Dan Froomkin, formerly of the Washington Post online, began his stint on Huffington Post this week. In it he pledges to continue to be an independent journalist who will not be part of the usual Washington cocktail weenie crowd. That’s the reporter and pundit crowd that promises good coverage in exchange for access to so-called important people at the Court of Versailles. Not quite jesters, these managers of our information go along to get along.
In the piece Froomkin speculates about the current health care debate and how Obama will eventually manage but probably not solve the problem. But it also could turn out to be yet another boondoggle like Medicare Plan D or….Homeland Security.
Our Fuzzy President is About to Come Into Focus
What I found unique and a further indication of Froomkin’s honesty is this paragraph:
Does Obama have the ability to stand up to corporate interests? There’s scant evidence of that so far. Indeed, most notably in the course of the financial industry bailout, he deferred to them quite spectacularly. And it’s not just corporate interests, either. There’s something about the military/national security complex [emphasis mine] that seems to set Obama back on his heels on such issues as dealing with Guantanamo detainees, coming clean about the Bush administration’s torture legacy or "Don’t Ask Don’t Tell."
Ah that phrase“military/national security complex reminded me of the Homeland Security Act. It was a whole new huge government scheme that turned out to be a way that the Pentagon could squeeze more money out of the taxpayers by appealing to fear and racism. The Pentagon already gets over $1 Trillion a year and the CIA doesn’t even have to give a clear accounting of how much they get. So how to get more dough? Come up with a place that can directly funnel tax money to your cronies, especially in the arms industry and the security business. It’s another part of what Naomi Klein calls "The Shock Doctrine". This is the privatization part. First you deregulate everything, and you privatize as much public stuff as possible which includes selling public parks and roadways, and you dismantle any remaining social safety nets just to keep the rabble weak.
Froomkin calls out this military/national security complex, but doesn’t go into detail. I look forward to him calling attention to this part of a very ugly part of our corporate state.
The angry right-wingers while hysterical and spouting misinformation are not all wrong to be very suspicious of government especially when we have heard about no-bid contracts to companies like Haliburton and Blackwater. What if we end up with a Homeland Medical Security Act that rewards the insurance, pharmaceutical, and hospital industries. but does little to help rising medical costs?
It’s the corruption, stupid. We must keep our eyes firmly on the crony capitalists and it sounds like Froomkin might be a welcome reinforcement to the band of young muckrakers like Sirota, Scahill, Greenwald, Klein, Prins, and, of course, Taibbi.



8 Comments







Good post, MM.
Thanks, Tom. I went to our Congress critter, Denny Rehberg’s, “clown” hall meeting last week. And while there were a few tea baggers reading from the script they found on the internet, Rehberg was the real culprit. He reinforced every piece of misinformation and stoked the fear. He ended by saying “the fight is between rural and urban”. He said that all the new democratic leaders were from big cities. So here we go again. Fascism most often starts in rural areas, as Sara Robinson’s piece points out.
A lot of these people are genuinely fearful but filled with misinformation. Progressives have a great deal of facts and information and share the tea baggers sense of powerlessness, but they don’t have white hot passion for a movement. That’s why I consider myself coming from a different tradition than the Progressive movement that relied on experts to come up with reasonable outcomes. I consider myself a Painite, a leftie, and just can’t get past the idea that this whole system is screwed up. “The game is rigged” said John Edwards. ‘You can’t reason with them, you have to fight them”. That doesn’t mean using fists or shouts necessarily, but it does me having a passion for justice. And it means taking a stand not behind a man or a party, but an idea. So I continue to write my letters to the editor and showing up and taking the dirty looks from my conservative neighbors.
As President, it is rather for Obama to set others back on their heels. Froomkin is getting there, but the problem isn’t that Obama is being pushed around. It is that he agrees with corporate interests across the board.
“Have I told you lately how much I love you?” Van Morrison, but also me. I so much agree with you and almost everything that you write on this site.
Loved the Taibbi article about Gingrich’s past adulation of living wills, etc. See his article at http://trueslant.com/matttaibb…..life-care/
versus his idiot talk this past Sunday.
As far as I’m concerned, Obama’s behavior speaks tons about his affirmation and subjugation to corrupt corporate interests and I have no hope or faith for any substantive change in his behavior and that sickens me no end.
Blessings,
Taibbi’s next assignment is on health care. It should really stir the pot and I’m looking forward to it.
Wish us luck tomorrow in Montana where Obama is staging another photo op in the heart of wing nut country, Belgrade, MT. I’m actually a little scared for the good folks for health care reform who will show up to counter the very organized tea baggers.
If I get a chance to ask a question, what should I ask?
Hi mm, Great post.
Ask him how he knows that the HR 676 Medicare for All bill isn’t feasible in this Congress when it’s the only alternative proposal that he himself took off the table before it could be considered seriously and get scored by CBO?
Or ask him how HR 3200, with its very weak public option can possibly drive down health insurance costs when Paul Krugman and Kenneth Arrow, two Nobel prize winning economists say there cannot be a free market in Health Care?
Or ask him what good it will do for escalating health insurance costs to pass a bill like HR 3200 which has an extremely weak public option that will not even take effect until 2013?
Or begin by saying that you’ve noticed that OFA, HCAN, and Move-on have been urging their supporters to go to Town Hall Meetings and support a public option, them ask:
But, Mr. President I’m very confused, “public option” can mean anything from the terribly weak versions we see in HR 3200 and in the HELP bill to a really strong public option that could evolve into Medicare for All over a five – ten year period. The “public option” in HR 3200 and HELP is very likely to fail to bring down costs, and the final bill likely to come out of Congress will probably be even weaker that these, so why should I support a travesty like that?
Ask him to please stop talking about co-ops, or what on earth gives him the idea that they could possibly work?
Yeah, yeah, I guess that sounds hostile.
I’ve been pissed off since listening to a nice, polite, gentle-voiced LYING Repub ex-congressman dance around the real issues while handing out the party talking points on npr’s Talk of the Nation an hour or so ago.
Okay, so some re-framing is in order, but I leave that to you. You sound like a reasonable person.