
“occupy sandy. 520 clinton avenue.” (bondidwhat via flickr / creative commons)
Originally posted at In These Times
Disaster has a way of concentrating the mind. And Gotham has always had its share of it: whether it’s a slow-burning disaster like the epidemic of income inequality, the endemic scourge of police brutality and racial profiling, or the chronic deprivation of healthy food in isolated neighborhoods. Superstorm Sandy churned all of these elements of urban chaos. But in its wake, the storm has laid bare new pathways for innovations, and new frontiers for struggles against inequality.
The undercurrent of these contradictions ran through a conference this weekend dedicated to “designing a city for the 99%,” a possibility made more real and urgent in the storm’s aftermath. Urban Uprising, held at the New School and the CUNY Graduate Center (where this reporter is also a graduate student), brought together academics, legal experts, organizers and urban ecologists to broach fresh questions about organizing communities: how to harness the energy of Occupy and channel it into direct, localized campaigns; how to balance environmental renewal with economic development; and how to reorient debates on food policy away from apolitical consumer interests and toward the connection between food justice and fighting poverty.
The post-Sandy recovery process colored discussions of one of the main themes: “reimagining the city,” which focused on cultivation, both literal and figurative, of a new urban landscape.
David Harvey, a City University anthropology and geography scholar, has long argued that the Left must learn to organize at the level of the city. His work on the links between urbanization and capitalism helped invigorate the “Right to the City” alliance, one of the groups that organized the conference. During the conference, Harvey noted the ways in which community initiatives like Occupy Sandy are reclaiming urban space for popular struggle. “In a way,” Harvey said in an interview with In These Times, Occupy Sandy is “spreading a political message by a different route. And therefore, Occupy has not gone away. It’s moved into the boroughs… It is therefore a commitment to a different kind of lifestyle, a different kind of on-the-ground politics which in the long run may be just as important as the symbolic politics of Zuccotti Park.”
A broader political backdrop to the discussions was the looming security state that has crystallized over the past decade, putting communities under both economic and political siege. Groups like the Immigrant Defense Project and the Los Angeles Community Action Network described struggles against the militarization of policing around the country, as well as the growing transformation of local police into agents of immigration enforcement, counterterrorism and drug wars.
Harvey described the intense police presence in New York “as a part of a long process of increasing militarization and securitization of urban life which has been going on for the last 30 or 40 years. … It’s become more and more closely organized, which has a lot to do, I think, with the management of what increasingly are becoming ‘disposable populations.’”
In a panel discussion on organizing in the city, writer Kazembe Balagun reflected on how Occupy and its offshoots reflect an evolving movement culture that has both physical and political underpinnings. “In many ways these movements are illusionary, fleeting, but they are real,” said Balagun, who is also an outreach coordinator for the leftist cultural and educational Brecht Forum. “They are spheres of actual working-class power, that reimagine space. Indeed, our challenge is to move from movement spaces, to movement communities, to the revolutionary rebel cities of our dreams.”
On this theme, activists throughout the weekend made plans to promote car-free, bike-centered neighborhoods, increase urban farming, and fight foreclosures through civil disobedience. There were also calls to radically revision public space. City University geography scholar Ruth Wilson Gilmore spoke about prison abolition as a way of democratizing social space.
Given that so many New York City residents are incarcerated in remote prisons upstate, Gilmore argued that “each prison is a mini-borough,” and that incarcerated New Yorkers are essentially “long-distance migrants circulating between here and there.”
Matthew Birkhold, co-founder of Growing Roots, a new initiative inspired by the movement in Detroit to reclaim land for urban gardens, noted that New York won’t necessarily model itself on any other city (the nature of Gotham’s dense real estate landscape doesn’t lend itself to takeovers of vacant lots, for example). But the group’s organizing model has less to do with the physical environment than on efforts to construct networks of mutual aid. “Relationships can happen in any context. It’s a matter of how you decide to intentionally build them,” Birkhold said.
A breakout session on environmental issues, meanwhile, revealed critical tensions between long and short term visions for “sustainability,” an idea that is difficult to define. How do you fight climate change while ensuring that low-wage workers aren’t stiffed in the accompanying economic disruption? How do you rebuild democratically in a fraught city like New York, where public projects tend to get mired in planning gridlock and poor households sidelined by the political elite?
