It’s Marginal Expected Shortfall that gets blown out by,
well, what looks a heck of a lot like self-deluded bank
managers who think it’s smart to reward their people for
accepting larger risk for a smaller price than will their
competitors.
http://vlab.stern.nyu.edu/welcome/risk

What Bernanke, Greenspan et al. ignored:
http://www.nber.org/papers/w11728

With right decision makers shafted, with war for
car cultures based only on oil taking priority
over even the fracking that’s spoiling our water,
the very “ultimate economic recovery” from that
is actually a losing proposition.

If you’re going to frack, at least roll out
cars that can use it, I would think.

But it’s Just Wars Just Oil and Just Near Free Reserves
for Big Banks – R – Us.

When the banks get essentially free reserves and lend it
back to Treasury, and when you get otherwise a half point
on the proceeds from your house, for a negative real return,
while the bank charges several times that, though the nominal
rate doesn’t look like much, on that capital that’s otherwise
available to lend, that’s gangbusters net interest margin
indeed. In fact, I think from memory that’s even made
Cramer bullish on the TBTF banks on a recent show (pre-Facebook,
pre-Whale?)

We’ve never seen $US trillions in free reserves before any more
than we have credit guarantees multiple 10′s X bank net assets.

So after how many $100 billions in interest income has been
surrendered to these bank favors (for anyone to be surprised by
these bank results, I’m sorry, you’d have to be a sorry individual.)

and $US trillions have been extended in near free reserves (raising
reserve requirements is simply a way of saying shaft employment now,
we had to feed the banks but we can’t let that ignite “velocity,”)
I think we’re all part of their crap shoot, though I think Nassim
Taleb would put it differently (self-serving reckless possibilities?
Yaha! economics?)

A little background you might find interesting:

Before Blaise Pascal added coefficients to Yang Hui’s “Triangle,”
(one choice leads to two, leads to 4, etc., in a triangle-like fashion,)
he and a correspondent mathematician pretended they wanted to unwind
a card game of chance such that each players relative strength and
biddings would be fairly settled.

It’s my guess his coefficients were inspired by a coding within
Nostradamus’ quatrains, running first vertically, then horizontally,
but with Nostradamus’ work, I’m further guessing, having conveyed to
Pascal that choices over time mathematically reflect (as in the web
bot, iChing, digital forensics, the like, this being funky now and salient, so I’m sparing persons’ names) moral decisions, which of
course is in and of itself obvious and almost meaningless. But
then again, it’s not. It says morality is math.
(Economists look at “tails,” historians “periodization.”)

(There’s potentially more. Parallel events but for slight
alterations in moral choices (as in, say, identical East – West,
but for one item here or there) seem to then offer actual
meta-experiment value, which would be handy if someone
cared to convey something through history.)

It sure looks like there’s a morality of life vs. one that’s not.
We’re obviously headed toward imitating the mistakes of the
inhabitants of Easter Island. It looks conversely like
freedom, equality and love are the path to life, though I
personally try seeing those now as generalized states, rather
than think of them in terms of the confines of my particular
language (which I think you’ve guessed is English.)

That triangle actually becomes spherical, though I’m
capable of taking this to a funkier level and suggest the
pyramids are confirmational. So if something imparted
character rather than blink out, it would have become morality,
math and history all by itself.

This decision pattern is very similar looking to those experienced
with fractals (ultra simple concept: repeated iterations of one thing
to many of the same until it forms a forest, with life the building
block.) I wonder if the two can be connected, as I also wonder if
probabilities and relativity can be connected in parallel. If they
can, can it be seamlessly? We actually have that already, somewhat,
in economics, such as in Taleb’s work. In fact, that’s now glaringly
obvious. I happen to think (factual characterizations subject to my
mis-characterizing them) what with the game of footsie with the employment
participation rate, the playing with the real estate statistics
by virtue of loss sharing and toxic mortgage sales subsidized by the
taxpayer, and thus a bubble bought by you and now distorting in myriad
ways, we’re in a much worse place with much worse probabilities. Heck,
it’s not just the M.E. that’s had it with the dollar, the Asian states
are struggling to break free too. All for avoiding bank holding cos.’
holders being the losers. (The interesting question would be do
probabilities and relativity provide a theoretical fixed point.)

