3:44 pm in Uncategorized by Michelle Chen
Originally posted at In These Times
Also see Tom Thumb’s post
NPR, This American Life
A dramatic investigation aired this week by This American Life raised concerns about federal disability insurance with its portrayal of the system as dysfunctional, financially unsustainable and ballooning out of control.
But experts say the program omitted key evidence that the doubling of workers on disability insurance since 1995 has been driven by genuine need.
In the show, featured on National Public Radio, This American Life
reporter Chana Joffe-Walt explores
a poor Alabama town where 1 in 4 people live on disability insurance
. The interviews with working-class beneficiaries depict them as victims of a culture of dependency, convinced that there’s no real job they could do, and prey to vulture-like lawyers. One attorney, who helps people appeal disability insurance rejections, boasts, “I’ve created some of the problems for the government because so many people appeal.” Joffe-Walt raises hand-wringing questions, “Who is making the case for the other side? Who is defending the government’s decision to deny disability?”
In fact, the government has staunch defenders
of its right to deny disability benefits: pro-market conservative commentators.
They argue that while other federal assistance programs have severely tightened since the neoliberal “welfare reform
” of the 1990s, disability (which was expanded after its 1956 enactment
to include more age groups) has become a de facto welfare system plagued with “misaligned incentives” that could lead to insolvency. Some conservatives use this narrative to make the case for privatizing disability insurance
, in tandem with the push to privatize Social Security.
But according to the Washington, D.C.-based think tank Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), the driver of growth in disability beneficiaries isn’t “misaligned incentives” or, as the show suggests, people taking advantage of an over-generous system. It’s simply more people.