After Sandy exposed vast disparities in vulnerability to environmental catastrophe, all of these questions have dovetailed in the post-storm recovery. “The problems with these communities has to do with access and control of resources, and in a situation like Sandy, there’s a disruption of the normal circuits of capital,” said Casey Butcher, an organizer with the Brecht Forum.
On the other hand, displaced communities could potentially re-anchor themselves for the long term through Occupy Sandy, which is applying Occupy Wall Street tactics in direct-action humanitarian aid in traumatized neighborhoods. ”Something like Occupy, in the context of providing disaster relief, has created a space for a process to unfold,” Butcher said.
For now, the rebooted Occupy movement is focusing on providing help where government has faltered (or, according to some reports, suppressed grassroots efforts). Long-term rebuilding will hinge on how government agencies interact with (or neglect) affected residents and activists.
Joel Stein, a graduate student in Design and Urban Ecologies at the New School a facilitator of the environmental break-out session, told In These Times that whatever recovery programs or policies emerge in the wake of Sandy, the groundwork should be laid by those with a real stake in the outcome: “There needs to be space created for communities to define their sustainability goals for themselves. They’re the experts of their own lives… And so they need to be able to create that vision for themselves.”
A single storm may not shift people’s thinking about the urban environment, but the recent convergence of social and ecological crisis are shifting the city’s political ground, uprooting lives but quietly seeding new ideals in the process.



7 Comments

Michelle, who participated in the conference from the communities? I am wondering if any of the hard-hit residents are yet able to become involved in this kind of re-visioning activity. I have been involved in these sorts of “town hall” activities over the years, and in my experience, it is often still what we call “the usual suspects” who are able to attend. Are you seeing more folks who had homes and businesses destroyed/damaged at this sort of meeting? I know people are still struggling to get to their feet and can’t imagine how they would participate. But of course I hope they can and do.
Good question. Though I did not canvas the people attending the event, the turnout was pretty large, especially on the second day (a full auditorium at the New School) and many of them seemed to be community activists, and the breakout sessions on the second day were intended to engage community members in a dialogue about re-envisioning the city. I don’t know how many of the audience members were among those who had homes or businesses severely damaged in the storm; I imagine those people may not be as focused right now on the more theoretical aspects of rebuilding, if they’re just trying to return to normalcy. But the conference (with a $5 sliding scale admission fee) seemed intended to be accessible. But hopefully even if these conferences don’t attract a cross-section of the affected communities they will at least start some useful conversations that will eventually trickle down to the grassroots level.
Thanks, Michelle. I think it is hard to engage communities when they are just dealing with the regular daily grind, so it would not be surprising for this to be too difficult. I just wonder how people come to activism and if these events push the process.
Appreciate your response!
I just helped put together a 350.org group locally and it’s hard to get people involved, even around an issue as supposedly pressing as this one. I find most people are so wrapped up with work and family that they have little time for such activism.
That, I suspect, is by design — or is at least one of what is for the elites a “happy accident” of the end of the 150-year labor shortage in America that fueled a 150-year period of rising wages, a period that ended in the 1970s due to various factors, the computer being one.
For me this is a timely post having just read The Great Disruption, Paul Gilding and am into the seminal work of Joeseph Stiglitz, The Price of Inequality. Have you read the new Stiglitz work?
Resilience is the only way forward. It is the way we build a future that can help us survive and, perhaps, reverse climate change.
What Hurricane Sandy taught us is that in the matter of a few hours even parts of the richest cities in the world can be reduced to refugee camp status. Fortunately, resilience starts from the same place all over the world, for the richest as well as the poorest. Turns out that helping the poorest first can reduce projected temperature climate change rise by 50% by 2050 if we do it right: http://www.unep.org/publications/ebooks/slcf/
I say Solar IS Civil Defense: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0mjqjgZ64E
Such a simple tactic is useful for NYC for emergencies and to bring about a quarter of the world’s population on the first steps into the 21st century.
Proves once again we are all in the same boat. Unfortunately, the boat leaks and the captain(s) are fools. Looks like the solutions have to come up from the ground and the people. Thanks for reporting on this conference. It’s important.