And, if it should be Nostradamus saw the future in “real time,”
then surprise! Morality teaches us how to travel through
space (that time is distance thing.)

The buying of the bubble from the bubble creators looks correct, to me.
Except the taxpayer is paying for much of the loss sharing.

This isn’t to be taken as legal advice, as it’s simply sensible doubting
that any market participant should understandably have. But I wouldn’t trust the title of a foreclosure part and parcel to an MBS absent an independent look at the title chain, particularly looking for whomever would be an unspoken for lienholder, especially at the moment of a
would be settlement, that apart from tracing the current conveyor every step back to the original. I don’t know that I could happily rely on the title insurer. And, where a settlement occurs but with other lienholders present but not participating (again not legal advice–get your own,) I really doubt the title insurer has seen anything like it before, and, I
honestly don’t know what quitclaim value a settlement’s supposed to have.

After all, if someone’s foreclosed, and his first was sold, there was
still nothing stopping him (absent a clause) from earlier adding a second.
What about that lender? It could simply be a home equity line from
a broker (and not one owned by the foreclosing bank.)

I agree with all the doubts expressed.

There are two additional areas I would have questions in.

Aside from $US trillions in virtually free reserves extended to the
TBTF banks by Bernanke at the expense of the earning power of everyone
else’s savings, including those of all who did the EXACT OPPOSITE of those
banks, that is, they sold the bubble (they made the RIGHT decision,)
the Fed has purchased $100′s billions in those banks’ MBS’s.

That’s a form of indirect lending power that just as well could have
been devoted to, say, free tuition. And that would represent an
investment indeed.

On the other hand, when the Fed sells the MBS’s, and when interest rates rise from the level of the Liquidity Trap, it, of course, will require less equity for the equivalent return. So the free interest reserves and the MBS purchases seem to be, if I’m not mistaken, a sure-fire give not just in interest to those banks but in an interest rate hit on the MBS’s as well, I would guess (I’m always legally defensive–I don’t know that interest rates will/won’t reflect near free reserves for bad banks forever or that Bernanke will/won’t be changing reserve accounts forever while
then necessarily letting employment suffer forever lest inflation break out, even if it means a generation lost to a mortgage derivatives Ponzi scheme,) indirectly against the taxpayers’ interest.

When the MBS’s are sold at a loss, I don’t see anything stopping the banks
from buying them back. That’s not fencing? That’s not laundering?

Add:
http://www.econmatters.com/2012/04/myth-buster-us-treasury-says-tarp.html

Also:
https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1GGGE_enUS395US395&ix=seb&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=US+taxpayers+to+subsidise+%2440bn+housing+settlement

Buying toxic mortgages also could be less stupid looking if the’
buyers are bank proxies aiming to quickly use the taxpayer-supported
loss sharing, and then to simple resell them (that’s different from
the Federal Reserve selling MBS’s at a loss and the banks buying them
back.)

The reserve ratios on the MBS insurance was said to have left the
large banks with 3% liquidity ratios. After the losses are laundered,
the taxpayer will have bought the bubble, those who sold their homes at
the top of the market will have bought the bubble back, they will have
paid for the banks’ loss sharing programs, and the banks will be back
at it, though, with what, 5% liquidity ratios? I don’t think that would
be a happy economy, cause the bubble will have been bought instead of
corrected, those who would have taken the banks’ collateral at the banks’
loss will have been shaken down, saving for retirement will have been
strangled, and the bubble will still be there with only a weaker
support system.

(Still the legal paranoid, this is only a guess too:) I think the
shadow inventory is hugely under-appreciated and only getting worse
faster than you’re buying the loss-sharing and thus subsidizing the
toxic mortgage sales.

Everything middle class will have been hacked. Teachers. Nurses.
Medicare. Social Security.

The Europeans will have been told they pay too much taxes.
(Remember? Europe: a tax and spend mistake?)

The Europeans will have been told they pay too little taxes.
(Remember? It’s more recent: Greeks: you pay too little taxes.
Actually, they pay, I think, about 23% VAT.)

I don’t mean to harp, but hypocrisy, running a mortgage
security Ponzi scheme cause you feel you’re good for it while
sneering at those who complain about it, even as they’re
forced to buy it with student sharecropper-hood and the like,
is like “transference.”
That’s taking a fear/pain experienced and pushing it onto others.

