“We Should Never Privatize Public Safety”
This is unrestrained Republican ideology in its most logical iteration. Governor Ric Scott and many Republicans in the state legislature, especially JD Alexander, received huge contributions from the GEO Group in campaign contributions. The GEO Group has also spent hundreds of thousands of dollars lobbying the Florida legislature in recent years, building a great relationship with conservative legislators. This is nothing but a ploy to divert taxpayer money to corporations. Republicans promote corporate welfare while eschewing individual and social welfare. They label the poor as “lazy” and bitch about their tax dollars going to social welfare programs, while they turn around and give huge tax cuts to the wealthy and subsidies and contracts to private corporations with histories of abuse and negligence, corporations that donate generously to their campaigns and help keep them in office. This is what they do.
The GEO Group utilized 2 of the top 5, and 3 of the top 10 lobbying firms in Florida during the past election cycle to maximize their influence. They have also donated hundreds of thousands to state campaigns, mostly to conservatives and incumbents. So it should come as no surprise that the state has decided to embark on the most ambitious prison privatization scheme in history.
This is conservative economics. This is the face of a country that allows for unlimited corporate contributions to politicians and campaigns. Republicans literally want to dismantle government and turn over government services to the private sector. They want to perpetuate the grossly unequal distribution of wealth and power in this country, because it serves their purposes and interests at the expense of everyone else’s. And I fear this is only the beginning of what will be a huge wave of anti-government, pro-privatization activity that we’re seeing crop up across the country. But people need to realize that government is not the problem. The government is a tool we can use to fix the problems inflicted on society by corporations and their endless greed.



28 Comments

Editors Note:
Hi WhyIHateCCA – Just a word to the wise, in general we’d like folks to limit their posting to 2 diaries a day. That way it gives everyone a chance to be on the recent diary list a good while.
Thanks for understanding.
B-
Hey Mike, thanks so much for posting this. You’ve been doing great work shining a light on the reprehensible private prison system for a long time. Really happy to have your work here at FDL.
Of course it is. The huge size of the U.S. prison system with its two million inmates, with the assistance of campaign contributions by prison guards’ unions, is primarily a problem caused by government.
The CCA crowd is still trying to work their questionable magic in Minnesota, even though the one prison they had in the state now sits empty:
http://renaissancepost.com/politics/the-private-prisons-scam/
And there’s more here: http://www.bluestemprairie.com/bluestemprairie/2011/05/what-did-torrey-westrom-think-he-was-saving-with-private-prison-proposal.html
Got evidence for this?
Maybe if we didn’t jail a bigger chunk of our populace than any other nation in the world, and for “crimes” that shouldn’t be outlawed, we wouldn’t need so many prisons: http://my.firedoglake.com/phoenix/2010/08/03/meet-neil-haugerud/
from about ten years ago (archived):
CCPOA = California Correctional Peace Officers Association
“The Power this prison guards’ union wields inside our prisons, legislative chambers and governors office disturbs me. It should disturb every citizen.”
– Judith Tannenbaum, English teacher, formally at San Quentin State Prison
California now has the 3rd largest prison system IN THE WORLD, following China and the United States as a whole.
There were 163,840 PRISONERS in California State prisons at last official count.
In the midst of this, membership in the California Correctional Peace Officers Association (CCPOA) has mushroomed and they have become one of the most powerful political groups in the State.
—> Since 1980 the California Correctional Peace Officers Association (CCPOA) has grown from 5,600 members to over 28,000 members.
—> The CCPOA has a 17 million dollar budget and 17 lawyers on staff.
—> In California, the average prison guard salary in 1996 was $44,000 – $10,000 more than the average
salary of a California public school teacher that year.
The CCPOA is the biggest contributor to political campaigns in California. The CCPOA gives twice as much in political contributions as the California Teachers Association, yet it is one tenth its size.
In 1998, the CCPOA gave over $2 million to [Dem] Governor Gray Davis, $763,000 to the media, and over $100,000 to Proposition 184, the 3 Strikes law. The 3 Strikes law mandated that convicted felons with one prior felony got twice the normal sentence for their 2nd strike, and convicted felons with two or more prior felonies would get at least 3 times the normal sentence or 25 years (whichever is more) for their 3rd strike. The CCCPOA has a vested interest in locking up more and more Californians.
California’s Doris Tate Crime Victims Bureau (the driving force behind the State’s “3 strikes law”) gets 78% of its funding, along with free office space and lobbying staff, from the CCPOA. The CCPOA also provides 95% of the funding for Crime Victims United, another Political Action Committee pressing for tougher laws and longer sentences.
http://www.prisonactivist.org/archive/factsheets/ccpoa.pdf
Governor Davis was subsequently fired by California voters and replaced with Arnold, who was considerably tougher on the CCPOA, which is currently serving w/o a contract.
