metamars

Last active
7 hours, 58 minutes ago
User Picture

CNN Censoring CDC Coverup of MMR Vaccine/Black Baby Autism

By: metamars Monday August 25, 2014 7:01 am

From: CDC whistleblower’s secret letter to Gerberding released by Natural News as mainstream media desperately censors explosive story

The mainstream media is pulling out all the stops to try to memory hole this breaking news story. When a citizen journalist posted the facts of the story to a CNN iReport page, CNN quickly removed it to prevent the public from learning the truth about this extraordinary moment in medical history.

The story has now been reposted at another CNN iReport page which will no doubt be censored and removed by CNN very quickly as well. But here’s the screen shot of what this page showed at the time of this writing:

{SEE LINK ABOVE FOR PHOTO}

All other mainstream media news sources, including the New York Times, Washington Post, USA Today, etc., have been ordered to deliberately censor this story, just as Natural News reported last week. There is a desperate attempt under way right now to silence the CDC whistleblower and sweep this entire story under the rug before it explodes beyond the control of the corporate-run media.

Imagine my surprise! /s

See also: http://www.activistpost.com/2014/08/cnn-ireport-on-cdc-whistleblower.html

 

CDC refuses to turn over documents to Congress showing MMR vaccines caused autism in black children

By: metamars Friday August 22, 2014 4:50 am

From CDC refuses to turn over documents to Congress: Evidence linking MMR vaccines to autism intentionally withheld from investigators

(NaturalNews) News has been rapidly exploding across the “truth media” regarding the CDC whistleblower who is now making shocking revelations: The CDC’s own research found that MMR vaccines caused autism in African-American children, and the agency knowingly buried this evidence to hide it from the public.

The scientific conspiracy went all the way to the top of the CDC, where Dr. Julie Gerberding — now an executive with vaccine maker Merck — took an active role in the cover-up and even arranged to have the whistleblower punished for trying to tell the truth.

CDC refuses to release evidence to Congress

Now we know that the CDC has also refused to turn over this information to Congress, too. U.S. Congressman Bill Posey (8th district, Florida) requested the documents from the CDC in a congressional hearing, but the CDC has stonewalled, refusing to turn over anything. This resulted in Congressman Posey calling for the CDC to be investigated. “The CDC can’t be trusted regarding investigating vaccine safety,” Posey said. “Huge conflict of interest. I think the CDC should be investigated.”

…..

The CDC possessed irrefutable evidence in 2002 that MMR vaccines caused a 340% increase risk of autism in African-American babies, yet instead of warning the public, the agency’s top scientists and executives actively conspired to bury that evidence.

(emphasis mine)

This article suggests that black babies are disproportionately, adversely affected by MMR vaccines. I’d never heard of drugs affecting any racial group differently, before …… last week. I had an older black couple as customers, and we got into a long conversation. It turns out that the woman was a breast cancer survivor, and her hair had not grown back from her chemotherapy treatment. Her husband informed me that this was common amongst blacks. So …. I find this article more plausible than I would have only a couple of weeks ago.

Supposed moderate, anti-Assad rebellion cooked up in West, funded by Qatar’s $10 billion

By: metamars Thursday August 14, 2014 8:10 am

unz.com: My Money’s on Putin The Latest in the New Cold War

If you thought that the Syrian rebellion was organic, and only became infected by foreign intervention, later on, you’re wrong. So indicates a quote from Interview with Route Magazine, which is quoted in My Money’s on Putin The Latest in the New Cold War

The discovery of the world’s largest, known gas reserves in the Persian Gulf, shared by Qatar and Iran, and new assessments which found 70 percent more gas in the Levantine in 2007, are key to understanding the dynamics of the conflicts we see today. After a completion of the PARS pipeline, from Iran, through Iraq and Syria to the Eastern Mediterranean coast, the European Union would receive more than an estimated 45 percent of the gas it consumes over the next 100 – 120 years from Russian and Iranian sources. Under non-conflict circumstances, this would warrant an increased integration of the European, Russian and Iranian energy sectors and national economies.

