
"Strike for the eight Demands" by DayDreamPilot on flickr. Strike Poster Workshop from Harvard University 1969.
Don’t be fooled by the complaints that the Occupy Wall Street movement hasn’t got a clear set of demands. Everybody in a position of power knows exactly what the people want. They simply don’t want to acknowledge it. Because, one issue at a time, the demands all boil down to one thing: we don’t want you running the world any more. You’re bad at it. Your motives are evil. The future you imagine is a vision of hell.
If I were in charge, I wouldn’t want to acknowledge that, either.
It’s an old trick: when an angry mob descends on your castle, ask what its demands are. The commoners will argue and bicker and eventually hand up a watered-down set of conditions for not torching the castle. Those can be negotiated down to a few easily-managed, cosmetic modifications to the status quo. Demands met, mob disperses. Nobody’s happy, nothing has really changed.
History is rife with examples of this kind of thing. If your rule is met with popular resistance, insist on perfect clarity from the crowd. Get them arguing. Get them turned upon each other. It reinforces your power: they have to negotiate on your terms. The powerful know full well that a vast, systemic program of injustices cannot be opposed by a few bullet points on a list.
As often as not, the people dispense with the list, and bullet points become the points of bullets. Nobody wants that.
It’s no surprise that most of the commercial media are ignoring this extraordinary story. They don’t want to cover a massive popular mobilization against the powers-that-be in the United States. After all, the powers-that-be are writing their checks.
It was a different thing entirely to report on the Tea Party movement 24 hours a day. Its goals were in perfect keeping with the corporate powers. The Tea Party was easily manipulated, its agendas easily hijacked, because its members weren’t for anything. They were just angry, and they would repeat almost any grievance suggested to them by their handlers, from denouncing environmental regulations and taxes on the super-rich, to insisting unions and school teachers were the source of all our problems. The only thing they were for, it seemed, was more wars.
So the Tea Party’s membership got wall-to-wall media coverage for over two years. They were able to shoo candidates into office (which turned out to be a disaster for mainstream Republicans) and dominate every news cycle through the 2010 elections. Why? Because, in their nihilistic fury, these people wanted to accelerate the growth of a money-driven authoritarian state. That worked fine for the money-driven authorities.
Now, there is a powerful, growing movement — a genuine populist movement not funded by the Koch Brothers or egged on by radio shock-jocks — that demands the American government get out of bed with corporate money. No more revolving-door lobbyists, paid-off politicians, or highest-bidder politics. Right there you can see why nobody in power wants to address this.
But add to that the desire to address the destructive income gap between richest and poorest, reverse the concentration of wealth, energize the economy from the bottom up, retool our future work to a sustainable model for a rapidly changing global environment, and rebuild our infrastructure — that we need a universal healthcare system not geared to profits but to wellness, rather than leaving millions of Americans to die for lack of resources — and I’m willing to bet there is genuine fear in the halls of power.
We’re not seeing it, of course. But there must be panic building in Washington, Wall Street, and the many other seats of political and industrial control. And those are just a few examples of the wrongs people want to address. The entire status quo is a disaster. It needs to be reinvented. That is a revolutionary idea.
If you are a reporter at one of the networks or the big news chains, you don’t want to talk about this. Much easier to scoff at the dirty hippies — look at that hair! Look at those tattoos! — than to admit this is real Americans in their millions, starting to awaken from a long nightmare alongside similar awakenings around the world.
A list of demands is not going to arise from this movement. It’s not about bumper sticker slogans and catchy signs. A real people’s movement is far more complex and filled with nuance than that. What Occupy Wall Street (and now, beyond) is demanding is nothing less than a return of democracy to this country, and the overthrow of Big Money’s stranglehold on our nation’s future.
That’s not a demand. It’s a promise.
UPDATE: a list of issues has been released by the New York City General Assembly, the loose leadership of that protest: note that it is not a list of demands.
http://nycga.cc/2011/09/30/declaration-of-the-occupation-of-new-york-city/
Cross-posted at the Huffington Post



11 Comments

I demand that our representatives be of the people, i.e., not effing millionaires. I demand also that our representatives be ineligible to take jobs in the lobbying sector after their service. I demand that truth in advertising laws apply to campaign ads. I demand that campaign promises become a contractual obligation (that is, to fight for what they promise, even if the passage of legislation ultimately fails), and that pulling an Obama in this area will result in recall.
“most of the commercial media are ignoring this extraordinary story”
http://abcnews.go.com/US/occupy-wall-street-protesters-americans/story?id=14652698
http://www.theatlantic.com/infocus/2011/09/occupy-wall-street/100159/
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-occupy-wall-street-protests-20111003,0,4289819.story
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/10/03/wall-street-protesters-brewing-tea-party-left-not-yet-strategists-say/
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/27/nyregion/wall-street-demonstrations-test-police-trained-for-bigger-threats.html
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203890804576591364076524234.html
http://money.cnn.com/2011/09/16/technology/occupy_wall_street/index.htm
Don’t you wish you were this “ignored”?
“The only thing they (Tea Party) were for, it seemed, was more wars.”
Really? I though they favored the Jeffersonian view of avoiding foreign military involvement. I suppose I’d be wasting my time asking you for some sort of documentation?
