• Donald B. commented on the diary post A Father’s Day Barbecue—Washington-Style by brasch.

    2013-06-16 11:06:02View | Delete

    Apparently, low hanging Republican fruit is on the menu, while a succulent slab of prime Obama just begging to get grilled is shoved to the back of the fridge.

  • Donald B. commented on the blog post Me & God Are Watching Skynet Grow

    2013-06-11 14:58:06View | Delete

    Hyperbole over the surveillance state to make a buck isn’t journalism or looking out for you. It’s hucksterism…

    Thanks in advance for your apology.

    Each of his blogs on this subject has been an attempt to pooh-pooh the story by impugning Greenwald’s character. Reread them if you need more citations; they’re abundant. You know this. Quit being disingenuous.

  • Donald B. commented on the blog post Me & God Are Watching Skynet Grow

    2013-06-11 14:15:12View | Delete

    Again, he’s had this fundraising appeal every single year since he’s been blogging. There’s no evidence he intended to make more ado about the NSA story than is warranted so he could inspire more donations.

    I fail to see what his personality has to do with the quality of his reporting. In what way should be be more generous, and to whom?

    Diminishing a message by impugning the character of the messenger is a sleazy, time honored tactic by the lazy and dishonest. This is what TBogg resorts to. Don’t be like him.

  • Donald B. commented on the blog post Me & God Are Watching Skynet Grow

    2013-06-11 11:55:05View | Delete

    Greenwald has made this same fundraising appeal every year since he started writing online. This isn’t a money grab. It takes money to do what he does, and the paycheck for blogging alone doesn’t cut it.

    Despite what one of the dittoheads said in a previous thread…

    FinnMacCool June 6th, 2013 at 10:56 am
    67
    In response to ehossne1 @ 49 (show text)
    Yeah, noticed that too…
    Think it might have something to do with wanting to “pull a billmon” but still wanting to get a paycheck?

    1) blog less
    2)????
    3)profit!

    I guess ‘troll posts’ would fill that #2 slot nicely (for a while anyway). Now that’s some outcomes based shit right there.

    …he’s working harder than ever, not cashing in.

    It’s intellectually lazy and dishonest for TBogg and the dittoheads to smear Greenwald as a greedy egotist. The real objection, of course, is over what he writes, over his taking to task the leaders in whom these brownshirts so blindly place their trust.

    They never bother to factually dispute what Greenwald and others write, because they haven’t the wherewithal to do so. Witless snark, ad hominen invective, and slander are all they have.

  • Donald B. commented on the blog post We Have Always Been At War With Ourselves

    2013-06-09 14:39:33View | Delete

    ‘Eh, nothing’s going to happen to me, loyal duopolist that I am, but too bad, so sad for any obnoxious firebagger who gets strung through these measures. He shoulda learned to love the crust from Obama’s rim as much as I do.’

  • Donald B. commented on the blog post We Have Always Been At War With Ourselves

    2013-06-08 18:37:47View | Delete

    The dittoheads are having another circle-jerk, splooging each other in the eye with that Obamabot juice, laughing at all the squares with their obnoxiously consistent principles and intellectual honesty, those fucking purity trolls who fail to appreciate the majesty of realpolitik.

  • Donald B. commented on the blog post Meet Firedoglake’s New Bradley Manning Coverage Assistant

    2013-06-06 11:29:29View | Delete

    I happily donated yesterday. Thanks for this important work.

  • Donald B. commented on the diary post Why I don’t defend James Rosen or the government by Libby Spencer.

    2013-05-26 09:02:02View | Delete

    One more time, you should read this paper from the New York Law School Law Review, which exhaustively covers this very subject, citing much more recent legal precedent confirming Rosen’s actions are constitutionally protected. The DoJ is obligated to follow the Constitution, not weaselly laws Congress has enacted to circumvent the Constitution.

  • Donald B. commented on the diary post Why I don’t defend James Rosen or the government by Libby Spencer.

    2013-05-26 08:15:39View | Delete

    It doesn’t matter what he did or didn’t expose. His actions were constitutionally protected, as set out by the cases discussed in the paper to which I linked in my previous post. You should take the time to read it.

  • Donald B. commented on the diary post Why I don’t defend James Rosen or the government by Libby Spencer.

    2013-05-26 08:12:53View | Delete

    You don’t seem to understand the law. You should really read this paper from the New York Law Review, especially section D, from which the following is taken:

    Following Bartnicki, the lower courts have explored the extent to which a publisher’s interaction with a source who unlawfully acquires information can be said to implicate the publisher itself [...]

  • Donald B. commented on the diary post Why I don’t defend James Rosen or the government by Libby Spencer.

    2013-05-26 02:29:51View | Delete

    I’m certain Prof. Turley is well aware that the PATRIOT Act grants broad powers to the government, asserting its right violate civil liberties. I’m sure he’s equally aware that the PATRIOT Act is bullshit and doesn’t trump the Constitution. It doesn’t need to be amended to exempt journalists, since the Constitution already guarantees the right [...]

  • Donald B. commented on the blog post Late, Late Night FDL: When The Music’s Over

    2013-05-21 00:08:44View | Delete

    Manzarek did a fine job producing those great early X albums.

  • Donald B. commented on the blog post Asian Driver, No Survivor: An Inquiry

    2013-05-19 19:10:00View | Delete

    (Disclaimer: I am not Mexican, did not go to Harvard, and have never had my hair cut at Fantastic Sams, so I’m not sure if I’m allowed to post about this)

    Aw, Mr. I-can-dish-it-out-but-I-can’t-take-it still has Teddy’s bright red hand print on his ass cheek, and it stings like a motherfucker.

  • Kevin, you’re more restrained and diplomatic than the situation warrants. I don’t know how you do it. People coldly throw fact after fact at TBogg, but he never apologizes for being wrong. Indeed, he only ever doubles down on his lies.

  • Can we please get back to the topic of how much of a pathological lying asshole TBogg is? That witless, snarky cunt gets shown up and has his bullshit refuted all the time, yet he soldiers on as if nothing happened.

  • Donald B. commented on the blog post Accidentally Like A Martyr

    2013-05-18 00:21:57View | Delete

    You’ve read everything KG and others wrote about this? So, you’re not pleading ignorance of the facts of the matter, you’re conceding you’ve knowingly misrepresented them. That doesn’t help your case.

  • Donald B. commented on the blog post Accidentally Like A Martyr

    2013-05-17 23:54:17View | Delete

    Hear, hear!

    I can’t imagine why Jane wants this intellectually lazy dispenser of witless snark on her site. He’s an embarrassment, and his conservadem views are completely antithetical to everything the site stands for. Perhaps he generates revenue that serves as a subsidy allowing the bloggers, like yourself, who know their ass from a hole in the ground to post?

  • Reid:

    Hear my hollow bark and tremble in…fear? No, laughter.

  • No, thank you. Your coverage of civil liberties issues, something grossly underrepresented in the media, is among the best anywhere.

  • Donald B. commented on the blog post Meet The New Paultard, Same As The Old Paultard

    2013-05-12 02:01:24View | Delete

    And you keep tonguing the crust from Obama’s rim and tell us how fresh it still tastes.

  • Load More