
(image: publik15, flickr)
Private Prisons Don’t Save Money in Arizona
Arizona sure loves it some privatization. Facing extreme budget shortfalls, the state attempted to sell off and then re-lease its state house in 2009 to earn some extra money, along with privatizing its entire prison system. But while that plan failed, the state’s thirst for privatization never waned. Though it already had multiple private prisons holding prisoners from other states and the federal government, a prominent republican in the state legislature introduced and helped pass SB1070, the now-infamous “Breathing While Brown” law. This law, as pointed out in an investigative report by NPR, was written by ALEC, a conservative legislation front group that has longed worked with the major players in the private prison industry and promoted privatization across the board. They’re also the ones behind attacks on global warming, voting rights, and unions, but that’s a different story.
So, the state basically gave a handout to private prison operators, who would undoubtedly benefit from stronger enforcement of federal immigration laws and increased detention. This came after the industry donated heavily in the 2010 election cycle, to candidates, political parties, and ballot initiatives favored by republicans. Then, even after 3 prisoners escaped from a private prison found to have numerous security deficiencies and went on a murderous rampage, state officials still pushed for more private prisons. They re-initiated a request for proposals from private companies to construct 5,000 prison beds.
Thankfully, people began to take notice. An advocacy organization filed alawsuit trying to block the RFP, which was dismissed on a technicality. But the substantive issue in the lawsuit wasn’t resolved; namely, that the state, by law, is required to conduct performance audits of its existing private facilities every two years, including cost-comparisons with public institutions. So the state began its audit late last year to compare public and private prisons, and the request for proposals was put on hold until the state could evaluate whether or not it would save money by turning to for-profit incarceration.
Now, common sense would tell you that there’s no way to improve services in a not-for-profit venture without raising the budget for that given venture. Private prison companies don’t make money by generating more revenue; they make it by cutting costs, in things like maintenance, security, and medical care provided to prisoners. So private prisons simply don’t offer better or even equivalent services and conditions compared to state-run facilities. But the findings of the audit may surprise those who aren’t familiar with this blog or the industry: the state wouldn’t actually save any money by privatizing its prisons. That’s right; even though they pay less, offer less benefits, cherry-pick the cheapest prisoners, and cut corners in every area of operations, private prisons cost just about as much to operate in Arizona as state-run facilities.
As a result, Arizona has cancelled its request for proposals for new beds, and the plan to further privatize the system is on hold for now. This is a smart move for many reasons, including the fact that the state’s rate of prison population growth slowed dramatically over the past few years. And when one looks at the numbers a little deeper, the myth of cost-savings offered by private prison operators becomes even more apparent. For medium-security prisoners, it cost the state of Arizona $5 less per prisoner, per day to house than a private prison would. If say half of the state’s 6,400 privately-housed prisoners are medium security, that means the state paid private prison companies $5,840,000 more than it would have cost them to just house those prisoners itself. In just 2010. For minimum-security prisoners, private companies offered a whopping $0.03 in savings per prisoner per day. And that’s for the cheapest possible population! Delving even further into the numbers, the audit seemed to show that private prison facilities’ value depreciates at an exorbitantly higher rate than public facilities (probably because they don’t perform regular maintenance, as a way to increase the bottom line). For example; state-run facilities depreciated at a rate of about $1.40 per prisoner, per day. Private facilities in the state depreciate at a rate of $12 per prisoner, per day. That’s around eight times as fast as government-run facilities.
The full report of the Arizona DOC can be found here.



19 Comments

It’s just so basic that privatizing something, and having to pay inflated salaries to executives and hit quarterly earnings numbers, is the exact opposite of saving money. If quarterly earnings have to continuously increase in order to satisfy shareholders and the board, how are costs going to be contained? Answer, they won’t be contained and the formerly inexpensive, relatively speaking, entity will now have costs spiraling out of control.
i agree totally. except that private prisons don’t even seem to offer much in terms of savings from the get-go. prisons are inherently expensive operations to run.
Thanks for rubbing my nose into the link betw criminalization of being brown in AZ and private prisons.
Same old, same old corruption betw pols & the corps who buy them.
Kind of analogous to making people buy medical insurance they don’t need, in the sense of govt forcing more customers (prisoners in this case) to ‘buy’ something that corps sell.
what a surprise…corrupt pols passing laws to create more prisoners after accecpting bribes from prison owners.
‘these swine should be fucked, broken, and driven across the land.’
- hunter s. thompson
WhyIHate,
This is not about saving money. It’s about making money, for the corps, not the taxpayers.
One’s imagination is not fertile enough to figure out what will be criminalized next.
Oh wait, having more than a week’s worth of food in your house (NDAA). That makes you not only a criminal, but also a terriss. Eligible for indefinite detention. Just you wait (Henry Higgins, just you wait) that congress will pass a law that indefinite detentioners will be put up (housed is too euphemistic a term) in private facilities.
Next stop, privatization of torture. Plausible deniability for pols.