It doesn’t have to be subliminal, though for the bankers
it obviously is.

It can be understood, mastered and
used.

That the bank holding cos. won’t simply suck up their own losses
and get recapped is simply what I call the “Government of Transference”
of the bank holding company owners.

It’s all so obvious and transparent it would be funny if it weren’t
for Capt. Lewis getting strung up and this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0Wlrslerw0
I’m guessing now being illegal
(note Kovic getting wrongly demonized “communist,” Nixon cynically
using anti-divisive rhetoric when he actually depended on division.)

As to the happy talk, a 3% bump after 2 mos down, with record low
mortgage rates, and an ocean of delinquent properties, with people often unable to move between states if they have pre-existing health issues,
with states laying off people cause of the bubble-induced recession, and
with an accumulating pent up need to sell, and with existing home sales
still a small fraction of the pre-collapse level, I really have to wonder how much is laundering, using the loss sharing, and how much is people
finally throwing in the towel on negative returns on Bernanke’s benchmarking returns to below inflation. Why even do these guys commute
to work in Washington? You can easily force people to buy a bubble,
subsidize loss sharing, or accept negative returns from your netbook.

And when the banks are taxpayer subsidized for placing their overvalued
collateral up for rent, there’s a laugher. The best places to rent, if you sold your home at the top of the bubble, is where, as you’re getting
close to nothing on the proceeds, where you might otherwise have expected to be getting $10,000 annually interest, are, then, where the rent level
will let you survive yet another year or two or three of Bernanke’s
free reserves, and then, if it’s from a large manager experienced in
clumping developments so as to allow it attention to detail and responsiveness to tenant requests, and to allow it to extend really nice amenities across that scale, you can make out pretty well.

If you rent a TBTF bank’s overvalued collateral, I assume the prop at this
point’s starting to look slummy. It could very well have origly been
spec in a nice place and have common amenities. However, where/when there’s a problem with something that’s customarily the landlord’s
responsibility, I wouldn’t want to have to call that bank.

FDL: If this results in a double-posting, what happened was
I edited $10,000 to $10,000′s; then, upon submission, the paragraph
formatting vanished. So I deleted at my account activity. And I’m
thus resubmitting here and now.

This pertains the original basis of demonization for the sake of associating foes with the demonized and use of division for
the sake of ulterior motives.

It’s indistinguishable, where g are a capital status crime, from the calls to exterminate J’s.

http://pages.citebite.com/g2a2d0expuk

That those who engage in the demonization have been likeliest carriers of the gy gene is proof,
on top of this, of the genetic, apart from the developmental, incidence.

http://www.bild.me/bild.php?file=3016012img069.jpg

Hitler was famously feminine, JFK’s killers substantially gay fascists, many / most religious right
gay bashers ultimately proved gay themselves, or, their kid(s) come out. The ultimate gradient and
proof: virtually all murderers of gays and persons wrongly presumed gay have proven being gay.
What’s this guy?
http://www.salon.com/2011/01/15/us_congresswoman_shot_final_hours/

So a history, a genetic science, and a morality prove each other simultaneously, and it is mathematical across event streams and meta-experimental where the East is identical but for the
transference. And all manner of indicia identify this “Government by Transference” as the operative proof.

It’s been a source of not simply the transference defining monopoly protected by fear and pacification (including those standing in as the American basij in the Tea Party,) but of the arrogance.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zPSO4REesc

How sad.

It’s division that has bought student sharecropper-hood and monopolies and war.

It’s division that murdered Ghandi.

It’s transference-tainted families (the ones with the hypocritical gays attacking gays and making a world afraid of being demonized,) not married gays, that are a world’s evil. One can easily imagine the hypocrites being the ones thought by many foreseen. I’m guessing they really want understanding, forgiveness and love now instead.

But if transference, fear mastered and transferred, and if it’s then the person in the street fearing the person resembling the obnoxious prior (which defines transference for him / her at that point,) is proposed ended by one who would today otherwise make this

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UephHvStdWw

(Is Ronnie Kovic being demonized as a “communist” and Nixon co-opting “divide and conquer.”)

illegal (!,) is the purpose then to end transference, or is it to see its triumph?

