“He needs a victory”, sighed Dr. Paul Hochfeld at the very end of our 40 minute interview with him on our local talk radio show. After a feisty and informative discussion with us about health care reform, in the end, Paul, like us, kind of sighed. When Paul talked to the Doctors for Obama group that had flown in to support President Obama’s health care reform (whatever that was), they told him that “the president needs a victory”. Even though Paul is a single payer advocate and knows like many of us do that a national system is the only thing that will work, in the end does it boils down to giving the President something to sign? He was politely called delusional by his colleagues. Did he not see that the Congress was incapable of passing something meaningfully comprehensive? Did he not see that there were not 60 votes in the Senate?
Basically what our well meaning friends, colleagues, and the pundits are telling us is that we have to throw the game. For some illusion of victory, we must cheat. We must give up and give in and throw in the towel. We are told that victories are incremental. The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire was a step along the way to labor reform. Women didn’t get the vote right away. African Americans didn’t really get their right to vote until the 1960s. Change comes slowly. Don’t be annoying and loud. Sit down and make sure you color within those lines, Sally Jean.
Looking backwards, change does seem slow for the cause of justice. But if Mother Jones or Eugene Debs or Sojourner Truth or Rosa Parks or Martin Luther King or Dr. Margaret Flowers had only looked backward and minded their “Ps” and “Qs” and waited for the promised land, women would still be wearing corsets and African Americans would still be at the back of the bus. Somebody should have told Jesus to sit down and shut up. “You know Rome wasn’t built in a day and it will eventually fall. So go eat some figs. You know we can’t get rid of these guys. We don’t have the 60 votes.”
No, without people who are impatient for change and who see justice as their sole guiding light who cannot sit down and shut up, there is no justice. These people cannot “circle the wagons” or “get in line” or all those other weasel phrases that are the bleats of a patriarchal sociopathic system that is in its death throes. Management speak, weasel words and cliches are like the bleats of the dumbass dinosaurs as they sink into the tar pits. Close your ears to them and fly high.
No, Dr. Paul, we must keep on truckin’. We must not throw in the towel or tow the line. And most certainly we must not throw the game. To keep up the illusion of a democracy with propaganda and photo ops is the real delusion. To go along with a political system that is as tainted as Chinese pet food and telling the world that “It tastes mighty fine”; now that is delusion. To have some sort of faith in the false priests of the false religion of greed is clinically delusional. And the sacrificing of millions of workers, throwing them into the volcano to appease that false god is not only deranged, it is criminal.
We want regulations back. We want vanilla consumer banks for ordinary lending transaction and Ponzi scheme gambling entities like Goldman Sachs separated. We want any kind of middlemen that deal with public issues such as health, energy, and food to take a modest profit, not shake us down for our last dime. We want short publicly funded elections with free advertising on TV and Radio for candidates. No more two Americas where wealth is rewarded and work is kicked to the curb.
We want a fair days pay for a fair days work. If we are forced to see life as a game we don’t want it rigged. Stop the purposeful confusion and manufactured illusion. Stop thinking you are smarter than we are because you see yourself as players. (And that includes the purring pundits of the Fat Cat news.) You are not smarter, you are cheaters. You are worse than delusional. To take off from Matt Taibbi, you politicians who collude with the banksters and insurance leeches are evil entrails-sucking vampire squids. And don’t bother to say “that was over the top”. It wasn’t. And I’m not crazy.



15 Comments







Great rant! And not a bit over the top. recommended
Only one quibble. Paul Krugman wrote a blog post recently about an ealier op-ed by Calvin Trillin… about how/why the financial crisis occurred. Apparently, it was due to the redistribution of the smart guys. They just became more greedy.
Rec.
if you’re “crazy” mm – you are in very good company
“throwing the game” is a most excellent metaphor – as “making it look close” is how it’s done.
Hey, Diane!
I was literally in the middle of listening to your podcast when this post popped up. Great interview. Paul Hochfeld is knowledgeable, erudite, and very funny. And he doesn’t just hit the standard talking points on SP; he covers the issues requiring reform throughout the broader health care sector.
It’s not just that our political system is as tainted as Chinese pet food. The edifice of health care reform we’re going to see this year will be built out of Chinese drywall.
Hey the Chinese Wall is dry wall. I love it! I find Dr. Paul’s exposure of the RUC committee at the AMA that decides how doctors are paid very disturbing. And so did he.
I’m laughing already, the handwriting is so on the wall.
Whatever HCR(?) bill Obama signs, he’ll tell us this isn’t the end of HCR, it’s just the beginning.
Then his supporters will preach that if we want more HCR from Obama, we’ve got to push him.
And that will be all the HCR we get.
Har dee har, har, har. The joke’s on us.
Wish me luck. I’m off into the belly of the beast. I am going to a Montana County Chairs meeting. Many of the ones who will show up love Max or pretend to love him. I will for be for some the life of the party and for others the bane of their existence. This is it for me, though. Listening to people drone on about “how legislation is made” or “why it’s important to have an election judge” always misses the point. The point is that this capitalist system either doesn’t work or, let’s be honest, works too well. Party politics is so frakking boring. But I owe it to people like Dr. Paul and Dr. Christina to go down fighting.