The problem with demands is, once you make them, people can make fun of them.
http://occupywallst.org/forum/proposed-list-of-demands-for-occupy-wall-st-moveme/
Well, I clicked on the link and all of the proposed demands seem perfectly moderate and reasonable to me. They also sound non-negotiable, which they should be.
As for people making fun of them: “First they ignore you, then they mock you, then they fight you, then you win.”
–Gandhi
At least the OWS crowd, which really does represent the rational self-interest of 99% of the American people, have achieved Stage Two. Stage Three might get ugly for awhile, but there are too many people who simply have nothing left to lose. The PTB have gone too far.
recommended and tweeted. My favorite: “Because, one issue at a time, the demands all boil down to one thing: we don’t want you running the world any more. You’re bad at it. Your motives are evil. The future you imagine is a vision of hell.”
In addition to not having some laundry list of demands that the plutocrats can debate, Occupy Wall Street has no leader, no clear spokesperson. Instead, as it should be in any Democracy, ALL the people are spokespersons. Instead of one center that can be attacked and destroyed, Occupy Wall Street has thousands of individual centers. Thousands of leaders. This is indeed “how a democracy should look.”
Our next step is to replace all 435 members of the House of Representatives with Independent candidates: non-millionaires; non-Wall Street stock owners; belong to the 80% of Americans who earn less than $100,000 a year; people from the majority. To expect a Democracy from a Congress that consists of 44% multimillionaires–all of whom own Wall Street stock–is nothing short of insane.
Do what you need to do now to file to run as an Independent in 2012. All these protests in 2011 will be for nothing if we arrive at the ballot box in 2012 and are confronted with two unacceptable choices–thus, once again, “the lessor of two evils.”
I wonder, if it turns unto state sponsored violence such as bullets flying how many will fight back. Nobody wants this to happen, but when push comes to shove someone has to fight back, but who?
Will hundreds of thousands pour into the streets in protest or will people meekly file back into their homes to watch it unfold on TV as the corporate powers that be tell everyone what heroes they all are saving us from “terrorists”?
While I totally agree with you that the media has a financial interest in not interrupting the status quo, there are (I think) practical reasons they aren’t covering the protests. Put yourself in the shoes of a newsroom manager. What’s the story here? How can you get an angle on that story that will grab the attention of a bunch of entertainment-addled Americans? So far, they’ve only done what they can to get a rise out of people: they’ve put up pictures of dreadlocked, tattoed people holding signs. The two times I saw it on the top stories of Google was when they all dressed up as zombies (by the way Ben) and when the woman got sprayed with mace by a renegade cop.
The OWS people do not have a single clear demand that the media can grab hold of. Yes, they have a list of things they don’t like. NO ONE who will speak up likes those things so what makes it news? What are they proposing be DONE? They’re trying to boil the ocean. The way news works, it doesn’t get coverage. But these days, news is a distant second to the way most people get their information anyway.
I DO think they’d be able to get the ball rolling on a single meme if they focused on one. I don’t think they’ll succeed in doing anything otherwise. If they focused on a single issue like repealing the deregulation of bandwidth to put news back under the regulation of the FCC, or publicly funded elections, or something like that, they they’d get people asking questions. They would also piss off some very specific people which would bring the needed attention.
If they write one bill and say “THIS is our demand” then suddenly news producers everywhere are going to have an angle. You’ll see the chicks on The View asking “What do they mean by ‘publicly funded elections’”? Then the idea gets planted. Like gay marriage. The first wave always fails but the idea ultimately prevails.
Uh… You’re kidding, right? I mean, either that list is for amusement value or the author is frackin’ crazy:
“Free college education”
“Immediate across the board debt forgiveness for all”
“Outlaw all credit reporting agencies”
“practical reasons they aren’t covering the protests”
“most of the commercial media are ignoring this extraordinary story”
What, does an anchorperson have to run you off the road and shout in your face?
http://abcnews.go.com/Business/occupy-wall-street-declaration-york-protesters/story?id=14656653
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2011/1004/Occupy-Wall-Street-flash-in-the-pan-or-beginning-of-a-movement
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/occupy-wall-street-protests-spread-to-dc-boston-la-and-chicago/2011/10/04/gIQA9IOOLL_story.html
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/10/04/opinion/main20115272.shtml
http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/bronx/2011/10/04/2011-10-04_add_school_layoffs_to_agenda_downtown.html
http://www.citywatchla.com/lead-stories/2304-occupy-wall-street-middle-class-issues
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/occupy-wall-street-is-a-tea-party-with-brains-2011-10-04
All within the last 24 hours.
Google has over 4 million more, but you should take that figure with a grain of salt. After all, some of them are not doubt whines about how the issue is being “ignored.”
My dear friends, do you want to be more sexy in people’s eyes? Just come in, please!
A lipstick, a pair of high heels, a Karen Millen London dress, change a girl into a woman.The London fashion week(Karen Millen outlet) is one of four most famous global fashion weeks.Depending on the high quality and various of design styles, Karen Millen Dress have become the leader in the dress products.
Welcome to our website:== http://www.karendresses.com == Thank you!