Later on, though, our generous Saudi ‘allies’ chipped in for the heavy hitters:

“The war in Ukraine became predictable (unavoidable?) when the great Muslim Brotherhood Project in Syria failed during the summer of 2012. …In June and July 2012 some 20,000 NATO mercenaries who had been recruited and trained in Libya and then staged in the Jordanian border town Al-Mafraq, launched two massive campaigns aimed at seizing the Syrian city of Aleppo. Both campaigns failed and the ”Libyan Brigade” was literally wiped out by the Syrian Arab Army.

It was after this decisive defeat that Saudi Arabia began a massive campaign for the recruitment of jihadi fighters via the network of the Muslim Brotherhoods evil twin sister Al-Qaeda.

Source: The Atlantic Axis and the Making of a War in Ukraine

So, this is why Syria was ripped up, and sectarian violence – beheadings and all – has flared up again in Iraq. It’s all about oil, gas, and the US-UK desire to be top dogs, forever, rather than live in a multi-polar world.

Furthermore, IMO it explains why the US ignored warnings about ISIL’s movement into Iraq, and possibly explains why the US didn’t bomb the crap out of arms depots that were going to be seized by ISIL. The US wants ISIL to threaten if not destroy and pipelines from Iran, through Iraq, and into Syria. You can interdict that flow in Syria…..or Iraq.

“Prominent left-liberal American academic” won’t publish opinion on US-supported false flags in Ukraine, fears “conspiracy theorist” label

By: metamars Thursday August 14, 2014 7:06 am

From unz.com:

American Pravda: Who Shot Down Flight MH17 in Ukraine?

Aside from attracting considerable debate from our website’s often “excitable” commenters, whose views range from the sensible to the deranged, our Whitney columns regarding MH17 had a far more important consequence. One of our left-liberal readers was shocked to read facts totally absent from the pages of The Nation, the Huffington Post, or any of the other left-liberal sites she visits. Out of curiosity, she contacted a very prominent left-liberal American academic, someone with special expertise in exactly that area of Europe. To her considerable surprise, he largely confirmed the outlandish “conspiracy theory,” saying that the evidence increasingly indicated that the American-backed Kiev government had shot down Flight MH17, either accidentally or otherwise.

Based on his remarks, it sounded like he and his friends had devoted 100x the time and effort that I had to investigating the incident, thereby reassuring me that my casual conclusions were at least not wholly ridiculous. Yet it also appeared that neither he or any of the other American experts in his circle who apparently share his views had seen fit to publish their opinions in any of the numerous media outlets to which they have easy access, presumably for fear of being denounced and stigmatized as “conspiracy nuts.” They may regard the possibility of an American military confrontation with nuclear-armed Russia as a terrible danger, but it pales compared to the horrifying risk that the 22-year-old bookers at MSNBC chat shows might decide to put a black mark down next to their names.

Oh, the horror! Better to “go along to get along”, rather then be called a “conspiracy theorist”! Why, that’s almost as bad as being called a “climate change denier” – a term applied to working scientists who don’t deny either that the climate changes, or that anthropogenic CO2 is a greenhouse gas, but who do deny that any sort of catastrophe is in the works, due to same.

On the plus side, a prominent Dutch journalist, Karel van Wolferen , apparently of the lefty persuasion, has published The Ukraine, Corrupted Journalism, and the Atlanticist Faith

Activists bear considerable share of the blame for this appalling state of affairs. See my diary Useless American Activists Should Have Been Delegitimizing American War Mongers, All Along

Southeastern States Suppressing Solar Energy – Where are the Green Organizations?

By: metamars Tuesday August 12, 2014 6:50 am

Yours truly has accused green organizations (e.g., 350.org) of being green veal pens. The main reasons are that they spread false propaganda about climate change*, they don’t push fusion** (perhaps the greenest technology available), nor are they openly telling the truth about who is driving CO2 increases, worldwide (it ain’t us). And thus, their “remedies” won’t do diddly squat, even if the ‘science’ they espoused was assumed to be completely accurate.

However, I have also complained that they don’t push for RICO like investigations into suppression of solar energy technology; and furthermore, they don’t look into racketeering type of suppression of solar energy deployment in states where it makes the most sense – like Florida. I had heard, anecdotally, at least, that solar energy adoption is nothing like you’d expect, from a Gary Null program, who has a house or ranch in Florida.