(same story, same reply as last from me; but, this time, w/o
the stuff as to how the process of demonization understood because it was receive, how it was transferred to everyone else, how it process self-produced, how it was the basis of division for the sake of judging to control to scapegoat to offer a target for blame instead of the that being the self-serving demagogue puppet-master go started (though folks know how to find my thoughts on that))

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/04/120406082846.htm?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencedaily+%28ScienceDaily%3A+Latest+Science+News%29&utm_content=Google+Reader

It can only be a wild guess, of course, but I’ve always wondered what the (self-presumed)
ulterior purpose could be underlying Janet Brewer’s war on migrant workers.

(DISCLAIMER: PERSONAL SUPPOSITION, OPINION, THEORY. I KNOW NOTHING WHATSOEVER
AS TO JANET BREWER’S PSYCHE OR INTENTIONS.)

Enlisting the support of people who enjoy mstrbtg their self adulation on others
and who mollify themselves and rehab their egos by controlling others provides
a clear field for whatever she could want.

Could it be water?

Could it be so Arizona gets less?

Could it be for an out-of-state brewer?

(Her name’s Brewer, so it’s a starting point in the world of guesses.)

Her supporters are sure they don’t want such things as health reform.

They either don’t actually do household budgets, or, they figure, they’ll
not need health care or they’ll die and go to heaven and only be happy
there.

They don’t realize, if they do have coverage, they can’t afford it and
the nation can’t afford it cause it’s pro-expense, anti-prevention.

Unfortunately, we pay the shifted death-in-progress expenses though
the cartel’s risk is predefined, and their game is a shell game,
in the long-run only illusorily covering what might be likely unless
you stay in the lord-slave relationship.

Really, the puppets here and abroad blame
people elsewhere for the abuses they (the puppets) cause at home.

Something new and important has emerged.
Tom Friedman has cited it.
http://www.postbulletin.com/news/stories/display.php?id=1492238

And this is it.
http://whynationsfail.com/

(NOTE: I haven’t read the book yet.)

Essentially, our leaders colonize us for their string pullers.
They blame people across the border.

Arizonans who don’t care about workers providing food and helping
their bosses pay taxes while those (migrant) workers receive no
benefits, go ahead and threaten or act like monumentally insulting
control freak crazies–enough to shake you in your booties–bash
them the same way it’s done in the Middle East. But the
leaders are extractive in each place.

What can be more obviously extractive than sinking savings’
earnings and currencies to bail banks?

Certainly killing Earth, but particularly parching the
Southwest, is extractive.

Thank you kindly.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5AjSGrZbxw

Of course Prof. Rogoff selects his points.

If you have a health risk factor and an individual
health insurance policy, and if you sold your
home at the top of the bubble while the smug bankers
who want to reduce the safety nets so they can sell you
annuities were themselves buying mortgages, then, you
often or typically or nearly universally cannot move
to another state to take advantage of a job op or to
help “clear the market” in real estate.

There’s all manner of proof shafting the middle class and
racing to the bottom in currency exchange value (a sell out
of the middle class compensating for the oligarchs if
ever there was one) only deepens a slump after a debt
bubble (who needs me? just google Reich, Chinn, etc.)

Some prof’s connected to the mechanisms favored by billionaire
demagogues remind me of them:

https://www.google.com/#hl=en&sugexp=pfwe&gs_nf=1&tok=-6SOGkfFpu3y-w6A8AkxxA&cp=8&gs_id=3d&xhr=t&q=cientificos&pf=p&output=search&sclient=psy-ab&oq=cientico&aq=0l&aqi=g-l4&aql=f&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=c4a6902264f68813&biw=1920&bih=876

who worked for them:

https://www.google.com/#hl=en&sugexp=pfwe&gs_nf=1&tok=_glj9PL4n3M7dNBhAd5VoA&cp=10&gs_id=bg&xhr=t&q=hacendados&pf=p&sclient=psy-ab&oq=hadandados&aq=0l&aqi=g-l4&aql=f&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=c4a6902264f68813&biw=1920&bih=876

It looks like a formula every bit as much as
as James Bond movie.

