”
No one knows how often this scene is repeated every day on the vast industrial farms that have drawn hundreds of thousands of migrants. But since the migrant farm workforce is the product of federal labor, food and immigration policies, the government is at least complicit in, if not at the crux of, this system of exploitation.
Although the law should theoretically protect all women from such abuse, immigrant workers are deterred from reporting work-related sexual violence because the law tends to criminalize them rather than treat them as survivors deserving of justice. As federal and state authorities have focused on arresting and deporting the undocumented, immigrant communities have every reason to see police as a source of terror, not protection.
Although special immigration relief known as the U-Visa is available to victims of crime, advocates are concerned that the qualifications for the visa are too stringent for people who are dealing with trauma and economic hardship. Access to counseling and other services is also severely constrained by language and culture barriers that make it hard for social agencies to build trust with underserved communities.
At the same time, sexual victimization is part of a continuum of exploitation, and as long as farmworkers, whether they’re here legally or not, are excluded from equal labor and civil rights, suffering in all forms will remain an intrinsic part of the agricultural system. Grace Meng, a researcher in Human Rights Watch’s U.S. Program who authored the report, told Alternet that while farmworkers face unique threats on the job, “a lot of the factors that make them vulnerable are true of unauthorized immigrant workers in a lot of industries.” Although special remedies like the U-Visa might help address individual violations, she said, “We think that the most practical and effective way to deal with the vulnerability of these workers and this population to crime and other abuses is to enact comprehensive immigration reform.”
It should be no surprise that on America’s farms, so many women are treated as less than human, since not even the government sees them as worthy of respect under the law.



5 Comments

This is horrible. It’s not surprising, when you consider the widespread lack of accountability for rapists and the employment-at-will system that provides so few protections to workers.
Maybe there are so few responses b/c the title is so horribly offensive. What is “your rapist”? Just b/c something horrible happened does not equal a “your” relationship of any sort…criminal, vile, etc. But not “my”/”your” anything. Astounding choice of words like “your” sweetie or boyfriend. Yuk.
It is sick, vile disgusting, evil. Nothing makes me more angry than force of will in violation of another human being.
That is why I so despise the political left (as a movement).
Because it is predicated upon force in violation of human will.
Rape some would call it.
Social justice according to others.
unending abuse, rape . . . SOP in the Republican model of American labor.
Michelle, I do often give pointers to articles presented here for many others to read (and they do) but I don’t always come by and report that in the comments. I also don’t find such a title offensive for investigative reports if one has the facts to back up what is being named. In reading of this, yeah, looks to me descriptive and then I would say power to the person(s) calling it out. By the way, Latina immigrants have been targets of harassment within food service operations too. I can’t find a fairly contemporary Sysco incident which I recall involved Honduran refugees versus people involved in circular migration that briefly hit the M$M and caught my attention because it was so disgustingly flagrant and within the DC metro area which is a first “port-of-call” for a lot of immigrants (variety of reasons). The incident is consist with the types of labor cases already brought forward against the company and industry. Also, I am wondering if it was settled out of court and the prospective plaintiffs were legally leveraged into silence for a financial settlement. I found it previously on the ‘Net but now can’t easily do so which is also disturbing as this indicates the increasing erasure of records of what actually happens/has happened versus fabrications of events (aka “the memory hole”). The whole concept of one kind of prison serving prisons is even more nauseating:
“Food Sunday: Prison Food Privatization And Aramark” | By: Crane-Station Sunday August 14, 2011 8:07 am
This tough work and not for those of a faint heart. Gracias por todos sus esfuerzos diligentes!