Funny thing, when I hit my system’s “refresh” button, I get a fresh cup of coffee – at least on this topic, I do. Honest I do!

Exactly. What this man who is our “elected President” has done is to pretend that our inalienable and inherent rights re mere “traditions.”

Here is a worthwhile chart:

Lawful

Common Law


Law of tradition
Set by precedence and established fact


The law that is common to all


Can only be determined after due process of law (a jury trial)
Deals in fact (living beings, truth)
Language -English

No crime without an injured party
Treats you as a man or woman
Broken when harm is caused to another
Has full force of Law
Seeks justice

NOTE: In the above list, nowhere does it say that if someone’s speech is not likeable, they deserve to die, and thus lose their right to “Life Liberty and Happiness”
#########################################################################

Legal

Acts of Parliament
Set by corrupt politicians
 (often bribed by lobbyists)

Statutory Obligations


Forced compliance is unlawful

Unenforceable (without consent)
Deals in fiction (corporations, legal entities, statutes, codes, and/or policies)
Language – Legalese (sounds like English, has different meanings)
To break legislation is an infraction of a policy.
Treats you as a corporate person
Broken when the rules are not adhered to, essentially a breach of contract
Has no force of Law without consent
Seeks profit and control

No condition can be placed upon a fundamental human right. The government cannot take what is already established as an inalienable right and turn it into a privilege with conditions attached. It can only offer terms to which your agreement is needed to implement a legally binding contract.

If you were born free then where and when does the obligation come from to obey government policy? There is no obligation, it is presumed. Only when we consent does the corporate legal fiction have any jurisdiction, as it is we who granted it. The people are the source of all authority. We created the government to serve us. It is a matter of fact that “the created cannot be master to that which created it” – namely, us.

Implied consent has no force of law as equal consideration was never offered. There is no such thing as a social contract. Therefore the legal framework has no inherent force of law and can only act on terms and conditions agreed to by you.

Here’s another consideration: if it is true as Obama has stated that it is okay to assassinate (by drone) someone who has not yet committed an action of violence but whose inspiring speech might lead others to do so, yesterday’s beheading of the man in London shows that killing Anwar Alwaki only served to elevate him to martyr status, and so his words live on and assumed greater purpose beyond the grave. Had he lived, perhaps he and his speeches would not have assumed this importance.

What a shame that our Officials never care to realize the blow back their policies have created.

Obama is the First American President to speak openly of our inherent rights as being mere “traditions.” He is PNAC through and through.

I have no idea how this man came to have a background in Constitutional Law.

But apparently whoever was grooming him for his new job as “Master of Abilities Needed for the New World Order Goals to Succeed,” was able to keep him regurgitating whatever statement is needed for whatever task is at hand. And he doesn’t even seem to mind that one speech given in May will contradict the speech presented the previous September. Orwell couldn’t have delineated such a character any better than destiny has.

Good to know that this Administration can take out anyone whose words are inspiring enough to encourage others to oppose them!

Yikes. That could be some of us right here!

I don’t know what to say. I had a criminal case against Wells Fargo for something they did to me. But no lawyers out there will handle an individual’s claim against someone like WF. It is common knowledge that the judges are too deep in bed with such firms to make it possible to have any sort of resolution favorable to any one human being taking them on.

My computer has a reset function, where I can make it act the way it did before some given date. I sure wish our society had that!