health care hypocrite graphic max baucus

"Ohhhh Max", Agent 99 from Get Smart

This quote above is from a classic 60′s kitschy sitcom. It would be funny, if it wasn’t so sad, that to this point heath care reform in Congress has been a joke. The people directly impacted by this reform are not amused. They are facing financial disaster if they get sick. It’s almost as if the powers that be are using health care as way to keep people down.

Yesterday, Marisa McNee linked to the quote below from this, her diary at the Campaign Silo.
My bold for emphasis.

As President Obama’s effort to overhaul the health care system seems to hit one roadblock after another in Congress, he is counting on Senator Max Baucus, a political shape-shifter and crafty deal maker who is not fully trusted by either party, to help him clinch his top domestic priority.

Not fully trusted by either party is very disturbing. If neither party trusts Baucus, why should I? And after looking at his campaign contributions, it’s very clear why no one should trust him. When you look at the pattern developing with the contributions to Conrad and Baucus, it’s a pattern that I wouldn’t want for a sofa, let alone the people crafting heath care policies.

Add to it this.

Lobbying disclosure filings for the first quarter of 2009 reveal that five of Baucus’ former staffers currently work for a total of twenty-seven different organizations that are either in the health care or insurance sector or have a noted interest in the outcome. The organizations represented include some of the top lobbying organizations in the health sector: Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and Researchers of America (PhRMA), America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), Amgen, and GE Health Care.

There’s a graphic that lays out the connection. Warning, it’s very graphic.

Baucus has served the public for 35 years.

In 1973, Max was elected to the Montana State Legislature. He served as a state representative from Missoula until his election to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1974. He was re-elected in 1976. Max was elected to the U.S. Senate in 1978 and has served consecutively ever since.

It’s appears that Baucus has had 35 years of tax payer funded health care. That’s more the half his life since this NYT article lists his age as 67. I’ve been paying for part of his health care ever since my first real job in 1978, as have all taxpayers.

And now the money, lots of it.

According to Open Secrets, for the 2008 campaign cycle Conrad has received $537, 141.00 from Health Professionals, $524,813.00 from the Pharmaceuticals/Health Products industries, $364,500.00 form Health Services/HMOs, and $332,826.00 from Hospitals/Nursing Homes.

Taking a look at the same campaign cycle, according to Open Secrets Schering-Plough Corp, a pharmaceutical company is his largest contributor with $72,200.00, and DaVita Inc., a provider of dialysis is fifth with $48,350.00, Amgen Inc, a biotechnology developing medicines is seventh with 45,750.00, Aetna is eighth with 45,250.00, Blue Cross and Blue Shield is tenth with $41,850.00, and Kindred Heathcare is twentieth with $28,400.00.

Please note, in this diary about Kent Conrad, according to Open Secrets, DaVita, Inc. was his largest contributor with $65,900.00, and Amgen Inc, was his second largest contributor with 47,000.00. In that post, please note also that Amgen Inc is misspelled.

Now to Baucus’s FEC filing, it reads like a who’s who of health care interests. It reads quite similar to Conrad’s FEC filing which you can find here.

If I apply for a job, a lot of employers now require a background check. Shouldn’t we the people, as the employers of elected officials have the same requirement for money from lobbyists? Conflict of interest anyone?

Max Baucus joins Joe Liberman, Lindsey Graham, and Kent Conrad in this ongoing series of Heath Care Hypocrites.

Graphic by Millineryman.