I don’t understand all this chatter about those sleazy Clinton affairs here.

The topic of the day is Weiner, his wife, Huma Abedin, and both of their rather obvious naked ambitions:

Anthony Weiner’s Cardinal Sin: Rank Hypocrisy, Not Creepy Sexting
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/05/21/anthony-weiner-s-cardinal-sin-rank-hypocrisy-not-creepy-sexting.html

Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/17/nyregion/weiners-wife-huma-abedin-failed-to-disclose-consulting-work-done-while-a-state-dept-aide.html

So much for an informed public discussion of political hacks that are not concerned in the least about the actual public role they are seeking beyond the mere artifice of the chosen.

I just noticed this article:

Boston bombing suspect under FBI surveillance for years, says mother
‘They told me my son was an extremist leader,’ says Zubeidat Tsarnaeva
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/apr/20/boston-bombing-suspect-fbi-surveillance-claim

And thanks to that Atlantic article you linked to, I noted this book:

The Terror Factory: Inside the FBI’s Manufactured War on Terrorism – Trevor Aaronson
http://trevoraaronson.com/

There’s also a shorter interview with Dawn about the film on the Sundance site here:

http://www.sundance.org/video/meet-the-artists-13-dawn-porter

You should at least notify them of the Times of the problems. That way possibly they can pull it, or assign someone to cover their lack of details properly. Because as it stands, theirs is the report which is more likely to be read. For instance see here today:

NYT: In Manning case, “Jailers Become the Accused”
http://boingboing.net/2012/12/08/nyt-in-manning-case-jailer.html

Well the basic issue is that our elites never frame the Climate problem in a way which we can address, nor do they use or state the actual data for the current state of affairs. Kim’s suggestion 4dC is actually avoidable is patently misleading today.

They all expect to be able to buy their way out of it while leaving the rest of us to deal with the consequences.

IF anyone listened to last week’s Radio Ecoshock program with scientist Dr. Kevin Anderson speaking on why a 4d C temperature rise is rather inevitable; we can understand how far behind the actual curve the World Bank president and the rest of our elites are in discussing this problem in any substantive way so there can be a substantive change in our consumptive patterns.

I rather like Rocky better than Ms. Stein, but he is not on the ballot here.

And since Mitt now owns the voting machines, it won’t matter whatever Obama manages to say in any of the debates:

Through a closely held equity fund called Solamere, Mitt Romney and his wife, son and brother are major investors in an investment firm called H.I.G. Capital. H.I.G. in turn holds a majority share and three out of five board members in Hart Intercivic, a company that owns the notoriously faulty electronic voting machines that will count the ballots in swing state Ohio November 7. Hart machines will also be used elsewhere in the United States…. In other words, a candidate for the presidency of the United States, and his brother, wife and son, have a straight-line financial interest in the voting machines that could decide this fall’s election.

Does the Romney Family Now Own Your e-Vote?
http://truth-out.org/news/item/12204-does-the-romney-family-now-own-your-e-vote

Willard’s repeated dishonestly shows he is unprincipled and characterless.

Well that is one of Romney’s best attributes so I can’t understand why you could suggest that he doesn’t have any principals.

You probably just don’t like him very much.

I don’t know what you are smoking, but it would be better to stick to the facts that are presented and not what you might prefer instead:

I think Candy Crowley felt sorry for President Obama, because he didn’t answer the question

Crowley told me she tried to clear up the question of how Obama had originally characterized the attack because “I was trying to move the conversation along. They got stuck on this.”
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/10/17/candy-crowley-injects-herself-into-the-presidential-debate.html

The exact phrasing Mr. O used is noted in this Guardian article today, since the substance of that T word was under dispute by the very principled Mr Romney:

In his Rose Garden speech Obama did use the phrase “acts of terror”, but he did so in the plural and within a general discourse on the threats facing the US rather than as a specific reference to Benghazi.

Candy Crowley takes heat from Republicans over Benghazi interjection
Moderator of the second debate criticised for fact-checking Romney on point about president’s remarks over Libya attack
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/oct/17/candy-crowley-republicans-benghazi-interjection

This was political semantics at its best on display last evening.