“Means testing” turns Social Security into a welfare program for the Very Poor(TM). WE all know what happens with THOSE programs, don’t we? I get really bummed out every time I realize how many otherwise smart Liberals/Progressives support this ridiculous idea.

He takes the most from Medicaid and Food Stamps — two programs used primarily by the very poorest in the nation. It is truly an assault on the poor. It’s also more Kabuki, as it’s obviously the MONSTER budget the Obama admin. can rail against, while creating a wicked bad budget that only looks “good” by comparison.

Keep fucking that chicken!

At this point, I’d be happy with a bone. I haven’t even gotten that. What did everyone think of my video (no one’s said a word)?

Link

How is he for the “very poor?” I happen to be in that income bracket and he sure as fuck isn’t for a person like me. I had it easier under Bush — and I hated Bush.

Okay, everything went glitchy on me and now that stupid post with NO LINK is up there.

You can click here to see the video I describe above in the wall of text!

I posted this in the Faster’s Roundup, but it got buried at the end. Going to try once more here, in hopes of some of you actually seeing it:

Okay, FDL’rs (or whatever we call ourselves), I created a grand video (coincidentally, the first video store to open up in my town when I was a kid was called, “Grand Video”) re: Obama’s 11ty-demensiony Chess. He’s actually doing it, it’s just that he’s playing for the wrong side.

This video explains just how Obama is robbing the poor and middle-class blind, while successfully blaming the Republicans (who are no better, but only half as clever). It also exposes 2 Obamas through clips explaining sequestration — one from 2011 and one from 2013. I worked really hard on it and hope a few of you will at least get something out of it!

I don’t know how to embed a video here, but I’m going to link. This is the only site I know of that can grasp that a person can be a LIBERAL and NOT supportive of Obama. I look forward to your feedback.

Here’s the link:

<a href=" Okay, FDL’rs (or whatever we call ourselves), I created a grand video (coincidentally, the first video store to open up in my town when I was a kid was called, “Grand Video”) re: Obama’s 11ty-demensiony Chess. He’s actually doing it, it’s just that he’s playing for the wrong side. I don’t know how to embed a video here, but I’m going to link. This is the only site I know of that can grasp that a person can be a LIBERAL and NOT supportive of Obama. I look forward to your feedback.
<a href=" Okay, FDL’rs (or whatever we call ourselves), I created a grand video (coincidentally, the first video store to open up in my town when I was a kid was called, “Grand Video”) re: Obama’s 11ty-demensiony Chess. He’s actually doing it, it’s just that he’s playing for the wrong side. I don’t know how to embed a video here, but I’m going to link. This is the only site I know of that can grasp that a person can be a LIBERAL and NOT supportive of Obama. I look forward to your feedback. Here’s the link:

Clicky for the Video!

Thanks for watching, fatster! I’ve been waiting for SOMEONE to give it a chance. You just made my miserable night SLIGHTLY less miserable.

Okay, FDL’rs (or whatever we call ourselves), I created a grand video (coincidentally, the first video store to open up in my town when I was a kid was called, “Grand Video”) re: Obama’s 11ty-demensiony Chess. He’s actually doing it, it’s just that he’s playing for the wrong side.

I don’t know how to embed a video here, but I’m going to link. This is the only site I know of that can grasp that a person can be a LIBERAL and NOT supportive of Obama. I look forward to your feedback.

Here’s the link:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dr1KOO-b0w

You’re crazy.

But if you abbv. enough w. it may make it sound like there’s something there b/c that’s how consp. theorists op.

“Sick” in the way we used to use “sick,” not in the way the kids are using it, right?

Consider yourself lucky. It’s worse than even I expected it to be, and I expected it to be bad.

I remember Jello Biafra attacking her in the 80s in his lyrics. I thought he was nuts — because at the time I was in the “Dems are all good, Repubs are all bad” place — now I wish more of us would have listened to his objections. Her title should be “The Honorable Propagandist, Dianne Feinstein.”

This line of questioning from Dianne Feinstein is fucking shameful.

Mikulski’s giving him one hell of a grilling. When she said she “looks forward to working with him,” I’m sure it gave him chills. ;-)

I feel like a moron for asking, but how do I get the movie in movie night to work? I have never been able to figure out how to watch the actual movie being discussed. Does it stream at a specific time and I always happen to miss it?

I’m certain I’m missing the obvious, which makes it is so embarrassing to ask this.

The fact that only 1 person, prior to me, even commented on this article is very distressing to me. It’s also odd that the indefinite detention of U.S. citizens that also passed with NDAA didn’t get a bigger mention. Unless it’s divided into two posts and I somehow missed that section.

also see young people working in areas that are dreadfully expensive to live in.

They should move. If you can’t live off of $450,000 a year, you’re doing it wrong.

But thanks, anyway, for the new year’s wishes. I hope you have a happy new year, too. :-)

I cannot stomach listening to people defend the rich.

The “middle-class” isn’t making $250,000 a year — or $450,000. I think you know that. Redefining the definition of “middle class” to include “wealthy” is a bad fucking idea.

Is there a way I can block your posts — not from the site, of course — but just so I don’t have to read them anymore?