This obscene prison problem — erroneously called in the above headline “public safety” — has all kinds of side effects. Here’s just one, from a recent speech by the public education patriot Diane Ravitch who (to her delight) has been called the greatest challenge to Bill Gates’s promotion of charter schools. Here is part of a recent Ravitch speech:
http://www.aasa.org/uploadedFiles/NCE/The_Conference_Daily_Online/2011_Conference_Daily/2011_Conference_Daily_Day_3_February_18,_2011/DianeRavitchSpeech-NCE11-text-format.pdf
Talk about slave labor in China, the U.S. Constitution expressly allows for the use of forced prison labor.
The Thirteenth Amendment of the Constitution, adopted at the end of the civil War in 1865, abolished slavery, but this same amendment expressly permits prison slavery and involuntary servitude.
AMENDMENT XIII – SECTION 1
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
I’m not sure that intentional conflation of public vs. private prisons with public vs. private money is a part of the problem. No evidence–just a gut feeling–but if you asked a large number of low-information (too busy to participate in understanding politics) citizens if they favored public or private prisons, a significant number would opt for private prisons. Because they’ve never given much thought to how prisons operate, they (il)logically believe that public prisons are funded with public money; private prisons with private money. They never think past the funding issue–and recognizing their illogical thinking–to arrive at the true problem. They fail to recognize that the funding for ALL prisons comes from taxpayers. The taxpayer doesn’t save a nickel . . . but employees and inmates alike take a hit because profits for management come before labor and prison/prisoner improvement.
Prison labor’s cheaper than slavery for corporations.
Slave plantation owners had to pay to feed the slaves, housing, and clothing.
Corporations don’t have to feed prison labor, provide clothing, housing, medical care. We pay for all that.
You want to know why the elites won’t bend on drug legalization. It’s because our prison system has been turned into labor camps.
Recently in Orlando Weekly re: what’s happening in Flori-duh.
http://orlandoweekly.com/news/privacy-policy-1.1148804
It’s also the only slavery still allowed in the Constitution. It’s purpose is supposed to be “punishment for crime”.
The Thirteenth Amendment Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.”, http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/thirteenthamendment.html
No doubt the corps will also be given huge subsidies/tax incentives so that privatization will not include feeding, clothing, housing, medical care, etc.
UNICOR, or Federal Prison Industries, Inc. (FPI), has its “Top 10 Reasons to buy from UNICOR.” Reason #3 is interesting.
3. MADE IN AMERICA.
Quality, Made in the USA products and services, supporting domestic jobs and our Nation’s economy.
some upcoming UNICOR trade shows:
Jun 13, 2011 – Jun 15, 2011 Office Furniture
Aug 7, 2011 – Aug 9, 2011 Electronics
Sep 11, 2011 – Sep 14, 2011 Services
Here’s the online catalog for California Prison Authority products and services.
http://catalog.pia.ca.gov/store.php?t=1306103454
Includes: furnishings, clothing & textiles, services, food products, bedding, shoes & boots, stationary & printing, cleaning products, metal products, gloves, signs & decals and modular buildings.
Plenty of jobs in a prison near you!
Jane may cut my stipend if you don’t read my comments (see above).
oops. so sorry!
So other than reforming laws requiring incarceration for non-violent convicts and exposing the “middle man” intrusion by private industry, how would we address this?
The Repugs will always go for privitization, even if it doesn’t save any money or actually costs more. The problem is that even if costs are the same or less, the money goes to the top, to the investment class, and not to the workers who will spend the money. Those lost dollars that WILL NOT be circulating in society.
I just hope the repugs are finally doing themselves in. Taxing the investment class is proving a difficult row to hoe.
The point has been made that prisons are a holdover from slavery. As Winona LaDuke points out, many on the Reservations get to chose to go to prison or war. Meanwhile, American prisoners are labor for the Defense industry (EmptyWheel examines aspects of this system here which makes this all the more grotesque) and with a large proportion of political prisons if you consider what the “War on Drugs” and the “Global War On Terror” really are. We haven’t even discussed how mentally ill and a few physically ill are kept in prisons because of “economics.” The closure of the mental illness treatment institutions over about a 25 year period simply left those who had been cared for to fend for themselves on the streets unless they got incarcerated.
So, check out what Angela Davis has to say in “The Prison: A Sign of Democracy?” (Nov. 28, 2007) (you can see it here or embedded here with the additional points made) and the work of the Angola 3 News here at FDL that contains more information that shows the US prison system for what it really is– a worldwide system and tool of US empire.
So, can we do away with prisons? There are some very old cultures that are some of the freest people on the planet, don’t believe in executions and don’t have prisons. At least one I know of starts basic education before what we call pre-school age and has opportunities for education well beyond what we think of as college for those who qualify. I think eventually we can close the on- and off-shore prison system if we place people over money and earnestly implement the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (we could update Article 2 to protect GLBT, intersex and gender self-identification as well).
Holy cow. Sorry I missed all the hubbub here folks but I’m going to try to get back to some of these comments.
OK Starting with Don Bacon (and repliers). Our government is noyl as good as the people we choose to put in it. For decades our country has elected leaders who have put policies in place that have caused our prison population to skyrocket, primarily for (as Phoenix points out), things that we’re merely angry at them for, not things that cause direct harm to others. Government minimalists argue that our government should serve primarily the purpose of defending us from threats, and should remain out of our private affairs, yet conservative leaders of this country from Nixon to today have criminalized activities of people that cause no direct harm to others. There is a very clear correlation between the war on drugs and our rates of incarceration.