Off I go for the 3 hour drive. It’s a beautiful day and I get to drive by a giant wind farm which is very cool. I am driving into an even more remote part of Montana than where I live. Tally Ho. Time to channel Matt Taibbi.
Good Luck, looking forward to the report when you return :)
Good luck, and I loved the article. You’re right – if people had been willing to settle for what they had, we’d have never made any progress at all. Tell those people if they think you should settle for what you have, that maybe they should settle for what they once had, and let us have it instead.
Check this out: New CBO scores for the House bills show a tab of 900 billion approx. which still includes a public option. This is good news for public option supporters as there is no need to settle for Max-imum Baucus Crap just because of its sleazy low price when the House bill is competitively priced and covers more people and with a public option.
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2009/10/house_health_bill_trimmed_by_3.html?hpid=topnews
Hi mm,
Let’s get the idea out that we don’t need 60 votes to get a much better reform than in the Baucus bill. All we need is 50 votes plus the VP to get rid of the filibuster and approve an Amendment for a strong PO, if Harry doesn’t include one in his bill. This is how it could go:
Harry can decide whether the PO will be in the bill or not. But if it’s not then Schumer, Rockefeller, or any other individual Democrat can do the following:
1) Object to the proposed UC agreement that Amendments to the bill would require 60 votes to pass.
2) When the bill moves to the floor without such an agreement an Amendment putting in a PO will be filibustered, but, also, one of the Senators supporting it can make a point of order calling for a vote on the amendment being considered by the Senate.
3) The presiding officer of the Senate, most often the Vice President of the United States, can then make a parliamentary ruling upholding the point of order and citing the Constitution of the United States rather than previous Senate rules (which uphold the right of unlimited debate) as the precedent supporting the ruling.
4) A supporter of the filibuster can then “appeal from the chair” by asking whether the Chair’s decision will stand as the judgment of the Senate.
5) If one of them does, then an opponent of the filibuster can move to table the appeal.
6) Since motions to table are not debatable, the Senate immediately votes on the tabling and decides by simple majority vote.
7) If a majority decides to table the ruling of the Chair, that the filibuster is unconstitutional, and that a majority vote is enough to bring a bill to vote and to pass it, then the point of order, along with majority rule, is upheld.
8) By its action in upholding the Chair, the Senate will have established a new precedent, namely that filibusters are unconstitutional, and that all legislation thenceforth may be passed by majority vote, following a point of order calling for a vote.
None of this requires Harry Reid’s cooperation or is up to him. The 52 supporters of the PO in the Senate would get a vote allowing them to overcome the filibuster and pass the PO amendment attaching it to his bill. It does, however, require the cooperation of Joe Biden who would be the presiding officer and therefore probably the President as well.
I understand that the Democrats are not likely to pursue this scenario if Harry doesn’t put the PO in his bill. However, if they fail to do something like this, then they will bear the responsibility, along with Harry, for the failure to pass a PO in the Senate.
In other words, it is they and not just Harry, who would be submitting to the tyranny of the five. We need to get this idea out and get it spread in the left blogosphere. It’s very important to have people look squarely at the fact that we can have much better health care reform, if not single-payer, enhanced Medicare for All, immediately, if Democrats are willing to give up the filibuster. So which is more important to them, the filibuster, or a health insurance reform with a strong PO?
I could care less about Obama’s need for a victory. He was elected. That was his victory. Now it is our turn. Ordinary Americans need a victory too.
Excellent post. Thank you.
superb rant montanamaven.
also gave your podcast a listen. excellent job all around! paul is impressive (would love to see him get more air time), and it’s quite interesting to compare your interviews with him before and after dc. i can hear the impact the experience of the trip, talking with other doctors and having some time during the trip to reflect has had.
keep truckin’ on!
MM thank you for all you are doing. And of course a huge THANK YOU to the Mad as Hell Doctors. Saw both Doc Hochfield’s visits on Eds and was the other one on Olbermann’s (forget now). You bring up so many good points. For me your focus on not throwing in the “towel” is so important.
Single payer advocates( and there are millions of us) should keep calling, emailing, lobbying in their offices and participating in civil disobedience. Reminding our Reps we are out here that single payer is what we want and that a robust “public option” is the compromise.
Just spent a week in D.C. as you say in the “belly of the beast” in my Reps offices talking with aides. Of course in Ohio our dear Senator Sherrod Brown (worked/volunteered thousands of hours for this fellow) is not only a slam dunk but one of the biggest public option pushers.
But Senator Voinovich (R) Ohio is not closed down to the public option. As his aide said he has his “deep concerns” and I have the list. But I am encouraging folks from Ohio and around the country to call Senator Voinovich and let him know that this will be one of his last opportunities (he is out next year..retiring) to DO THE RIGHT THING.
Please call or write Voinovich and let him know what you think about Health care reform. Especially the folks from Ohio
http://voinovich.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Contact.ContactForm
Thanks for listening to both of the interviews. You are very astute, as always. Dave and I were moved by his slight hint of despair at the end and his desire to keep talking to friends like us who share his cause. His desire to keep talking is important and we here at firedoglake have helped his group by keeping their name in the news. We kind of have adopted this group and this doctor here at the lake and I am glad I could do a small bit.
The interviews are at montanamaven