“So, the state basically gave a handout to private prison operators, who would undoubtedly benefit from stronger enforcement of federal immigration laws and increased detention.”
I attended court in Tucson, AZ last November to see with my own eyes the horror show that is the new Operation Streamline (see: http://maxblumenthal.com/2010/02/were-all-parasites-this-is-operation-streamline/ and http://www.grassrootsleadership.org/_publications/OperationStreamline.pdf ). The day I was there, 70 undocumented immigrants were in the dock. Almost everyone of them–having only just met with an attorney the morning of the trial–pled to a guaranteed 1-6 month prison sentence in order to avoid a harsher felony charge for being desperate enough to cross the US border in search of work. Adding up their collective sentences and multiplying that by the $75 per day it costs in taxes to put each of them in prison (according to the Tucson Public Defender’s Office) yielded a total of over $300,000. This sum is for one day, in one court, in one city.
And the kicker? Operation Streamline has failed miserably as a deterrent. And why shouldn’t it? If you have already decided dying of thirst or exposure in the desert is worth crossing the border, three months in prison is going to make you think twice? The new program has, however, succeeded very well in putting millions of dollars into for-profit prisons.
privatize> company with profits> company/owners able to cotribute/bribe politicians> polititicians provitize for the benefit of their donors….lather,rinse,repeat….thus endeth the lesson
I would not be surprised to learn that private prison corporations donate to political campaigns. But since it’s legally secret I guess I’ll never know.
The PIC is a great money deal for white bigots everywhere. Plus, the old ” out of sight, out of mind, buried out in the desert ” rehab program functions much better in this corporate environment. And, I’ve thrown away year old plums that look better than most of the residents of Arizona. They’ve all been out in the sun too, too long.
They don’t just donate to them, they run them as well.
AZ Gov Jan Brewer’s 2010 campaign manager, Chuck Coughlin, was a registered lobbyist and president of HighGround Public Affairs Consultants, which has represented Corrections Corporation of America, and her campaign spokesman, Doug Cole, was a registered lobbyist for HighGround Public Affairs Consultants. There’s more, but I haven’t time to dig it up right now – Brewer’s entire staff is made up of lobbyists.
With all the Border Patrol activity here in the Tucson area, it’s been conspicuous the past few years that the Border Patrol buses have been replaced w/ Wackenhut buses.
ECahn, if you (or anyone) is interested in seeing all the dots from an investment banker’s point of view, Catherine Austin Fitts explains the privatization process here http://dunwalke.com/9_Cornell_Corrections.htm and here http://www.narconews.com/Issue40/article1644.html (much more detail) from start-up through legislation and eventual dumping of the private prison corp. You can probably skim it, with your background. For me it was a primer in how big money makes bigger money.
When people are so poor we can’t be ‘consumers’, the big boys go to the customer of last resort — the govt. They just don’t need us anymore.
privatization of government services like prisons, education, the military, etc. has to be one the stupidest things, and greatest scams of all time. That privatization could some how save money is ludicrous on the face of it:
1) take a fixed pot of money
2) have someone skim a chunk of it for themselves, and
3) presto magico better services are provided with the smaller remainder.
someone has to be really an effin’ moron to fall for that steaming pile of dung.
But pleuge, you left out the magic math pixie dust: fat union pensions! The savings come from fat union pensions! (Or lack thereof.)
Only private companies are Job Creators! Jobs RealAmericans(TM) need. Jobs without those fat union pensions, that is. ‘Cause what RealAmerican would want a goverment-guaranteed income when they retire? They’ll all have big private accounts, which they payed into steadily from their lavish non-union wages. Also, home equity. Real estate only goes up! Especially in Arizona.
If prisons weren’t privatized, the costs of incarceration might influence the legislative landscape toward more contemporary approaches to law enforcement, i.e. the number of things you can go to actual jail for might be reduced. This is difficult for big business authoritarians to accept, so privatization outsources this under the guise of reducing the size of government, yet the costs are the same anyway.
Privatizing prisons turns incarceration from a big government thing to a big business thing.
that’s certainly true in the private prison context; the industry is notorious for failing to hire unionized COs, who would undoubtedly demand better pay and benefits than the industry tends to provide.
they also donate heavily to state and federal campaigns. the two biggest companies have spent millions upon millions of dollars over the past decade or two lobbying, mostly on immigration and crime/sentencing issues. And as hoken pointed out, the industry is quite good at establishing relationships with politicians and making use of the revolving door between politics and the industry. the new governors of Ohio and Maine in 2010 brought in former CCA executives to head up their DOCs. They also then both had legislation introduced that would have sent many of their prisoners to private facilities; Ohio ended up selling a state prison to CCA.
you can find a lot of info regarding their contributions on websites like opensecrets.org (federal) and followthemoney.org (state). Make sure to look not only for the companies, but also for their PACs (yes, they have separate PACs that also donate), and for individual contributions from executives, board members, and known lobbyists (such as Chuck Coughlin, Doug Cole, and others at HighGround)