So historically I agree with you in a sense, but I feel that government should be seen as a tool to correct the errors we’ve made individually, or as a society, even if those errors originated in the government. that’s why we elect people, and don’t elect others; because we think, and hope, they’ll change things for the better. but just eliminating government altogether is not the solution.
Yes CA’s guard union is notoriously powerful for a union lobby, but the connections california now has with CCA worry me more. the state gives CCA hundreds of millions of dollars to operate multiple state prisons, as CCA donates heavily to campaigns and spends hundreds of thousands in lobbying in the state. And of course they always operate up to CCA’s stellar standards.
But an interesting thing to know is that CCA, through their work in the American Legislative Exchange Council, actually helped to draft and then get passed California’s three strikes law. So if you want to argue that some entity has contributed to california having an absurdly overblown prison population, look no further than CCA. The guards union protects the jobs of guards, whereas CCA continually seeks expanding markets (i.e. more prisoners) to ensure a steady flow of revenue.
In my experience at least, the majority of people I speak with, upon learning that private prisons even exist in this country (let alone the sheer number of people that are housed in them) are appalled at the idea. Obviously, some not so much as others, but many people immediately see the inherent moral impropriety of incarcerating people for profit.
But it’s definitely true that both employees and prisoners take the hit, along with the families of folks who are locked up in private prisons
Wow – fantastic points! To take this even further, i strongly recommend at least reading about, if not picking up the book on, The New Jim Crowe, written by Michelle Alexander. She discusses how the prison industrial complex is the most effective means of social control and stratification since the era, and it’s essentially a way to continue to disenfranchise African-Americans.
I too feel that prisons are primarily a means for continuous oppression of, mostly the poor, but to a lesser extent minorities as a whole. I say that because overt racism isn’t easy to get away with nowadays, so the wealthy disguise is as a sort of disdain for the poor, a population which is often comprised largely of minorities (espcially in urban areas)
Lainey and Beth, I totally agree. There have been numerous studies in various states that have shown private prisons aren’t ever able to deliver on the cost-savings they promise, and in many cases cost more to run (less efficiently, mind you), than government facilities. It’s clear to me that R’s aren’t fiscally responsible; the only fiscal decisions they make are to benefit their wealthy friends and continue the ridiculous disparities that exist in this country
Thank you for the tip re Alexander’s book.
A feature of the daily life of most middle class (yes, there’s a silver of one in Mexico) and poor Mexicans within their own country is keeping the corrupt police state at bay. I think the majority of Americans have little understanding or appreciation for what this means but that might be changing as perceptions get corrected about the level of institutionalized corruption in the US.
Jane’s post, “Immigrants For Sale: $5 Billion a Year” (May 22, 2011) makes a companion piece to this. I recall opening a publication in 2006 (I believe it was a Color of Change magazine which was new to me) and reading about American children with an immigrant parent incarcerated in Tukwila, WA (Seattle metro area) in an ICE detention facility.
(excerpt from “Report on Immigration In The United States: Detention and Due Process,” Hans and Tamar Oppenheimer Chair in Public International Law, McGill University, Dec. 30, 2010)
Here’s a list I’d like to see revisited and updated: United States Detention Profile: List of Detention Sites (GlobalDetentionProject.Org, Feb. 2009)
thanks beerfart! I’ve blogged extensively on the situation in Florida and how it’s been a huge handout to the private prison industry. There are similar situations going on in Ohio and Maine, where the industry has donated heavily to campaigns and the state governments are now looking to privatize more of their system. In fact, in both those states, recent CCA employees were hired as heads of the departments of corrections. Then there’s Arizona, where 2 of CCA’s former lobbyists actually work for the governor. The industry has cultivated relationships with state governments for a long time through campaign contributions, donations to PACs, and lobbying.
But what is often lost is how effective all this money is, because there’s no counter-lobby. For example, the oil industry, which also lobbies heavily and donates to politicians and PACs, has counters to its power like greenpeace and other groups that try to work against climate change and greenhouse gas emissions. NO ONE lobbies for prisoners, no one donates to politicians for them or to uphold their rights. So they become commodities in this big exchange where rich companies take taxpayer dollars to perform an inherently governmental function, less efficiently than the government, and for no significant savings in cost. Check out my diary post from today for more on that.
The Aussies have similar problems and have done excellent documentaries about the issues and transnational entities we are dealing with as many Aussies are pretty upset about the matter (hello, they started out as a penal colony!). They are also angry over electing Gillard PM as they thought she was a progressive but now is outed as no such thing given her statements about Wikileaks (Dec. 2, 2010). I am not surprised about Gillard as the drone industry has Aussie interests involved and the drones need special precious metals and rare earth commodities which just happen to be under indigenous lands. So much is explained as to why there’s the push to open indigenous lands for mining operations and to further “militarize” (read “occupy”) places like the US
concentration campsReservations (e.g. Diné Bikayah which gave the US military the Code Talkers).