
"Mechanicsburg IL - United States Post Office Zip Code 62545" by myoldpostcards on flickr
As headlines across the corporate media world of the U.S. reported on August 11th, the U.S. Postal Service is proposing to cut its workforce by 120,000 jobs and withdrawing from the federal health and retirement plans. Initial reports were that during the last four years, the service lost $20 billion, including $8.5 billion in fiscal year 2010. Therefore, the U.S. Postal Service drafted two documents in “Workforce Optimization” paper and a paper on health and retirement benefits requesting breaking its labor contracts and reigning in its health benefit and pension costs. It would seem almost reasonable until one drills deeper down into the facts. If you do that, then you can see this is a case where the corporate state is union busting again (and attacking the middle class) through a deceptive creation of crisis to seek further privatization (classic shock doctrine).
At the heart of the matter is a 2006 Congressional mandate put on the US Postal Service contained in the “Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act of 2006” to pre-fund healthcare benefits of future retirees, a 75 year liability over a 10 year period. No other agency or corporation is required to do this. This provision costs the Postal Service $5.5 billion a year. When you add in an adjustment that was made in how workers’ compensation costs were calculated based on interest rate assumptions and long term predictions concerning health care and compensation of $2.5 billion (a non cash accounting adjustment), you come up with $8 billion in cost. Actual loss was $500 million and when added, comes to the $8.5 billion reported for 2010. While $500 million is a lot, it doesn’t compare with $8.5 billion and is down from the previous year loss of $1 billion. If you took out the onerous pre-funding mandate, the Postal Service actually shows a $700 million profit over the last four years instead of the $20 billion loss. The Postal Union has been trying to get Congress to authorize the transfer of the Postal Service’s money estimated to be between $50 billion and $75 billion overpaid in the Civil Service Retirement System transferred into the PSRHBF.
The National Association of Letter Carriers is pushing passage of Rep. Stephen Lynch’s bill, H.R. 5746 which calls for this transfer strategy. The American Postal Workers Union is pushing H.R. 1351 also introduced by Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-MA) which would address the crisis without cutting pay and benefits, without eliminating collective bargaining rights, or slashing service. The corporatists, on the other hand also have a bill, H.R. 2309, introduced by Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) and Rep. Dennis Ross (R-FL) which would not address the USPS overpayments to its pension accounts, will not address the onerous pre-funding mandate, force postal workers to make up the difference, create a commission that would order post office closures and a board to cut wages, abolish benefits, and end layoff protections, and increase postal workers’ health care costs. We can only hope this attack on American workers fails. Is there anyone taking any bets in this dark and disgusting period of American history?



15 Comments

Yeah, most corporations don’t fund their health and retirement plans at all. Like General Motors and several major airlines that come immediately to mind, they just file for bankruptcy and push the responsibility off on the U.S. taxpayers; of course the retirees get screwed too, they then get only 60% of what they worked a lifetime to secure.
So much to be pissed off about and so little time.
Good post Michael. Rec’d.
“At the heart of the matter is a 2006 Congressional mandate put on the US Postal Service contained in the “Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act of 2006” to pre-fund healthcare benefits of future retirees, a 75 year liability over a 10 year period. No other agency or corporation is required to do this. “; THAT is the message the unions need to be pushing.
Rec’d.
Gee, I wonder why we didn’t hear about this from the leader of the Democratic Party? I mean does Obama ever talk about labor without holding his nose?
Yep. Thanks.
True.
Nope. Just talk about sacrifice.
His newer word is “burden”. He told a retired teacher in Iowa when she asked about collective bargaining for public sector workers that she must share the burden.
Gee, maybe they’ll give postal workers heavier bags.
Burden eh? Keeping things fresh for the same message I suppose.
Well, just lost my appetite. Thanks for saving me a pound or two with this truly horrific newsbite.
I am PBNS(Pissed But Not Surprised). Important news, though. Recc’d.
My reaction is more varied. Agree that it’s largely about breaking the union. However, have a couple of other points:
- Since 1984 or 1987 U.S. government workers have been paying into SS and a new pension plan rather than the old Civil Service Retirement System. The last people covered under CSRS will be retiring during the next ten years, which just happens to more or less overlap with the period for the PO to pre-fund their CSRS pension. I wonder if the PO overpayment scheme is a way for the government to avoid having to pony up general fund monies to augment the CSRS fund? (Maybe it’s been raided the same way the SS Trust Fund is full of T-bonds that will soon need to be redeemed.)
- One thing the postal workers have going against them, and rightfully so, is the no-layoffs clauses in their contracts. If automation and/or a reduction in postal mail volume means that fewer workers are required, then the surplus people should not be guaranteed a job. And no, this doesn’t mean that I don’t think the government — and/or a quasi-government hybrid organization like the USPS — should be hiring people during a recession. It just means that job creation money should go into productive jobs (like infrastructure) and that the USPS should not be forced to continue to employ people for which it has no real work.
- And BTW, my parents were both union members and I’m a union member. But one thing I learned growing up is that “featherbedding” — being guaranteed a job by union contract even if there wasn’t really a job to do — reflected badly on all union members and damaged the image of unions with the non-union public. It especially pissed off union members with private sector jobs who saw their tax money helping to pay for unproductive and unnecessary workers. It was a “double whammy”: tax money out of their pockets AND a black mark against unions in the private sector. It’s this kind of thing that is being used by the right against public sector workers right now to justify the union-busting crusade.
USPS lost $20 billion over the past four years?
Interesting how profit/loss framing is being applied here to make USPS look like it is a terrible economic burden on USA and for Americans to keep and maintain.
Many small cities,villages and towns see USPS as the only “face” of the USG/Federal presence in their midst. So shutting down these small postal stations is not unlike taking USG out of these small,local communities. Making it all sound like large amounts of money are being poorly spent or “lost” appears to be the intended misdirection here. Another Reaganism version of “government is the problem” being run here to effectively render USG as being “bad” and “useless” as per Grover Norquist point of view?
Imagine if many of these small/smaller USG “outposts” were instead taken in the other direction? Being staffed to help Americans with health,social and welfare questions/needs/access?
The bigger question then to be taken up is what/how the Pentagon/CIA have been doing these past ten years is scored on regarding “cost” and “lost” to USG and the American people?
Just read over at HuffPost that USG is now actively seeking to stay on in Afghanistan until 2024. No mention of “cost” and “lost” in this story to the USG.
Defeating Barack Obama in November 2012 would be a good thing.
Barack Obama is a bona fide fraud/corporatist Reaganite tool who has been deceptive and duplicitous repeatedly since Jan.20,2009.
The current attack on Social Security and Medicare is largely being made possible by Barack Obama and this derelicted D Party he leads.
Voting Barack Obama out of the WH may not solve many of the deeper problems the USA and Americans are being assaulted with but Barack Obama deserves to suffer a steep political defeat in November 2012.
The “no layoff”clause is not what you think it is. Carriers of any classification with less than 6 years of service. can be layed off. It’s probably about the same for the other postal unions.
Sorry about that. Thanks.
Thanks for the update and info.
Always appreciated.
The USPS will be taken down and privatized. That’s a given. They’ve got everything else, so this is next on the list. Mailing a letter for less than a dollar will be a thing of the past very soon.
Hubby just said something interesting: How come there’s one rule for funding benefits for USPS workers and another (called “raiding”) for Social Security benefits?
Wish THAT system had been required to stash away $$$ for all those fancy “entitlements” for our retired elderly.