I was a no-go at another column.
Technology, technology, technology.
Or, if, I’m not to that personally-guaged as fabulous person’s
taste, I consider FDL a haven, and I happen to think curiosity
led humans over one mountain after another.

obviously an “all is clear” signal = “the fix is in.”

It would then also mean: asymmetries (principles held in your face
but thrown overboard per convenience; no, much more than that!
it’s: small risk welcome, large risk taken without forseeable limit
STILL! with you shouldering the losses–in every sector with influence.)

And that is bankrupting the U.S., though you are blamed,though other nations are blamed (the divisions allow the middle classes to blame
the people across the border while they get shafted all over the place.)

And so, the modi of operandi vary a little, but it’s always figureheads.

I saw on YouTube a lecture at Stanford about the Chinese eating our kids’
lunch.

Actually, their middle class is starting to enjoy rising minimum wages.

Their leaders use Communism as a pretense for control, something more
solid than Bloomberg’s need to check the quality of the food you want to
donate to the hungry in NY, but they’re smarter.

They’re not quite the Ming Dynasty, who put the nobles at bay, but
our leaders need to shaft you means they will shaft your money right into
the Chinese, who are perfectly good people otherwise, of course.

But then they’ll be locked out.

So. It’s the same old story. Your local ego-creep mstrbtg onto you your
slavery and saying all’s right on the night.

If you strip away the “transference, arrogance, and vanity” then the
East and the West are identical.

In the West, the royals assumed names per regional assignment.
In the East, just emporers.

That’s why the trolls on the occ boards seek division every stupid-
transparent way.

About that lecture.
My docs know my medical truths.
My accountant knows my stock market score (quite well, thank you-
she teaches forensic accounting at a local major univ.)

So as to the folks in China: if they’re educated and democratic,
they’ll have healthy and happy communities.

We won’t only if we lack in education and democracy. If we don’t
it’ll be because we are falsely told this column’s headline story.

I haven’t believed that for a long time.
It’s been decades since it only took one wage earner to
keep his / her family in a house / put a couple kids through
college–comfortably.

Today’s academic sharecroppers feel compelled to sell their ideals
to make up their loans.

neat system, huh?

The more you suffer, the easier the arrogance and the transference.

If you sold the stuff the people remaking the rules bought, you’re
paying for their mistakes open-ended big-time. We’re talking
homes. You’re handing your life to them.

You’re handing your birthright to them.

What’s different this time is it’s transparent.

So.
Which is going to go away?
The asymmetry?
The transparency?

Hmmm.

Neither too soon.
But obviously never the transparency.

So, you found your way to FDL.
Everyone else has their casino economy and their transference
and their mollifications.

So, now I give you and your friends and mine, who never found their way to FDL:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpozeekT1iY

hello?

The cost of pro-fraud legislation is getting pretty deep.

The mortgagors don’t expect to recoup their equities, so they
should be seen as punished enough if there’s no recourse
(re: the banks.)

If you sold your house at the top of the mortgage Ponzi scheme
then let’s say you received $1,000,000.

If the banks sucked up their losses and fraud, the mortgagors
would lick their wounds, the U.S. would have much still needed
risk taking in tact though not one-sided as to parties to
transactions, and you would’ve cleared the market 4 years ago.

Instead, you’ve gotten not 5% on the proceeds of $1,000,000
but closer to 0%, because that’s what it means to give
(~) free reserves to the banks that created the often alleged
bogus paper work (for fees) at each step in the process along
the way to creating a mortgage Ponzi scheme.

You’re still the person who made the right decision.

You’re the payor for a truly remarkable number of inventions
for bailing out the banks. You’re watching all manner of
concern for immigration (Schumer / VISA’s / who’s
worried about terrorists today?) and property rights so trumpeted as
important by the people who created the bubble and the frauds
get plowed under overnight for their convenience.

All this so that you cannot buy back for your share of the
deal in a free market that you, now as a safe harbor seeker
at FDL, were ostensibly less fond of.

Your Congress is pleading with the world to make their
currencies stronger cause that’s supposed to help.
(It could help the Ponzi scheme until there’s nothing left
to wages / currency here.)

Ideals: Good.
Transference and hypocrisy: Bad.

Transparency and asymmetry: Fun.