Now, from Sunny States Continue to Suppress Solar Energy

But while Florida advertises itself as the Sunshine State, power company executives and regulators have worked successfully to keep most Floridians from using that sunshine to generate their own power.

Wilkerson discovered the paradox when she set out to harness sunlight into electricity for the vintage cottages she rents out at Indian Rocks Beach. She would have had an easier time installing solar panels, she found, if she had put the homes on a flatbed and transported them to chilly Massachusetts.

“My husband and I are looking at each other and saying, ‘This is absurd,’” said Wilkerson, whose property is so sunny that a European guest under doctor’s orders to treat sunlight deprivation returns every year. The guest, who has solar panels on his home in Germany, is bewildered by their scarcity in a place with such abundant light.

Florida is one of several states, mostly in the Southeast, that combine copious sunshine with extensive rules designed to block its use by homeowners to generate power.

(emphasis mine)

P.S.: Not that it matters, but I had assumed that oil companies were behind the suppression of solar. This article suggests that electrical utilities are the main culprit.

* the lies and misrepresentations surrounding climate science was investigated by Donna LaFramboise

** including so-called cold fusion, which is the subject of a yearly non-credit course at MIT

A militarily useful, less ethically challenged use of drones (that might save US pilots from getting beheaded)

By: metamars Monday August 11, 2014 6:26 pm

Caveat: I don’t know much about military targeting systems. I’ve assumed/inferred that targeting small, moving vehicles (that presumably don’t give a strong radar or infrared signal) is not easy – you need a human spotter/aimer. Also, for all I know, something like this already exists, though I’ve never heard of it.

I’m extremely leery about the use of drones to assassinate people. Though targeting is not public knowledge, we all know about collateral damage, the likely futility of believing that you can kill leaders faster than they can be replaced, etc. Terrorist strength is much greater now, than before the advent of the drone killing machines, so it strains credulity to give them any sort of positive credit for making the world safer than it would have been, otherwise.

However, the current chaos in Iraq, where ISIS dudes roaming about with weaponized jeeps, and threatening beheadings, crucifixions, and even genocide, suggests a militarily useful, and less ethically challenged use, for drones. Especially in the current situation, where insertion of US ground troops is undesirable, and getting a pilot shot down, captured, and perhaps beheaded would be a disaster (if for no other reason than it would invite large scale escalation of US military forces).

Basically, my idea is to use the drone (pilots) as spotters/aimers, but the ordinance is fired from manned US fighter/bombers flying at a safe distance. The missiles are fired in the general direction of the drones, but as they approach the drones, control is ‘handed off’, like a baton, to the drone. The drone pilot will have been keeping the weaponized jeep in his sights during the whole time.

While this would work well against stationary targets, with drone pilots half a world away, from observing the approximately 3 second delay in satellite communications in news programs like CNN, I have to assume that this won’t work for moving targets, like jeeps. If a jeep is going 60 mph, that’s 88 feet per second. You probably wouldn’t want to miss by more than 8 feet, say, to you need to have maximum time delays of order 1/10th second.

The speed of light in a vacuum is about 300 million meters/second. In 1/10th of a second, you’d need a straight line proximity of 30 million meters (in a vacuum). The earth’s diameter is about 13 million meters, so the circumference is about pi times that, or 40 million meters.

The previous paragraphs suggest that satellite transmissions, overall, move considerably slower that the speed of light in a vacuum. Regardless, I’m not going to take the time to look into this, further, but it seems obvious that putting drone pilots in AWACS planes, for example, in the theater of operations, but still at safe distances, would allow sufficiently proximal targetting of mobile targets, like our ISIS friends – err, fiends – in jeeps. Even if overall ‘speed of signal’ is 30x slower than the speed of light in a vacuum, 1/30th the circumference of the earth still amounts to a large, safe distance.

Also, the drones could completely drop armamanets, and thus stay in the air, longer.