This recalls the Schneider (Australian tourist) attack (San Diego beach:)
arbitrarily, naively, assumed g’y (Schneider is not that.)
The attackers ran to Aryan Nation country and were later,
IF MEMORY SERVES CORRECTLY (I DON’T KNOW THIS
FOR A FACT,) reportedly g’y.

DISCLAIMER: REGARDLESS OF THEIR CONVICTION STATUS,
I CANNOT ACTUALLY FIND FACTUAL PROOF
SCHNEIDER’S ATTACKERS PROVED UP BEING, LIKE VIRTUALLY ALL
ACTUAL MURDERS OF G’YS TO DATE SO FAR, G’Y THEMSELVES.
RECALL THIS CONFLATOR OF SCAPEGOATING WITH GOOD
MORALITY AND POLICY:
http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-01-14/entertainment/30008786_1_photos-g-string-gun-culture

On a perfect scale, the more needing to assail g’ys, the likelier
g’y.

I suspect this guard was good with the idea this pedestrian looked like
someone lacking a birthright matching his own, and this

http://awurl.com/u4j2oMcpG#first_awesome_highlight

was insufficient.

If you’ve trouble accessing that (filters are variously unhappy
with varying degrees of opacity,) then here,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_Fu%C4%8D%C3%ADk_%28journalist%29
at :

“It so happens that killing a man is not the greatest evil that one can do that man. The Nazis were specialists, not only in murder and physical torture, but also in man’s degradation and
debasement, in the extermination of his hope,
his attachment to life and his faculty of reasoning.”

That’s because the originators of demonization for associating with the
demonized originally wanted to divide and conquer and clear the
path for self-serving demagoguery.

Imagine hypothetically: a Governor demonizes immigrants, perfectly legally
present ones, but also viciously abusive of persons unable or not needing to mstrbt their self-adulation and food fortune on others, and though desired economically scapegoated for their having been shafted by their own dividers and frauds, garners the support of a whole gaggle of mollifiers and ego freaks statewide.
Then, in fact being a puppet for a billionaire, sells out a state’s water claims in support of a boss, who, for all one might imagine, is an out-of-state Brewer.

I use “g’y” to thwart web filters, considering myself well-intentioned and
de-fanged as to all by persons of the same inclination; references to nasty
g’ys is to not simply demonstrate the more vicious toward g’y, or the more
self-divided from them, the likelier being the not-self-aware g’y gene
carrier: the logical exteme proving this is the reality, namely, virtually all
murderers of g’ys have proven g’y.

They process self-created by inducing the g’y gene to hide w/in
hetero marriage.
Hitler was famously feminine. JFK’s killers were substantially g’y fascists.
These types, and low and behold perhaps THESE people were foretold after
all, seem perhaps to still be operative in our time.

The opposite of divide and conquer: royalty assuming names as needed
regionally.

The East: just emporers.

Though the world has been about judging for control and arrogance and the
rejecting of that, under numerous labels, it’s that: royals taking names per need
regionally, vs. just emporers, that really proves a gradient with math value.

But, I’ve theorized the East is identical but for that twist of judging for
control: the control freak system. The system of Government by Transference.

Transferring fear intended originally for oneself,
until your unsupecting citizens
are afraid to stand next to each other, or fight in the streets instead of
studying math, garnering the support of all who need to mollify, that
need amplified by the process, and garnering the support of those who need to mstrbt their egos on everyone else, their arrogance also a product of this historical accident, defines the world’s divisions, the system of
figureheads substituting for warriors and bankers leading asymmetrically.

END OF MESSAGE OF BROAD INTEREST.
BEGINNING OF IDEAS OF FREAKASAURUS INTEREST.
(But I don’t spam. FDL is a large part of my own sustenance surfing the web.)
Though personally traditionally atheist, now seeing how this
moved history: Hitler was famously feminine, JFK’s killers substantially
g’y fascists, and because of the following, I happen to be curious as to a
new possibility, wherein

science proves morality and history
morality proves science and history
history proves morality and science

along with a personal view that people have been seen in “real time”
through time, that being a measure of distance, and so, our history and morality can possibly quite surprisingly revolutionize our science and technology.

genuinely a remarkable presumptuous habit how the puppet masters can
flatten Social Security with their folly and blame it also.

And they blame everyone in sight around the world. After all, there
are cronies there too.

Except, in their efforts to suspend all manner of economics (calling you
not capitalist in perfect hypocritical form,) law (who needs usual and
ordinary proof of title?) and immigration (in practice his ideas are
plausible, but got Schumer? (VISA’s galore if you by-pass our screwed
middle class and pay up for TBTF banks’ over-valued assets,) they’re not
just making a mockery of the ideals they smugly claim you don’t measure
up to (while they sociopathically try limiting you,) but they actually
chase investment away with their -0- interest rates.

They can’t shaft China and their thus-aided yuan, because their cronyism
requires the input indefinitely.

The truth is economically, mathematically

–

—I happen to be someone who’s said the historians call it: “periodization,”
the economists: “tails,” wherein morality, math and history can become
one—

_____________________________

this will not work without our freeing ourselves from the fraud and arrogance.

Actually, Stiglitz (I never won a Nobel, but he did) has said as much:

http://www.businessinsider.com/nobel-economist-says-we-have-to-prosecute-fraud-or-else-the-economy-wont-recover-2010-11

http://www.businessinsider.com/stiglitz-fed-creating-chaos-2010-10#ixzz11W1eoMXZ

I’m not traditionally curious in morality, but labor on the other side
of the world wouldn’t be a problem on this side but for those other cronies.

So, this is really a practiced strategy for slavery, an arrogant entitlement to it, an economy and civil system that can’t survive absent
seeing past division.

This in part defines a lot of hypocrisy, identifying the finger pointers as the real bad guys and thus affording that curiosity, and my own super-narrow freakasauris thought is this could be coalescing because it’s conveyed.
–

Well then, I can’t end this on “freakasauris.”
So, google Reich, Chinn austerity.

and make the TBTF bankers pay up one way or the other, and tell
the corps about this:

http://robertreich.org/post/16123475847

and tell the billionaires they too often pay no taxes and you don’t like it.

Well, I hope this is close on point enough. I think it’s very relevant
overall.

(I think…)

We’re partly resisting hypocrites transfering fear and demonization
(and their allies in the business of sheer corruption and basking in
arrogance.)

We’re fighting “divide and conquer.”

While protection of the privatization of profits and socialization of
costs in favor of those yielding influence is the broader issue, what
all who are not billionaires but otherwise can count themselves with
America’s traditional majority populations can relate to are:

paying for TBTF banks’ losses
the dollar trashed in support of free reserves (doubt that?–
the rush to the yuan, with the help of Congress’ complicity
in looking to blame)
savings’ income production ripped off
economic expectations tied to near free reserves (near zero percent)

in health care letting you drown, the cost of your failed (too late) rescue
efforts passed to all not controlling a protected cartel, watching the
loss of life and waste of resources pile up, but with the cartel
enjoying a privileged guarded huge profit.

only adjusted by Obama thusly: the larger the overall national health expense,
the better off the cartel is; it’s only that: you subsidize (~cover) the
risk (@ exchanges.)

So, that means, I so simply offer, that as to those traditional majority
populations: they will get ever more skrewed until there is nothing left
of America but its cartels (we’re pretty much there and actually only now
already reclaiming our rights) that it behooves them to understand those
cartels are using sheer appeals to division. They demonize, associate
with the demonized, divide, and apply their transference of fear, their
mollification, and their arrogance and crushing personal needs to limit you
away from your equality and to essentially deny your birthright.

Apart from aims to enslave, I’m sorry, I simply don’t believe one’s own
success has to come out of the abuse of others.

When other folks do well, that creates need for another pizza shop down
the block.

I KNOW NOTHING WHATSOEVER AS TO ANY ASPECT OF
MR. LIMBAUGH’S PSYCHE. ANY IMAGINED OR REAL
INNUENDO FROM THE FOLLOWING ONLY REFLECTS
PERSONAL CURIOSITY AND SPECULATION.

His hostility toward this woman might be
related to the following, n’est-ce pas?

http://goo.gl/lL4GY
(validity of reports / allegations unknown by me)

What are some of the things it could mean if / when
a man needs Viagra simultaneously with having an ability
to snap at a woman?

(Really… just asking, though I’ve some well traveled ideas.
You know, it really could simply be he’s fat and that definitely
has pertinent physiological effects.)