NASA Shocker: 12% chance of a near-wipeout of humanity’s high-tech civilization, due to solar flares, in the next 10 years

By: metamars Tuesday July 29, 2014 3:15 am

PLEASE POST A LINK TO THE NASA STORY IN YOUR SOCIAL MEDIA. FEEL FREE TO COPY THIS DIARY, VERBATIM, AND POST IN OTHER FORA. “FAILURE IS NOT AN OPTION”

NASA Source Link: Near Miss: The Solar Superstorm of July 2012

Story Link: Near Miss: NASA sounds red alert over solar flare that nearly wiped out human civilization two summers ago

Caveat: The NASA article claims an estimate of 20x katrina in economic losses, or $2 Trillion. However, US government revenues are $3 Trillion, yearly. Since frying the grid seems consistent with revenues of near $0 for much longer than a year (under good conditions, it’ll take 2 years to replace a transformer, in small batches), something here makes no sense to me, at all. Either NASA is soft-pedalling their estimate of economic loss, or else naturalnews.com is grossly exaggerating.

This link is of a recent interview of MIT-trained engineer Matthew Stein by Gary Null about solar flares’ likely impact of a Carrington event level solar storm. Unfortunately, taking this guy seriously suggests that NASA is soft-pedalling their estimate of economic loss.

According to shocking new research published by NASA, each decade there is roughly a 12% chance of a near-wipeout of humanity’s high-tech civilization. In fact, one such event nearly wiped out technology across the planet during the summer of 2012.

….

Analysts believe that a direct hit by an extreme CME such as the one that missed Earth in July 2012 could cause widespread power blackouts, disabling everything that plugs into a wall socket. Most people wouldn’t even be able to flush their toilet because urban water supplies largely rely on electric pumps

As all this is happening, hundreds of nuclear power plants across North America would run out of backup diesel fuel for their generators, causing cooling pump failures and leading to a cascading series of nuclear meltdowns equivalent to hundreds of Fukushima disasters. This might render much of the continent uninhabitable by humans for centuries, if not millennia.

German Industrialists Helped Hitler’s Rise; They Can Stop WW3 (Maybe)

By: metamars Sunday July 27, 2014 7:31 am

(Of course, I don’t think that modern day German industrialists bear any culpability for the actions of their ‘fathers’ and ‘grand-fathers’. However, they do have a unique opportunity to sort of compensate for some of Germany’s historical shame.)

The following will be sketchy. I don’t have time for doing much more.

Hitler’s rise in Germany was aided by German industrialists, who thought they could control Hitler and his thugs. They were quite mistaken……

The US’ war mongering against Russia, if it leads to hostilities, and goes nuclear, will likely result in some of the Russian nukes being used in Germany. It’s doubtful that such hostilities would lead to a full nuclear exchange between the US and Russia – everybody would lose such a war.

Even so, just one nuclear detonation on your soil will likely ruin your economy for a few years – and what if there’s more than a few? Say, 5 or 6?

Because of the rogue nature of the US, NATO should be replaced with a purely European organization. This is anathema to the US elites, so the question arises of what more plausible scenarios could be embraced by citizens that could help avert the folly that the US is threatening?

Germany would be safer with a diminished NATO, even if the above ideal scenario (NATO dissolved in favor of a purely European alliance) is implausible. Obviously, a Germany which has no Russian nukes exploded on its soil is also going to be more affluent. Much better for stock prices! :-)

As the most influential European country in NATO, Germany could save the day by withdrawing from NATO, and letting it’s European neighbors know that some German boodle could be had by European allies who follow suite. With any luck, Germany would peel off at least half of European allies.

Merkel is a politician, who told Putin that he shouldn’t “think in the old way”. I frankly don’t know much about Merkel, but I would say that a German politician who abides their NATO ally to fund neo-Nazis in the Ukraine has no business telling any Russian leader how to think.

So, scratch the Merkel.

Enter the German industrialists (businessmen, generally)

Their corporate forbears helped lead the world into destruction. They have $$ and influence – this time around, they can help save the world from destruction. They can electorally threaten Merkel, and any other German politician who is sheepishly going along with the American orchestrated farce.

And they already have an unlikely ally, in the newish anti-Fed + anti-NATO-wars public gatherings that are going on in over about 123 German cities. (See my diary
Populist, Anti Fed Movement Up 23% in less than 1 month – “If you want to change something … you have to go on the streets” )